(FB 1551139715 Timestamp) THE OMFG Q OF THE DAY: “CAN YOU OWN P-SSY?” Answering this ‘fringe’ stuff simply demonstrates the power of propertarian analysis. 😉 And it’s funny….. lol —“Curt Doolittle can pu–y be property?”—Kyle Brawn You know, under the right conditions, I would answer that question sarcastically and get hammered for it. But at the moment I have my wits about me, and I will say that: Empirically, for almost all of history, it has been property. I am not sure it still isn’t. It’s just collective rather than private ownership. Empirically, Given The Possible Series: 1. Possession in fact (under your control – self defense ) 2. Consensual Property. (normative property – reciprocal defense) 3. Institutional Property (property rights – institutional defense) It is possible to have ‘it’ under your control, normatively under your control, and institutional under your control. Having ‘it’ just requires your ability to protect your control by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means. In general it’s pretty difficult without (a) a slave population, and (b) institutional means of defending it. Given that ‘it’ is not capable of self defense, ‘it’ doesn’t have an opinion. It is instead, the men who are willing to insure or prevent ‘ownership’ by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means that determine the outcome. In general the outcome depends upon (a) the affordability of surplus native females willingness of native brothers and fathers to tolerate or (b) the affordability of surplus alien females and the ability of native females to rally their protecting males to prohibit the discount of their female market value by alien females. The future has a very good chance of restoring slavery as far as I can tell, and the recent period of luxury produced by the western advances in technology may be a temporary rather than permanent progression. That is, I think, the argument. Hence, scarce females, protected by fathers and brothers produce high female market value, and plentiful females unprotected by fathers and brothers produce low female market value. In other words Might Makes Rights – whether right or wrong. Always and everywhere. “Veritas Et Violentia”
Theme: Sex Differences
-
(FB 1551391575 Timestamp) OUR WOMEN HAVE KILLED US —“The west has a case of pa
(FB 1551391575 Timestamp) OUR WOMEN HAVE KILLED US —“The west has a case of pathological altruism – self-destructive charity based on a narcissistic personality type and an addiction to dopamine.”–JWarren Prescott —“Not pathological. It’s maladaptive altruism.”—Martin Å tÄpán Except it’s only because women do, and women vote. White men haven’t voted for suicide. OUR WOMEN HAVE. THE WHITE MALE USA IS RED.
-
(FB 1551378161 Timestamp) MEN NEED INCENTIVES, AND WOMEN HAVE NO END OF “SELFISH
(FB 1551378161 Timestamp) MEN NEED INCENTIVES, AND WOMEN HAVE NO END OF “SELFISHNESS” (CONSUMPTION) —“We are the minds which set the body of tomorrow in motion.”— Michael D Abbott The Feminists and Postmodernists assume a steady state. That a sufficient minority of men will not reach the point where they say “Every other alternative is better than this one.”
-
(FB 1551391575 Timestamp) OUR WOMEN HAVE KILLED US —“The west has a case of pa
(FB 1551391575 Timestamp) OUR WOMEN HAVE KILLED US —“The west has a case of pathological altruism – self-destructive charity based on a narcissistic personality type and an addiction to dopamine.”–JWarren Prescott —“Not pathological. It’s maladaptive altruism.”—Martin Å tÄpán Except it’s only because women do, and women vote. White men haven’t voted for suicide. OUR WOMEN HAVE. THE WHITE MALE USA IS RED.
-
(FB 1551378161 Timestamp) MEN NEED INCENTIVES, AND WOMEN HAVE NO END OF “SELFISH
(FB 1551378161 Timestamp) MEN NEED INCENTIVES, AND WOMEN HAVE NO END OF “SELFISHNESS” (CONSUMPTION) —“We are the minds which set the body of tomorrow in motion.”— Michael D Abbott The Feminists and Postmodernists assume a steady state. That a sufficient minority of men will not reach the point where they say “Every other alternative is better than this one.”
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551397685 Timestamp) WEAPONIZED GYNOCENTRISM by JWarren Prescott The primary neurochemical for the pleasure response is dopamine. Yes, itâs evolutionary, however, political power triggers not only dopamine but testosterone in both men and women. Then the dominance/submissiveness hierarchy further rewards individuals as they gain dominance and penalizes them as they lose dominance. Too much dopamine disrupts normal cognitive function and emotions giving rise to errors in judgment and erratic behavior. While it is true that Men are better suited to handle higher levels of testosterone, women have a greater sensitivity to it. Addicted to power? Yeah, pretty much. Now, clear the path to political power by legitimizing victimhood and philanthropy and you have just weaponized gynocentrism.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551397685 Timestamp) WEAPONIZED GYNOCENTRISM by JWarren Prescott The primary neurochemical for the pleasure response is dopamine. Yes, itâs evolutionary, however, political power triggers not only dopamine but testosterone in both men and women. Then the dominance/submissiveness hierarchy further rewards individuals as they gain dominance and penalizes them as they lose dominance. Too much dopamine disrupts normal cognitive function and emotions giving rise to errors in judgment and erratic behavior. While it is true that Men are better suited to handle higher levels of testosterone, women have a greater sensitivity to it. Addicted to power? Yeah, pretty much. Now, clear the path to political power by legitimizing victimhood and philanthropy and you have just weaponized gynocentrism.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551561470 Timestamp) By: Bill Joslin Removing barriers allows people to express there preferences more fully. As seen in the Nordics – general differences are more greatly expresses. Further to that, the largest impact over the smallest time horizon to reduce crime and increase productivity in a society is to educate and enfranchise mother’s into the economy. Why? Because values on education and work ethic are learned first from the mother (at home) which deepens instillation of those values. Countries which open education and work to there woman after these being closed to woman see a start increase in productivity and crime reduction in less than ten years. Our issue isn’t woman working but rather an economic situation where woman must work. When woman must work for a family to survive this causes an intra-family competition over resources and resource distribution (marital tensions) – when working for luxuries this competition doesn’t come into play… It ends up being a net benefit for the family. (via Brandon Hayes)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551551252 Timestamp) —“How do you get women to leave the workforce? Reduce incentives for them to choose a career over family? If so how would that work?”—John Smith CLARIFICATION It’s not important that women leave the work force so much as that we lower the burden of not being in the work force so that women work for luxuries, socialization, and joy rather than out of economic necessity at the expense of family. There are women who will always feel the drive for achievement just like men do. There are plenty of women however, who would prefer to maintain a comfortable middle class lifestyle, while raising their children without compromise. HOW: 1. Distribute liquidity (money supply) directly to consumers, instead of thru the financial system. 2. Eliminate Consumer Interest on durable goods. 3. Restore voluntary disassociation, so it’s not necessary to ‘buy a home where good schools are’ rather than have good schools by prohibiting peoples who ruin them. We can make most neighborhoods good neighborhoods again -without much difficulty. 4. Eliminate subsidy for non-degrees in non-subjects. 5. Eliminate communal property, alimony, and child support. 6. Tax Freedom for self-support of 4 or more children. 7. Involuntary Sterilization of dependent mothers. 8. Restore universal male service, and continual fitness for service through age 60. 9. Reduce junior and high school to half time and part time work thereby eliminating jobs for immigrants. 10. This ends the ignorance, desocialization, and lack of agency an of teenagers such that they do not enter maturity with pent up sexual, social, economic, frustrations. We subsidize bad behavior. end the subsidies and the behavior will end. —“Those solutions lighten the burden of raising a nuclear family and help people avoid debt pitfalls. So that definitely helps women choose not to prioritize work over family. However, there is social status and wealth you can get from choosing a career over family. Women, like all humans, like wealth and social status. What’s stopping a female from becoming career oriented because she wants wealth and social status?.”–John Smith Women are not like men. They are much more signal driven. Change the signals and change the behavior. We will never turn back the clock. But we can rebalance the distribution. —“Very interesting Curt, thank you.”–John Smith
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551544387 Timestamp) RADICAL CHANGE TO REVERSE RADICAL CHANGE The returns on low investment parenting in exchange for additional income by women’s entry into the workforce, then absorbed by taxation and redistributed to the underclasses and immigrants has been catastrophic in addition to dysgenic. Instead, return to high investment parenting, high returns commons, and reduction in signaling costs between peoples capable of high trust order, with the resulting high returns is superior to the continuation of this suicide by finance.