Theme: Sex Differences

  • Women need to feel others, like men need to fire gaze. Same Need, Different Stim

    Women need to feel others, like men need to fire gaze. Same Need, Different Stimuli.
  • Women need to feel others, like men need to fire gaze. Same Need, Different Stim

    Women need to feel others, like men need to fire gaze. Same Need, Different Stimuli.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-02 12:09:00 UTC

  • Women need to feel others, like men need to fire gaze. Same Need, Different Stim

    Women need to feel others, like men need to fire gaze. Same Need, Different Stimuli.
  • My answer to Is it better for a woman to have an IQ of 140 or above and be avera

    My answer to Is it better for a woman to have an IQ of 140 or above and be average looking or less, or to have an e… https://www.quora.com/Is-it-better-for-a-woman-to-have-an-IQ-of-140-or-above-and-be-average-looking-or-less-or-to-have-an-exceptional-physical-beauty-that-defies-age-with-an-IQ-of-100/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=d4283e13


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 02:33:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968675547390840834

  • The Answer To The Restoration In A Nutshell

    When european women obtained their ‘freedom’ via the mechanical innovations of men, the ballot by the permission of men, and birth control by the scientific innovations of men, they put their efforts not into mechanical and scientific innovations, but to attack men, the church, and did so using the ballot and state. And when American women did so, likewise they did not seek achievement, but to attack – but lacking the church or the nobility they attacked men in general. They destroyed our boys, our schools, our families, and our government – and now western civilization, by the ballot, and their near monopoly on consumption. Men create nearly everything, but women consume nearly everything. Our experiments with democracy rather than rule of law of reciprocity and markets in everything, capitalism rather than rule of law of reciprocity, feminism instead of contractual relations under the rule of law of reciprocity, and free speech, rather than a market for law(reciprocity) order, goods, services, and information. THE ENLIGHTENMENTS We have seen four European enlightenments that have dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, disease, early death, and the deceptions of Priests and Tyrants. 1-Early Aryan/Seas – Truth @2000-1500bc. 2- Ancient Mediterranean Sea – Reason 600bc to 100ad, and 3-Late Medieval Atlantic Ocean – Empiricism, 1200ad to 1700ad, and 4-Truncated Germanic Scientific Enlightenment – science 1830-1940ad 5- The heavily-resisted information revolution. currently in progress. The First Aryan Enlightenment of truth was opposed by the creation of organized religion as a means of resisting the invention of aristocracy. The Second Aryan Enlightenment of reason was opposed by the creation of monotheistic and abrahamic deception. The Third Aryan Enlightenment produced weath that all groups sought to oppose by creating create pseudo moral narratives by which they could privatize those technological gains. The Fourth Aryan Enlightenment produced wealth that all groups sought political power by which they could privatize those technological gains. However, each of those opportunities for parasitic gains by various means of deception, were created by a single Aryan technology: Sovereignty which requires Rule of Law of Reciprocity > Empirical (operational) Truth > Jury and produces markets in everything as a result: association, cooperation, reproduction, production of goods services and information(markets), production of commons (govt as market), and king as judge of last resort. Western civilization can function only if it is homogenous and high trust. No other people have demonstrated an ability to produce such Civilizations of such creativity and innovation with exclusive reliance on markets governed by the limits of reciprocity that we call natural law. IN EACH ERA WE ARE TOO FORGIVING. Why? we do not limit markets to consumption of our most precious asset: our genes, and our civilization. In this sense, markets not limited to natural law are just as suicidal as any other form of hyperconsumption. THIS PROBLEM IS SOLVABLE By restoration of the single law of reciprocity that we call natural law, and the prohibition on the imposition of costs upon all forms of capital, including, genetic, cultural, and traditional. And most importantly, by extension of the demand for warranty of due diligence from goods and services, to speech (information). Free truthful speech is one thing. Free False Speech is not. And we now have the ability to determine whether speech is warrantied against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit. IN OTHER WORDS… we must restore Defamation, LIbel and slander, and we must extend defamation, libel and slander protections to Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Truth. That would allow us to prosecute Gossip, Rallying, Shaming – the tool used by women, the abrahamists, and the underclasses who are too incompetent to contribute to markets.
  • THE ANSWER TO THE RESTORATION IN A NUTSHELL When european women obtained their ‘

    THE ANSWER TO THE RESTORATION IN A NUTSHELL

    When european women obtained their ‘freedom’ via the mechanical innovations of men, the ballot by the permission of men, and birth control by the scientific innovations of men, they put their efforts not into mechanical and scientific innovations, but to attack men, the church, and did so using the ballot and state. And when American women did so, likewise they did not seek achievement, but to attack – but lacking the church or the nobility they attacked men in general.

    They destroyed our boys, our schools, our families, and our government – and now western civilization, by the ballot, and their near monopoly on consumption.

    Men create nearly everything, but women consume nearly everything.

    Our experiments with democracy rather than rule of law of reciprocity and markets in everything, capitalism rather than rule of law of reciprocity, feminism instead of contractual relations under the rule of law of reciprocity, and free speech, rather than a market for law(reciprocity) order, goods, services, and information.

    THE ENLIGHTENMENTS

    We have seen four European enlightenments that have dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, disease, early death, and the deceptions of Priests and Tyrants.

    1-Early Aryan/Seas – Truth @2000-1500bc.

    2- Ancient Mediterranean Sea – Reason 600bc to 100ad, and

    3-Late Medieval Atlantic Ocean – Empiricism, 1200ad to 1700ad, and

    4-Truncated Germanic Scientific Enlightenment – science 1830-1940ad

    5- The heavily-resisted information revolution. currently in progress.

    The First Aryan Enlightenment of truth was opposed by the creation of organized religion as a means of resisting the invention of aristocracy.

    The Second Aryan Enlightenment of reason was opposed by the creation of monotheistic and abrahamic deception.

    The Third Aryan Enlightenment produced weath that all groups sought to oppose by creating create pseudo moral narratives by which they could privatize those technological gains.

    The Fourth Aryan Enlightenment produced wealth that all groups sought political power by which they could privatize those technological gains.

    However, each of those opportunities for parasitic gains by various means of deception, were created by a single Aryan technology: Sovereignty which requires Rule of Law of Reciprocity > Empirical (operational) Truth > Jury and produces markets in everything as a result: association, cooperation, reproduction, production of goods services and information(markets), production of commons (govt as market), and king as judge of last resort.

    Western civilization can function only if it is homogenous and high trust. No other people have demonstrated an ability to produce such Civilizations of such creativity and innovation with exclusive reliance on markets governed by the limits of reciprocity that we call natural law.

    IN EACH ERA WE ARE TOO FORGIVING.

    Why? we do not limit markets to consumption of our most precious asset: our genes, and our civilization.

    In this sense, markets not limited to natural law are just as suicidal as any other form of hyperconsumption.

    THIS PROBLEM IS SOLVABLE

    By restoration of the single law of reciprocity that we call natural law, and the prohibition on the imposition of costs upon all forms of capital, including, genetic, cultural, and traditional. And most importantly, by extension of the demand for warranty of due diligence from goods and services, to speech (information). Free truthful speech is one thing. Free False Speech is not. And we now have the ability to determine whether speech is warrantied against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit.

    IN OTHER WORDS…

    we must restore Defamation, LIbel and slander, and we must extend defamation, libel and slander protections to Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Truth. That would allow us to prosecute Gossip, Rallying, Shaming – the tool used by women, the abrahamists, and the underclasses who are too incompetent to contribute to markets.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-27 14:13:00 UTC

  • The Answer To The Restoration In A Nutshell

    When european women obtained their ‘freedom’ via the mechanical innovations of men, the ballot by the permission of men, and birth control by the scientific innovations of men, they put their efforts not into mechanical and scientific innovations, but to attack men, the church, and did so using the ballot and state. And when American women did so, likewise they did not seek achievement, but to attack – but lacking the church or the nobility they attacked men in general. They destroyed our boys, our schools, our families, and our government – and now western civilization, by the ballot, and their near monopoly on consumption. Men create nearly everything, but women consume nearly everything. Our experiments with democracy rather than rule of law of reciprocity and markets in everything, capitalism rather than rule of law of reciprocity, feminism instead of contractual relations under the rule of law of reciprocity, and free speech, rather than a market for law(reciprocity) order, goods, services, and information. THE ENLIGHTENMENTS We have seen four European enlightenments that have dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, disease, early death, and the deceptions of Priests and Tyrants. 1-Early Aryan/Seas – Truth @2000-1500bc. 2- Ancient Mediterranean Sea – Reason 600bc to 100ad, and 3-Late Medieval Atlantic Ocean – Empiricism, 1200ad to 1700ad, and 4-Truncated Germanic Scientific Enlightenment – science 1830-1940ad 5- The heavily-resisted information revolution. currently in progress. The First Aryan Enlightenment of truth was opposed by the creation of organized religion as a means of resisting the invention of aristocracy. The Second Aryan Enlightenment of reason was opposed by the creation of monotheistic and abrahamic deception. The Third Aryan Enlightenment produced weath that all groups sought to oppose by creating create pseudo moral narratives by which they could privatize those technological gains. The Fourth Aryan Enlightenment produced wealth that all groups sought political power by which they could privatize those technological gains. However, each of those opportunities for parasitic gains by various means of deception, were created by a single Aryan technology: Sovereignty which requires Rule of Law of Reciprocity > Empirical (operational) Truth > Jury and produces markets in everything as a result: association, cooperation, reproduction, production of goods services and information(markets), production of commons (govt as market), and king as judge of last resort. Western civilization can function only if it is homogenous and high trust. No other people have demonstrated an ability to produce such Civilizations of such creativity and innovation with exclusive reliance on markets governed by the limits of reciprocity that we call natural law. IN EACH ERA WE ARE TOO FORGIVING. Why? we do not limit markets to consumption of our most precious asset: our genes, and our civilization. In this sense, markets not limited to natural law are just as suicidal as any other form of hyperconsumption. THIS PROBLEM IS SOLVABLE By restoration of the single law of reciprocity that we call natural law, and the prohibition on the imposition of costs upon all forms of capital, including, genetic, cultural, and traditional. And most importantly, by extension of the demand for warranty of due diligence from goods and services, to speech (information). Free truthful speech is one thing. Free False Speech is not. And we now have the ability to determine whether speech is warrantied against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit. IN OTHER WORDS… we must restore Defamation, LIbel and slander, and we must extend defamation, libel and slander protections to Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Truth. That would allow us to prosecute Gossip, Rallying, Shaming – the tool used by women, the abrahamists, and the underclasses who are too incompetent to contribute to markets.
  • Is It Better For A Woman To Have An Iq Of 140 Or Above And Be Average Looking Or Less, Or To Have An Exceptional Physical Beauty That Defies Age With An Iq Of 100?

    It’s actually the wrong question. It is better to have fewer defects than to have extraordinary advantages.

    LOOSE STATISTICS

    • After a family makes 100K a year (50k each), they do not get happier with more income.
    • After an individual has an IQ above 105 they do not get happier with more.
    • After an individual has average looks (Sexual Market Value), they do not get happier with more –
    • The women who have the most children are 5′4″ tall, brunette, fit, have average intelligence, and ‘femininity’. (Because men will sacrifice more for them).
    • There is a 20% premium in income and happiness on ‘primping, preening, and fitness’. Dress well, primp and preen, stay fit.
    • Women have higher sexual market value when young that continually declines unless they develop what used to be called ‘grace’. Men have higher sexual market value if they age as long as they produce even a little income, remain fit, and practice good grooming. Unfortunately women have a much easier time fitting in to changes in social arrangements and men a much harder time adapting to changes in social arrangements. Unfortunately men absorb nearly all the cellular damage on behalf of women and children – and have shorter life spans because of it.
    • There is a significant correlation between avoiding debt and happiness. Do not chase virtue signals or conspicuous consumption signals. The only ‘unnecessary’ expense should be living where you’re around ‘better’ neighbors.
    • There is a significant correlation between high intelligence and unhappiness. Grouchy old smart people are not an illusion. They’re frustrated that the children are running with social, political, and economic scissors.
    • Happiness is generally the result of family, friendship, and organizational relationships.

    ie: if you are asking whether it’s going to make you happier or not, it is evidently far better to be at least average looking, stay fit, groomed, and dressed, have a balanced personality, and average intelligence, than it is to be exceptionally intelligent.

    But more importantly, the underlying answer is that it is better to have few disadvantages, than to have ay particularly advantage.

    (Women (unfortunately) compete with other women – and not with men. Everything they do is to increase or maintain their status with other women. This is why women generally destroy each other in organizations – through hen pecking (gossip). Why? Men only want to know their place in line. Women are always frustrated and petulant if they are not at the head of the line. This psychological quirk explains most of women’s behavior in private, public, and politics. Women poison wells with gossip. Everywhere in society. )

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-better-for-a-woman-to-have-an-IQ-of-140-or-above-and-be-average-looking-or-less-or-to-have-an-exceptional-physical-beauty-that-defies-age-with-an-IQ-of-100

  • Roughly, What Percentage Of Historical Humans Have Procreated?

    Historically, as a general rule of thumb, something on the order of a third of men and two thirds of women.

    With periods of punctuated equilibriums where a small number of men generate a vast number of offspring.

    https://www.quora.com/Roughly-what-percentage-of-historical-humans-have-procreated

  • Is It Better For A Woman To Have An Iq Of 140 Or Above And Be Average Looking Or Less, Or To Have An Exceptional Physical Beauty That Defies Age With An Iq Of 100?

    It’s actually the wrong question. It is better to have fewer defects than to have extraordinary advantages.

    LOOSE STATISTICS

    • After a family makes 100K a year (50k each), they do not get happier with more income.
    • After an individual has an IQ above 105 they do not get happier with more.
    • After an individual has average looks (Sexual Market Value), they do not get happier with more –
    • The women who have the most children are 5′4″ tall, brunette, fit, have average intelligence, and ‘femininity’. (Because men will sacrifice more for them).
    • There is a 20% premium in income and happiness on ‘primping, preening, and fitness’. Dress well, primp and preen, stay fit.
    • Women have higher sexual market value when young that continually declines unless they develop what used to be called ‘grace’. Men have higher sexual market value if they age as long as they produce even a little income, remain fit, and practice good grooming. Unfortunately women have a much easier time fitting in to changes in social arrangements and men a much harder time adapting to changes in social arrangements. Unfortunately men absorb nearly all the cellular damage on behalf of women and children – and have shorter life spans because of it.
    • There is a significant correlation between avoiding debt and happiness. Do not chase virtue signals or conspicuous consumption signals. The only ‘unnecessary’ expense should be living where you’re around ‘better’ neighbors.
    • There is a significant correlation between high intelligence and unhappiness. Grouchy old smart people are not an illusion. They’re frustrated that the children are running with social, political, and economic scissors.
    • Happiness is generally the result of family, friendship, and organizational relationships.

    ie: if you are asking whether it’s going to make you happier or not, it is evidently far better to be at least average looking, stay fit, groomed, and dressed, have a balanced personality, and average intelligence, than it is to be exceptionally intelligent.

    But more importantly, the underlying answer is that it is better to have few disadvantages, than to have ay particularly advantage.

    (Women (unfortunately) compete with other women – and not with men. Everything they do is to increase or maintain their status with other women. This is why women generally destroy each other in organizations – through hen pecking (gossip). Why? Men only want to know their place in line. Women are always frustrated and petulant if they are not at the head of the line. This psychological quirk explains most of women’s behavior in private, public, and politics. Women poison wells with gossip. Everywhere in society. )

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-better-for-a-woman-to-have-an-IQ-of-140-or-above-and-be-average-looking-or-less-or-to-have-an-exceptional-physical-beauty-that-defies-age-with-an-IQ-of-100