Gonna happen. has to. if we had brought russia into nato after 92 we’d be ok. but with france fucking up europe, germans free riding, the poles not wanting to rise, and russia having to fight for her survival it’s fragmented.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-03 16:14:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1400486038569684995
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1400484787098374145
ENDING THE MONOPOLY GOVERNMENT
“European history over the last thousand years has been the almost steady growth of public authority and the public services. ” – via Quigley
“What are your thoughts on Robert Nisbet’s angle on the cause of that growth. Namely, that the growth of the western state is largely the result of an absorption of the functions previously specialized-in by associations such as the family, militia, church, etc.” – contrafabian
1) These are subtle differences in understanding as generations pass and we learn more.
2) The more scientific presentation is not ‘community’ but ‘commons’ since it is commons we seek to produce – and that other people can’t produce equally as well. I use ‘commons’.
3) I agree that the absorption of functions into the state violates trifunctionalism and violates the traditional success of western civ by creating a monopoly rather than competing institutions specifically serving the classes.
4) I would criticize the failure of the church’s function of indoctrination, education, family, and insurer system because of the failure of the church to reform in the 1800’s, and the terrible crime of incorporating that sequence into the state has weakened our civilization.
5) My work restores the competition between elites and classes and eliminates the monopoly, leaving the state as a) Monarchy, Military, Judiciary, Sheriffs and Militia, b) the Interior, Treasury, and Congress, and c) the ‘church’ secular or not as the institution of the family.
6) This would provide three tax-raising agencies: one for necessary services (military, judiciary, police, militia); one for commercial commons production (govt); one for education and family (church, education, health, retirement) competing for revenue.
7) Combined with economic voting, prohibition on unions in those industries, and an obligation to serve in militia, interior(commons), or church-hospital, we might be able to restore individual responsibility and accountability.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-30 20:52:26 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106326127192091702
What’s not complex is (a) yes they are conquering an ancestral homeland that the European’s ancestors displaced them from for their resistance movement against Roman law. that was the real reason. Roman law. (b) The Israelites are a superior people, with an advanced civilization, displacing an inferior people. (c) Islam has been at war with the rest of the world for 1400 years and has destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world it could reach. (d) We could not let communism spread to the middle east and into the oil regions during the cold war and so Israel functioned as our primary military base in the region – it would have undermined our ability to ‘bribe’ the rest of the world by access to our markets. (e) we are still stuck with a vast number of primitive backward people who are a threat to mankind. So no, it’s not a problem of equals. It’s a problem of paying various costs like Israeli expansion and warfare while we wait to see if the Muslims can reform or if we will have to join China and Now India to contain Islam as we contained communism, should have contained Christianity, judaism, and islam in the past. (f) the author is relying on Jewish relativism which is the source of the problem in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam – no man doesn’t have intrinsic value. We are either helping one another evolve, or causing one another to devolve, and the Abrahamic faiths, their method of moral sophistry, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience, culminating in the Muslim world has been a cancer for mankind for 1400 years. So no. It’s not complex. It’s just an unpopular purely empirical truth.
What’s not complex is (a) yes they are conquering an ancestral homeland that the European’s ancestors displaced them from for their resistance movement against Roman law. that was the real reason. Roman law. (b) The Israelites are a superior people, with an advanced civilization, displacing an inferior people. (c) Islam has been at war with the rest of the world for 1400 years and has destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world it could reach. (d) We could not let communism spread to the middle east and into the oil regions during the cold war and so Israel functioned as our primary military base in the region – it would have undermined our ability to ‘bribe’ the rest of the world by access to our markets. (e) we are still stuck with a vast number of primitive backward people who are a threat to mankind. So no, it’s not a problem of equals. It’s a problem of paying various costs like Israeli expansion and warfare while we wait to see if the Muslims can reform or if we will have to join China and Now India to contain Islam as we contained communism, should have contained Christianity, judaism, and islam in the past. (f) the author is relying on Jewish relativism which is the source of the problem in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam – no man doesn’t have intrinsic value. We are either helping one another evolve, or causing one another to devolve, and the Abrahamic faiths, their method of moral sophistry, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience, culminating in the Muslim world has been a cancer for mankind for 1400 years. So no. It’s not complex. It’s just an unpopular purely empirical truth.
RT @curtdoolittle: @bot3685 It means we are slaves, pets, subjects.
Our ancestors had it right. We have opponents on our route to godhoo…
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-28 02:43:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1398107579088347146
It means we are slaves, pets, subjects.
Our ancestors had it right. We have opponents on our route to godhood and they are the anvil upon which we are forged.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-28 02:33:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1398104998068817924
Reply addressees: @bot3685
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1398104443678183426
The LDS and Amish reproductive arguments are true but constitute are a repetition of the same fallacy of the libertarians: they require a host state or empire to provide the (masculine political) commons that their (feminine familial) social order cannot.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-26 16:24:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1397589416240103437
Reply addressees: @blamblamtheman @sergei_ivan @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1397573221738852353
1) Definition of sovereignty: Sovereignty in demonstrated interests. This is an empirical definition that’s impossible to contradict.
2) Reciprocal insurance of sovereignty in demonstrated interests is likewise.
3) So, define ‘aligns with energetic liberation’ mean.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-25 17:13:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1397239419149639685
Reply addressees: @earthevolution3 @Lord__Sousa @ThruTheHayes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1397238228202270722
If you can make the argument, do it. Don’t virtue and dominance signal by throwing sh-t at the wall in the pretense that it’ll stick. At worst, Sousa is leaving out ‘reciprocal insurance’, and the position of ‘the law’ as means of decidability might change depending on emphasis.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-25 17:06:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1397237545243660289
Reply addressees: @earthevolution3 @Lord__Sousa @ThruTheHayes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1397234553924751367
RT @Lord__Sousa: Selfdetermination forces sovereignty,
Sovereignty forces reciprocity,
Reciprocity forces law,
Law forces markets,
Mark…
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-25 15:34:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1397214497140523012