Theme: Sex Differences

  • The locations and variation in male vs female is informative

    The locations and variation in male vs female is informative.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 15:17:00 UTC

  • MALE AND FEMALE LOYALTY BIAS = OUR MORAL BIAS —“Men marry and fall I love with

    MALE AND FEMALE LOYALTY BIAS = OUR MORAL BIAS

    —“Men marry and fall I love with a women with the belief that he will be the most important part of her life. This is the start of the destruction of so many marriages. Once the female has children her first loyalty becomes those children. The males loyalty still lay with the female. This creates a dangerous dynamic were the Male tries increasingly to become the females first priority to no avail.”— Eric Bumpus

    I’m going to state it pejoratively: men mistakenly marry a wife under the presumption of the same priority he was treated by his mother. Women marry a husband with the presumption that her children will be given the same priority by the man as she gives them.

    Both of these are false presumptions. Men are loyal to tribe, fellows, wife, and children. Women are loyal to children to the exclusion of all others.

    This reflects genetic differences in morality. Males and conservatives tend to value all six Moral Dimensions relatively equally. Women and liberals tend to value Harm/Care almost exclusively.

    The fallacy of equality is one of the greatest catastrophes since the invention of false gods, and marxist pseudoscience.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 14:42:00 UTC

  • ADAPTABILITY VS LOYALTY: ECONOMICS OF RELATIONS MALE……………………….

    ADAPTABILITY VS LOYALTY: ECONOMICS OF RELATIONS

    MALE…………………………..FEMALE

    Greater Loyalty and ………Greater Adaptability and

    Lower Adaptability ………..Lower Loyalty

    Evolution varied the same theme.

    We are compatible but we are neither identical nor equal.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 13:53:00 UTC

  • THE ADAPTABILITY OF WOMEN AND A LESSON FOR MEN The specialty of women is their a

    THE ADAPTABILITY OF WOMEN AND A LESSON FOR MEN

    The specialty of women is their ability to adapt to whatever local condition is necessary, whether it be her children, the women who she supports and is supported by, the micro polity she is constrained within, the macro polity she is constrained within – the polity consisting of the constraints of men. Men cannot do this – we specialize for fit into groups, and we lose our ability to adapt fairly quickly, and as such are at long term disadvantages under change of groups.

    The problem of women’s extraordinary adaptability is the illusion of agreement and shared understanding that they demonstrate when ‘adapting’ to a male.

    For example, it’s very common for a man (me included) to love his exe’s but understand their incompatible. Or even to cast a woman as crazy but still love her. But women very often un-adapt to men (my ex wife for example), and produce anything from dislike, to antagonistic anger, to absolute hatred of him.

    What men forget is that this is part of the seductive capability of a woman. And that their loyalty is to their children, and rarely to their husbands, and in those cases where there is loyalty it certainly appears to be reducible to social and economic security. Whereas for most men, loyalty is the most important emotion we feel, and govern our behavior by. (For evolutionary reasons it was necessary for group survival.)

    So all but a very few women have far less agency than we do. And because of that we are easily convinced that they are more compatible and loyal than we are. They are very different, they are less loyal, they possess lower agency, but they adapt extraordinarily. For this reason a woman is very different about every seven years of her life. While a man is fairly fixed in temperament by his late teens, and once he matures in his early to mid twenties, he will simply have more knowledge and less energy as the years pass.

    It is extremely important that you share core values and roles, because over time, sexual attraction, the social status of marriage, the financial benefit of a shared household, the economic utility of incomes.

    But you must never forget that in general she has less agency, and more adaptability, and less loyalty than you do.

    Love women. Help them nest. Increase their social status with her friends at every opportunity. Listen. Demonstrate understanding. Do not argue or reason with women about what is good or preferable. The only answer is yes we can, yes I can, yes I can but not until next year, no I can’t, no I won’t. Help her be the best she can be.

    Never let them nag you ever. It is a cancer that women evolved for the raising and training of children which must never be directed to a male. Never let them take you for granted. Never give them control of your income, only some agreed upon portion of it.

    The first time you see her give you a ‘disgust response’ in her facial expressions (including eye rolls) sell all the assets you can, separate the assets you can’t sell, and leave or divorce her. Once a woman has given you the disgust response it is only a matter of her planning her exit.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 13:15:00 UTC

  • PANDORA’S BOX OF DEMOCRACY There are always weak men. They are never sufficient

    PANDORA’S BOX OF DEMOCRACY

    There are always weak men. They are never sufficient in numbers, and easily shamed by the strong. There are however far too many weak women, and they will not be shamed by the strong, only doubling-down on their impulses. As such, opening Pandora’s Box by the inclusion of women into the process of political decisions, without expressly limiting the impulses of women, allowed for the combination of weak men, weak women, and those who would profit from enabling weak men and weak women – the inverse of those who traditionally carried the burden to shaming and policing weak men and weak women.

    A separate house for women would have done it.

    Limiting the vote to married households would have done it.

    Limiting the vote to married households with children and property would have done it best of all.

    But while as families we share common interests, as individuals we do not.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 11:38:00 UTC

  • “Conservatives are more orderly, and therefore less likely to mix anything up, i

    —“Conservatives are more orderly, and therefore less likely to mix anything up, including race, sexuality etc. Liberals are more open to experience, which is often correlated with high IQ, but it’s not the high IQ that makes them less prejudiced, it’s the lack of orderliness.”—Joel Harvey


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 08:30:00 UTC

  • Synthetic Female vs Analytic Male – Another Example

    —“The most common form of synesthesia is when people see or hear words in colour. The condition affects about 1 in 25 000 people and is found more commonly in women than men.”—FEMALE <-Psychotic <- Solipsistic < Feminine – Neutral – Masculine ->Aspie -> Autistic -> MALE (Female )Breadth Traversal vs Depth Traversal (Male) Think of the hierarchy of neurons as a database of sensory fragments and relations. And thought as the process of constantly iterating (recursive) searches, with experience and short term memory of that experience as our constantly changing result set.

  • Synthetic Female vs Analytic Male – Another Example

    —“The most common form of synesthesia is when people see or hear words in colour. The condition affects about 1 in 25 000 people and is found more commonly in women than men.”—FEMALE <-Psychotic <- Solipsistic < Feminine – Neutral – Masculine ->Aspie -> Autistic -> MALE (Female )Breadth Traversal vs Depth Traversal (Male) Think of the hierarchy of neurons as a database of sensory fragments and relations. And thought as the process of constantly iterating (recursive) searches, with experience and short term memory of that experience as our constantly changing result set.

  • 35 Years: Upper 5% Males > Females Math, Females > Males Verbal

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289617301241?via%3Dihub
    (Again, my argument is that (((they))) have reversed sexual dimorphism and this accounts for (((their))) performance in articulating nearly anything – at the cost of female cognitive biases.) —“Sex differences in cognitive ability level and cognitive ability pattern or tilt (e.g., math > verbal) have been linked to educational and occupational outcomes in STEM and other fields. The present study examines cognitive ability tilt across the last 35 years in 2,053,265 academically talented students in the U.S. (SAT, ACT, EXPLORE) and 7119 students in India (ASSET) who were in the top 5% of cognitive ability, populations that largely feed high level STEM and other occupations. Across all measures and samples, sex differences in ability tilt were uncovered, favoring males for math > verbal and favoring females for verbal > math. As ability tilt increased, sex differences in ability tilt appeared to increase. Additionally, sex differences in tilt increased as ability selectivity increased. Broadly, sex differences in ability tilt remained fairly stable over time, were consistent across most measures, and replicated across the U.S. and India. Such trends should be carefully monitored given their potential to impact future workforce trends.”—
  • 35 Years: Upper 5% Males > Females Math, Females > Males Verbal

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289617301241?via%3Dihub
    (Again, my argument is that (((they))) have reversed sexual dimorphism and this accounts for (((their))) performance in articulating nearly anything – at the cost of female cognitive biases.) —“Sex differences in cognitive ability level and cognitive ability pattern or tilt (e.g., math > verbal) have been linked to educational and occupational outcomes in STEM and other fields. The present study examines cognitive ability tilt across the last 35 years in 2,053,265 academically talented students in the U.S. (SAT, ACT, EXPLORE) and 7119 students in India (ASSET) who were in the top 5% of cognitive ability, populations that largely feed high level STEM and other occupations. Across all measures and samples, sex differences in ability tilt were uncovered, favoring males for math > verbal and favoring females for verbal > math. As ability tilt increased, sex differences in ability tilt appeared to increase. Additionally, sex differences in tilt increased as ability selectivity increased. Broadly, sex differences in ability tilt remained fairly stable over time, were consistent across most measures, and replicated across the U.S. and India. Such trends should be carefully monitored given their potential to impact future workforce trends.”—