Theme: Sovereignty

  • PUTTING YOUR TRUST IN ONE GOVERNMENT ORDER OR ANOTHER? You have to choose whethe

    PUTTING YOUR TRUST IN ONE GOVERNMENT ORDER OR ANOTHER?

    You have to choose whether to trust the self interest of the judicial ‘priesthood’, the self interest of the monarchy, the self interest of the ruling oligarchy, or the self control of the democratic polity, or the self interests of public intellectuals.

    My argument is that you can’t trust any of them, and that the judicial priesthood benefits from ‘maintaining the rules of the game’, but if and only if the military will back them up.

    Why? The judiciary is a purely via-negativa discipline: it advocates nothing, and only resolves conflicts. It is already privileged. It is already high status. It is operationally selective (failure is quickly obvious and resolved), and failure of members is against the interest of the whole, who police it well through hierarchical review.

    The central issue in limiting the judiciary and preserving its freedom from via-positiva action, is nothing more than insufficiently enumerated terms of decidability.

    And that’s what i’ve done. Provided that completeness.

    -Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-04 09:17:00 UTC

  • The transcendence of our people via sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty,

    The transcendence of our people via sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, through continuous competition in markets in all walks of life, defeating those competitors who are inferior and leaving them behind, and ensuring we are always and everywhere best, first, strongest.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-02 21:05:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080570866491109382

    Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @TrueDilTom @Dick71224996

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075859949614497792


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075859949614497792

  • There is conflict. I want to exterminate these scumbags whether left or right an

    There is conflict. I want to exterminate these scumbags whether left or right and see them burn slowly so that no pretenders ever again try to steer out people into submission to falsehood deceit and ignorance.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-02 21:03:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080570420871528449

    Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @TrueDilTom @Dick71224996

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075859949614497792


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075859949614497792

  • by Gary Knight Thinking on JBP and sovereign individualism. It’s interesting tha

    by Gary Knight

    Thinking on JBP and sovereign individualism.

    It’s interesting that he often cites ancient genetic causes for hierarchy as a defence against SJW complaints regarding patriarchy and capitalism.

    He correctly identifies the depth of hierarchy and inequality in ancient biological programming that goes right back to our most remote ancestors.

    E.g. Dominance hierarchies in lobsters.

    What’s frustrating is he doesn’t apply the same analogy to Western Dominance.

    He attributes the Christian ethic as the source of the classical liberal / enlightenment values that birthed individualism as the source of Western Success (although he doesn’t say ‘Western success’ explicitly.

    It seems apparent in my readings about indo-Europeans that the West developed sovereignty mostly as a bi-product of distributive power which was an accident of geography – sufficient rivers, fertile land, hills, crags and natural barriers to break up the European landscape into defensible City states which led cultural development away from centralised monopoly governments that formed in the Middle East, Egypt etc.

    I think Peterson flaw is he gives to much credit to Christianity in his arguments for promoting the sovereign individual and fails to see the ancient source code for this cultural feature.

    In a sense he feels the words of Abrahamism gifted us new programming for regarding the individual as sacred when it seems we had in us from our martial ethic and domestication allowed the extension of sovereignty down the classes as we had more people capable of the agency to hold the idea.

    Which is why Christian Africa doesn’t have individualism and market success – software can’t take root in hardware that can’t process it.

    ——-

    If I was to use a loose metaphor I feel like Western Sovereignty is like a European plant species that was kept tame my the conditions in which it rooted.

    But once conditions changed and it had its shot it just spread across the earth and dominated – but first it had to be hardened by time and circumstance.

    Eg The plant species Lantana species is a potted flower in the UK.

    Once it was exported to Australia it thrived in the sunlight and grew rampant, choking out competitors.

    I see Western Sovereignty the same.

    Shaped my marital conflict over distributive geography and then once the conditions changes it became hyper-fertile and encompassed the world.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-30 08:54:00 UTC

  • One BEGS for Liberty by permission. One FORCES sovereignty at the point of a spe

    One BEGS for Liberty by permission. One FORCES sovereignty at the point of a spear, tip of an arrow, blade of a sword, and barrel of a gun. That’s the difference between failed beggars for liberty and successful warriors of sovereignty.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 16:35:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1079053423436316672

  • Mr PRESIDENT: Reminding you once again, that despite your attempt at governing w

    Mr PRESIDENT: Reminding you once again, that despite your attempt at governing well, and draining the swamp – you will eventually have to call upon us to achieve it. And you must not leave office without having done so. Revolution Comes.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 16:27:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1079051351991205889

    Reply addressees: @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1079040052234203141


    IN REPLY TO:

    @realDonaldTrump

    The Mueller Angry Democrats recently deleted approximately 19,000 Text messages between FBI Agent Lisa Page and her lover, Agent Peter S. These Texts were asked for and INVALUABLE to the truth of the Witch Hunt Hoax. This is a total Obstruction of Justice. All Texts Demanded!

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1079040052234203141

  • To complete the project of ending the LIBERTARIAN program and replacing it with

    To complete the project of ending the LIBERTARIAN program and replacing it with the SOVEREIGNTARIAN program: obtaining existential sovereignty at the barrel of a gun, rather than continuing centuries of begging for liberty on your knees like feeble old women.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 16:21:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1079049773959860224

    Reply addressees: @LPNational

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1079046851612106752


    IN REPLY TO:

    @LPNational

    What is your Libertarian New Year’s resolution?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1079046851612106752

  • One BEGS for Liberty by permission. One FORCES sovereignty at the point of a spe

    One BEGS for Liberty by permission. One FORCES sovereignty at the point of a spear, tip of an arrow, blade of a sword, and barrel of a gun. That’s the difference between failed beggars for liberty and successful warriors for sovereignty.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 11:35:00 UTC

  • (a) we are gonna rise up, we are gonna win, we are gonna bring the war to you. (

    (a) we are gonna rise up, we are gonna win, we are gonna bring the war to you.
    (b) the police will run, and the military will not fight.
    (c) never, ever, ever, give up your guns.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 00:47:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1078814702430507008

    Reply addressees: @p2_james @ThatGunGuy2 @guardian

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1078355266951933952


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1078355266951933952

  • Nationalism: keeping all polities alive and well and responsible for their own d

    Nationalism: keeping all polities alive and well and responsible for their own domestication and transcendence.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 16:42:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1078692561085255685