Learning P
Focus on:
(a) The west’s group strategy of a universal militia, sovreignty, reciprocity, markets and natural law.
(b) Our P-amendments to the constitution to restore the constitution, our way of life, and western civlization.
(c) the basics of reciprocity and testimony
(d) How to understand and defeat the sophisms and deceits.
Everything else is technical.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-12 14:33:00 UTC
RT @RickTurpin33: @curtdoolittle In the vacuum of collapsing central authority a new world emerges, one of free men (men of the spear) who…
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-10 19:05:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1248688458161405952
NATION VS STATE VS COUNTRY
Most common errors conflate nation (people), country (territory) and state (government) because the ‘natural’ order is that these are the same: a body of people, the territory they live in and the government they defend and operate it with.
HUMAN GROUP
individual > family > clan > tribe > nation > race > man
HUMAN RULES
norms (manners, morals, ethics) > laws > institutions, traditions > arts > myths > religions.
TERRITORY
Farm > village > town > city > county – province > country > state > federation (capital) > empire (core state, and capital) > civilization.
ORGANIZATION
father > pater familia (extended family or clan) > headman or chieftain (tribe of clans) > king(kingdom) of tribes > monarch(monarchy under christianity) > state (corporation over all) > federation (of states) > empire (heterogeneous states) > civilization.
LEADERSHIP
individual > family or clan > oligarchy (group) > democracy (most)
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-10 17:22:00 UTC
Propertarianism = Western civlization in scientific terms.
A universal militia, Rule of Law by Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Adjudicated by Jury, Producing markets in every aspect of life, producing the most adaptive and innovative civilization in human history.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-04 18:44:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246509075522863110
Reply addressees: @af_clips @realThomBieler @NickJFuentes @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246457859161886720
—“Third, safeguard the principles of the liberal world order. The founding legend of modern government is a walled city protected by powerful rulers, sometimes despotic, other times benevolent, yet always strong enough to protect the people from an external enemy. Enlightenment thinkers reframed this concept, arguing that the purpose of the legitimate state is to provide for the fundamental needs of the people: security, order, economic well-being, and justice. Individuals cannot secure these things on their own. The pandemic has prompted an anachronism, a revival of the walled city in an age when prosperity depends on global trade and movement of people.”—Kissinger
NO. The purpose of the legitimate state is (a) to defend the people against the barbarian hordes, (b) defend the future generations against the fashions of the people. (c) increase the intergenerational human cultural civilizational capital. (d) adapt to crisis, peace, and windfalls. (((Cosmopolitianism))) is just barbarism.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 20:51:00 UTC
THE TEN CANONICAL PRINCIPLES IN THE NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGNS.
1. Commensurability: Definitions by Disambiguation by Serialization and Operationalization
2. Truth: Satisfaction of demand for infallibility.
3. Testimony: Due diligence against perceivable dimensions.
4. Reciprocity: Due diligence against incentive to retaliate.
5. Property In Toto: Measurements of Demonstrated intersets
6. Compatibilism: Gender and class division of perception, cognition, memory, advocacy, and cooperation.
7. Trifunctionalism: Three possible means of coercion, produces three competing specializations of elites.
8. Perfect Government: rule of law, monarchy as judge of last resort, houses for regions, classes, genders, with one family one vote – adapting to authority under threat, markets under peace, and redistribution during windfalls.
9. Transcendence: Evolutionary necessity ‘to become the red queen’ – we may never stop nor never rest.
10. Western Group Evolutionary strategy is “OODA” meaning technology, maneuver and initiative. This strategy is created by excellence and beauty, heroism and duty, truth and oath, sovereignty and reciprocity, rule of law and jury, and markets in everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war – while suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, and devoting the surpluses to the production of commons, and the multiples for all that result.
That’s the core of P.
The rest is application.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 14:23:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/91983328_247803306617830_2706454043638628352_o_247803303284497.jpg WHICH ONE OF US DENIES GOD’S HAND?
P’s premise is sovereignty reciprocity and testifiability that produce universal calculability in human word and deed. And that faith is by definition and necessity not testifiable. Meaning that one does not bring faith to court. if it isn’t a matter for court, then do as you will. We cannot legislate faith. We can only legislate actions. We can legislate against pseudoscience sophistry and the supernatural to advance frauds. Christianity does not ask us to legislate frauds. judaism, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and human biodiversity denial do ask us to. This is because our civilization has always separated law and religion under trifunctionalism. And as such we deliver unto god and Caesar’s law separately. This competition between material and spiritual has prevented the evils of jewish and muslim religion (deceits), the stagnation of the Hindu (too much mysticism), and the despotism of the Chinese (too much authority), and the crimes of the catholic church (too much corruption). So P continues the tradition of producing law law. And MEASURING DIFFERENT RELIGIONS by their violation of the law. If a religion does not violate the laws of nature, the natural law of man, and the evolutionary law of transcendence, then it does not violate the EVIDENCE of god’s hand in his own writing – the evidence written in the universe- rather than man’s misinterpretation of it. In the test of whether man has misinterpreted god’s intent, lied about god’s intent, the laws of nature, natural law and evolutionary necessity of transcendence allow us, using the evidence of gods’ hand, to determine the errors in religion. There is no error in Jesus’ teachings. It is the scientifically correct optimum. There is plenty of violation of gods laws in the bible. And every political religion (and christianity is a political religion) is far worse than the misinterpretations in the bible that does not come from Jesus’ teachings. The true religions are nature worship and ancestor worship (heathenism), hero worship (paganism), and a political religion of which christianity appears the optimum – at least, as Jesus spoke it not the many many people who have ‘interpreted’ everything other than Jesus’ word. I am bound by the necessities of physical law, the natural law and of evolutionary law of transcendence – because those are the only *faultless* evidence of god’s word and deed, whether one follows Divine, deist, or naturalist understandings of god. As such if you disagree with my position you must choose the words of men who erred and lied over the words of Jesus and the hand of god written in the hand of god, the physical laws of nature, the natural law of man, and the necessity of evolutionary transcendence. So which one of us denies god? You or me?WHICH ONE OF US DENIES GOD’S HAND?
P’s premise is sovereignty reciprocity and testifiability that produce universal calculability in human word and deed. And that faith is by definition and necessity not testifiable. Meaning that one does not bring faith to court. if it isn’t a matter for court, then do as you will. We cannot legislate faith. We can only legislate actions. We can legislate against pseudoscience sophistry and the supernatural to advance frauds. Christianity does not ask us to legislate frauds. judaism, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and human biodiversity denial do ask us to. This is because our civilization has always separated law and religion under trifunctionalism. And as such we deliver unto god and Caesar’s law separately. This competition between material and spiritual has prevented the evils of jewish and muslim religion (deceits), the stagnation of the Hindu (too much mysticism), and the despotism of the Chinese (too much authority), and the crimes of the catholic church (too much corruption). So P continues the tradition of producing law law. And MEASURING DIFFERENT RELIGIONS by their violation of the law. If a religion does not violate the laws of nature, the natural law of man, and the evolutionary law of transcendence, then it does not violate the EVIDENCE of god’s hand in his own writing – the evidence written in the universe- rather than man’s misinterpretation of it. In the test of whether man has misinterpreted god’s intent, lied about god’s intent, the laws of nature, natural law and evolutionary necessity of transcendence allow us, using the evidence of gods’ hand, to determine the errors in religion. There is no error in Jesus’ teachings. It is the scientifically correct optimum. There is plenty of violation of gods laws in the bible. And every political religion (and christianity is a political religion) is far worse than the misinterpretations in the bible that does not come from Jesus’ teachings. The true religions are nature worship and ancestor worship (heathenism), hero worship (paganism), and a political religion of which christianity appears the optimum – at least, as Jesus spoke it not the many many people who have ‘interpreted’ everything other than Jesus’ word. I am bound by the necessities of physical law, the natural law and of evolutionary law of transcendence – because those are the only *faultless* evidence of god’s word and deed, whether one follows Divine, deist, or naturalist understandings of god. As such if you disagree with my position you must choose the words of men who erred and lied over the words of Jesus and the hand of god written in the hand of god, the physical laws of nature, the natural law of man, and the necessity of evolutionary transcendence. So which one of us denies god? You or me?
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 02:08:00 UTC
WHY?
China: 1.39B @ $13.61 trillion USD
Russia 0.14B @ $1.66 trillion USD
Russia is a vast, low population density, poor country with insufficient population to compete as a global power.
China is a vast, high population density, wealthy country with sufficient population to compete as a global power.
There is no Europe or Russia without Russia+Europe. Russian military, culture, resources, plus european economy is necessary for both.
Russia is to Canada as China is to America.
That’s why.
Canada exists because Americans don’t want it not to.
Russia exists only until Chinese don’t want it to.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-02 10:56:00 UTC
HALF TRUTHS ARE SOURCES OF IGNORANCE
Yes I know of the seven laws of Noah. 😉
They are too primitive.
They start with god (submission) rather than sovereignty ( responsibility).
They don’t include truthful speech regardless of cost.
They don’t prevent the great crimes of history (sophistry, false promise, baiting into hazard, fraud)
Instead they are the origin of the license for the great crimes of history.
They aren’t the source of good. They are the source of evil.
Why? Because any half truth spreads ignorance.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:53:00 UTC
RECIPROCITY (FULL VERSION)
The natural law is (+)Sovereignty and (-)Reciprocity, in display word and deed, including reciprocity in speech (truthful speech) regardless of cost to the status(dominance, competence hierarch), within the limits of proportionality (in group defection) within the limits of the utility of cooperation (out groups).
“Within the limits of the utility of cooperation.”
There is no ideal. There are no ideals.
There is only what satisfies demand for infallibility.
FULL VERSION
Limiting our display word and deed to:
– Fully informed (truthful and complete);
– Regardless of cost to the status, competence, or dominance hierarchy.
– Productive and;
– Voluntary transfer (or exchange, or imposition of costs upon);
– The Demonstrated interests of Others;
– Either directly or indirectly (by externality)
– Within the limit of incentive for in-group defection;
– Within The Limit of the Utility of future out-group Cooperation;
– And liable and warrantied, within the limits of restitutability;
– Eliminating the incentive of retaliation and retaliation cycles,
– And imposition of costs upon the commons of trust by which others cooperate.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:36:00 UTC