THE CORRECT ANSWER When there is one ethnicity we form Castes and Classes and Clans, and Cults, and Political polities, and orders, and war bands. As long as women practice signal competition with other women, and hypergamy (an evolutionary necessity) men will practice signaling and organizing together to create competitive advantage. As long as we are intellectually, physically, and intuitionistically different (we are), and as long as groups differ in distributions of intellectual, physical, and intuitionistic abilities, we will compete like all other species and practice reproductive, social, economic and political selection (competition). If we stop we will die off. Race is just the easiest first means of discrimination in pursuit of higher sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value. After that is class. After class is physical attractiveness and behavior and intelligence. We are riders on our genes. We either assist those genes, or we will face extinction by those who do.
Theme: Sex Differences
-
—“Q: What if there was only one ethnicity in existence?”—
THE CORRECT ANSWER When there is one ethnicity we form Castes and Classes and Clans, and Cults, and Political polities, and orders, and war bands. As long as women practice signal competition with other women, and hypergamy (an evolutionary necessity) men will practice signaling and organizing together to create competitive advantage. As long as we are intellectually, physically, and intuitionistically different (we are), and as long as groups differ in distributions of intellectual, physical, and intuitionistic abilities, we will compete like all other species and practice reproductive, social, economic and political selection (competition). If we stop we will die off. Race is just the easiest first means of discrimination in pursuit of higher sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value. After that is class. After class is physical attractiveness and behavior and intelligence. We are riders on our genes. We either assist those genes, or we will face extinction by those who do.
-
Jewish (Female) Coercion vs European (Male) Coercion – Completing the Method
by James Santagata (More on Santagta’s Analysis) While we are talking about: FEMININE) – Abrahamic (Jewish > Abrahamic > Semitic) Critique (reputation destruction), Pilpul (Excuse making), and Bilbul (retreat to confusion) argument under threat of ostracization which constitute the feminine method of coercion; – as a counter to – MASCULINE) – European Logic, Science, History, and Reciprocity(law) under threat of violence, which constitute the male method of coercion; We must recognize that we have OUR OWN TRAITORS against reciprocity as well: DEFECTORS) – Abrahamic theology > Socratic Criticism (Critique) > Platonic Justification (Pilpul) > German continental philosophy et al > French enlightenment Philosophy > French Postmodern Philosophy > Anglo female Defectors. So while we have Feminine antagonists, we also have our own beta-defector/traitors, as competing with our Masculine practitioners of truth, duty, reciprocity, and markets (meritocracy). This means that we are outnumbered, and that to preserve western excellence and our own genes we must rule out of self defense, if not out of profitable offense. SANTAGATA’S COMPLETION OF THE JEWISH METHOD By James Santagata —“3 Phases Attack / Debate Strategy by Jewish Left* (You’ll notice Jewish right engages using fact, logic, etc. as a default, the left not) Phase 1: Pilpul – (Hebrew for pepper) tiring contortions to exhaust opponent while trying to mock and create the illusion of superior intellect (and morals). Phase 2: Bilbul – (Hebrew for confusion). If the opponent calls out and crushes the Pilpul, it moves to Bilbul which is to confuse and create habit. Phase 3 – Bulbul – (Hebrew for “penis” or “dick”, child taunt / usage among Israelis), if one makes it past Pilpul and Bilbul the phase moves to Bulbul, name calling and pure ad hominems. Phase 1-3 are predictive and simple patterns and techniques to quickly deflect, side step or crush Pilpul, Bilbul and finally Bulbul. There is a fourth phase but I am still searching for Hebrew or even Yiddish word that would convey that while satisfying the rhyming / semi-alliterative pattern of Pilpul, Bilbul & Bulbul.”— I’ll correct (or extend) james’ rather brilliant insight here by saying that the jewish RIGHT does not abandon appeal to reasonableness and complete the adoption of western reciprocity of costs as decidability. James’ other insight is that the Jews are also pursuing the feminine strategy of sh-t testing. In other words, they are creating demand for dominance and we are failing both them and our women. This last insight of James’, I think, completes the description of jewish behavior as cognitively feminine. It also completes the analysis that they are engaged in conspiracy rather than simply demonstrating the female reproductive instinct that is the product of female evolutionary cognitive bias. It also explains why jews maintained maternal households, and only adopted monogamy in the late middle ages, prior to practicing polygenic reproduction.
-
Jewish (Female) Coercion vs European (Male) Coercion – Completing the Method
by James Santagata (More on Santagta’s Analysis) While we are talking about: FEMININE) – Abrahamic (Jewish > Abrahamic > Semitic) Critique (reputation destruction), Pilpul (Excuse making), and Bilbul (retreat to confusion) argument under threat of ostracization which constitute the feminine method of coercion; – as a counter to – MASCULINE) – European Logic, Science, History, and Reciprocity(law) under threat of violence, which constitute the male method of coercion; We must recognize that we have OUR OWN TRAITORS against reciprocity as well: DEFECTORS) – Abrahamic theology > Socratic Criticism (Critique) > Platonic Justification (Pilpul) > German continental philosophy et al > French enlightenment Philosophy > French Postmodern Philosophy > Anglo female Defectors. So while we have Feminine antagonists, we also have our own beta-defector/traitors, as competing with our Masculine practitioners of truth, duty, reciprocity, and markets (meritocracy). This means that we are outnumbered, and that to preserve western excellence and our own genes we must rule out of self defense, if not out of profitable offense. SANTAGATA’S COMPLETION OF THE JEWISH METHOD By James Santagata —“3 Phases Attack / Debate Strategy by Jewish Left* (You’ll notice Jewish right engages using fact, logic, etc. as a default, the left not) Phase 1: Pilpul – (Hebrew for pepper) tiring contortions to exhaust opponent while trying to mock and create the illusion of superior intellect (and morals). Phase 2: Bilbul – (Hebrew for confusion). If the opponent calls out and crushes the Pilpul, it moves to Bilbul which is to confuse and create habit. Phase 3 – Bulbul – (Hebrew for “penis” or “dick”, child taunt / usage among Israelis), if one makes it past Pilpul and Bilbul the phase moves to Bulbul, name calling and pure ad hominems. Phase 1-3 are predictive and simple patterns and techniques to quickly deflect, side step or crush Pilpul, Bilbul and finally Bulbul. There is a fourth phase but I am still searching for Hebrew or even Yiddish word that would convey that while satisfying the rhyming / semi-alliterative pattern of Pilpul, Bilbul & Bulbul.”— I’ll correct (or extend) james’ rather brilliant insight here by saying that the jewish RIGHT does not abandon appeal to reasonableness and complete the adoption of western reciprocity of costs as decidability. James’ other insight is that the Jews are also pursuing the feminine strategy of sh-t testing. In other words, they are creating demand for dominance and we are failing both them and our women. This last insight of James’, I think, completes the description of jewish behavior as cognitively feminine. It also completes the analysis that they are engaged in conspiracy rather than simply demonstrating the female reproductive instinct that is the product of female evolutionary cognitive bias. It also explains why jews maintained maternal households, and only adopted monogamy in the late middle ages, prior to practicing polygenic reproduction.
-
New Territory Or Return To Normal
Well, we are in new territory, because we have not been in a situation where women are able to produce sufficient income that they can pay other women to raise their children before, rather than depend upon men for income (and defense). It’s just never happened before. There is no means of producing that kind of male leadership for approximately two thirds of males. Without the compromise of marriage and the family and the division of labor, under contemporary technology, women basically do not need men whatsoever, unless they can capture one of the top third of men. And that is what is happening. It’s working out for about half of men and the other half are basically screwed. There are means of fixing this problem so that we nullify the ancestral family in accordance with the new economic and biological reality. (Which in turn restores our pre-agrarian relationships to their evolutionary state: serial relationships where women are heads of ‘households’. And men rotate through them as desired. with brothers and uncles providing ingroup care rather than husbands providing that care. That’s what we did prior to agrarianism and agrarian marriage. The first is to end redistribution so that we account for the higher demands of men in slower maturity, greater cellular damage, greater illness because of it and greater care needed in old age because of it. And he second is we end redistribution due do children so that men can trade income for affection. The third is that we restore all male institutions that have existed throughout history, for the caretaking of excess males. The fourth is to separate male and female education again so that males can learn in a highly competitive environment. Fifth is to create separate houses of government for men and women so that the tendency of women to welcome invaders that will destroy the productive potential of men, and male’s tendency to want to subordinate women. Otherwise we get what we see is men creating a civil war, which is what ALWAYS HAPPENS when there is an excess of unsatisfied men. This basically ends the experiment with universal marriage as a means of defending the polity against women bearing children and forcing the cost upon the group/tribe/village/polity. This is no problem any longer because women are, in large part, doing do. Furthermore divorced single mothers prefer to not divide their attention between men and children. (data). So we can reverse the (relatively recent) male centered household, and create the mother centered household with the males transiting in and out of households as desired by the women. None of that asks anything of women other than to end income provided my men to women, and end political domination of one sex over the other. If men are economically unnecessary then they are. That is what has happened because of modernity and the pill. So marriage is only valuable to 1/3 of men and women, and the rest of the time, men are merely gene contributors. So what are we going to do with those extra men – if they don’t have anything to care about? ‘Cause history is very clear on this subject
-
New Territory Or Return To Normal
Well, we are in new territory, because we have not been in a situation where women are able to produce sufficient income that they can pay other women to raise their children before, rather than depend upon men for income (and defense). It’s just never happened before. There is no means of producing that kind of male leadership for approximately two thirds of males. Without the compromise of marriage and the family and the division of labor, under contemporary technology, women basically do not need men whatsoever, unless they can capture one of the top third of men. And that is what is happening. It’s working out for about half of men and the other half are basically screwed. There are means of fixing this problem so that we nullify the ancestral family in accordance with the new economic and biological reality. (Which in turn restores our pre-agrarian relationships to their evolutionary state: serial relationships where women are heads of ‘households’. And men rotate through them as desired. with brothers and uncles providing ingroup care rather than husbands providing that care. That’s what we did prior to agrarianism and agrarian marriage. The first is to end redistribution so that we account for the higher demands of men in slower maturity, greater cellular damage, greater illness because of it and greater care needed in old age because of it. And he second is we end redistribution due do children so that men can trade income for affection. The third is that we restore all male institutions that have existed throughout history, for the caretaking of excess males. The fourth is to separate male and female education again so that males can learn in a highly competitive environment. Fifth is to create separate houses of government for men and women so that the tendency of women to welcome invaders that will destroy the productive potential of men, and male’s tendency to want to subordinate women. Otherwise we get what we see is men creating a civil war, which is what ALWAYS HAPPENS when there is an excess of unsatisfied men. This basically ends the experiment with universal marriage as a means of defending the polity against women bearing children and forcing the cost upon the group/tribe/village/polity. This is no problem any longer because women are, in large part, doing do. Furthermore divorced single mothers prefer to not divide their attention between men and children. (data). So we can reverse the (relatively recent) male centered household, and create the mother centered household with the males transiting in and out of households as desired by the women. None of that asks anything of women other than to end income provided my men to women, and end political domination of one sex over the other. If men are economically unnecessary then they are. That is what has happened because of modernity and the pill. So marriage is only valuable to 1/3 of men and women, and the rest of the time, men are merely gene contributors. So what are we going to do with those extra men – if they don’t have anything to care about? ‘Cause history is very clear on this subject
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/40468510_288780981718799_72105922384
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/40468510_288780981718799_7210592238433206272_o_288780975052133.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/40406718_288781251718772_5349829599112986624_o_288781245052106.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/40390788_288781041718793_8816571091267878912_o_288781038385460.jpg NO MORE LIES ON RACE
RACES EXIST, ARE MEANINGFULLY DIFFERENT, AND IMPORTANTLY SO.
THE IMMATERIALITY OF RACE IS A SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION (LIE) TO DESTROY GREAT CIVILIZATIONS
1 – The Four Major Races: Caucasoid (West Eurasian), Mongoloid(East Eurasian), Australoid (Pacific), and Negroid (African).
2 – The West Asian (Caucasoid) Macro Race: Includes the (extinct) peoples of north africa, the levant, and the steppe.
3 – The Indo European Major Races (European – Iranic – Indian ): Includes the (extinct) peoples of india, the Iranic and what we consider the turkic branch (as well as others)
4 – 750M: White “Loosely” European Peoples (Subrace) means ‘european christendom’ which includes southern europeans: southern spain, the boot of italy, the byzantine balkans who are of anatolian rather than russo-ukrainian origins.
5 – 450M: White “Narrowly” Northern European Peoples (Minor Race) means descendants of atlantic, germanic, and slavic europeans from france to the urals, of aristotelian(atheist), protestant, catholic, and Orthodox backgrounds, who are primarily the descendents of russo-ukrainian, and built their civilization in the cold.
White nationalists, and white identitarians use the narrow definition. When the rest of us refer to european civilization we use the looser definition.
BEEN DOWN THIS ROAD BEFORE
I’ve answered this question before (it’s a repeat). There are about 450M Northern European ‘white’ people. (atlantics, germanics, northern and eastern slavs) If we include earlier generations such as southern europeans (anatolians), and old europe (balkans) are about 750M white people. (FWIW: The white population of the united states is around 190m.)
Quote from a specialist:
—“The truth is that anyone who can read a PCA-plot will know that Europe is genetically divided into two different categories and that is North and South European, with the latter being less homogenous and closer to the Middle East in terms of FST-distance, which strengthens the idea that Southern Europe has received gene flow from West Asia. This becomes more evident when you see that Sardinians do not express this pattern (pulling toward the Middle East) despite having no Steppe ancestry.
With that being said, you should take a look at the plot I attached by Lazaridis et al (2016) which showcases the intra-European division. Ignore the non-European clusters. What you will see is that Chris’ theory of Italy and Spain being supposedly half-White is null and void, although admittedly there is South-North cline within Italy (since Italy is the country with the highest genetic diversity in Europe).
The point is that even the northern part of Italy is well within the Southern European genetic continuum. The only country which has a legitimate North Europe-South Europe crossover cline is France.”—
EUROPEAN GENETIC PLOT
(Attached)
WEST EURASIAN GENETIC PLOT
(Attached)
WORLD GENETIC PLOT
(attached)
THE PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC ATTACK ON CIVILIZATION.
The curse of postmodern pseudoscience in most of the other answers. Postmodernism like Marxism was designed, like Abrahamic Religions, as an attack on European Peoples (civilization), to eradicate our civlization in the modern world just as Abrahamic religion was used to eradicate the five great civilizations of the ancient world: Roman New Europe), Byzantine (old europe), Anatolian, Persian (Iranic), Egyptian, and North African. All those civilizations were destroyed by the last attempt at cultural destruction.
Why? Marxism/Postmodernism in the modern world, and Abrahamic Religion in the ancient world foster dysgenic rapid reproduction of the underclasses reversing genetic domestication under small farm mixed agrarianism, effectively weaponizing reproduction and ignorance and superstition against civilization.
There are reasons that the Han, Koreans,Japanese and Europeans succeeded and other civilizations failed to maintain rates of innovation. The reason is that the Han, Koreans and Japanese remained insular and homogeneous, and whites succeed as long as they also remain homogeneous and practice eugenic reproduction through manorialism (meritocracy).
The rest of the world did the opposite and the sizes of their underclasses pose such a burden that they cannot produce sufficient middle and upper classes to produce high trust commercially successful political orders.
THE REALITY OF RACES, SUBRACES, MINOR RACES
Races, Subraces, Tribes, Clans, Families and Classes can interbreed, but differences matter. The primary differences are the degree of neoteny (white and east asian) vs deeper maturity (semites, iranics, africans, and australoids), the more feminine or masculine structure of the brain (yes really), and the size of the underclass due largely to winter climates, manorial farming, and close cohabitation in winters while caring for animals. (Or in the european and chinese cases, aggressive use of criminal punishment – particularly european hanging of large portions of the underclasses every generation).
Using size of class, degree of neoteny or maturity, and balance of masculine and feminine traits, each of the Races, Subraces, an sometimes Tribes, has evolved (adapted) for certain excellences that are geography, climate, means of production, and method of socialization dependent.
Human domestication like animal domestication, uses neotonic selection to suppress sexual maturity and preserve the features and cooperative intuitions of youth. The goal for any polity is to increase intelligence, industriousness, and trust. Counter to our assumptions the San (the oldest continuous tribe) were more gentle, and humans appear to have become increasingly AGGRESSIVE in some regions and increasingly GENTLE in other regions, which is easily measurable by group testosterone distributions, rates and ages of maturity, and ‘hardiness’ of features (deeper maturity). By the upward redistribution of reproduction (china, europe, and jewish) you increase the distribution of neoteny in the public largely by the reduction of rates of reproduction of the underclasses. The simple fact is that many people are a harm to their fellows simply because they are a drag on norms, laws, traditions, values, and institutions, literacy, technology, and the work force capacity – perhaps most importantly making a sufficient middle class to produce a voluntary organization of possible impossible, and forcing the dependence upon familial corruption (india, south america, south europe, all of islam) despite access to trade routes.
THE OPTIMUM POLITICAL ORDER
The optimum political order is homogenous – diversity is always and everywhere bad for obvious and well documented reasons. It trades short term profits for long term costs that destroy the political order and reduce it to levantine, south american, and indian levels of poverty and corruption.
The optimum political order is Small – The only value of scale military power to exploit others. The only value of federations is to produce defense of trade routes and prohibit rent seeking (corruption) on those trade routes.
THE EUGENICISTS WERE RIGHT.
And any group of size (the east asians) who succeed will leave the rest of the world behind. The europeans managed by the late middle ages to nearly eliminate their underclasses. This is why european intelligence is dropping (the flynn effect is reversing). Not because of individuals. But because of restoration of their underclasses. If Norway can lose IQ (they have) then any group can.
Smarter people are more moral – simply because they can afford to be.
“NO MORE LIES”


Source date (UTC): 2018-08-30 20:05:00 UTC
-
Women are disloyal to the tribe. period. The reasons for this are evolutionary
Women are disloyal to the tribe. period. The reasons for this are evolutionary.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-30 02:04:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1034985153167335425
Reply addressees: @SmashMarxCult @jboschredux @BlackDawning
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1034778561088053248
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1034778561088053248
-
Of course. wealth and lack of enforced norms allow us to explore the extremes of
Of course. wealth and lack of enforced norms allow us to explore the extremes of our intuitions. Women never satisfied with last month’s fashion will always innovate in order to attract attention and feel they are ‘giving’ somehow.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-30 02:03:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1034985036737597440
Reply addressees: @SmashMarxCult @jboschredux @BlackDawning
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1034778561088053248
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1034778561088053248
-
The Mythology that We Have Constructed to Justify Marriage as A Norm, No Longer Holds
—“Darn it, women are just awful, aren’t they? Still, chin-up, boys…wont be long until you lean, mean, problem solving machines successfully master artificial wombs and then you can be rid of the dead weight of womanhood.”— Lisa Outhwaite That’s not true. Women are WONDERFUL. It’s just that the MYTHOLOGY that we have constructed to justify marriage as a norm, no longer HOLDS, and the postmodern and feminist mythology is FALSE. Ergo, given our different reproductive strategies, different moral and preferential intuitions GIVEN those different and competing strategies, and the amount of agency we have in the interpersonal and political-military spheres of cognition, then we must find a means of cooperating now that the family has been destroyed by marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and the leftist (marxist-postmodernist) attack on western civilizations institutions of truth duty reciprocity, family civil society (voluntary production of commons). I mean, women have no idea that they are giving judaism and islam a foundation in this era just as they did in the ancient world, and are in the process of destroying the civilization in this era just as they did in the ancient. Men vote red. non-whites vote blue. and most white women defect blue. The only defectors are white women. Yet we have the only civilization that blues are trying to invade and be a part of.