(FB 1544800088 Timestamp) SOMEONE JUST SHARED THIS WITH ME: (pls take credit whomever did so. i can’t find it) And it’s the net of it. But it’s not just that women are unhappy and live with it. it’s that white men are unhappy and committing suicide in droves because of it. So it’s not just women who suffer – as usual, its men who DIE.
Theme: Sex Differences
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1544800088 Timestamp) SOMEONE JUST SHARED THIS WITH ME: (pls take credit whomever did so. i can’t find it) And it’s the net of it. But it’s not just that women are unhappy and live with it. it’s that white men are unhappy and committing suicide in droves because of it. So it’s not just women who suffer – as usual, its men who DIE.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545059232 Timestamp) UM. THE GENDERS CANNOT TAKE EACH OTHER’S VENTING SERIOUSLY –“I can’t understand men who talk about … putting women back in the kitchen, out of the workforce, or referring to of r_pe during a war. …”— A Female Friend That’s because you aren’t a man. Just like I am not a woman and can’t imagine that they’re serious rather than hyperbolic (LARPing). I have overheard far too many conversations of women talking about their husbands as mere monetary and physical resources to be exploited, and the stupidity of men and how women would do such and such better, and how they need female ‘unity’. I am also aware that women are over-privileged compared to men in everything from moral intuitions, to daily life, to health care, to political processes. These things are simply empirical. But they do not change the opinions of women on their relative status. Naxalt(defense of child) is to some degree a defense against male hyperbole(defense of tribe). This is why it is so hard for males and females to communicate at any scale. This is why men and women cannot work in or debate politics together except under the most optimum of circumstances. Hyperbole (exaggeration) of offense, and NAXALT (exaggeration) of defense. Defending children vs Exciting men. These cognitive differences are real, universal, and inescapable. If men wanted to oppress women they would do so. They do not do so because those women are their wives, daughters, sisters and mothers. But if men agree to do something, there is nothing that can stop them. Because in the end, the use of violence determines all political conflict. And political competition is simply a means of circumventing political violence within the limits of provoking political violence. Western men treat their women better than all other people’s combined. And under majority democracy it has come at the cost of inequality of outcomes for those men. Hence why I recommend houses for the genders, if there is to be a democratic government of any kind: so that we limit each other.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545059232 Timestamp) UM. THE GENDERS CANNOT TAKE EACH OTHER’S VENTING SERIOUSLY –“I can’t understand men who talk about … putting women back in the kitchen, out of the workforce, or referring to of r_pe during a war. …”— A Female Friend That’s because you aren’t a man. Just like I am not a woman and can’t imagine that they’re serious rather than hyperbolic (LARPing). I have overheard far too many conversations of women talking about their husbands as mere monetary and physical resources to be exploited, and the stupidity of men and how women would do such and such better, and how they need female ‘unity’. I am also aware that women are over-privileged compared to men in everything from moral intuitions, to daily life, to health care, to political processes. These things are simply empirical. But they do not change the opinions of women on their relative status. Naxalt(defense of child) is to some degree a defense against male hyperbole(defense of tribe). This is why it is so hard for males and females to communicate at any scale. This is why men and women cannot work in or debate politics together except under the most optimum of circumstances. Hyperbole (exaggeration) of offense, and NAXALT (exaggeration) of defense. Defending children vs Exciting men. These cognitive differences are real, universal, and inescapable. If men wanted to oppress women they would do so. They do not do so because those women are their wives, daughters, sisters and mothers. But if men agree to do something, there is nothing that can stop them. Because in the end, the use of violence determines all political conflict. And political competition is simply a means of circumventing political violence within the limits of provoking political violence. Western men treat their women better than all other people’s combined. And under majority democracy it has come at the cost of inequality of outcomes for those men. Hence why I recommend houses for the genders, if there is to be a democratic government of any kind: so that we limit each other.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545061608 Timestamp) RESTORING VIOLENCE TO THE STUDY OF POLITICS We removed violence from the discourse in order to accommodate women into the political system – despite the fact that the market for politics, like all other markets, is simply a proxy for violence. I set out to restore violence to libertarianism and it resulted in “Sovereigntarianism” (Propertarianism). Noah brings up the current context: –“Another big hurdle is adjusting mens relationship to violence. I have no problem with women saying “I disavow all violence” but I don’t want to hear men saying such weak things. We men need to embrace violence and the consequences of violence. The more comfortable we are with hard edged solutions the better. We don’ t seek them, but we don’t avoid what’s necessary. A failure to account for the power of violence has been a weakness of the right for too long.”—– Noah J Revoy You can’t peace your way into power unless you have power, and if you peace your way into power you will not retain it. Empires fall for this reason as much ore more so than any other. Pacifism is just rent seeking by avoidance of the cost of preservation of the natural order of reciprocity.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545061608 Timestamp) RESTORING VIOLENCE TO THE STUDY OF POLITICS We removed violence from the discourse in order to accommodate women into the political system – despite the fact that the market for politics, like all other markets, is simply a proxy for violence. I set out to restore violence to libertarianism and it resulted in “Sovereigntarianism” (Propertarianism). Noah brings up the current context: –“Another big hurdle is adjusting mens relationship to violence. I have no problem with women saying “I disavow all violence” but I don’t want to hear men saying such weak things. We men need to embrace violence and the consequences of violence. The more comfortable we are with hard edged solutions the better. We don’ t seek them, but we don’t avoid what’s necessary. A failure to account for the power of violence has been a weakness of the right for too long.”—– Noah J Revoy You can’t peace your way into power unless you have power, and if you peace your way into power you will not retain it. Empires fall for this reason as much ore more so than any other. Pacifism is just rent seeking by avoidance of the cost of preservation of the natural order of reciprocity.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545312562 Timestamp) THEY HAVE BEEN AGAINST US FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS We will teach you rather quickly that “toxic masculinity”, like the entire feminine spectrum, is not an attack on the present male, but an attack on the white race, and the men of the white race in particular – and that this attack has been going on in one form or another since our birth 20k years ago. The patterns of the dark ages…..
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545309375 Timestamp) Able? Able? You’re an addict acting like a clown spewing abrahamic critique in the competitive method of females because you can’t put forth an argument other than normative, justificationary, or ridicule. Abrahamism: false promise, baiting into moral hazard, advanced by “Pilpul” consisting of the heaping of undue praise, sophism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience, and defended by “Critique”, consisting of disapproval, moralizing, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, and reputation destruction – thereby advancing a falsehood on one hand, and attacking the person rather than argument on the other. What I do, is teach how to identify and defeat these arguments. What you don’t know is that Truth under threat of violence is the competitive strategy of males, and conformity under threat of reputation destruction the competitive strategy of females. Nor do you realize you are making TEXTBOOK ARGUMENTS using every one of the female techniques. The problem is, someone has to care about your approval, when you’re conducting your Pilpul and Critique in a forum of men for whom truth is far more important than approval, and who are training specifically to end the Abrahamic Deceits in their modern form: Marxism, Boasianism, Freudianism, Keynesianism (pseudoscience), Postmodernism and Libertarianism (sophism), and Feminism (false promise, denial). Truth is what differentiates the west from the rest. We survived christianity and the dark ages thanks to our sovereignty, heroism, truth, duty, and law, with the restoration of martial behavior under the viking conquest, and the restoration of greek thought, the replacement of the church’s mandated ignorance and superstition with literacy, and british contractualism and legalism, combined with greek thought, restoring our empiricism. All of these resulted in the agrarian revolution, world conquest, industrialization, and the creation of the modern world that has dragged the entire world out of semitic ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature. You’re just another drug user, defending his ‘high’, by reaching for any excuse you can find, like a woman defending her reputation despite sleeping with the enemy for money. We ought to shave your head and make you wear a dress. TRUTH IS TRUTH AND TRUTH IS ENOUGH. Satisfaction of demand for Religion(membership in the pack or herd) can be produced by Education(Stoicism), Therapy(buddhism), or Medication(Abrahamism). Cheers.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545312562 Timestamp) THEY HAVE BEEN AGAINST US FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS We will teach you rather quickly that “toxic masculinity”, like the entire feminine spectrum, is not an attack on the present male, but an attack on the white race, and the men of the white race in particular – and that this attack has been going on in one form or another since our birth 20k years ago. The patterns of the dark ages…..
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545309375 Timestamp) Able? Able? You’re an addict acting like a clown spewing abrahamic critique in the competitive method of females because you can’t put forth an argument other than normative, justificationary, or ridicule. Abrahamism: false promise, baiting into moral hazard, advanced by “Pilpul” consisting of the heaping of undue praise, sophism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience, and defended by “Critique”, consisting of disapproval, moralizing, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, and reputation destruction – thereby advancing a falsehood on one hand, and attacking the person rather than argument on the other. What I do, is teach how to identify and defeat these arguments. What you don’t know is that Truth under threat of violence is the competitive strategy of males, and conformity under threat of reputation destruction the competitive strategy of females. Nor do you realize you are making TEXTBOOK ARGUMENTS using every one of the female techniques. The problem is, someone has to care about your approval, when you’re conducting your Pilpul and Critique in a forum of men for whom truth is far more important than approval, and who are training specifically to end the Abrahamic Deceits in their modern form: Marxism, Boasianism, Freudianism, Keynesianism (pseudoscience), Postmodernism and Libertarianism (sophism), and Feminism (false promise, denial). Truth is what differentiates the west from the rest. We survived christianity and the dark ages thanks to our sovereignty, heroism, truth, duty, and law, with the restoration of martial behavior under the viking conquest, and the restoration of greek thought, the replacement of the church’s mandated ignorance and superstition with literacy, and british contractualism and legalism, combined with greek thought, restoring our empiricism. All of these resulted in the agrarian revolution, world conquest, industrialization, and the creation of the modern world that has dragged the entire world out of semitic ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature. You’re just another drug user, defending his ‘high’, by reaching for any excuse you can find, like a woman defending her reputation despite sleeping with the enemy for money. We ought to shave your head and make you wear a dress. TRUTH IS TRUTH AND TRUTH IS ENOUGH. Satisfaction of demand for Religion(membership in the pack or herd) can be produced by Education(Stoicism), Therapy(buddhism), or Medication(Abrahamism). Cheers.