It is inconceivable to a conservative or libertarian how much time a liberal spends thinking about equality – the same as a female spends thinking about her status – a fear of being left behind. It is equally inconceivable to a liberal, how little conservatives or libertarians think about equality – only the actions they can take to maintain their position or improve its condition. The right has no fear of being left behind.
Theme: Sex Differences
-
“[Chinese] are suffering precisely the same process as the West. The most intell
—“[Chinese] are suffering precisely the same process as the West. The most intelligent females are not selecting for the most intelligent Chinese males or, indeed, any males. As in the West, they are dedicating themselves to their education and then their careers, meaning they are simply failing to pass on their genes at all.”—
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-06 02:35:00 UTC
-
The West is indeed the Goldilocks Zone for genius
September 6th, 2018 2:37 AM
—“Northeast Asians, compared to Europeans, have higher gene frequencies of polymorphisms which make people collectivist, socially anxious, and fearful of anything novel. Kura and his team argue that this is adaptation to a particular ecology, where it is vital to stay in a tightly-bonded group. However, they note that scientific innovators tend to combine very high IQ with an optimally low level of collectivism, low social anxiety and low fearfulness of the new. In other words, they have high âOpenness-Intellec tâ, as psychologists term this trait. This psychological profile means that they can think outside the box and donât care about the offence to vested interests which their new idea will almost certainly result in. This is why, maintains Kura, it is the West that generated the Industrial Revolution, rather than more intelligent Northeast Asians. The West is indeed the Goldilocks Zone for genius.”—
http://www.unz.com/article/dysgenics-and-low-creativity-why-china-cant-save-civilization/
-
Chinese are facing the same problem
September 6th, 2018 2:35 AM
—“[Chinese] are suffering precisely the same process as the West. The most intelligent females are not selecting for the most intelligent Chinese males or, indeed, any males. As in the West, they are dedicating themselves to their education and then their careers, meaning they are simply failing to pass on their genes at all.”—
-
The West is indeed the Goldilocks Zone for genius
September 6th, 2018 2:37 AM
—“Northeast Asians, compared to Europeans, have higher gene frequencies of polymorphisms which make people collectivist, socially anxious, and fearful of anything novel. Kura and his team argue that this is adaptation to a particular ecology, where it is vital to stay in a tightly-bonded group. However, they note that scientific innovators tend to combine very high IQ with an optimally low level of collectivism, low social anxiety and low fearfulness of the new. In other words, they have high âOpenness-Intellec tâ, as psychologists term this trait. This psychological profile means that they can think outside the box and donât care about the offence to vested interests which their new idea will almost certainly result in. This is why, maintains Kura, it is the West that generated the Industrial Revolution, rather than more intelligent Northeast Asians. The West is indeed the Goldilocks Zone for genius.”—
http://www.unz.com/article/dysgenics-and-low-creativity-why-china-cant-save-civilization/
-
Chinese are facing the same problem
September 6th, 2018 2:35 AM
—“[Chinese] are suffering precisely the same process as the West. The most intelligent females are not selecting for the most intelligent Chinese males or, indeed, any males. As in the West, they are dedicating themselves to their education and then their careers, meaning they are simply failing to pass on their genes at all.”—
-
Conservatives also tend to be more attractive?
Conservatives also tend to be more attractive?
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-05 23:33:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037483843475963911
Reply addressees: @Real_Xi_Jinping
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037478178829361152
IN REPLY TO:
@LRH_Superfan
@curtdoolittle Dunno
Basic conservatives want to regulate less so maybe less neurotics are drawn to themOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037478178829361152
-
The selection pressure is male vs female not resource dependence. The question i
The selection pressure is male vs female not resource dependence. The question is how did local selection pressures distribute male and female moral (cognitive) biases? Evolution works regressively aslo. Why did some groups increase aggression, tribalism, and inbreeding?
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-05 23:32:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037483641977352192
Reply addressees: @DavidJamesJnr
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037480950257672194
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037480950257672194
-
RT @DegenRolf: Replication study fails to find any evidence of stereotype threat
RT @DegenRolf: Replication study fails to find any evidence of stereotype threat impairing women’s math and spatial performance. https://t.…
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-05 15:10:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037357232969666560
-
STANDARDS —“light-skinned black Americans suffer an obesity income penalty sim
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2332649218795185DOUBLE STANDARDS
—“light-skinned black Americans suffer an obesity income penalty similar to white Americans, whereas medium- and dark-skinned black Americans seem to suffer no obesity income penalty.”—-
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2332649218795185Updated Sep 5, 2018, 12:38 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-05 12:38:00 UTC