Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • We are supposed to love women and care for them. We are not supposed to debate w

    We are supposed to love women and care for them. We are not supposed to debate with them over true or false. Only whether a want is possible for the two of us, or impossible for the two of us. Our education, commerce, and politics places too much emphasis on true or false or good or bad, and too little upon possible and impossible. Women are precious creatures if they are honest. There is no reason we must worry about good and true. Only possible and harmful. It does not matter if what they want is good or true, only whether it is possible and not harmful. We are happy to ask women not to ask us to think as women. But we too infrequently fail to reciprocate by not asking women to think as men. Women nest at home, seek signal status with their peers, and try to overload their children, and none of these three impulses have any limit other than her exhaustion. An exhaustion which she will transfer to you. So do not ask woment to be men and think of limits and efficiency. Just love them, and do what is possible. The suffering occurs when we engage in transfers and not exchanges. and the enemy of exchanges is lethargy caused by lack of fitness, and lack of will.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 09:46:00 UTC

  • Contradiction is not a problem for women or liberals. Because correspondence wit

    Contradiction is not a problem for women or liberals.

    Because correspondence with reality is not necessary for women or liberals.

    Because truth is not necessary for women or liberals.

    Because the purpose of liberal verbalism is to lie, cheat, and steal.

    Because they are seeking to avoid trades, and impose rents.

    The Left is a Kleptocracy, and the Right a Meritocracy.

    There is nothing more to be said.

    Liberals and Women just ‘want’.

    We’re the ones who limit their wants to what is not harmful.

    Otherwise there is no end to their wants.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-18 09:28:00 UTC

  • Is Male Bonding The Source Of Civilization?

    (hmmm… well, lets do a propertarian analysis of that question)—“How do you feel about mannerbunds?”—Harrison Baker

    Well you know, I tend to stay away from silly terminology and instead make operationally testable statements. men evolved to work in groups of brothers to herd women, hold territory, and kill competitors and take their stuff. this requires both cooperation: shared risk, and loyalty: elimination of defectors and parasites, and a division of spoils preserving both cooperation, loyalty, and the punishment of defectors and cheats. civilization is the result of teh accumulated knowledge and institutions that allow us to scale this system to ever larger and ever more competitive circumstances. in this sense, yes, the bond between men that we traditionally call the ‘intitiatic brotherhood of soldiers’ is in fact, the source of what we call ‘civilization’: cooperation at very large scales. But we could just as likely say that it’s the need for men to bind to herd women and hold territory and develop institutions that is the source of civilization. or we could say that it is man’s reaction to the untrustworthiness of women that is the origin of civilization since all we do is invent better farms in which to herd our women at lower cost to us. Or we could say that women are untrustworthy in order to force us to build good farms (nests) for them in which they can nest. And that it is women’s untrustworthiness that forces us to cooperate and create nesting areas for them. Roll that little model around in your head for a while? 😉 Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Is Male Bonding The Source Of Civilization?

    (hmmm… well, lets do a propertarian analysis of that question)—“How do you feel about mannerbunds?”—Harrison Baker

    Well you know, I tend to stay away from silly terminology and instead make operationally testable statements. men evolved to work in groups of brothers to herd women, hold territory, and kill competitors and take their stuff. this requires both cooperation: shared risk, and loyalty: elimination of defectors and parasites, and a division of spoils preserving both cooperation, loyalty, and the punishment of defectors and cheats. civilization is the result of teh accumulated knowledge and institutions that allow us to scale this system to ever larger and ever more competitive circumstances. in this sense, yes, the bond between men that we traditionally call the ‘intitiatic brotherhood of soldiers’ is in fact, the source of what we call ‘civilization’: cooperation at very large scales. But we could just as likely say that it’s the need for men to bind to herd women and hold territory and develop institutions that is the source of civilization. or we could say that it is man’s reaction to the untrustworthiness of women that is the origin of civilization since all we do is invent better farms in which to herd our women at lower cost to us. Or we could say that women are untrustworthy in order to force us to build good farms (nests) for them in which they can nest. And that it is women’s untrustworthiness that forces us to cooperate and create nesting areas for them. Roll that little model around in your head for a while? 😉 Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Definitions: Domestication vs Infantilization

    DOMESTICATION: The use of institutions to delay and reduce sexual maturity through intergenerational selection. (the reduction of impulsivity – largely through the reduction of testosterone and estrogen.) –vs– INFANTILIZATION: The use of information to delay and reduce cognitive ability – largely through the distribution of disinformation.

    Today’s youth have been infantilized, and too many are from undomesticated reproductive lines. A spartan is domesticated but the opposite of infantilized.

  • Definitions: Domestication vs Infantilization

    DOMESTICATION: The use of institutions to delay and reduce sexual maturity through intergenerational selection. (the reduction of impulsivity – largely through the reduction of testosterone and estrogen.) –vs– INFANTILIZATION: The use of information to delay and reduce cognitive ability – largely through the distribution of disinformation.

    Today’s youth have been infantilized, and too many are from undomesticated reproductive lines. A spartan is domesticated but the opposite of infantilized.

  • “Curt: Can you clarify the difference between infantilization and domestication?

    —“Curt: Can you clarify the difference between infantilization and domestication?”— Murray Sell

    Sure,

    DOMESTICATION: The use of institutions to delay and reduce sexual maturity through intergenerational selection. (the reduction of impulsivity – largely through the reduction of testosterone and estrogen.)

    –vs–

    INFANTILIZATION: The use of information to delay and reduce cognitive ability – largely through the distribution of disinformation.

    Today’s youth have been infantilized, and too many are from undomesticated reproductive lines.

    A spartan is domesticated but the opposite of infantilized.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 11:10:00 UTC

  • IS MALE BONDING THE SOURCE OF CIVILIZATION? (hmmm… well, lets do a propertaria

    IS MALE BONDING THE SOURCE OF CIVILIZATION?

    (hmmm… well, lets do a propertarian analysis of that question)

    —“How do you feel about mannerbunds?”—Harrison Baker

    Well you know, I tend to stay away from silly terminology and instead make operationally testable statements.

    men evolved to work in groups of brothers to herd women, hold territory, and kill competitors and take their stuff.

    this requires both cooperation: shared risk, and loyalty: elimination of defectors and parasites, and a division of spoils preserving both cooperation, loyalty, and the punishment of defectors and cheats.

    civilization is the result of teh accumulated knowledge and institutions that allow us to scale this system to ever larger and ever more competitive circumstances.

    in this sense, yes, the bond between men that we traditionally call the ‘intitiatic brotherhood of soldiers’ is in fact the source of what we call ‘civilization;: cooperation at very large scales.

    But we could just as likely say that it’s the need for men to bind to herd women and hold territory and develop institutions that is the source of civilization.

    or we could say that it is man’s reaction to the untrustworthiness of women that is the origin of civilization since all we do is invent better farms in which to herd our women at lower cost to us.

    Or we could say that women are untrustworthy in order to force us to build good farms (nests) for them in which they can nest. And that it is women’s untrustworthiness that forces us to cooperate and create nesting areas for them.

    Roll that little model around in your head for a while? 😉

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 10:19:00 UTC

  • Politics is a proxy for violence between men. A market for trades to avoid viole

    Politics is a proxy for violence between men. A market for trades to avoid violence. Women have permission to use this proxy -within limits.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 18:41:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798596724533161988

  • Politics is a proxy for violence between men. A market for trades to avoid viole

    Politics is a proxy for violence between men. A market for trades to avoid violence. Women have permission to use this proxy -within limits.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 13:41:00 UTC