Theme: Sex Differences

  • *(It’s the opposite. guarantee financial insecurity if they don’t have replaceme

    *(It’s the opposite. guarantee financial insecurity if they don’t have replacement children – because that’s what they’re doing to everyone else by their selfishness. Men fight in war, take the dangerous jobs, bear more risk, push less costs onto society, absorb more cellular damage, specialize more but adapt to groups less, and die earlier. And what do women without children do except indulge in self gratification? πŸ˜‰ Attention seeking? Attention getting? After all, why do women want attention other than that evolution provided the incentive to maintain control over children (and other women, and especially men).)

    Reply addressees: @Womenrising2023 @AutistocratMS @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 00:15:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752485811860226048

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752483956136538410

  • (AFAIK, relative equality is irreversible, but the vast redistribution from men

    (AFAIK, relative equality is irreversible, but the vast redistribution from men to women will have to end. It was bad enough when we went from one propertied family with one vote, to one family regardless of responsibility one vote, to one person one vote. So I suspect continued collapse of marriage, economic democracy, and separate houses for men and women. That said, what I really expect is to see the conservative women continue to repproduce and the progressive (selfish) women continue not to, and the legislation will level out, because that reproductive shift is already happening. But this current circumstance can’t survive for long. The damage to society, poltics, economics, and long term redistribution is irreversible.

    Reply addressees: @Womenrising2023 @AutistocratMS @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 00:06:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752483499804700672

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752481828785496270

  • Not a fruitful line of discourse. Nor is idiosyncratic evidence. Women dumb down

    Not a fruitful line of discourse. Nor is idiosyncratic evidence. Women dumb down industries, and generally make them less competitive. This is not a universal but largely is. The net affect of women in HR alone has been catastrophic.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-30 21:46:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752448239612129586

    Reply addressees: @Womenrising2023 @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752447601666887965

  • they are so small in numbers they don’t matter. The world doesn’t need women in

    they are so small in numbers they don’t matter. The world doesn’t need women in those capacities. I won’t even go into the harm women contribute to every organization and every discipline of every kind. That research is just coming out but it’s been obvious since the eighties.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-30 21:42:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752447288973152529

    Reply addressees: @Womenrising2023 @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752446573756272907

  • I know the data., It doesn’t matter. (a) single mothers are harmful to the produ

    I know the data., It doesn’t matter.
    (a) single mothers are harmful to the production of functional and responsible adults, and in particular are the source of emasculated, self centered, underdeveloped, dysfunctional, mentally ill, troubled, and criminal children. Single fathers do not produce this outcome for two obvious sets of reasons I have covered elsewhere.
    (b) Single women vote against individual responsibiilty regardless of whether they have children or not, and even more so if they have that children – precisely becuase they do NOT have men as insurers.
    (c) You are trying to create a general rule from exception because childless women will very shortly represent the majority of women, and they lack the fertile years remaining to produce replacement offspring.

    Imagine men saying this: “I would like to be immune from military service, to be free of paying taxes other than those I would myself consume, and not be responsible for protecting other men and specifically women, so that I could live my life in relative comfort, peace, and luxury at almost no cost, because men are quite cheap to maintain because men do not need to nest, or hyperconsume, or seek consumption for status signals and attention.”

    There is no way out of this box.

    Reply addressees: @Womenrising2023 @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-30 21:41:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752446935120670720

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752444691142885533

  • “there are many women who live without men day in and day out and are happy, sat

    –“there are many women who live without men day in and day out and are happy, satisfied and content in every way.”–
    I understand. Yet, if you wish to retain the quality of life that makes possible that ‘irresponsibility for family formation’ then you will eventually (it’s happening right now) lose that quality of life not only in the present but at dramatic scale as you age into the future.

    So, yes, thanks to men, there is a shortage of incentive to form intergenerational families and bear the costs of high investment parenting instead of high consumption singlehood.

    Unfortunately by not forming families these same people guarrantee that they will NOT have social security or medical care in old age.

    IMO we would need to restore the relationship between old age income and the production of offspring by ending the disintermediation of the state’s insurance by forcing savings and then ensuring poverty and challenge in old age for the singles for not having replacement level children and rewarding those who pay the high cost of marriage family and the production of generations.

    So while I understand @WomenRising2023, and to some degree I wish I had remained single rather than lost multiple fortunes in divorce, I understand that unless someone bears the responsibility for replacement rate production there will be no ‘civilization’ and no ‘economy’ upon which we all depend.

    Not forming a family is the equivalent of stealing from every other family that does – at extraordinary scale.

    Unless of course, we end redistribution, end retirement, end retirement medical care, and force everyone to pay their way monetarily instead of through the production of offspring.

    I’ll never undrsetand why women seem unable to grasp the consequences of their actions, nor apologize for them when they error or harm, or ecen appreciate the free riding upon the men they do so through taxation. In effect the only net contributors to taxation are white men over 35. Everyone else is just a parasite upon those men.

    Yes, really.

    Families are like taxes.
    They’re more like military service.
    It doesn’t matter what you want.
    You produce them or you die in poverty.
    All we are doing today is spending down accumulated genetic capital made possible by the industrial revolution. And worse, the people who are not reproducing are not those that shouldn’t, and as such the IQ of the country and the world is in free fall. You cannot have an advanced society if this continues much longer.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Womenrising2023 @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-30 21:24:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752442659572948992

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752438170375868838

  • “Although the overall sex ratio for unmarried adults in the United States was ab

    –“Although the overall sex ratio for unmarried adults in the United States was about 90 men per 100 women, the 30-to-34 age group had the highest ratio at nearly 121 men to 100 women (in 2019).”–


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-30 20:42:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752432115126284379

  • “Although the overall sex ratio for unmarried adults in the United States was ab

    –“Although the overall sex ratio for unmarried adults in the United States was about 90 men per 100 women, the 30-to-34 age group had the highest ratio at nearly 121 men to 100 women (in 2019).”–


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-30 20:42:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752432115075940352

  • RT @Z3r0An0n: Alexey Kondrashov (Evolutionary geneticist) On the pessimistic out

    RT @Z3r0An0n: Alexey Kondrashov (Evolutionary geneticist) On the pessimistic out

    RT @Z3r0An0n: Alexey Kondrashov (Evolutionary geneticist)
    On the pessimistic outcome of dysgenics. https://t.co/i3U82fii7o


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-30 04:29:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752187303668469844

  • You’d be really, really, really wrong…. Christianity did provide a means of do

    You’d be really, really, really wrong….
    Christianity did provide a means of domesticating the feral underclasses and women given the vast superiority of european aristocratic civilization over the rest. But it came at the cost of teaching those domesticated animals how to lie…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-29 01:49:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751784696449495519

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751784243720552583