Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • I love my people. And it’s pretty hard to Improve upon germanic and nordic men,

    I love my people. And it’s pretty hard to Improve upon germanic and nordic men, and our germanic and nordic woman can be beautiful. But damn. Slavic women are just so much better looking that it makes an upper middle class american suburb look like an animal farm. And yes, a LOT of it is weight. But, (a) while many of us from England were from the middle and upper middle genetic classes, the vast number of american immigrants were not. And while we were able to let loose the constrained human capital of lower middle and lower class europeans, the asymmetry of reproduction between the classes has been obvious.

    Civil life in New England is quite civil so to speak. It’s still a copy of Little England in many ways – save for the effeminate lack of confidence endemic to postwar brits. our men are still manly by british terms if not russian. Thanks to a working class.

    The cities are all wastelands.

    The working class male preserves masculinity because he must.

    The white collar effeminate male lacking military service civic responsibility and a brood of children is a threat to society.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-20 07:43:00 UTC

  • Was researching for reference to Dysgenia relative to the intertemporal division

    Was researching for reference to Dysgenia relative to the intertemporal division of reproductive labor, and selected the heading, “Genders” from the propertarian website main page, and here is what I got (linked below). My response was: “Well, okay.” Because I recall some extensive conversations (fb posts on your page) on dysgenia and IDRL couple years or so ago, which I must say is information too valuable and useful to lose. My next step might be to do a search on your fb page. But that’s not what I was aiming for. I’m seeking an official linkable reference source (ie an online page on this topic and containing the above information).

  • Was researching for reference to Dysgenia relative to the intertemporal division

    Was researching for reference to Dysgenia relative to the intertemporal division of reproductive labor, and selected the heading, “Genders” from the propertarian website main page, and here is what I got (linked below). My response was: “Well, okay.” Because I recall some extensive conversations (fb posts on your page) on dysgenia and IDRL couple years or so ago, which I must say is information too valuable and useful to lose. My next step might be to do a search on your fb page. But that’s not what I was aiming for. I’m seeking an official linkable reference source (ie an online page on this topic and containing the above information).

  • Conservative Vs Progressive? What Does It Mean?

    Eugenic/K/Aristocratic/Male/Concentrate Capital to produce competitive excellence in smaller numbers. — vs — Dysgenic/r/Socialist/Female/Distribute capital to produce numbers regardless of quality. This is the causal difference. I can find no conditions under which this parsimony fails to provide explanatory power.

  • Conservative Vs Progressive? What Does It Mean?

    Eugenic/K/Aristocratic/Male/Concentrate Capital to produce competitive excellence in smaller numbers. — vs — Dysgenic/r/Socialist/Female/Distribute capital to produce numbers regardless of quality. This is the causal difference. I can find no conditions under which this parsimony fails to provide explanatory power.

  • SLAVIC WOMEN, GERMAN WOMEN, BRITISH WOMEN, AMERICAN WOMEN… Women create demand

    SLAVIC WOMEN, GERMAN WOMEN, BRITISH WOMEN, AMERICAN WOMEN…

    Women create demand for affection.

    One of the reasons slavic women put so much emphasis on beauty is to compete with their past antagonists the germans. Why? they think German women are manly. To a large degree this is true. The english took the opposite position with the French. English women couldn’t compete with the french so they lionized puritan ‘drab’.

    Women conduct their own world wars. Men just don’t pay attention.

    It’s women that have destroyed western civilization.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-13 08:31:00 UTC

  • Slavic Women, German Women, British Women, American Women…

    Women create demand for affection. One of the reasons slavic women put so much emphasis on beauty is to compete with their past antagonists the germans. Why? they think German women are manly. To a large degree this is true. The english took the opposite position with the French. English women couldn’t compete with the french so they lionized puritan ‘drab’. Women conduct their own world wars. Men just don’t pay attention. It’s women that have destroyed western civilization.

  • Slavic Women, German Women, British Women, American Women…

    Women create demand for affection. One of the reasons slavic women put so much emphasis on beauty is to compete with their past antagonists the germans. Why? they think German women are manly. To a large degree this is true. The english took the opposite position with the French. English women couldn’t compete with the french so they lionized puritan ‘drab’. Women conduct their own world wars. Men just don’t pay attention. It’s women that have destroyed western civilization.

  • One of the mistakes our people make – or rather, the men among our people make,

    One of the mistakes our people make – or rather, the men among our people make, is in visualizing an ideal man rather than the various men required in a division of specialization in an army, hunting party, or production line. When we worked in armies (militias) we all knew this. When we work on sports teams we know this. When we hunt we know this. When we work under the influence of christianity, classical liberalism, liberalism, marxism, and postmodernism in the industrial and post industrial age – we consider ourselves individuals.

    All monopoly is bad. it’s intellectual laziness. We must only know the optimum role we can play on the team.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-11 10:25:00 UTC

  • One of the mistakes our people make – or rather, the men among our people make,

    One of the mistakes our people make – or rather, the men among our people make, is in visualizing an ideal man rather than the various men required in a division of specialization in an army, hunting party, or production line. When we worked in armies (militias) we all knew this. When we work on sports teams we know this. When we hunt we know this. When we work under the influence of christianity, classical liberalism, liberalism, marxism, and postmodernism in the industrial and post industrial age – we consider ourselves individuals. All monopoly is bad. it’s intellectual laziness. We must only know the optimum role we can play on the team.