I thinking that’s the optimum answer…. 😉
We need a ‘right of return’. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-09 22:04:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1822031243221070059
Reply addressees: @sqpatrick77 @ukhomeoffice
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1822029484414935428
Dear Dr Dawkins (@RichardDawkins), (and all interested others);
The US was constructed as a REPUBLIC (rule of law) under the NATURAL LAW (inviolable sovereignty, reciprocity, duty) under CONCURRENT democracy (concurrence or regions and classes) and COMMONALITY (concurrence of decisions regardless of regions) in resolution of disputes in court.
This is why we had the house elected by local population (families), Senate elected by the legislature (industry), and Presidents elected by electors (activist elites) of STATES. This exists to defend minority rights and to PROHIBIT majority desires. Meaning that the government must be given permission by the CONCURRENCY (agreement) of the states, and NOT the majority of the population.
This is because the USA is a union of STATES not a country. (which a Brit should understand given the composition of the UK – despite the UK’s lack of documented foundations.)
In other words the People and their States are sovereign and not the federal government. Similarly american citizens are largely sovereign unlike the UK, where parliament is sovereign and not the people, and where the constitution is unwritten.
So just as Europe is failing to produce a federal power equivalent to the united states because of regional differences (states)n – and failing (despite french designs to rule europe), while the US is devolving from the federal power back to the states to empower cultural differences in regions – because federalism failed once the continent was conquered and the world wars ended.
I am affectionately devoted to you and your work. But you are demonstrably but understandably, like many educated elites in the UK, possessed of the odd presumption of moral supremacy under the illusion that we all ‘can obtain and perform our rights as Englishmen’ despite twenty five hundred years of demonstrated failure of that presumption from the Hellenes to the present.
It may be true that the ‘rights of Englishmen’ if adhered to are all but indistinguishable from Natural Law, and that those elites are in fact most virtuous in the world – but that does not mean the rest of the world is, much of it is, or ever can be. There is no wisdom of crowds whenever the crowd can vote itself a discount at the cost of others past present and future.
The secret of the west, aside from individual (familial) sovereignty, resulting in limits on authority, generating demand for consensus, and debate to produce it, in turn requiring truth-before-face, consists in the informal and form institutionalization of the demand for responsibility for self, private and common in exchange for political participation. And in the postwar period, we see the contradictory demand for equality in responsibility of political wisdom against the efforts at redistribution, irresponsibility, unaccountability, because of individual irresponsibility for personal private and common.
So in this rare case I must disagree with you. Even though european criticism of Trump is understandable, americans (and british as well) are no longer demographically and economically capable of preserving anything more than the anglosphere – the world has caught up with us, and in some case is surpassing us, and as such we cannot afford to ‘carry’ world defense of the international system we developed to encourage peace through human rights, democracy, and free trade, finance, and international law.
WIshing it was so is not a reason for moral criticism of reaction to the world as it is, and will likely remain, as it returns to a conflict of civilizations, the attempted return of empires, and the attempted return to imperial demand for autarky by controlling trade, trade routes, and resources.
Affections
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Reply addressees: @RichardDawkins
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-09 16:49:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821951855196286988
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821942700179849592
RT @spaceangelvoice: you truly have no idea just how militarily dominant the US alone is, let alone all of NATO. but despite what both the…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-08 19:40:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821632706221883785
–“Our solution isn’t really that complicated. It’s the devolution of the federal government back to the states, so that the USA becomes more like europe, with various cultures united in trade and defense – just as europe is trying to unite various cultures into trade and defense. This does not require the victory or oppression of feminine leftists concerned with care and consumption, or masculine rightists concerned with responsibility and capital. It simply allows us to continue the ‘big sort’ into regions that favor our preferred way of life. We would end up with a spectrum of cultures like europe’s mediterranean, french, germanic, baltic and slavic differences in temperament and culture.
Your lives can be better, slower, and surer. People would be able to have confidence in the future and the future would serve their interests.”– @ThruTheHayes
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-02 01:14:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1819179871525847040
–“Our solution isn’t really that complicated. It’s the devolution of the federal government back to the states, so that the USA becomes more like europe, with various cultures united in trade and defense – just as europe is trying to unite various cultures into trade and defense. This does not require the victory or oppression of feminine leftists concerned with care and consumption, or masculine rightists concerned with responsibility and capital. It simply allows us to continue the ‘big sort’ into regions that favor our preferred way of life. We would, lend up with a spectrum of cultures like europe’s mediterranean, french, germanic, baltic and slavic differences in temperament and culture.
Your lives can be better, slower, and surer. People would be able to have confidence in the future and the future would serve their interests.”– @ThruTheHayes
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-02 01:14:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1819178141887148032
–“The foundation of middle eastern ethics isn’t at all akin to western contractualism: sovereignty, reciprocity, and agreement, instead it’s the ethics of slavery, whether by physical means (expensive) or by fictional (religious) means (cheap). Either way its domination over the…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-31 21:59:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818768456034271736
RT @TabbyTeamster: Imagine an ethno nationalist crowned federal republic with American style popular sovereignty. With an ethnonationalist…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-31 03:21:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818487158933454954
@POTUS: NO, THE SUPREME COURT WILL NEVER CHANGE ITS FUNCTION AND MISSION.
The USA is the only constitutional republic that ALSO has sovereignty of the people and the concurrency of the people by both regions and classes – and NOT the government.
We are the only constitutional republic that prevents the people and the government from enacting harms against one another – because our common law, our constitution, our bill of rights, were derived from natural law – meaning the science of cooperation, meaning individual sovereignty.
And the court exists to defend the constitution and the people, from not only the tyranny of the well meaning fools in government (You) but the tyranny of well meaning fools in the majority of the polity (the left).
As such we are protected by ‘the natural law’, ‘the rights of englishmen’, ‘human rights’, and their codification in a constitution that allows us to overthrow you and replace you if you try to violate that law.
The supreme court is reversing the democratic party’s and their leadership in the radical left’s attempt to circumvent the people, the natural law, the common law, the constitution, and the long history of western civilization to its founding principles discovered on the Steppe: the prohibition on authority by the distribution of sovereignty, reciprocity, contract, duty, excellence, truth, and beauty i to the distributed dictatorship of those demonstrating responsibility to insure those principles with one another.
And there is no person living or dead that will defeat me in this argument.
And if we must end this government as did our ancestors to prevent you from your crimes, we will do so with vigor, and sufficient demonstration, that no one will try again for a thousand years.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Reply addressees: @POTUS
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-31 02:00:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818466683029221376
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818349589801443672
NO. WE DO NOT AND WILL NEVER LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY OF MOB RULE
1) We live in a Republic under Rule of Law, and Rule of Law under the Natural Law, where we democratically elect representatives. We do not live in a democracy. Democracies always fail for the same reason: Power, Status, and Attention seeking (you and yours), and irresponsibility and incompetence (people who vote for you) create dependency which sponsors corruption and tyranny that brings nations to their end.
2) If you try to further destroy The Republic, the Rule of Law, Rule of Law by the Natural Law (tort by Sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, excellence, truth), decided by the common law (commonality across classes and regions), and legislated by demand for concurrency (across classes and regions), in the defense of minority rights (those who demonstrate ability and responsibility for the self, family, business, and commons) or undermine their purpose in preserving our individual sovereignty in demonstrated interests (defense from those like you), then there are enough of us to easily bring this government down by force, reconstitute it with amendments, and legislation, and to restore those rights, obligations, inalienations, and prevent you and those like you from destroying the reason for the radical success of the west versus the rest: “the institutionalization in all walks of life of individual responsibility for personal private and common.” This alone is what makes high trust european civilization and it’s unique production of commons possible.
And if we must replace this government, then we must do so such that no one again dares what you have dared for ten thousand years.
I founded The Natural Law Institute for the purpose of protecting our people and our civilization and by externality mankind from the cancer of your petty, power-seeking, ignorance and arrogance.
And I am but one man among millions who would gladly face the noose rather than suffer the consequences of ignorant, arrogant, well meaning fools.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @JoeBiden
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-30 00:12:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818077275348189184
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818048146238230704
Never happen. Need a constitutional convention or an amendment to pull it off. The president and congress cannot command the court.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-29 21:44:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818040001810382895
Reply addressees: @kylegriffin1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817866427128303959