Theme: Sex Differences

  • “That’s a [gender here] problem”

    Curious. Men both consciously and unconsciously demarcate their responsibilities an interests by “that’s a woman’s problem”. In other words, women are better suited, more interested, and more able to solve that category of problems. Do women do the same thing? Do women demarcate their responsibilities by saying “that’s a man’s problem”? If so, on what?

  • Women Conform to Whatever Power They Perceive

    The vast majority of Women try to reduce or eliminate social threats, so they conform to whatever power they perceive. It’s not rational from a male perspective because if there is an external threat women will rapidly and easily undermine the men (their host).

  • Women Conform to Whatever Power They Perceive

    The vast majority of Women try to reduce or eliminate social threats, so they conform to whatever power they perceive. It’s not rational from a male perspective because if there is an external threat women will rapidly and easily undermine the men (their host).

  • The Other Unnamed Gender-Specific Cognitive Bias

    (response) How long have you been following me? Because if you don’t know when and why I use the imperative form, it cant be long. I don’t have a name for your particular form of “disapproval by shaming” – as distinct from an appropriate argument against falsehood – but it is strangely a behavior as gender-specific as NAXALT. I should name it. Agency requires we can separate the preferable, from the good, from the true. And address each accordingly as a personal preference, shared preference, or truth independent of preference or good. Whatever we call it, it’s one of the gender-specific cognitive biases that conflates preference, good, and truth, such that there is no distinction between the preferable, the presumption of knowledge of the good and the disregard for the true. Using this form of disapproval means one lacks Agency. It means that one is not fully human, but still a mammal lacking reason, but able to speak – even if not sensibly.

  • The Other Unnamed Gender-Specific Cognitive Bias

    (response) How long have you been following me? Because if you don’t know when and why I use the imperative form, it cant be long. I don’t have a name for your particular form of “disapproval by shaming” – as distinct from an appropriate argument against falsehood – but it is strangely a behavior as gender-specific as NAXALT. I should name it. Agency requires we can separate the preferable, from the good, from the true. And address each accordingly as a personal preference, shared preference, or truth independent of preference or good. Whatever we call it, it’s one of the gender-specific cognitive biases that conflates preference, good, and truth, such that there is no distinction between the preferable, the presumption of knowledge of the good and the disregard for the true. Using this form of disapproval means one lacks Agency. It means that one is not fully human, but still a mammal lacking reason, but able to speak – even if not sensibly.

  • We Are Men. We Form Packs. We Hunt. when We Discover a New Technique We Converge on It.

    Criticizing a sacred cow? Hit a value-nerve? eh? We are all working to define a path to a future for our people and that process is exhaustive and fractally fragmented. Once we exhaust the search we will coalesce on what survives as a possibility. Men are not women. We specialize into small packs. The packs that mailnvest will disappear. Those that do not will converge. As always. Abandon equality and homogeneity – they are women’s work. Understand that we are men. We specialize. We form packs. We hunt. We innovate. We imitate, and we improve – and little by little we become the gods we desire to be. Man is glorious.
    May 09, 2018 9:08pm
  • We Are Men. We Form Packs. We Hunt. when We Discover a New Technique We Converge on It.

    Criticizing a sacred cow? Hit a value-nerve? eh? We are all working to define a path to a future for our people and that process is exhaustive and fractally fragmented. Once we exhaust the search we will coalesce on what survives as a possibility. Men are not women. We specialize into small packs. The packs that mailnvest will disappear. Those that do not will converge. As always. Abandon equality and homogeneity – they are women’s work. Understand that we are men. We specialize. We form packs. We hunt. We innovate. We imitate, and we improve – and little by little we become the gods we desire to be. Man is glorious.
    May 09, 2018 9:08pm
  • I wonder…. let’s say military service of six years, ownership of real property

    I wonder…. let’s say military service of six years, ownership of real property, and a wife are required for male suffrage, and three children, a husband, and real property are required for female suffrage. With suffrage comes a substantial discount in fees (taxation), and a substantial increase in insurance (retirement insurance), and that all such insurance accounts are in the singapore model as retirement savings accounts. There is no community property. Children are women’s property until onset of puberty, then males are men’s property until maturity. A family (corporation) insures society against the behavior of their offspring until they also have families. Schools are only until working age (12/puberty), and after that apprenticeships combined with related classes, for two hours a day.

    This basically institutionalizes the late medieval upper middle class model.

    What happens?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-09 10:03:00 UTC

  • Curious. Men both consciously and unconsciously demarcate their responsibilities

    Curious.

    Men both consciously and unconsciously demarcate their responsibilities an interests by “that’s a woman’s problem”. In other words, women are better suited, more interested, and more able to solve that category of problems.

    Do women do the same thing? Do women demarcate their responsibilities by saying “that’s a man’s problem”?

    If so, on what?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-09 09:56:00 UTC

  • Well, moral LAW is objective (Logical and Scientific), moral NORMS are evolved,

    Well, moral LAW is objective (Logical and Scientific), moral NORMS are evolved, and moral PREFERENCES are expression of personal reproductive strategy. The problem is everyone assumes it works the other way ’round.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 22:16:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993978073547714561