Apr 16, 2020, 10:22 AM By Lucas Cort SOVEREIGNTY – DOMINANT MALE The male strategy creates sovereignty IN FACT – violence and Law – establishment of action, preservation and insurance between insurers. FREEDOM – ALL Those Sovereigns then grant PERMISSION to those of lesser insurance or specializations in the division of labour to act within the limits of that permission(markets) what we call FREEDOM. If FREEDOM is used as the starting point without understanding the necessity for sovereignty that makes freedom possible, then men will not pay the cost of defending the sovereigns who create freedom. LIBERTY – ASCENDANT MALE The ascendant male navigates the permissible freedom with LIBERTY(agency, autonomy). If LIBERTY is used the starting point without understanding the necessity for the larger structures of permission and insurance to uphold that permission, the idea of liberty (autonomy) can undermine the very thing that allows it to survive through entitlement (false priors) and possible negative externalities that undermine group cohesion (think libertarianism – baiting into hazard, etc). REDISTRIBUTION – FEMALE This can be divided further into the female strategy, which has the primarily focus on empathy using social transactions to create redistribution within the group. If REDISTRIBUTION is used as the starting point, first entitlement devoid merit, then hyper consumption, and redistribution undermine the value of the structure that allows it to navigate, just as the ascendant male.
Theme: Sovereignty
-
The Hierarchy of Possibilities Prevents Error
Apr 16, 2020, 10:22 AM By Lucas Cort SOVEREIGNTY – DOMINANT MALE The male strategy creates sovereignty IN FACT – violence and Law – establishment of action, preservation and insurance between insurers. FREEDOM – ALL Those Sovereigns then grant PERMISSION to those of lesser insurance or specializations in the division of labour to act within the limits of that permission(markets) what we call FREEDOM. If FREEDOM is used as the starting point without understanding the necessity for sovereignty that makes freedom possible, then men will not pay the cost of defending the sovereigns who create freedom. LIBERTY – ASCENDANT MALE The ascendant male navigates the permissible freedom with LIBERTY(agency, autonomy). If LIBERTY is used the starting point without understanding the necessity for the larger structures of permission and insurance to uphold that permission, the idea of liberty (autonomy) can undermine the very thing that allows it to survive through entitlement (false priors) and possible negative externalities that undermine group cohesion (think libertarianism – baiting into hazard, etc). REDISTRIBUTION – FEMALE This can be divided further into the female strategy, which has the primarily focus on empathy using social transactions to create redistribution within the group. If REDISTRIBUTION is used as the starting point, first entitlement devoid merit, then hyper consumption, and redistribution undermine the value of the structure that allows it to navigate, just as the ascendant male.
-
Either Way We Have to Outlaw Social Construction by False Promise
Apr 21, 2020, 12:28 PM (worth repeating) So if (((the))) war on western-sensemaking: our realism, naturalism, operationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity, testimony, commons, and eugenics, is a continuation of their ancient world rebellion against the masculine empires, and an involuntary rebellion against evolution-eugenics. This means if it’s genetic, as it is in our women,it’s irreparable, and separation is the only possibility. If it’s purely cultural (doesn’t appear to be) then it’s a matter of separating from their culture. Either way we have to outlaw it by requiring truthful reciprocal speech. Which is the purpose of my work on the law: to end the repeatedly successful use of abrahamic technique at destroying civilizations from within by false promise, baiting into hazard, selling to vulnerable women and the underclasses, and reversing east and west eugenics.
-
Either Way We Have to Outlaw Social Construction by False Promise
Apr 21, 2020, 12:28 PM (worth repeating) So if (((the))) war on western-sensemaking: our realism, naturalism, operationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity, testimony, commons, and eugenics, is a continuation of their ancient world rebellion against the masculine empires, and an involuntary rebellion against evolution-eugenics. This means if it’s genetic, as it is in our women,it’s irreparable, and separation is the only possibility. If it’s purely cultural (doesn’t appear to be) then it’s a matter of separating from their culture. Either way we have to outlaw it by requiring truthful reciprocal speech. Which is the purpose of my work on the law: to end the repeatedly successful use of abrahamic technique at destroying civilizations from within by false promise, baiting into hazard, selling to vulnerable women and the underclasses, and reversing east and west eugenics.
-
The State as A Monopoly on Violence Is Evidently False.
Apr 24, 2020, 2:11 PM The westphalian peace resulted in the demand between states that the state maintain a monopoly on violence. The muslims do the opposite and ended the westphalian peace. The state cannot in fact and never has had, a monopoly on violence. It still doesn’t. It just tries. What defines a state is not it’s monopoly on violence but it’s capacity to produce the incentives that produce order with violence among those incentives.
-
The State as A Monopoly on Violence Is Evidently False.
Apr 24, 2020, 2:11 PM The westphalian peace resulted in the demand between states that the state maintain a monopoly on violence. The muslims do the opposite and ended the westphalian peace. The state cannot in fact and never has had, a monopoly on violence. It still doesn’t. It just tries. What defines a state is not it’s monopoly on violence but it’s capacity to produce the incentives that produce order with violence among those incentives.
-
Man – Organization – Power
Power
Numbers – breeding migrating immigrating – Invasion power
( … )
Theologies – Undermining – Power to Oppose and Destroy Empires
( … )
Philosophies – Power and Influence Under Monarchies
( … )
Ideologies – Power and Influence under Democracy
( … )
Wealth, Science and Technology – Military and Economic Power
( … )
Command, Legislation, and Regulation Law – Existential Power
( … )
Violence –
( … )
-
Man – Organization – Power
Power
Numbers – breeding migrating immigrating – Invasion power
( … )
Theologies – Undermining – Power to Oppose and Destroy Empires
( … )
Philosophies – Power and Influence Under Monarchies
( … )
Ideologies – Power and Influence under Democracy
( … )
Wealth, Science and Technology – Military and Economic Power
( … )
Command, Legislation, and Regulation Law – Existential Power
( … )
Violence –
( … )
-
Globalism was dying. Now it’s dead. Let 1000 nations bloom!!! 😉
Globalism was dying. Now it’s dead.
Let 1000 nations bloom!!! 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-10 17:49:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259540964227637249
Reply addressees: @sgjner @Tom_Fowdy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259539931145240576
-
How To Offend Globalists: I mention “nine nations of north america”, w/ a map of
How To Offend Globalists: I mention “nine nations of north america”, w/ a map of china made for the same purposes and what’s rather obvious truism turns into a troll storm. So I’ll add europe’s and india’s natural borders to the list for good measure. 😉
Let 1000 Nations Bloom! https://t.co/W8Bc9l10GR
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-10 17:48:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259540764218007552