Theme: Sovereignty

  • “If you will fight then you will earn an opinion. If you will not, you don’t. It

    —“If you will fight then you will earn an opinion. If you will not, you don’t. It’s not a grey area.”— Anon.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 20:23:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060628899871252483

  • In other words, yes, I’m shaming you for trying to obtain sovereignty at a disco

    In other words, yes, I’m shaming you for trying to obtain sovereignty at a discount, (fraud), because you are shaming me for stating that sovereignty cannot be obtained at a discount (truth).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 19:52:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060621116132245505

    Reply addressees: @readomain

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060608670025875462


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060608670025875462

  • Well, revolutions are against the government to alter powers, civil wars between

    Well, revolutions are against the government to alter powers, civil wars between factions for control of power, and wars of secession means of separation.
    In this case we pursue revolution first, then secession second if revolution fails, and civil war third if secession fails,


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 12:50:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060514833840381953

    Reply addressees: @readomain

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060511593384079361


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060511593384079361

  • “TRUMP OPENS THE DOOR TO NATURAL LAW JURISPRUDENCE: A BRIEF ANALYSIS OF THE BIRT

    “TRUMP OPENS THE DOOR TO NATURAL LAW JURISPRUDENCE: A BRIEF ANALYSIS OF THE BIRTHRIGHT MANOEUVRE

    By Zachary Miller, Esq.

    The drafter of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause was Jacob Howard, a Senator from Michigan. On the floor of the U.S. Senate in 1866, Sen. Howard said this of his intent regarding that amendment’s Citizenship Clause:

    “THE AMENDMENT Which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of ***natural law*** and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.”

    Of course, the currently dominant Scalian originalist legal philosophy does not extend to the contemplation of the intent of the drafter of an amendment; it stops short at the plain language of the document. Trump’s maneuver here is to ask the Supreme Court to go beyond originalism and inquire into Senator Howard’s intent when he drafted the amendment. And if successful, the result will be nothing less than the explicit enshrinement by the United States Supreme Court of the great and ancient natural law into American Constitutional Jurisprudence.” – Zachary Miller

    (via Brandon Hayes )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 07:01:00 UTC

  • Rump Opens the Door to Natural Law Jurisprudence:

    “TRUMP OPENS THE DOOR TO NATURAL LAW JURISPRUDENCE: A BRIEF ANALYSIS OF THE BIRTHRIGHT MANOEUVRE By Zachary Miller, Esq. The drafter of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause was Jacob Howard, a Senator from Michigan. On the floor of the U.S. Senate in 1866, Sen. Howard said this of his intent regarding that amendment’s Citizenship Clause: “THE AMENDMENT Which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.” Of course, the currently dominant Scalian originalist legal philosophy does not extend to the contemplation of the intent of the drafter of an amendment; it stops short at the plain language of the document. Trump’s maneuver here is to ask the Supreme Court to go beyond originalism and inquire into Senator Howard’s intent when he drafted the amendment. And if successful, the result will be nothing less than the explicit enshrinement by the United States Supreme Court of the great and ancient natural law into American Constitutional Jurisprudence.” – Zachary Miller (via Brandon Hayes )

  • SOVEREIGNTY: INNOVATION IN UKRAINE (The Strategy for Christendom) by Igor Surkan

    SOVEREIGNTY: INNOVATION IN UKRAINE

    (The Strategy for Christendom)

    by Igor Surkanov

    Ukraine is adopting an ideal model to spread across the west.

    The Dual militia system

    One is smaller and more ideological, and the other larger and under the state and political.

    But the smaller one organizes for the young and creates leaders for all three orgs.

    State, army, national guard.

    (genius)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 13:41:00 UTC

  • TO THE TEACHING OF RULE RATHER THAN SUBMISSION (important idea) |RULE| Self > Fa

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/03/24/education-returning-to-the-teaching-of-rule/RETURN TO THE TEACHING OF RULE RATHER THAN SUBMISSION

    (important idea)

    |RULE| Self > Family > Commons > Polity > Nation > Civilization > Mankind > Universe

    WE HAVE A CHOICE OF STRATEGY:

    Submission(Left-Female-Outcast Male) <-> or,

    … Consumption(libertarian- Ascendant Male) <-> or,

    … … Rule (Right-Established Male).

    ARISTOCRACY IS THE ULTIMATE PHILOSOPHY


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 07:43:00 UTC

  • Does Anyone Have Rights …

    —“Does anyone have rights outside of what the observer fails to or chooses not to challenge?”—Anne Summers

  • What’s Posse Comitatus

    WHAT’S POSSE COMITATUS?
    —“The purpose of the act is to limit the powers of the federal government in using its military personnel to act as domestic law enforcement personnel.”—

  • Sovereignty: Innovation in Ukraine

    (FB 1541529692 Timestamp) SOVEREIGNTY: INNOVATION IN UKRAINE
    (The Strategy for Christendom)
    by Igor Surkanov Ukraine is adopting an ideal model to spread across the west.
    The Dual militia system One is smaller and more ideological, and the other larger and under the state and political. But the smaller one organizes for the young and creates leaders for all three orgs. State, army, national guard. (genius)