Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • ERGO, THE MARKET IS NO LONGER IN OUR INTEREST AND WE SHOULD RETURN TO RULE AS OU

    ERGO, THE MARKET IS NO LONGER IN OUR INTEREST AND WE SHOULD RETURN TO RULE AS OUR MEANS OF PROFIT?

    —“Put (too) simply the only men who are good enough to get into university are men who are good at STEM. Women are good enough to get into non-STEM and STEM fields. Thus, among university students, women dominate in the non-STEM fields and men survive in the STEM fields. (The former is mathematically certain while the latter is true only given current absolute numbers of male students. If fewer men went to college, women would dominate both fields). I don’t know whether this story will hold up but one attractive feature, as a theory, is that it is consistent with the worrying exit from the labor market of men at the bottom.

    If we accept these results, the gender gap industry is focused on the wrong thing. The real gender gap is that men are having trouble competing everywhere except in STEM.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-12 12:22:00 UTC

  • Women’s minds, including emotions, evolved, and remain, attenuated for the purpo

    Women’s minds, including emotions, evolved, and remain, attenuated for the purposes of bearing and raising generations of children: when young, when fertile, when mother, when grandmother. But what does this mean? It means that upon appeal to intuition in matters interpersonal, social, and political, that women’s intuition supplies a bias – and men’s does not supply that bias. Why? Because men change physically, but women change not only physically but mentally in puberty – and that change continues throughout life: hyperattenuation. While female precociousness, verbality, attention seeking, manipulation, care-taking are present, the increase in psychological illness, and female dominance in psychological illness, is caused largely (a) this hyperattenuation, and (b) lack of mindfulness training that is typically provided by the child-caring, familial, tribal, and especially masculine limits placed on their behavior by the social condition. It’s quite evident from travelling the world that women act as demand-generators in social orders without which men would not compete for women’s attention, but would compete against men for women as property.

  • Women’s minds, including emotions, evolved, and remain, attenuated for the purpo

    Women’s minds, including emotions, evolved, and remain, attenuated for the purposes of bearing and raising generations of children: when young, when fertile, when mother, when grandmother. But what does this mean? It means that upon appeal to intuition in matters interpersonal, social, and political, that women’s intuition supplies a bias – and men’s does not supply that bias. Why? Because men change physically, but women change not only physically but mentally in puberty – and that change continues throughout life: hyperattenuation. While female precociousness, verbality, attention seeking, manipulation, care-taking are present, the increase in psychological illness, and female dominance in psychological illness, is caused largely (a) this hyperattenuation, and (b) lack of mindfulness training that is typically provided by the child-caring, familial, tribal, and especially masculine limits placed on their behavior by the social condition. It’s quite evident from travelling the world that women act as demand-generators in social orders without which men would not compete for women’s attention, but would compete against men for women as property.

  • Women’s minds, including emotions, evolved, and remain, attenuated for the purpo

    Women’s minds, including emotions, evolved, and remain, attenuated for the purposes of bearing and raising generations of children: when young, when fertile, when mother, when grandmother. But what does this mean? It means that upon appeal to intuition in matters interpersonal, social, and political, that women’s intuition supplies a bias – and men’s does not supply that bias. Why? Because men change physically, but women change not only physically but mentally in puberty – and that change continues throughout life: hyperattenuation. While female precociousness, verbality, attention seeking, manipulation, care-taking are present, the increase in psychological illness, and female dominance in psychological illness, is caused largely (a) this hyperattenuation, and (b) lack of mindfulness training that is typically provided by the child-caring, familial, tribal, and especially masculine limits placed on their behavior by the social condition. It’s quite evident from travelling the world that women act as demand-generators in social orders without which men would not compete for women’s attention, but would compete against men for women as property.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-11 06:48:00 UTC

  • I had a very ‘evil’ thought. You know, during our rise to the hunter gatherer ph

    I had a very ‘evil’ thought. You know, during our rise to the hunter gatherer phase, women were herded as domesticated animals. During our hunter gatherer phase, they seem to have been members of families. During our agrarian phase they were treated as property, slaves, or labor as often as not. During our industrial phase – given the advent of birth control – they have sought equality with men, but the majority end up as single mothers and men as serial sex partners providing extra income. So is what we are seeing now, men simply – as are women – following incentives. Because the obvious incentive is for the majority of men to vote themselves sustenance from the state and abandon all contribution and responsibility for family. And in effect, return to the more traditional tribal role of leaving women to do the vast majority of the work, and spending the rest of the time ‘hunting and fishing’ so to speak.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-31 17:12:00 UTC

  • While there are minor differences in verbal and spatial ability between the race

    While there are minor differences in verbal and spatial ability between the races and subraces at all levels, which appears to be due to degree of neotonic selection, and degree of selection for sexual dimorphism (in other words, very minor), the principle differences between the races and subraces are the scale of the underclasses, where underclasses are determined by IQ, Neoteny, Dimorphism, Symmetry (lower error).

    In other words, the europeans and east asians were under greater selection pressure for cooperation in harsh agrarian cycles, whereas the warmer climes were under greater selection pressure for early maturity against disease gradients, food availability gradients, and competitor gradients.

    So in that sense while it is true that europeans and east asians are more ‘advanced’ genetically no group is prohibited from achieving the very same rate of genetic development in just a few generations under soft eugneics (reduction of reproduction in the underclasses).

    This means basically that we have been reversing evolution for over a century and a half.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-28 16:36:00 UTC

  • Which gender is modernity good for? There is a reason asylums were largely full

    Which gender is modernity good for?

    There is a reason asylums were largely full of women, and prisons largely full of men. We demonstrate our anti-social behaviors differently.

    Unfortunately we’ve legalized female insanity, and over prosecuted male criminality.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-24 13:01:00 UTC

  • “I don’t care how big all your all c–ks are. Women are women and you still need

    —“I don’t care how big all your all c–ks are. Women are women and you still need us at the end of the day. So you can be smart about it or suffer. That’s Natural Law. LOL. There I said it.”— Megan K. Usui

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-22 20:50:00 UTC

  • So wait. Mother’s instinct is bad? Intelligence and conscientiousness are key pr

    So wait. Mother’s instinct is bad?

    Intelligence and conscientiousness are key predictors of all important life outcomes, such as socioeconomic success, marital status, health and longevity. It is unclear, however, if and to what extent lay people appreciate these dimensions of individual differences. Here, 142 mothers of 0–12 month old infants were asked to select from each of the Big Five personality traits the facets that they most liked their child to have. Afterwards, mothers rank-ordered the facets they had selected and ‘intelligence’ from most to least important for their child to have. Less than 10% of mothers rated intelligence and the conscientiousness facet as most important. By contrast, 51% rated the extraversion facet as most important, followed by 20% of mothers who favoured the agreeableness facet. Our results suggest that mothers preferred extraversion over intelligence and conscientiousness, despite their strong, empirically demonstrated predictive validity for important life outcomes.

    Keywords

    Big Five; Conscientiousness; Extraversion; Intelligence; Parenting; Personality

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886917304865

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-22 18:26:00 UTC

  • Rolf Degen (@DegenRolf): “Mothers want extraversion over conscientiousness or in

    https://t.co/rgkpJu0IN6Retweeted Rolf Degen (@DegenRolf):

    “Mothers want extraversion over conscientiousness or intelligence for their children.” https://t.co/rgkpJu0IN6 https://t.co/qcN1XMKeGI

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-22 18:24:00 UTC