Theme: Sex Differences

  • RT @datepsych: Another peek at some data from our recent survey: 1. Women who ar

    RT @datepsych: Another peek at some data from our recent survey:

    1. Women who are more feminist indicate that an emotional connection is l…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-19 00:35:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1759376228874609150

  • RT @NoahRevoy: Male and female brains are different. Higher testosterone during

    RT @NoahRevoy: Male and female brains are different.

    Higher testosterone during early brain development changes the males brain structure…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-18 20:47:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1759318783372496941

  • Good Summary of women’s left shift

    Good Summary of women’s left shift
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcISagkvBVQ


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-16 21:59:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758612063067296172

  • Not true. Just curiosity in different domains. Women are hyper-consumptive and i

    Not true. Just curiosity in different domains. Women are hyper-consumptive and it never stops. That is their source of curiosity. Men capitalize. Its harder.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-16 05:35:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758364522052538384

    Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758274772536836356

  • Sex differences in cognition and valuation. Signaling. Status. Self Image. … S

    Sex differences in cognition and valuation. Signaling. Status. Self Image. … Sexes have opposite incentives, intuitions, instincts.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-16 00:38:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758289643639095632

    Reply addressees: @RutRemy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758264236914978974

  • OVERTON WINDOW: IN THE ABSENCE OF UNIVERSAL FAMILY CONSTRUCTION WOMEN MOVE NATUR

    OVERTON WINDOW: IN THE ABSENCE OF UNIVERSAL FAMILY CONSTRUCTION WOMEN MOVE NATURALLY LEFT, MEN MOVE NATURALLY RIGHT
    You may note that everyone is getting on board now with my explanations either directly, indirectly, or by their own eventual discovery, that men are moving right (responsibility) and women are moving left (irresponsibility) and that without the reciprocal compromise of marriage, for reasons whether economic, emotional, sex, reproductive, and late-age-care, the incentive to behave as other than a hyperconsumer with minimum burdent of civic responsibility, that reproduction is crashing.

    Now I have a pretty good recipe for fixing it. But, how many people will give up crime in favor of productivity if they aren’t forced to, and how many people will give up hyperconsumption of the commons instead of production of commons if they aren’t forced to?

    The only reasons humans have to cooperate are (a) family production (b) commons production that produce discounts on family production, (c) polities that produce discounts on the commons production that in turn produce discounts on family production.

    If we do not put the family first, which will force the commons second, and the polity third, then we have no reason to cooperate at all other than to engage in the most massive tragedy of the commons since the fall of Rome.

    The pill, no fault divorce, elimination of ‘marrying the state’, intergenerational redistribution instead of mandatory savings, and dozens of other follies have led to one obvious lesson:

    There are four certainties in life: death, military service, taxes, and reproduction.

    Otherwise there is no polity, commons, family or .. individual.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:43:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758260864375730178

  • You may note that everyone is getting on board now with my explanations either d

    You may note that everyone is getting on board now with my explanations either directly, indirectly, or by their own eventual discovery, that men are moving right (responsibility) and women are moving left (irresponsibility) and that without the reciprocal compromise of marriage,…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:43:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758260475916091404

  • You may note that everyone is getting on board now with my explanations either d

    You may note that everyone is getting on board now with my explanations either directly, indirectly, or by their own eventual discovery, that men are moving right (responsibility) and women are moving left (irresponsibility) and that without the reciprocal compromise of marriage, for reasons whether economic, emotional, sex, reproductive, and late-age-care, the incentive to behave as other than a hyperconsumer with minimum burdent of civic responsibility, that reproduction is crashing.

    Now I have a pretty good recipe for fixing it. But, how many people will give up crime in favor of productivity if they aren’t forced to, and how many people will give up hyperconsumption of the commons instead of production of commons if they aren’t forced to?

    The only reasons humans have to cooperate are (a) family production (b) commons production that produce discounts on family production, (c) polities that produce discounts on the commons production that in turn produce discounts on family production.

    If we do not put the family first, which will force the commons second, and the polity third, then we have no reason to cooperate at all other than to engage in the most massive tragedy of the commons since the fall of Rome.

    The pill, no fault divorce, elimination of ‘marrying the state’, intergenerational redistribution instead of mandatory savings, and dozense of other follies have led to one obvious lesson:

    There are four certainties in life: death, military service, taxes, and reproduction.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-15 22:42:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758260475769376768

  • DOMINANCE OF JEWS IN USE OF WORDS? How much more do women talk than men? When wo

    DOMINANCE OF JEWS IN USE OF WORDS?
    How much more do women talk than men? When women talk is it about the experience of the moment or about the direction of the economy, society, polity? What is easier to talk about – the experiences of the moment, or the directions and potentials of the economy society and polity?
    What is the cognitive difference between the sexes: verbal facility instead of modeling facility, empathizing in time instead of systematizing over time, and evasion of responsibility for the commons due to risk instead of seeking responsibility for commons despite risks, and hyperconsumption at minimum cost as demonstration of reproductive demand instead of production of capital at minimum cost as demonstration of reproductive supply.
    If you radically increase female intelligence, maintain female antisocial aggression, and given such females access to (a) the control of resource allocation (finance), and (b) the industrialization of social construction of lying by seduction into the false promise of freedom from nature’s laws, you will deterministically produce jewish cultural and genetic behavior.
    That behavior is the polar opposite of the wester tradition of maximizing individual agency, competency, responsibility, merit and hierarchy by the production of capital that is a contribution to the commons that in turn reduces the costs of everything for all.
    Roughly speaking “All (ashkenazi) jews are cognitively female.”
    Once you understand this, you’ll grasp that some groups are as impossible to civilize to the same degree as others because of the distribution of sex differences in cognition in the population, and that THIS DIFFERENCE IS AS IMPORTANT AS IQ DIFFERENCES in the populations, and as important as neotenic differences in the population.

    1) Population Differences: Sex > Neoteny > Intelligence
    2) Cultural Differences: Institutional Path dependency: Religion, State, Contractualism(law). Europeans started with law (the most advanced) then the state (next most advanced) and religion last (natural religion, not christianity). So we have the adaptive advantage of the optimum path dependency. China=State, MENA = Artificial Religion, India=Natural Religion, Africa = Magical Religion.

    If you want to know the equivalent of the grand unifying theory of physics but in the behavioral sciences, this is it. And yes, it’s really that darn simple.

    The world isn’t complex. It’s the stories we make up that distract us from knowing the world as it is, that prevents us from seeing the simplicity of it, of nature, and of the universe.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @AshaLogos


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-14 18:17:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1757831435136724992

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1757499805289660847

  • RT @MoreBirths: We want to believe that fertility rates are stabilizing. They ar

    RT @MoreBirths: We want to believe that fertility rates are stabilizing. They are not. They are in free fall with some of the biggest drops…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-14 12:18:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1757741142479683964