Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • Someone the other day said that women never admit they’re wrong, or that they’ve

    Someone the other day said that women never admit they’re wrong, or that they’ve screwed up. And that’s been bothering me, because I didn’t realize that I subconsciously recognize that when I’m dealing with a woman, that unless she’s asking me a question, she will never admit anything. And so I just don’t work that hard and dismiss her.

    This is not true of all women, but it’s true of the kind of woman that can’t exit her solipsism (emotionalism) and rationally determine the truth or falsehood of an argument independent of her feelings about it.

    it must be very hard for women to manage their emotions. I can only for a millisecond a few times a year imagine what it is like to think like a woman and it terrifies me. I would feel totally out of control.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 20:55:00 UTC

  • WHO INVENTED PATRIARCHY? —“The [female] archaeologist Marija Gimbutas found th

    WHO INVENTED PATRIARCHY?

    —“The [female] archaeologist Marija Gimbutas found that the early agricultural cultures of Old Europe in the Aegean, Balkans and southern Italy gender relations were remarkably egalitarian. She suggests that it was the result of waves of kurgan building invaders from the Ukrainian steppes that changed these gender relationships and instituted male hierarchies that led to the rise of patriarchy.[20]”—

    in other words, the “Yamna”, the ‘Aryans’, The Europeans, (us) invented it. And with it we conquered the entire world.

    So please stop giving religion credit for anything other than imposing ignorance on our people. Greece was brilliant, Rome was practical, and the church imposed abrahamism, and between the church and the muslims we had the second great dark age in recorded history.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 20:48:00 UTC

  • “THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A GENETIC MIDDLE CLASS” –An Idiot Apparently (a) you

    —“THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A GENETIC MIDDLE CLASS” –An Idiot

    Apparently (a) you don’t read much about genetics (b) don’t know much about the relationship between IQ and occupations, (c) don’t know much about economic history. (d) certainly don’t know much about bipartite manorialism, or the hajnal line, and the relationship between crops and family structure and inheritance patterns. (e) and haven’t read ‘the Son Also Rises’ nor the research it was based upon.

    Try not to be stupid in my presence. My time is really valuable. And while I’m generous with it, I take exception to having it wasted.

    There are people who are deserving all the time.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 20:03:00 UTC

  • ABRAHAMIC ARGUMENTS ARE ALL FEMINIST. Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Cosmopolitan(Je

    ABRAHAMIC ARGUMENTS ARE ALL FEMINIST.

    Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Cosmopolitan(Jewish), and Postmodern (French).

    The weaponization of the female strategy of undermining alphas through shaming, gossip, lying and rallying large numbers of the inferior and the weak, so that capital is not concentrated in the best for the purposes of evolutionary transcendence, but distributed to those lacking merit for the purpose of evolutionary regression.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 17:49:00 UTC

  • USE THE PEJORATIVE “ABRAHAMISM”: THE FEMALE STRATEGY That’s why I tell people to

    USE THE PEJORATIVE “ABRAHAMISM”: THE FEMALE STRATEGY

    That’s why I tell people to use the pejorative ‘Abrahamism’ so that we can take down lying no matter what sect makes use of it. they’re all liars. They cannot hide behind our defense of christianity any longer, if we no longer defend the church, only natural law which predates the church.

    Abrahamism: the use of the feminine reproductive strategy, (r-selection) and the use of feminine means of argument: gossip and deceit.

    Abrahamism is the only successful method of rebelling against aristocracy whether a peerage of markets by europeans, or a monolithic bureaucracy by the chinese.

    THe hindus aryanized aristocracy with castes. The buddhists tried, but could only invent buddhism not Stoicism. The chinese developed reason and bureaucracy and command. The west developed reason, and science and law, and markets in everything, and because of that we could develop Stoicism.

    But in 3500 years of dragging humanity out of ignorance and poverty, we and the chinese have only encountered one successful strategy: the weaponization of the female strategy of gossip, deceit, henpecking, and parasitism, and the weaponization of reproduction without merit of one’s offspring: dysgenia. r-selection.

    All of history can be reduced to the invention of Aristocracy, the domestication of primitive peoples, and the successful rebellion by the semitic underclass’s use of the weaponization of the female reproductive strategy, just as women rally against and undermine alphas.

    That’s all of the history of civilization right there. It’s that simple.

    Evolution by K. Devolution by R.

    The female was the first animal we tamed, and we didn’t do a good enough job.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 17:46:00 UTC

  • ARGUMENT WITH A SOLIPSIST (NON-RATIONAL FEMALE): ITS GENETICS Kathy. Why do you

    ARGUMENT WITH A SOLIPSIST (NON-RATIONAL FEMALE): ITS GENETICS

    Kathy.

    Why do you hold an opinion if you don’t even know the most trivial statistical descriptions of the economy? Except for Luxembourg the whole world is worse off. The difference is that the USA (as DESIGNED) is better for middle class people, and europe is better for working class people, and the global elite are not affected by policy, and the underclass is genetically inferior and unwanted and a drag on everyone else’s attempt to get INTO economic security.

    You can’t have both. Attempts to increase the security of the underclasses and increase the power of the political and underclasses, will merely reduce america to european levels of disposable income (much poorer), and our poor to their levels of poverty. Why? Because we have heavier underclass burdens. The europeans are just now experiencing the problems that we have had since ending slavery: genes matter. Why? whether yuo like it or not the overall wealth of your people is dependent upon the size of the underclass, and northern europe was just more effective at killing off the underclass through manorialism, hanging 1% per year, plague, war, and winter starvation.

    With lower burdens the middle class expanded downward and northern europeans were, by the early modern era, nearly all members of the genetic middle class no matter what economic class.

    By importing those people into the states, and making use of fiat credit (fiat money) we were able to finance the conversion of middle class genetics to middle class income.

    This doesn’t work with people who are not capable of middle class performance because of their genetics.

    Deal with it. People were not ‘oppressed’. They were domesticated. And the reason chinese, jews, and northern europeans were more prosperous and built higher evolved societies, is simply because between cold weather, harsh farming, wars and plagues, and intolerance for crime, they killed off or exported their underclasses.

    yet now well intentioned fools, fond of pseudoscience, are trying to reverse the very means by which our prosperity – your luxury – has been made possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 16:37:00 UTC

  • Men are more dangerous, so less a threat to each other. Women are less dangerous

    Men are more dangerous, so less a threat to each other.

    Women are less dangerous, so a greater threat to each other.

    Women are vicious. Watch them. Vicious. Petty. Spiteful.

    Danger breeds honorable behavior.

    Lack of it breeds petty behavior.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-29 15:45:00 UTC

  • “Arranged marriages”– No. Arranged marriage is VERY BAD. Dysgenic as hell. Veto

    –“Arranged marriages”–

    No. Arranged marriage is VERY BAD. Dysgenic as hell.

    Veto by parent is EXCELLENT however.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-29 15:39:00 UTC

  • (humor) Woman: “No. Do it this way….” Man 1: “So you’re reminding me that I’m

    (humor)

    Woman: “No. Do it this way….”

    Man 1: “So you’re reminding me that I’m wrong again?”

    Man 2: “We’re always wrong. We’re men.”

    Man 1: “We’re always right when there are no women around.”

    (laughter)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-29 10:16:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-racist-to-have-a-skin-color-preference-when-dating-people/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=fadced23

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-28 18:06:00 UTC