Feb 7, 2020, 12:10 PM The qualities of a king (christian monarch to be precise) have to do with the entire family, not the king himself. And great kings are not what we’re looking for. That’s a via-positiva. We’re looking for constitutional monarchs that handle exceptions and prevent usurpation of power, not those who govern. Rule of Law Monarchy (Strictly Constructed Natural Law) … Constitutional Monarchy (Traditional Articulated Rights law) … … Christian Monarch (Church Sanctioned Customary Law) … … … King ( Private Property Traditional Customary European Law ) … … … … Imperial Tzar (Military Arbitrary Ruler – Post Mongol Russia ) … … … … … Imperial Caesar (Military Arbitrary Ruler – Pagan Europe) … … … … … … State Dictator – (Military Arbitrary Ruler)
Theme: Sovereignty
-
A Little Context for When I Use “monarchy”
Feb 7, 2020, 12:10 PM The qualities of a king (christian monarch to be precise) have to do with the entire family, not the king himself. And great kings are not what we’re looking for. That’s a via-positiva. We’re looking for constitutional monarchs that handle exceptions and prevent usurpation of power, not those who govern. Rule of Law Monarchy (Strictly Constructed Natural Law) … Constitutional Monarchy (Traditional Articulated Rights law) … … Christian Monarch (Church Sanctioned Customary Law) … … … King ( Private Property Traditional Customary European Law ) … … … … Imperial Tzar (Military Arbitrary Ruler – Post Mongol Russia ) … … … … … Imperial Caesar (Military Arbitrary Ruler – Pagan Europe) … … … … … … State Dictator – (Military Arbitrary Ruler)
-
Pay People to Accelerate the Big Sort at The Cost of The State, Academy, Finance, Entertainment Industries
Feb 7, 2020, 2:56 PM I (we) hold the position that (a) we should be pursuing rights to self determination, and our way of life, and that requires arms just as others require faith. (b) We are tolerant of those that conform to our traditional group strategy, and are inclusive within that limit, but that integration on a scale of other than middle and upper middle class christians (Black, Hispanic, Asian) has failed, and that we will not leave a window open for repeating the failures of the 20th. Our strategy evolves. My strategy at present is to push rights. Move to the center on those rights, but be intolerant regarding policy and rights, which will drive our better people to us, and cause separation on demand for commons that will happen to be those preferred by our people. My understanding from the historical evidence everywhere is that if we create a separate union on our terms, then the best will depart leaving the blue cities ghettos with an elite that exploits them but cannot exploit the middle, and that new cities will replace the commercial them. As I’ve said, by merely emptying DC as a power center, and gutting new york as a financial center, and disemboweling the media’s income stream, we will achieve our goals. The reason this will work is that we are going to buy off left right and center middle with the returns on redistributing all that wealth. So to repeat the strategy for those that aren’t on board with it, we offer a deal that is full of desirable ideas and then turn the population against the real enemy. At that point they will double down like all humans and give us moral license to us both left and right activists and ‘divide the spoils’.
-
Pay People to Accelerate the Big Sort at The Cost of The State, Academy, Finance, Entertainment Industries
Feb 7, 2020, 2:56 PM I (we) hold the position that (a) we should be pursuing rights to self determination, and our way of life, and that requires arms just as others require faith. (b) We are tolerant of those that conform to our traditional group strategy, and are inclusive within that limit, but that integration on a scale of other than middle and upper middle class christians (Black, Hispanic, Asian) has failed, and that we will not leave a window open for repeating the failures of the 20th. Our strategy evolves. My strategy at present is to push rights. Move to the center on those rights, but be intolerant regarding policy and rights, which will drive our better people to us, and cause separation on demand for commons that will happen to be those preferred by our people. My understanding from the historical evidence everywhere is that if we create a separate union on our terms, then the best will depart leaving the blue cities ghettos with an elite that exploits them but cannot exploit the middle, and that new cities will replace the commercial them. As I’ve said, by merely emptying DC as a power center, and gutting new york as a financial center, and disemboweling the media’s income stream, we will achieve our goals. The reason this will work is that we are going to buy off left right and center middle with the returns on redistributing all that wealth. So to repeat the strategy for those that aren’t on board with it, we offer a deal that is full of desirable ideas and then turn the population against the real enemy. At that point they will double down like all humans and give us moral license to us both left and right activists and ‘divide the spoils’.
-
They Don’t Want Our Rule
Feb 7, 2020, 7:46 PM
They want proximity to us but they don’t want our rule. Well, great, we don’t want to rule them, but we won’t tolerate their rule either.
-
They Don’t Want Our Rule
Feb 7, 2020, 7:46 PM
They want proximity to us but they don’t want our rule. Well, great, we don’t want to rule them, but we won’t tolerate their rule either.
-
“What Is Your Ideology?”
Feb 11, 2020, 8:35 AM
—“So, what is your political ideology? I mean I know you’re right wing. But, what are you? A Nationalist-Socialist or Libertarian Civic Nationalist?”— Amit Patel
I am none of those things – all of which i consider excuses for obtaining power under democracy to circumvent markets. I am ‘right wing’ only in the sense that I am intolerant of violations of the laws of nature and the natural law of reciprocity. I am an Aryan(european branch of indo-europeans): transcendence of man into gods through competitive heroism, demonstrated excellence, speaking truth, and creating beauty. I am a European Sovereigntarian: Markets in everything: Let A Thousand Nations Bloom. I am an Aristotelian: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, I am a Jeffersonian libertarian: a written constitution of natural law, with transactional procedural modifications. I am a Constitutional Monarchist favoring multi-house governments as markets for the classes. I am a Manorialist: natural eugenics – home before children, family as the central unit of society, bring capital to people not people to capital. I am a Conservative: Bear your own costs, externalize no cost, purely empirical government, change by evidence not by hypothesis. I am a National(kinship) Socialist: direct the maximum proceeds to the production of capitalizing (not consumptive) commons. I am a Kinship Christian: humility in ones never ending pursuit of virtue, exhaust all opportunities for forgiveness before abandoning it, and demonstrate personal acts of charity at personal cost. I am a Kinship Pagan: we owe a debt to nature, our ancestors known and named, and known as heroes, and known only as archetypes (gods), and are responsible to them for preserving their investments in making us, just as those that follow us are responsible for preserving our investments in them. I am a universalist: any people that wishes european civilization’s benefits can adopt them if they try – or not if they choose not to. The Laws of Nature The Natural Law Self Determination Our Transcendence into gods Sovereignty to do so A Universal Militia The Oath of Reciprocal Insurance A constitution of the natural law Markets in association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities. A Judicial Priesthood A monarchy as a judge of last resort A Cabinet Houses for the classes (three or four) … Territory … Industry … Family … (Dependents) Local Priority in Legislation, regulation, norm. Professionalized (Privatized) Education
-
The Right to Self Determination
Feb 11, 2020, 5:34 PM We either have the right to self determination – or we have the right to extermination. So choose. (I’m happy either way.) Genomes, genetic distributions, institutions, culture, traditions, norms, manners, ethics, morals, laws, history, myth, legend, monuments, territory, are all assets. Some assets are valuable. Some are not. Some are harmful. If we choose to preserve an asset, we do so. 1) We know that moral intuition is genetic, sex biased, and that only trauma can change it – even then only slightly. We know that all traits are somewhere between 70-80% heritable and the rest is idiosyncratic accumulation rather than patterns of environment. 2) We know that class is genetic, with lower classes accumulating more loads (defects), upper middle the fewest, and aside from noble families, the upper classes random lottery results from the middle – but otherwise there is little to no class rotation. 3) We know that moral biases reflect female (herd, infant-equality, devotion, consumption) strategy and the male (pack, mature-hierarchy, loyalty, capitalization) instinct and that females use social superpredation by undermining, and males political superpredation by violence. 4) We know that each of us is born with a bias in female (lateral breadth) vs male(longitudinal velocity) brain structures, and that the stereotype of male analytic and female empathic is physical construction, and that given freedom to do so we pursue interests fitting our bias. 5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the female, empathic, equalitarian, consumptive, infantilized, and underdeveloped strategy and some by the male, analytic, hierarchical, capitalizing, and mature strategy. And so we must separate or civil war. 6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic, the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution. 7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of ignorance, this time with social construction of the myth of possible equality, the only result of which will be dysgenia and decline – we are fine with it. But you can’t take the rest of us with you. 8) Some of us are more than semi domesticated animals sensing, perceiving, feeling, experiencing intuiting, and responding to incentives to hyper consume. And some of us are willing to let you turn your cities into dysgenic favelas. Which is what we plan to let you do.
-
The Right to Self Determination
Feb 11, 2020, 5:34 PM We either have the right to self determination – or we have the right to extermination. So choose. (I’m happy either way.) Genomes, genetic distributions, institutions, culture, traditions, norms, manners, ethics, morals, laws, history, myth, legend, monuments, territory, are all assets. Some assets are valuable. Some are not. Some are harmful. If we choose to preserve an asset, we do so. 1) We know that moral intuition is genetic, sex biased, and that only trauma can change it – even then only slightly. We know that all traits are somewhere between 70-80% heritable and the rest is idiosyncratic accumulation rather than patterns of environment. 2) We know that class is genetic, with lower classes accumulating more loads (defects), upper middle the fewest, and aside from noble families, the upper classes random lottery results from the middle – but otherwise there is little to no class rotation. 3) We know that moral biases reflect female (herd, infant-equality, devotion, consumption) strategy and the male (pack, mature-hierarchy, loyalty, capitalization) instinct and that females use social superpredation by undermining, and males political superpredation by violence. 4) We know that each of us is born with a bias in female (lateral breadth) vs male(longitudinal velocity) brain structures, and that the stereotype of male analytic and female empathic is physical construction, and that given freedom to do so we pursue interests fitting our bias. 5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the female, empathic, equalitarian, consumptive, infantilized, and underdeveloped strategy and some by the male, analytic, hierarchical, capitalizing, and mature strategy. And so we must separate or civil war. 6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic, the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution. 7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of ignorance, this time with social construction of the myth of possible equality, the only result of which will be dysgenia and decline – we are fine with it. But you can’t take the rest of us with you. 8) Some of us are more than semi domesticated animals sensing, perceiving, feeling, experiencing intuiting, and responding to incentives to hyper consume. And some of us are willing to let you turn your cities into dysgenic favelas. Which is what we plan to let you do.
-
Ethnocentrism, Sovereignty: Rule of Law – Its Enough.
Feb 24, 2020, 10:55 AM The Via- Positiva Small, homogenous, low power distance, polities under rule of law, and their naturally limited capacity for fiat currency inflation demonstrate the optimum mixed economies for both trade and redistribution. The optimum organization of such a polity is by Sovereignty, Rule of law of Reciprocity, an independent cult of the judiciary, a universal militia, a standing professional army of warriors, a monarchy as a judge of last resort, houses for the classes demonstrating contribution to the commons for the production of commons. And markets in everything. Ethnocentrism is the optimum group strategy because kin selection favors – or at least doesn’t resist – loyalty, high trust, commons, and redistribution. Ethno-supremacism is a necessary property of ethnocentrism. Europeans are demonstrably superior genetically, culturally, scientifically, medically, technologically, institutionally, civilizationally to all other civilizations in the ancient and modern worlds. And we are so for one reason: sovereignty. Everything in our civilization descends from it.