Mar 26, 2020, 7:54 PM Um. He panicked. The ukrainian revolution spread to st petersburg and moscow and he had to crack down on it there. Secondly, it meant nato could take ukraine, the crimea, and the black sea, and leave russian with her artic ports only.. Third it meant his attempt to rebuild russian military capacity was done, because all the high tech equipment was in the don valley in ukraine near the coal mines. That’s why those two hundred and some odd ’emergency supply’ trucks went to ukraine – sure, they brought in arms. BUt more importantly they took all the precision equipment back to russia. Hence the’ little green men’ (russian soldiers without insignias) quickly arriving in crimea. They seized all the private property and redistributed it to russian nationals.. He panicked. The man doesn’t even use cell phones, tablets, or computers because he’s so afraid of the CIA everywhere. The russians are hella good at war plans so they pulled it out of the deck and set it off. They didn’t expect the ‘fight’ from the volunteer (militia) ukrainians – especially Right Sector nationalists. He’d spent years killing off the ukrainian military through their puppet president in ukraine. The military didn’t fight. But the ukrainians west of the dnipr didn’t want any repeat of generations of their families being murdered, or their opportunity for joining europe ended so they fought hard. What I found most interesting was his rapid nationalization of the press, and the manufacture of fake news – staging false testimony. Using video from the chechen war. Making up all sorts of nonsense. We were keeping track of how they were using the same actresses to fake different videos. It was hysterical. Ukraine had to shut off the media from russia and the trains. Russians still sneak in and bomb all sorts of stuff now and then. The idea is just to wait until they can seize the territory, cut the west of ukraine off from the black sea, open the land route to crimea, and incorporate Transnistria – and possibly moldova.
Theme: Sovereignty
-
Yes I know of the seven laws of Noah. 😉
Yes I know of the seven laws of Noah. 😉 https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/yes-i-know-of-the-seven-laws-of-noah/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 12:45:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265987663095447553
-
Yes I know of the seven laws of Noah. 😉
Mar 31, 2020, 3:39 PM They are too primitive. They start with god (submission) rather than sovereignty ( responsibility). They don’t include truthful speech regardless of cost. They don’t prevent the great crimes of history (sophistry, false promise, baiting into hazard, fraud) Instead they are the origin of the license for the great crimes of history. They aren’t the source of good. They are the source of evil. Why? Because any half truth spreads ignorance.
-
Yes I know of the seven laws of Noah. 😉
Mar 31, 2020, 3:39 PM They are too primitive. They start with god (submission) rather than sovereignty ( responsibility). They don’t include truthful speech regardless of cost. They don’t prevent the great crimes of history (sophistry, false promise, baiting into hazard, fraud) Instead they are the origin of the license for the great crimes of history. They aren’t the source of good. They are the source of evil. Why? Because any half truth spreads ignorance.
-
“Within the limits of the utility of Cooperation.”
Mar 31, 2020, 8:27 PM Minor expansion of Natural Law
–“The natural law is (+)Sovereignty and (-)Reciprocity, including reciprocity in speech (truthful speech) regardless of cost to the status(dominance, competence hierarch), within the limits of proportionality (ingroup defection) within the limits of the utility of cooperation (outgroups).”—
“Within the limits of the utility of cooperation.” (ie: test of limits and full accounting.)
-
“Within the limits of the utility of Cooperation.”
Mar 31, 2020, 8:27 PM Minor expansion of Natural Law
–“The natural law is (+)Sovereignty and (-)Reciprocity, including reciprocity in speech (truthful speech) regardless of cost to the status(dominance, competence hierarch), within the limits of proportionality (ingroup defection) within the limits of the utility of cooperation (outgroups).”—
“Within the limits of the utility of cooperation.” (ie: test of limits and full accounting.)
-
Reciprocity (full Version)
Apr 1, 2020, 2:16 PM RECIPROCITY (FULL VERSION) The natural law is (+)Sovereignty and (-)Reciprocity, in display word and deed, including reciprocity in speech (truthful speech) regardless of cost to the status(dominance, competence hierarch), within the limits of proportionality (in group defection) within the limits of the utility of cooperation (out groups). “Within the limits of the utility of cooperation.” There is no ideal. There are no ideals. There is only what satisfies demand for infallibility. FULL VERSION Limiting our display word and deed to: – Fully informed (truthful and complete); – Regardless of cost to the status, competence, or dominance hierarchy. – Productive and; – Voluntary transfer (or exchange, or imposition of costs upon); – The Demonstrated interests of Others; – Either directly or indirectly (by externality) – Within the limit of incentive for in-group defection; – Within The Limit of the Utility of future out-group Cooperation; – And liable and warrantied, within the limits of restitutability; – Eliminating the incentive of retaliation and retaliation cycles, – And imposition of costs upon the commons of trust by which others cooperate.
-
Reciprocity (full Version)
Apr 1, 2020, 2:16 PM RECIPROCITY (FULL VERSION) The natural law is (+)Sovereignty and (-)Reciprocity, in display word and deed, including reciprocity in speech (truthful speech) regardless of cost to the status(dominance, competence hierarch), within the limits of proportionality (in group defection) within the limits of the utility of cooperation (out groups). “Within the limits of the utility of cooperation.” There is no ideal. There are no ideals. There is only what satisfies demand for infallibility. FULL VERSION Limiting our display word and deed to: – Fully informed (truthful and complete); – Regardless of cost to the status, competence, or dominance hierarchy. – Productive and; – Voluntary transfer (or exchange, or imposition of costs upon); – The Demonstrated interests of Others; – Either directly or indirectly (by externality) – Within the limit of incentive for in-group defection; – Within The Limit of the Utility of future out-group Cooperation; – And liable and warrantied, within the limits of restitutability; – Eliminating the incentive of retaliation and retaliation cycles, – And imposition of costs upon the commons of trust by which others cooperate.
-
Strategies
Apr 14, 2020, 12:02 PM by Lucas Cort The male strategy creates sovereignty (IN FACT – violence and Law – establishment of action, preservation and insurance between insurers) Those Sovereigns then grant PERMISSION to those of lesser insurance or specializations in the division of labour to act within the limits of that permission(markets) what we call FREEDOM. The ascendant male navigates the permissible freedom with LIBERTY(agency, autonomy). When liberty becomes the starting point without understanding the necessity for the larger structures permission and insurance to uphold that permission, the idea of liberty (autonomy) can undermine the very thing that allows it to survive through entitlement (false priors) and possible negative externalities that undermine group cohesion (think libertarianism – baiting into hazard, etc). This can be divided further into the female strategy, which has the primarily focus on empathy using social transactions to create redistribution within the group. If this becomes the starting point, entitlement devoid merit, hyper consumption, and redistribution undermine the value of the structure that allows it to navigate, just as the ascendant male.
-
Strategies
Apr 14, 2020, 12:02 PM by Lucas Cort The male strategy creates sovereignty (IN FACT – violence and Law – establishment of action, preservation and insurance between insurers) Those Sovereigns then grant PERMISSION to those of lesser insurance or specializations in the division of labour to act within the limits of that permission(markets) what we call FREEDOM. The ascendant male navigates the permissible freedom with LIBERTY(agency, autonomy). When liberty becomes the starting point without understanding the necessity for the larger structures permission and insurance to uphold that permission, the idea of liberty (autonomy) can undermine the very thing that allows it to survive through entitlement (false priors) and possible negative externalities that undermine group cohesion (think libertarianism – baiting into hazard, etc). This can be divided further into the female strategy, which has the primarily focus on empathy using social transactions to create redistribution within the group. If this becomes the starting point, entitlement devoid merit, hyper consumption, and redistribution undermine the value of the structure that allows it to navigate, just as the ascendant male.