LIBERTARIANISM FAILS BUT SOVEREIGNTY DOESN’T ––“How does libertarian/anarcho capitalism and aim to prevent company cooperation? If four health companies decided that they would hike prices and violently attack competition, what would stop them? They are health companies so can’t be boycotted.”—- Quora User Well, let’s keep in mind that Libertarianism is just Pilpul (Sophistry) for the suggestible but morally disposed. And so we can’t take anything Mises, Rothbard, or Hoppe or their anglo equivalents very seriously. While their work has grains of truth here and there, it’s only to obscure it’s falsehoods, deceptions, impossibilities and malincentives. Instead, if we simply look at western SOVEREIGNTY meaning RULE OF LAW, under RULE OF LAW of Torts, we individually own some things, familially own others, privately organize to own others, and publicly organize to own others. The only open community property we can seize is the opportunity created by the vast decrease in opportunity cost created by our the combination of our proximity and demand for reciprocity. So that without the state to interfere by providing license (privileges) to families, individuals, organizations, corporations of all kinds, then individuals and groups could bring suits in courts against violations of reciprocity (natural law) in any of those forms of property. As such while governments originally provided limited liability insurance that limited liability to the money invested in the corporation, they also granted all sorts of privileges by denying individuals and groups the right to sue private and public organizations for personal, private, and public property violations in the markets for goods, services, and information. So there is no reason you couldn’t organize a group of people to produce a ‘class action’ against a polluter, or a market manipulator under Rule of Law. The fact that you can’t today, means that we do not live under rule of law, but rule by legislation.
Theme: Sovereignty
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-28 17:38:00 UTC
-
Are you kidding me? My hero is Palpatine. The Empire did nothing wrong. 😉
Are you kidding me? My hero is Palpatine. The Empire did nothing wrong. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-28 12:46:00 UTC
-
NORTH KOREA Now hopefully we can get out of South Korea. Then out of germany. Th
NORTH KOREA
Now hopefully we can get out of South Korea. Then out of germany. Then out of italy. Then destroy iran’s regime. Then bring everyone home.
39,000 troops stationed in Japan,
38,000 troops in Hawaii
34,000 troops in germany
23,500 troops in south korea
12,457 troops in Italy
9,123 troops in United Kingdom
3,905 troops in Spain. (??? this is weird)
Bahrain 7,193
Kuwait 2,082
Turkey 1,851
UA Emirates 1,099
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 12:38:00 UTC
-
Women Seek And Adapt To Power
by Candice Mary When foreigners kill men’s comrades and give them the option to surrender and become slaves, men attack. Women ask instead “what language do we speak? What god do we worship?”
Women evolved to shape themselves to the men who capture them. Now, just replace “Foreign men” with “Government” and there is the answer. We can be mad about that or accept reality and manage it. “Women seek and adapt to power.” -
Women Seek And Adapt To Power
by Candice Mary When foreigners kill men’s comrades and give them the option to surrender and become slaves, men attack. Women ask instead “what language do we speak? What god do we worship?”
Women evolved to shape themselves to the men who capture them. Now, just replace “Foreign men” with “Government” and there is the answer. We can be mad about that or accept reality and manage it. “Women seek and adapt to power.” -
The Western Cult Is Sovereignty and Law
TO TALEB (THE WESTERN CULT IS SOVEREIGNTY AND LAW) (possibly important post for followers) Replying to @nntaleb @bryan_caplan @tylercowen Nassim: a) Substitute “Warranty and Liability” for “Skin in the Game” and you switch from discourse under colloquial, rhetorical, propter-hoc, low trust, heterogeneous, bazaars, to scientific post-hoc, high trust, homogenous, rule-of-law ‘markets’ proper. Nassim: b) I’ve watched you slowly move this direction, but I haven’t seen you include the fact that western civ and all it’s +/-‘s are the result of the primacy of sovereignty and reciprocity in the traditional law back into oral (pre-)history. Nassim: c) And so, my reading of history, is that the aristocracy was taught to rule (meaning decide, not direct), and the nobility to govern (direct), and labor to obey. (Indo European Tripartism). Otherwise I’m certain your positioning of the ‘Doctrine’ vs ‘Techne’ is correct. Nassim: d) So my read is the law is taught as a craft (practiced) and the ‘liberal arts” are taught as doctrines, and we are wasting a phenomenal amount of money not separating Techne(craft), Religion(obedience), and Law(Rule). Meaning the problem is the Academy (secular church). Nassim e: (Closing) So my intuition is that we all carry our cultures with us and possibly to some degree in our genes, and that this cultural difference is what you are intuiting, but expressing in literary, rational, and mathematical rather than western (legal,scientific) form.
-
The Western Cult Is Sovereignty and Law
TO TALEB (THE WESTERN CULT IS SOVEREIGNTY AND LAW) (possibly important post for followers) Replying to @nntaleb @bryan_caplan @tylercowen Nassim: a) Substitute “Warranty and Liability” for “Skin in the Game” and you switch from discourse under colloquial, rhetorical, propter-hoc, low trust, heterogeneous, bazaars, to scientific post-hoc, high trust, homogenous, rule-of-law ‘markets’ proper. Nassim: b) I’ve watched you slowly move this direction, but I haven’t seen you include the fact that western civ and all it’s +/-‘s are the result of the primacy of sovereignty and reciprocity in the traditional law back into oral (pre-)history. Nassim: c) And so, my reading of history, is that the aristocracy was taught to rule (meaning decide, not direct), and the nobility to govern (direct), and labor to obey. (Indo European Tripartism). Otherwise I’m certain your positioning of the ‘Doctrine’ vs ‘Techne’ is correct. Nassim: d) So my read is the law is taught as a craft (practiced) and the ‘liberal arts” are taught as doctrines, and we are wasting a phenomenal amount of money not separating Techne(craft), Religion(obedience), and Law(Rule). Meaning the problem is the Academy (secular church). Nassim e: (Closing) So my intuition is that we all carry our cultures with us and possibly to some degree in our genes, and that this cultural difference is what you are intuiting, but expressing in literary, rational, and mathematical rather than western (legal,scientific) form.
-
We just need to rule. The experiment failed. Return to rule for money and profit
We just need to rule. The experiment failed.
Return to rule for money and profit. 😉
Militia > King (General) > Judge > Sheriff > Family > Individual.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 15:41:00 UTC
-
Nassim: b) I’ve watched you slowly move this direction, but I haven’t seen you i
Nassim: b) I’ve watched you slowly move this direction, but I haven’t seen you include the fact that western civ and all it’s +/-‘s are the result of the primacy of sovereignty and reciprocity in the traditional law back into oral (pre-)history.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 14:34:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989513027933392897
Reply addressees: @nntaleb @bryan_caplan @tylercowen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989512005244674048
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@nntaleb @bryan_caplan @tylercowen Nassim: a) Substitute “Warranty and Liability” for “Skin in the Game” and you switch from discourse under colloquial, rhetorical, propter-hoc, low trust, heterogeneous, bazaars, to scientific post-hoc, high trust, homogenous, rule-of-law ‘markets’ proper.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/989512005244674048
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@nntaleb @bryan_caplan @tylercowen Nassim: a) Substitute “Warranty and Liability” for “Skin in the Game” and you switch from discourse under colloquial, rhetorical, propter-hoc, low trust, heterogeneous, bazaars, to scientific post-hoc, high trust, homogenous, rule-of-law ‘markets’ proper.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/989512005244674048