Theme: Sovereignty

  • Why? The painful truth? I’m not sure where the demarcation between domesticated

    Why? The painful truth? I’m not sure where the demarcation between domesticated animal and human lies, but it’s in part in making that distinction.

    Either rule or be ruled. Either rule intolerantly or be defeated.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-01 17:20:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322951569193766926

    Reply addressees: @DrewBaye @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322951138870808576


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DrewBaye @TOOEdit They intuit “true and good” as Sowells “Unconstrained Vision”: they are free of physical(scarcity), natural(reciprocity), and evolutionary(regression to the mean) laws. The false promise of freedom from those laws, and blaming white people (oppressors) for discovering them SELLS.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322951138870808576

  • What is P-law?

    What is P-law? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/11/01/what-is-p-law/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-01 16:41:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322941808234606593

  • What is P-law?

    1. Given Self-Determination by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Adversarialism, that maximizes the rate of adaptability with maximum prosperity.

    2. A Universally Commensurable, Value-Neutral, Formal Logic (Science) of Natural Law (language, psychology, sociology, law, politics, group strategy, aesthetics)

    3. A Universal, Constitutional Framework, for Optimum Government, and a body of law within it, providing the completion of the European, Aristotelian, Constitutional Project

    5. The formal codification of the Group Evolutionary Strategy of the European People, and an explanation for their disproportionate success.

    Our ‘Book’: The ‘Sacred’ Law of European Peoples.

    (pinned)

  • What is P-law?

    1. Given Self-Determination by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Adversarialism, that maximizes the rate of adaptability with maximum prosperity.

    2. A Universally Commensurable, Value-Neutral, Formal Logic (Science) of Natural Law (language, psychology, sociology, law, politics, group strategy, aesthetics)

    3. A Universal, Constitutional Framework, for Optimum Government, and a body of law within it, providing the completion of the European, Aristotelian, Constitutional Project

    5. The formal codification of the Group Evolutionary Strategy of the European People, and an explanation for their disproportionate success.

    Our ‘Book’: The ‘Sacred’ Law of European Peoples.

    (pinned)

  • 1. Given Self Determination by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Adversarialism. 2. A Fo

    1. Given Self Determination by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Adversarialism.

    2. A Formal Logic (Science) of Natural Law (language, psychology, sociology, politics, group strategy)

    3. The completion of the European Constitutional Project

    4. The Group Strategy of the European People https://twitter.com/AristocratSoul/status/1322677939524296704

  • 1. Given Self Determination by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Adversarialism. 2. A Fo

    1. Given Self Determination by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Adversarialism.

    2. A Formal Logic (Science) of Natural Law (language, psychology, sociology, politics, group strategy)

    3. The completion of the European Constitutional Project

    4. The Group Strategy of the European People


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 23:29:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322682081911197702

    Reply addressees: @AristocratSoul

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322677939524296704

  • The Chinese Are Doing It Right – If They Succeed.

    The Chinese advantage is that they DONT have democracy.

    They have an Ethnic homogeneity, territorial isolation, military and political autonomy, a professional and ethnocentric elite and bureaucracy.

    If cured of their overpopulation, they live in one of the most choice pieces of real estate in the world – vulnerable only due to their ‘unnecessary’ population. 

    We are all victims of our first institutions. The hindus to location, demographics and mysticism, the semites to demographics, location, and authoritarian religion, the chinese to geography, state formation, and the europeans to rule of law. Each has a benefit and a weakness.

    Prussia was the restoration of the european project after the dark ages. So note how desperately the french, English, Russians, and (americans) tried to destroy it. English rule of law hadn’t time to make it across Germany. Instead the French had a tantrum and destroyed Europe. (And the Jews and now Muslims are taking advantage of the opportunity.)

    If white male still ran european civ, and prussian order, and english government, we would do the same.

    But we can’t. Why? Women’s emotions and immigrant predation.

    My work is hard to understand – at first – because it’s a system for exposing ignorance, error, bias, deceit and fraud. But once you master it,all of human history makes common sense again. It’s just opaque or confusing because of all the lies – including those we tell ourselves.

     

     

  • The Chinese Are Doing It Right – If They Succeed.

    The Chinese advantage is that they DONT have democracy.

    They have an Ethnic homogeneity, territorial isolation, military and political autonomy, a professional and ethnocentric elite and bureaucracy.

    If cured of their overpopulation, they live in one of the most choice pieces of real estate in the world – vulnerable only due to their ‘unnecessary’ population. 

    We are all victims of our first institutions. The hindus to location, demographics and mysticism, the semites to demographics, location, and authoritarian religion, the chinese to geography, state formation, and the europeans to rule of law. Each has a benefit and a weakness.

    Prussia was the restoration of the european project after the dark ages. So note how desperately the french, English, Russians, and (americans) tried to destroy it. English rule of law hadn’t time to make it across Germany. Instead the French had a tantrum and destroyed Europe. (And the Jews and now Muslims are taking advantage of the opportunity.)

    If white male still ran european civ, and prussian order, and english government, we would do the same.

    But we can’t. Why? Women’s emotions and immigrant predation.

    My work is hard to understand – at first – because it’s a system for exposing ignorance, error, bias, deceit and fraud. But once you master it,all of human history makes common sense again. It’s just opaque or confusing because of all the lies – including those we tell ourselves.

     

     

  • 9) …rule of law at the top, is the fastest means of innovation possible for ma

    9) …rule of law at the top, is the fastest means of innovation possible for man. Realism, naturalism, operationalism, self-determination, by sovereignty and reciprocity adversarially settled in a market competition we call the court by the test of tort (trespass) CALCULATES.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 21:13:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322647957393543172

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322647955904602118


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    8) … Indian civilization reach equilibrium set by the geography (it did). Chinese civilization reach limits and convert to moralizing rather than religion (it did). And europeans, by LEAPFROGGING the religious and state phases, (yes that’s the point) developed the ….

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322647955904602118

  • It’s just easier to defend china really. This is a big place. Lots of it is dese

    It’s just easier to defend china really. This is a big place. Lots of it is desert or reclaimed desert, and we either wall off or ‘clear territory’ and expand our southern border or we have the same problem the chinse had with the mongols.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 20:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322630778895949826

    Reply addressees: @NRxAuthors @PeterZeihan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322630095509610497