https://business.financialpost.com/opinion/lawrence-solomon-if-alberta-turns-separatist-the-rest-of-canada-is-in-big-trouble?fbclid=IwAR0ic5UU_zSrQJNhCnAj8uUMWzKpQx57qP6cZ8giGstTBCVK6ZwJN-4wSPsUpdated Oct 22, 2019, 9:59 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 21:59:00 UTC
https://redstatesecession.org/unreported-2017-reuters-poll-shows-states-ready-to-secede/Updated Oct 22, 2019, 9:41 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 21:41:00 UTC
—“What about the Military under P?”–
The P constitution preserves the federal military system for the simple reasons that (a) we need to prevent hostiles taking territory on this… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=489042168359345&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-20 22:20:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186044544057593856
—“What about the Military under P?”–
The P constitution preserves the federal military system for the simple reasons that (a) we need to prevent hostiles taking territory on this continent (b) military is the only organization the benefits tremendously from scale.
We also push forward military reforms like the light infantry proposal, limiting constraints on rules of engagement, limiting punishments for lapses of judgement during conflict; fully separating the Marines, cultural remasculinization, competitive pay, mixing civilian contract military service personnel,and detaching compensation from rank, restoring military R&D, skipping a generation and moving out of policing and into pure defense of our citizens anywhere in the world, trade route, territorial, population and asset defense, and giving the military full license so that they are rarely used, but if they are, they are terrifying.
In addition the military gets a ‘house’ in congress and all in all restores the state-military-industrial complex over the state-academy-media complex. Honestly it’s very hard for the military to disagree with our proposal.
P is a reform on the scale of the roman reforms.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-20 18:20:00 UTC
I see how you would make that assessment yes. But preventing an iranian islamic takeover of the entire middle east (Rather than the Iranic populations as an ethno-empire or ethno-state) is something we can’t tolerate despite our distance. But others have to help pay. This is how.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-20 17:23:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185969888642371584
Reply addressees: @ClownBa73413423 @politico
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185960863339089920
IN REPLY TO:
@FullAccountant
@curtdoolittle @politico I understand the petrodollar is coming to an end like you’ve said China, Iran, the EU, Venezuela, etc. But it still exists even if its decaying in value.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185960863339089920
The Russians don’t care who we have in the White House. Putin’s position is that nothing changes anyway-the USA is naive and idealistic. It’s in our interests to have Russia move strategically south where they are the Regional Power rather than west into Eastern Europe where not.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-20 14:36:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185927678253305856
Reply addressees: @politico
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185918668116549633
IN REPLY TO:
@politico
There’s one thing the Kremlin wants even more than sowing chaos in the United States: keeping President Donald Trump in the White House https://t.co/0P83JqM6kH
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185918668116549633
No more wars in Asia “regardless of cost”. That’s what you don’t get. The Kurds need their own state. We can’t get it for them. We pay the cost now. They pay the cost. They were dependents not allies.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-20 14:06:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185920131056226304
Reply addressees: @LadyAodh
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185601699802689536
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185601699802689536
—“The way I think about it is; only a pre-existing state is capable of preventing people from forming a new state, so libertarianism is less “doomed to fail” than it is a complete… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=487173055212923&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-18 14:38:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185203614547095552
—“The way I think about it is; only a pre-existing state is capable of preventing people from forming a new state, so libertarianism is less “doomed to fail” than it is a complete nonstarter.”—James Brittingham
MONARCHY = PRIVATE PROPERTY STATE
It’s also doomed to fail, since the balance of commons vs private consumption isn’t possible unless the monarchy owns the territory, collects rents on it, and produces commons from the rent, thereby making all parties, including the state, private property owners.
P-MONARCHY
In P I argue that a monarchy can only survive corporally in the age of gunpowder b/c it’s dependent upon the militia and military rather than an alliance of land-holding families of professional warriors – with the relationship between militia and monarchy governed by rule of law. I prefer income taxes over land taxes, and I prefer rental income be limited to the monarchy or ‘the church’, just as I prefer consumer credit be handled by the monarchy, and the privatization of all bureaucracy as customer service organizations – thus preventing rent-seeking across the spectrum. Unions then serve as insurers of relations, and insurers fulfill their functions of insurers of property, and families return to insurers of kin, and we, incrementally wipe all rent seeking off the map, driving all capital into longer and longer and larger and larger investment and return cycles. It is possible to restore responsibility and accountability because the economy will be purged of innumeracy and itself returned ot ‘accountability’. ie: no more financial and economic lies.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-18 10:38:00 UTC
QUESTION: —“Curt I have a question for you. Do you think that there is any possibility of a tyrant getting in charge of the USA should it descend into civil war for separation? Or do we think this can be done by democratic processes in place? The latter one I think realistically doesn’t have a chance.”—
There is a possibility of democratic process *IF* we propose a solution that is a superior alternative to certain conflict. This is what I hope to do. But the public won’t accept that until the conflict is certain. Which will happen soon.
Any democrat is by definition a tyrant, because any rule by legislation rather than rule by law of reciprocity is by definition despotism.
My hope, and most probable is a military takeover of the government. The problem is that the military needs something to enforce. So we must provide them with the market demand (up rising), moral license (to prevent chaos and civil war), and solution (that they can enforce to maintain the peace).
We will need to act before the election. That’s all I can tell you. And that is why I’m working so hard to get enough done to provide that solution – at the last minute.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 17:21:00 UTC