Theme: Sovereignty

  • THE REASON AMERICANS ALWAYS BACK THE SAUDIS by Anonymous Oil is traded in US dol

    THE REASON AMERICANS ALWAYS BACK THE SAUDIS
    by Anonymous

    Oil is traded in US dollars primarily as a handshake and security contract between Saudi Arabia and USA since the 1970’s. World Trade of oil in US dollars keeps US dollar strong and inflation low in USA, what Americans can buy for a US dollar.

    The countries holding most of the gas in the world are thinly populated countries like Qatar and Saudi Arabia, their rulers need US blessings to survive. Since the petrol producers demand payments in US dollars ( In reality they do not have that much need for US dollars), all other countries from Africa to Asia have need for US dollars to pay for oil.

    So US issues trillions of dollars of debt in US treasuries which results in lot of currency in the market that should drive inflation in USA. But these oil producers suck up US treasury debt keeping US dollar the king. Other countries chase US dollar again keeping demand for US dollar high.

    Imagine if world oil trade moved away from US dollar, you will have trillions of dollars who nobody suddenly needs. USA has a policy to keep demand for US dollar high in the world. This helps Americans live in low inflation and almost zero interest environment. It’s been this monetary system for a long time. Only one that can fix it is not even USA, it is GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council). It will take long time for another currency to take place of USD.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:41:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576455071529008

  • WHY IS OIL PRICED IN DOLLARS (AND WHY DOES IRAN WANT TO CHANGE THAT?) by Michael

    WHY IS OIL PRICED IN DOLLARS (AND WHY DOES IRAN WANT TO CHANGE THAT?)
    by Michael Kosh

    Oil is priced in dollars because through Bretton Woods the dollar was pegged to gold and everything else was essentially pegged or floated to the dollar. The world was flooded with dollars after WWII which partially led to the present American consumerism, but it also enabled the world to essentially use the dollar as they would gold. Reserves soon played a role and in order to maintain stability the gold window was closed and eventually the US went off the gold standard all together. In the meantime though, oil, which is a global commodity, was traded using the dollar which drastically simplified the whole system. The system has remained in place due to inertia.

    In order to change the currency used, the world would have to be flooded with a different currency (which doesn’t make sense since the US has the world’s largest economy except for perhaps the Euro which is extremely unstable) and while the Fed may whit away the value of the dollar, it’s highly unlikely that it will default and therefore it is not susceptible realistically to any speculative attacks. While currencies such as the Euro hold a substantial percentage of reserve holdings, the dollar is still THE reserve currency and those holding dollars wouldn’t want to see their holdings drop in value from a drop in demand (it’s bad enough for them that QE3 is skyrocketing the supply and at some point it could possibly be abandoned, but not until a certain level of desperation kicks in).

    Under the present circumstances, the only realistic alternative would be to have a somewhat balanced basket of currencies including the dollar be the drivers of world trade, but then do you buy oil with yen one week and pounds the next? A basket of currencies is inherently unstable from a global perspective since the constant shifting of portfolios would add volatility to the market. Granted, the Federal Reserve has somewhat of a blank check, but there is no perfect system. If not the dollar, what currency? In addition, how do you transfer from a system based on one currency to one based on another smoothly?

    An analogy I would make is look at Russia with the New Economic Policy in 1921 and then following the collapse of the Soviet Union. In one case the shift was to a command economy and the other it was a shift away (although Putin still has his hands in the oil industry through companies like Gazprom) but both put considerable strains on the economy. This actually brings up another point though, if the shift away from the dollar were to occur it would likely stem largely from Russia’s initiatives. Regardless, there’s too much at stake with the oil trade to risk a global fiasco in order to change currencies. The price of American hegemony in the currency realm is still the cheapest option to other countries for the time being at least.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:40:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576452262591997

  • WHY DOES IRAN WANT WHAT IT WANTS? —“why does iran want to change that? well be

    WHY DOES IRAN WANT WHAT IT WANTS?

    —“why does iran want to change that? well because dollars are inconvenient maybe i dont know. lemme go ahead and read your full post now so i get a better idea lol.”—Sascha Alexander Günter

    Imagine the demand for the Rial (iranian currency) if one could only buy iranian oil in Rials. Imagine if iran succeeds in taking syria, iraq, lebanon, and the west coast of the persian gulf? We forget that the Afghanis and half of Pakistani’s are iranic peoples.

    THE MATH
    Iran 81m (Core State)
    Iraq 38.2m
    Syria 18.2m
    Lebanon 6m
    —-
    140M = Russia.

    And then, add by alliance

    Afghanistan 35.5m
    Pakistan 197m …. with 140 Nuclear Weapons.
    —-
    375m = USA

    This makes iran a world power with the ability to print money for debt on the scale of the USA, making her more powerful than russia in the hemisphere.

    Now, you may not think in these terms, but the iranian political classes do.

    (Just like the russians dream of uniting orthodoxy (eastern european, russian, greek, caucasian peoples).)

    WHAT DOES THE REST OF THE WORLD WANT?

    —“Genuine question then, is that something we want? Don’t have a choice on the matter long term? Or something we’d do anything to avoid it occurring?”—MJ Street

    It’s something to WANT if they’re not an exporter of islamism, asymmetric warfare, terrorism, and instability
    It’s not something to want if they oppose the arabs and try to take the arab ports on the gulf.

    At least FIVE civilizations
    1. Turkey
    2. Central Asia
    3. Irania
    4. Arabia
    5. North Africa

    What we want is Iran to depose the islamists, return to persian history as another indo european civilization and peer to India, arabia, north africa, the west, and china.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:32:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576420681867566

  • IMO Return our Kings and we’re fine. Russia and America in particular. Iran, …

    IMO Return our Kings and we’re fine. Russia and America in particular. Iran, … because access to power provides the worst possible incentives. While serving the wealth of power provides the best. Especially under rule of natural law – the western law of sovereignty.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:02:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576301354644612

  • You misrepresent criticism of your destruction of western civilization, rule of

    You misrepresent criticism of your destruction of western civilization, rule of law of sovereignty and reciprocity, the american experiment in a third way – commercial cooperative rather than political or religious with the nuclear family as the purpose of policy – as hate.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 23:12:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158878474075066368

    Reply addressees: @s_cala

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158866579863560199


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158866579863560199

  • So where you begin your Pilpul: those weren’t western examples; Conflated nation

    So where you begin your Pilpul: those weren’t western examples; Conflated nationalism with individualism. You stated western “individualism” instead of individual SOVEREIGNTY, Reciprocity, High Trust, and specialization in production of the Commons and high returns therefrom.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 15:09:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158756945173581824

    Reply addressees: @jtlevy @Mattzwolinski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158755544510926849


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @jtlevy @Mattzwolinski Did you have to practice that little bit of Pilpul and Critique in front of a mirror? Nationalists are the defenders of their genome, their kin, the commons ad institutions that persist them across generations. Hong Kong to exit Europeans; India Muslims; Europe Jews and Muslims.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158755544510926849


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @jtlevy @Mattzwolinski Did you have to practice that little bit of Pilpul and Critique in front of a mirror? Nationalists are the defenders of their genome, their kin, the commons ad institutions that persist them across generations. Hong Kong to exit Europeans; India Muslims; Europe Jews and Muslims.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158755544510926849

  • @Diomedes “Weapons exist so that people like us can prevent people like you from

    @Diomedes

    “Weapons exist so that people like us can prevent people like you from ending our civilization and its invention of sovereignty, reciprocity, rule of law, universal standing, the nuclear family and the demand for marriage and self sufficiency prior to reproduction, so that your costs are not born by others at the expense of their children, kin, and generations.

    In other words, weapons exist so that we can put you down when we need to. That is the origin of anglo civilization. And it is why we will persist.

    By putting you down.”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 14:58:33 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102570623822640651

  • Um. The only reason we didn’t conquer you, was cost. You didn’t have a chance

    Um. The only reason we didn’t conquer you, was cost. You didn’t have a chance.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 14:03:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158740401194487813

    Reply addressees: @zyf9032a @PeterSchiff

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158738807832793090


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158738807832793090

  • All we care about is rule of law, by reciprocity, in display word and deed. You

    All we care about is rule of law, by reciprocity, in display word and deed. You fit in just fine. Excellence and heroism. Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity. Judge and Jury, Family and Commons, Markets in Everything. Can’t choose your sex. pref. Can choose all above.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 23:05:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158514314246049797

    Reply addressees: @theThiagoCortes @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158511109126496257


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158511109126496257

  • And that we can restore our Constitution to its origins in Natural Law of sovere

    And that we can restore our Constitution to its origins in Natural Law of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth and duty, heroism and excellence, jury and markets, and increase the suppression of fraud from the commercial to the public sphere to end the industrialization of lying…


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 17:57:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158436863310532609

    Reply addressees: @bog_beef @FriedrichHayek @liz_franczak

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158436239885950976


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @bog_beef @FriedrichHayek @liz_franczak And that abrahamic lying (False promise of equality, the sophisms of Pilpul and Critique, and the fawning of undue praise) were modernized from supernatural to pseudoscientific, then sophistry, then outright denial, in Authoritarian Marxism-Socialism, Postmodernism, and Feminism.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158436239885950976


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @bog_beef @FriedrichHayek @liz_franczak And that abrahamic lying (False promise of equality, the sophisms of Pilpul and Critique, and the fawning of undue praise) were modernized from supernatural to pseudoscientific, then sophistry, then outright denial, in Authoritarian Marxism-Socialism, Postmodernism, and Feminism.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158436239885950976