Pictures tell a thousand words. It’s obvious really. MAGA = Eugenic. ANTIFA=Dysgenic. I mean. I get it. It’s Gene Envy. (Class Hatred)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-06 12:53:00 UTC
Pictures tell a thousand words. It’s obvious really. MAGA = Eugenic. ANTIFA=Dysgenic. I mean. I get it. It’s Gene Envy. (Class Hatred)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-06 12:53:00 UTC
There are an infinite number of fictions we can fabricate. There is only one most parsimonious description. As far as I know a god is a fictional character. A demigod is a fictional character. A hero is a fictional character. And archetypal measurements are the easiest for man to employ. I leave Pilpul, Critique and the Fictionalisms for Women and Abrahamists. Truth is the weapon of men for a reason, and lies the weapon of those who are not men for a reason. Men Truth, Duty, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Markets of Meritocracy. All else is for those who are not men, but animal.
There are an infinite number of fictions we can fabricate. There is only one most parsimonious description. As far as I know a god is a fictional character. A demigod is a fictional character. A hero is a fictional character. And archetypal measurements are the easiest for man to employ. I leave Pilpul, Critique and the Fictionalisms for Women and Abrahamists. Truth is the weapon of men for a reason, and lies the weapon of those who are not men for a reason. Men Truth, Duty, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Markets of Meritocracy. All else is for those who are not men, but animal.
You absolutely positively interpret men and women differently. You absolutely positively attribute lower agency to women. You absolutely positively intuit the masculine and feminine cognitive biases. These biases are genetic, and reinforced through learning in both the observer and the observed. The problem is, that THEY are cognitively female. And pursue the cognitive and reproductive strategy of females. So while you should tolerate women, you should not tolerate THEM. This is one of the reasons why their strategy works. We hear feminine argument, for redistribution in support of generations, but we are really hearing is redistribution in the destruction of our generations by outsiders.
You absolutely positively interpret men and women differently. You absolutely positively attribute lower agency to women. You absolutely positively intuit the masculine and feminine cognitive biases. These biases are genetic, and reinforced through learning in both the observer and the observed. The problem is, that THEY are cognitively female. And pursue the cognitive and reproductive strategy of females. So while you should tolerate women, you should not tolerate THEM. This is one of the reasons why their strategy works. We hear feminine argument, for redistribution in support of generations, but we are really hearing is redistribution in the destruction of our generations by outsiders.
There is no conspiracy among peoples with genetic and cultural homogeneity, any more than there is a conspiracy between women against men, or predators against prey, or competent against incompetent. We demonstrate differing degrees of neoteny, different moral intuitions, differing brain distributions, different endorphin distributions, and different morphology distributions for ancestral reasons. We all participate in the unconscious persistence of genetic, class, cultural, mythological, and institutional strategies. We can enumerate the properties of different group strategies, right down to the grammar of the speech and the methods of arguments, and the distributions of cognitive biases people and peoples use (which is one of the research programs what I work on). All of these properties and in group differences are both measureable at the individual and observable at the collective. One does not blame a dog for dragging it’s backside on the carpet. It’s a dog. One simply teaches the dog not to do so. One does not blame women for feminine cognitive biases and life preferences – they were an evolutionary necessity. One does not blame a competing group for pursuing it’s genetic interest at others expense – one simply creates norms, traditions, laws, institutions, and knowledge to prevent murder, violence, theft, fraud, fraud by omission, free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, conspiracy, rent seeking, producing pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, propaganda, systemic lying, advocating or practicing moral and ethical irreciprocity, attempts at conversion, at institutional erosion, asymmetric reproduction, invasion, conquest, war, and genocide in either short term or long term means. Either a group can defend itself against destructive, parasitic and predatory competitors or it can’t. Groups compete. They compete by the means available to them. And groups learn to exploit every possible niche, from the most high trust, innovative, and productive, to the most low trust, parasitic, and destructive. But we cannot blame others for their immorality (free riding, parasitism and predation). We can only seek to defend ourselves against the immoral. There are no conspiracies. All our talk is just smoke and negotiation and deception on behalf of our genes. We are under the illusion that the rider drives the elephant, but the rider (our consciousness) is just a passenger on the elephant of our genes. Genes don’t conspire. They can’t.
There is no conspiracy among peoples with genetic and cultural homogeneity, any more than there is a conspiracy between women against men, or predators against prey, or competent against incompetent. We demonstrate differing degrees of neoteny, different moral intuitions, differing brain distributions, different endorphin distributions, and different morphology distributions for ancestral reasons. We all participate in the unconscious persistence of genetic, class, cultural, mythological, and institutional strategies. We can enumerate the properties of different group strategies, right down to the grammar of the speech and the methods of arguments, and the distributions of cognitive biases people and peoples use (which is one of the research programs what I work on). All of these properties and in group differences are both measureable at the individual and observable at the collective. One does not blame a dog for dragging it’s backside on the carpet. It’s a dog. One simply teaches the dog not to do so. One does not blame women for feminine cognitive biases and life preferences – they were an evolutionary necessity. One does not blame a competing group for pursuing it’s genetic interest at others expense – one simply creates norms, traditions, laws, institutions, and knowledge to prevent murder, violence, theft, fraud, fraud by omission, free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, conspiracy, rent seeking, producing pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, propaganda, systemic lying, advocating or practicing moral and ethical irreciprocity, attempts at conversion, at institutional erosion, asymmetric reproduction, invasion, conquest, war, and genocide in either short term or long term means. Either a group can defend itself against destructive, parasitic and predatory competitors or it can’t. Groups compete. They compete by the means available to them. And groups learn to exploit every possible niche, from the most high trust, innovative, and productive, to the most low trust, parasitic, and destructive. But we cannot blame others for their immorality (free riding, parasitism and predation). We can only seek to defend ourselves against the immoral. There are no conspiracies. All our talk is just smoke and negotiation and deception on behalf of our genes. We are under the illusion that the rider drives the elephant, but the rider (our consciousness) is just a passenger on the elephant of our genes. Genes don’t conspire. They can’t.
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
( I have had a number of female stalkers. When my wife filed for divorce, I joined nearly every major dating service. (It was fascinating really). I do my research thoroughly. 😉 I found Amanda in I think the first month? Or rather she got drunk with her best friend Cathy and found me. Anyway, that took about 90 days to turn into a bit of a relationship and a few months more to get serious (exclusive). So during this time I also met Sandy (not her name). Very conversational. Talked a lot. Enjoyed it. But something bothered me, so I stopped returning her calls. And for reasons I will never understand this little (hot) blonde (hot) bundle of (hot) craziness turned into a possessive little stalker. Thankfully too far away, and I travelled too much for any serious concern. Now, I don’t know if you know this or not, but once you close your account or stop paying, they don’t take down your data – not unless you write them a letter. (Might have changed). Anyway. Some time ago I got a notification from a different service that a “Sandy” from the same city had tagged my profile. And, I just now got a letter from one a DIFFERENT service that this stalker’s account was closed and that they are not responsible for the consequences of any further contact. Seriously. This was almost nine years ago? I mean. There are fking crazy people in this world. “Still crazy after all these years.” I mean, I know that as an aspie I am kinda incompetent at this stuff but damn. Nine years? )
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-05 21:56:44 UTC
( I have had a number of female stalkers. When my wife filed for divorce, I joined nearly every major dating service. (It was fascinating really). I do my research thoroughly. 😉 I found Amanda in I think the first month? Or rather she got drunk with her best friend Cathy and found me. Anyway, that took about 90 days to turn into a bit of a relationship and a few months more to get serious (exclusive). So during this time I also met Sandy (not her name). Very conversational. Talked a lot. Enjoyed it. But something bothered me, so I stopped returning her calls. And for reasons I will never understand this little (hot) blonde (hot) bundle of (hot) craziness turned into a possessive little stalker. Thankfully too far away, and I travelled too much for any serious concern. Now, I don’t know if you know this or not, but once you close your account or stop paying, they don’t take down your data – not unless you write them a letter. (Might have changed). Anyway. Some time ago I got a notification from a different service that a “Sandy” from the same city had tagged my profile. And, I just now got a letter from one a DIFFERENT service that this stalker’s account was closed and that they are not responsible for the consequences of any further contact. Seriously. This was almost nine years ago? I mean. There are fking crazy people in this world. “Still crazy after all these years.” I mean, I know that as an aspie I am kinda incompetent at this stuff but damn. Nine years? )
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-05 17:56:00 UTC
GENES DON’T CONSPIRE, THEY COMPETE, BLINDLY
There is no conspiracy among peoples with genetic and cultural homogeneity, any more than there is a conspiracy between women against men, or predators against prey, or competent against incompetent. We demonstrate differing degrees of neoteny, different moral intuitions, differing brain distributions, different endorphin distributions, and different morphology distributions for ancestral reasons. We all participate in the unconscious persistence of genetic, class, cultural, mythological, and institutional strategies. We can enumerate the properties of different group strategies, right down to the grammar of the speech and the methods of arguments, and the distributions of cognitive biases people and peoples use (which is one of the research programs what I work on). All of these properties and in group differences are both measureable at the individual and observable at the collective. One does not blame a dog for dragging it’s backside on the carpet. It’s a dog. One simply teaches the dog not to do so. One does not blame women for feminine cognitive biases and life preferences – they were an evolutionary necessity. One does not blame a competing group for pursuing it’s genetic interest at others expense – one simply creates norms, traditions, laws, institutions, and knowledge to prevent murder, violence, theft, fraud, fraud by omission, free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, conspiracy, rent seeking, producing pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, propaganda, systemic lying, advocating or practicing moral and ethical irreciprocity, attempts at conversion, at institutional erosion, asymmetric reproduction, invasion, conquest, war, and genocide in either short term or long term means. Either a group can defend itself against destructive, parasitic and predatory competitors or it can’t. Groups compete. They compete by the means available to them. And groups learn to exploit every possible niche, from the most high trust, innovative, and productive, to the most low trust, parasitic, and destructive. But we cannot blame others for their immorality (free riding, parasitism and predation). We can only seek to defend ourselves against the immoral. There are no conspiracies. All our talk is just smoke and negotiation and deception on behalf of our genes. We are under the illusion that the rider drives the elephant, but the rider (our consciousness) is just a passenger on the elephant of our genes. Genes don’t conspire. They can’t.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-05 17:08:00 UTC