Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • “Males are required to make group judgements regardless of outliers. “— Greg H

    —“Males are required to make group judgements regardless of outliers. “— Greg Hamilton

    Women evolved to think of individual children’s (and women’s) needs, while men evolved to think of the tribe (family) survival.

    Division of production cycles, division of temporal perception, cognition, calculation, and advocacy.

    We are amazing together, but we are cognitive specialists. We need to understand what part of the production cycle we specialize in. The now, the soon, the later, and the future.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 15:41:00 UTC

  • “Women are devoted, and men are loyal. There’s a difference.”

    —“Women are devoted, and men are loyal. There’s a difference.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 15:14:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993509259613745153

  • UM, LET ME HELP YOU….. —“Just an opinion”— It is a fact that we can, using

    UM, LET ME HELP YOU…..

    —“Just an opinion”—

    It is a fact that we can, using the big 5/6 inventory, and breaking those dimensions into traits, measure the differences between the expressions of those genders, and this measurement has been done at vast scale over many years.

    These traits map to reward (endocrine) systems. Those endocrine systems map to stages of the prey and reproductive drives, since in evolutionary history that is the minimum necessary framework evolution was able to work with and extend into the full suite of properties of homo-sapiens-sapiens.

    As such, while I use Ordinary Language Terms, those terms are necessary to translate those differences in endocrine responses and therefore incentives, to a narrative set of comparisons that people can understand.

    In this case, men in fact do demonstrate loyalty and women far less, while men do not experience what women call devotion (the feeling they have toward children) on anywhere near the scale.

    I then translate these terms into economic language such that we see the equilibrial relation between male and female behavior.

    I do this so that I can explain to people in scientific terms what their intuitions mean, sot hat they know they are both genetically determined (80%) in utero/developmentally determined (20%) and not choice.

    Because they are not choice, that means we must not expect to CONVINCE each other. Instead the solution is not to achieve one solution or the other but to create exchanges where both get SOME or MOST of what they want (both personally and politically) even if none of us get ALL of what we want.

    Now because I just assume you are a decent person (it is my default presumption even if I must tolerate the occasional solipsism from the intuitions of women, and the occasional dominance expression from overconfident young men), I’m taking the time to explain this to you – even though you did not take the time to investigate me, or ask me how I came to such conclusions, or even construct a rational or scientific opposition, just an emotive one.

    But I cannot cover the subjects I do, which literally encompass the entirety of the human spectrum of knowledge and explain every statement in argumentative form.

    Instead, people tend to follow me for rather long periods, and I post a lot of aphorisms, contrasts (as do confucians, but closed), series, spectra, and grids as well as “SKETCHES” because if I wrote proofs for every idea I put forth (a) no one could comprehend them, and (b) I would cover 1/100000’th of the subjects that I do.

    OK?

    Thank you. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 12:54:00 UTC

  • Do you know what the cognitive bias called NAXALT is, and how you can identify t

    Do you know what the cognitive bias called NAXALT is, and how you can identify that a woman, or a male lacking a father is speaking by the use of this cognitive bias?

    Men cognitively perceive distributions and speak in distributions. Women fear distributions and speak in equality or indifferences.

    So you merely demonstrate the fact that we are different in cognitive function (which the science says anyway – men and women have different brain structures), just as we are in anti-social behavior, with men biasing toward physical crime and women biasing toward emotional and psychological crime (psychosis).

    So, no the statement is simply true. Which is one of the primary causes for the relative absence of women in powerful positions in high risk and competitive organizations, versus the relative dominance of women in parasitic monopolistic bureaucracies like the government and education.

    We are paid in no small part by our loyalty.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 12:13:00 UTC

  • “Women are devoted, and men are loyal. There’s a difference.”

    —“Women are devoted, and men are loyal. There’s a difference.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 11:13:00 UTC

  • women choose. women choose what they understand. women must learn to understand

    women choose. women choose what they understand. women must learn to understand what is good, not what is familiar.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 00:09:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993281579207229441

  • women choose. men must choose not to choose poorly from those that choose them

    women choose. men must choose not to choose poorly from those that choose them.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 00:01:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993279585247727617

  • women choose. women choose what they understand. women must learn to understand

    women choose. women choose what they understand. women must learn to understand what is good, not what is familiar.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-06 20:09:00 UTC

  • women choose. men must choose not to choose poorly from those that choose them

    women choose. men must choose not to choose poorly from those that choose them.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-06 20:01:00 UTC

  • Counter Signaling Naxalt: We Are Compatible Opposites

    —“…all women are different…”— A distinction without a difference. It is almost as impossible to have a scientific conversation with women about philosophy, economics, politics, and war as it is for a man to have a conversation about relationships, carrying a baby, nursing and how ‘beautiful and special’ her lower 80% munchkin is. Seriously. Even the fact that one would say such a thing is evidence – because that statement is an instance of NAXALT. It means you’re empirically blind: that there is no normal distribution and in particular that the vast majority are indifferent. I expect a woman to love me, care for me, and try to make me better and happier than I am. And women are in general, if you are worth having as a mate, pretty good at it – and often even if you aren’t worth having as a mate. The best relationship for a man to have with a woman is where you listen to her, fulfill her wants and needs, try to help her be all she can be, listen to her insights into people she has spoken to, cherish each other and the time together, but never take her opinions beyond those wants, needs, relationships, and your relationship more seriously than you do the impulsive fascinations of your golden retriever has with disgusting smells. Just as all but a minority of men are empathically blind, all but a minority of women are morally blind. They have to be. Or they would never bear and raise children – 80% of which are of necessity in the bottom 80%. Female puberty produces marginal insanity for good reason. You’d have to be insane to care for babies, toddlers, and dependent children. Female marginal insanity is an evolutionary adaptation necessary for our survival. The fact that this was common knowledge in all cultures until the Victorians tried to corral the newly liberated lower classes, advertisers found women spent 70% of world income, and feminists tried to take power from white men, is merely a blip in the stream of history. I love women but I know I am blind to the things women are not, just as I know women are blind deaf and dumb to anything they cannot feel. And I hate that I even have to write about such things, because it’s the lies that these things are not both true and obvious that cause the difficulties in our relationships. (A simple experiment: Watch the View for a week and observe how women can make excuses to justify anything that will bring about consensus no matter how false, impossible, or outright stupid. It doesn’t matter the topic. Just watch the absurd excuses they will make to generate consensus on a status quo. )