(6 of 6) So we may grant one another the right of self-determination by political separation, and political enforcement of our differences in right eugenic and evolutionary and left dysgenic strategies.
But neither has the right to deprive the other of self-determination.
(5 of 6)
No more lies. We will choose our destiny by Honest discourse or honest violence, but not by the restraint of violence by tolerance for violence and lies.We are incompatible because the Right’s Eugenics and Left’s Dysgenics are politically incompatible and irreconcilable.
Schmitt didn’t himself realize how influenced by the French ‘counter-enlightenment’ against British Empirical, Sovereign, Legal, and Prussian Miltary and Tripartist restoration of europe.
—“Schmitt contends that from 1890 the old Westphalian order of the jus publicum europaeum, born at the end of the Thirty Years’ War (1648), began to dissolve into a ‘universalism without territories’ and into the ’empty’ and abstract normativism of an international legality”— Alain de Benoist @Daily_Benoist
We should call it what it is:
1) European civ was and remains the Common Law of self determination by sovereignty reciprocity we call Tort, the Holy Roman Empire (HRE), and the federation of states under a weak monarchy the optimum form of european govt – the optimum form of ALL government.
2) France warred against the HRE and Germania organized in response – to resist another French aggression.
3) The european conflict was, is, and remains, the Roman, Catholic, and French Feminine, Semitic, Monopoly, Authoritarian, Arrogant State against the Greek, Aryan(Protestant), Germanic, Masculine, European, Rule of Law, Market, Skeptical State.
4) The USA, a power that Europe seeks to replicate, is very close to a second civil war that will result most likely in a restoration of her original design as a mirror of the HRE with traditional Germanic law as that rule of law. Was preserved in England and never subject to the corrupting influence of Napoleonic law that deprived the people and the law of sovereignty.
The rest of Europe should fear a unified Europe that contains Paris more than it should fear a unified Europe that contains Moscow. At least Moscow works in Russian people’s interests. Paris does not.
So perhaps the French should look more objectively at the problem. It’s not that Europe fears integration. it’s that the French history of undermining european peoples, and the French authoritarian model rather than the Holy Roman Empire, British, and American model, is a threat to european civilization – as it always has been.
That is the cause of the failure of european coherence.
Humility, recognition of her role in destroying europe, would serve Paris better than ambitions to rule.
Schmitt didn’t himself realize how influenced by the French ‘counter-enlightenment’ against British Empirical, Sovereign, Legal, and Prussian Miltary and Tripartist restoration of europe.
—“Schmitt contends that from 1890 the old Westphalian order of the jus publicum europaeum, born at the end of the Thirty Years’ War (1648), began to dissolve into a ‘universalism without territories’ and into the ’empty’ and abstract normativism of an international legality”— Alain de Benoist @Daily_Benoist
We should call it what it is:
1) European civ was and remains the Common Law of self determination by sovereignty reciprocity we call Tort, the Holy Roman Empire (HRE), and the federation of states under a weak monarchy the optimum form of european govt – the optimum form of ALL government.
2) France warred against the HRE and Germania organized in response – to resist another French aggression.
3) The european conflict was, is, and remains, the Roman, Catholic, and French Feminine, Semitic, Monopoly, Authoritarian, Arrogant State against the Greek, Aryan(Protestant), Germanic, Masculine, European, Rule of Law, Market, Skeptical State.
4) The USA, a power that Europe seeks to replicate, is very close to a second civil war that will result most likely in a restoration of her original design as a mirror of the HRE with traditional Germanic law as that rule of law. Was preserved in England and never subject to the corrupting influence of Napoleonic law that deprived the people and the law of sovereignty.
The rest of Europe should fear a unified Europe that contains Paris more than it should fear a unified Europe that contains Moscow. At least Moscow works in Russian people’s interests. Paris does not.
So perhaps the French should look more objectively at the problem. It’s not that Europe fears integration. it’s that the French history of undermining european peoples, and the French authoritarian model rather than the Holy Roman Empire, British, and American model, is a threat to european civilization – as it always has been.
That is the cause of the failure of european coherence.
Humility, recognition of her role in destroying europe, would serve Paris better than ambitions to rule.
Is A Unified Europe Necessary?
Response to Alain De Benoit
Sovereignty in the Russian apolitical? French political, authoritarian and socialist? Sovereignty in the German Holy Roman Empire and pre-war American states? Sovereignty In the British and American individual?
The reason Britain leaves the EU and that the Anglosphere is incompatible with Europe is the common law makes individuals and the law sovereign, not the parliament, nor the state, and thereby forcing the people, the parliament, the state to exhaust all possible means of preserving individual and legal sovereignty before they can produce commons.
The French model that presumes her feminine authoritarian false consensus bias, and limited adversarialism is best despite her failure as a world power, failure as a scientific and industrial power, cause of endless european wars, undermining of all other european alliances, and postwar tolerance for Islam given the 1500 year history of its war on civilization.
So Russian authoritarian? French authoritarian unification? German, British, and American federation of states? France has been the PROBLEM for Europe. The Germans, Italians, East Europe, and Russia would readily organize if it were not for French attempts to undermine the greater German people for centuries and continue her long running program of first trying to seize papal then european power, despite being the most backward government in Europe, launching the authoritarian revolutions, and giving birth to socialism and communism.
Other than France the rest of Europe only joins the EU for economic and military reasons. Economic reasons provided by Germans, military reasons provided by the USA, and it’s despite the French authoritarianism that the rest of Europe fears.
The USA is very close to a second civil war that will result most likely in a restoration of her original design as a mirror of the HRE with traditional Germanic law as that law. Was preserved in England and never subject to the corrupting influence of Napoleonic law that deprived the people and the law of sovereignty.
The rest of Europe should fear a unified Europe that contains Paris more than it should fear a unified Europe that contains Moscow. At least Moscow works in Russian people’s interests. Paris does not.
So perhaps the French should look more objectively at the problem. It’s not that Europe fears integration. it’s that the French history of undermining european peoples, and the French authoritarian model rather than the Holy Roman Empire, British, and American model, is a threat to european civilization – as it always has been.
That is the cause of the failure of european coherence.
Humility would serve Paris better than ambitions to rule.
Is A Unified Europe Necessary?
Response to Alain De Benoit
Sovereignty in the Russian apolitical? French political, authoritarian and socialist? Sovereignty in the German Holy Roman Empire and pre-war American states? Sovereignty In the British and American individual?
The reason Britain leaves the EU and that the Anglosphere is incompatible with Europe is the common law makes individuals and the law sovereign, not the parliament, nor the state, and thereby forcing the people, the parliament, the state to exhaust all possible means of preserving individual and legal sovereignty before they can produce commons.
The French model that presumes her feminine authoritarian false consensus bias, and limited adversarialism is best despite her failure as a world power, failure as a scientific and industrial power, cause of endless european wars, undermining of all other european alliances, and postwar tolerance for Islam given the 1500 year history of its war on civilization.
So Russian authoritarian? French authoritarian unification? German, British, and American federation of states? France has been the PROBLEM for Europe. The Germans, Italians, East Europe, and Russia would readily organize if it were not for French attempts to undermine the greater German people for centuries and continue her long running program of first trying to seize papal then european power, despite being the most backward government in Europe, launching the authoritarian revolutions, and giving birth to socialism and communism.
Other than France the rest of Europe only joins the EU for economic and military reasons. Economic reasons provided by Germans, military reasons provided by the USA, and it’s despite the French authoritarianism that the rest of Europe fears.
The USA is very close to a second civil war that will result most likely in a restoration of her original design as a mirror of the HRE with traditional Germanic law as that law. Was preserved in England and never subject to the corrupting influence of Napoleonic law that deprived the people and the law of sovereignty.
The rest of Europe should fear a unified Europe that contains Paris more than it should fear a unified Europe that contains Moscow. At least Moscow works in Russian people’s interests. Paris does not.
So perhaps the French should look more objectively at the problem. It’s not that Europe fears integration. it’s that the French history of undermining european peoples, and the French authoritarian model rather than the Holy Roman Empire, British, and American model, is a threat to european civilization – as it always has been.
That is the cause of the failure of european coherence.
Humility would serve Paris better than ambitions to rule.
3. Rights can only be brought into existence by (a) territorial sovereignty- military, state (b) an insurer of last resort – court and court enforcement such as sheriffs, deputies and militia or a hierarchy of police and military. (c) Under State vs Govt, Govt produces Commons.
Newcomers on the world stage, Persian and European empires were both IE (not middle eastern), whose primary purpose was fighting to preserve their first-principle: self-determination, by denying competitors, by funding a military to increase trade and taxes that resulted.
Because in the west we pay the high cost of self-determination by self-determined means by individual sovereignty and reciprocity. You call this ‘freedom’. But it is the MOST eugenic, fastest evolving strategy in the world and the reason for the west outpacing all other civs.