Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • INTELLIGIBILITY AND THOSE OF LOW AGENCY by Noah J Revoy P will always be harder

    INTELLIGIBILITY AND THOSE OF LOW AGENCY
    by Noah J Revoy

    P will always be harder for women and low value men to grasp because of the positive understanding of the value of violence that is required to learn P.

    In the blue pilled democratic fantasy women have equal power to men in the commons with none of the responsibilities. In the red pilled P reality women and weak men have very little power and far more responsibilities.

    – Women who are not attached to a strong man who belongs to a strong male hierarchy have no real power.

    – Men who are not valuable enough to enter into a male hierarchy have no real power.

    Unattached women and low value men will never admit their vulnerable state. Instead they will seek to maintain the failing status quo until it is no longer possible. They will never admit P is right, not even to themselves, which would cause existential dread.

    Therefore to them it must remain unintelligible.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:13:15 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426292683104911

  • Jun 26, 2019, 1:36 PM WOMEN DEMONSTRATE DISGUST (IMPURITY) RESPONSE TO SPEECH LI

    Jun 26, 2019, 1:36 PM
    WOMEN DEMONSTRATE DISGUST (IMPURITY) RESPONSE TO SPEECH LIKE MEN TO BIOLOGICAL DEFECTS

    Males and females can demonstrate the Purity(Positiva)(Negativa)Disgust sensitivity with different biases just like all differences in gender cognitive bias. The female to the Vulnerable outlier (child, female, weak, infirmed), just as the male to the Defective outlier.

    GENDER COGNITIVE BIAS SERIES:
    Survive by Numbers (Nature)
    <= The Herd Strategy(Offspring, Numbers, Dysgenic )
    … <= Female Cognitive Bias
    … … <= Psychosis
    … … …
    … … … … -> Sympathy(thinking)
    … … … -> Analytic
    … … -> Autistic
    … => Male Cognition
    => The Pack Strategy (Resources, Quality, Eugenic)
    Survive By Competition (Competitors)

    Male and Female Brain structures and Endocrinology vary to produce compatible but opposite drives.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:12:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426289257406363

  • IT”S NOT A CONSPIRACY (AS MUCH AS) ITS GENETICS AND CULTURE They specialized in

    IT”S NOT A CONSPIRACY (AS MUCH AS) ITS GENETICS AND CULTURE

    They specialized in the female group strategy of false promise of sex affection support and loyalty to guarantee the advantage of her offspring regardless of merit, by the use of GSSRM to undermine or advance others in pursuit of her status and her children’s.

    This is why they have reversed (or limited) sexual and cognitive dimorphism, and transferred female intuition and competitive strategy to males and vica versa.

    “They’re all female”. (so to speak)

    It’s not a conspiracy any more than females against males are a conspiracy.

    It’s a genetic disposition to parasitic rent seeking on the POLITY just as women have a genetic (and necessary) disposition to parasitic rent seeking upon the MALES in their polity.

    Rates of homosexuality, feminine aspect of male speech patterns, female cognitive and verbal traits in males and visa versa, differences in distribution of mental illness between genders…. Etc.

    “They’re all female” so to speak, and therefore they compete as females. They use the female group competitive strategy. And they have weaponized it effectively against the one group that is most trusting and therefore vulnerable to it:europeans. We are the least racist, clannish, classist peoples but we are also the most vulnerable to the female technique.

    Once you see it you can’t UNSEE it.

    They don’t produce commons. They seek host countries that produce commons that they can parasitically produce rents upon through the same techniques women extract resources from men: false promise, gsrrm, etc, non-rational purely moralistic thought. etc….

    They sound moral.
    They’re not.
    They are amoral or immoral.
    Just like women.
    We evolved to tolerate female behavior.

    I don’t know yet whether our reaction to their mastery of the feminine means of persuasion is evoking evolutionary or purely cultural biases to tolerance.

    I think macdonald and I differ in this one bias: him genetic and me cultural, but in many things it’s probably both.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:46:29 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426187468145353

  • TOURNAMENT, PAIR BONDING, CAPITAL, POLITICAL ORDER, POLICY —“What are your tho

    TOURNAMENT, PAIR BONDING, CAPITAL, POLITICAL ORDER, POLICY

    —“What are your thoughts in this case and specifically how it relates to tournament species v. pair bonding species. When society has comfortable stores and capital, where does that leave the pair bonded class compared to the tournament class of human. Considering both male and female it would be common to see the tournament class dominate every time. How does the pair bonded male compete and in socialist arena where the female is taken care of by the greater part of society? Is the socialist economical model naturally doomed by progress of the human condition to become a communal type and deficit living situation?”—Craig Michael

    1. Restore political reciprocity (eliminate redistributions).
    2. Restore voluntary disassociation and association.
    3. Eliminate interest on consumer credit.
    4. Restore the Militia, Regiment and Barracks system (soak up men) and the WPA so we have defense, emergency, and commons production programs for single males.
    5. Enact singapore retirement that is non-attachable or transferrable.
    6. Convert legal marriage to an exchange of limited powers of attorney, and private contract.(what it legally exists as)
    7. Restore the legal definition of ‘marriage’ to a publicly subsidized corporation for the intergeneration production of children.(which is what it exists as)
    8. Restore fault divorce, and restitution for interference in a marriage (make cheating extremely expensive).
    9. Eliminate Alimony, Support, Common property. (restore male contributory portability)
    10. Restore the primacy of policy to family rather than individual.
    11. Eliminate the marriage penalty and maintain the individual penalty (increased taxes on unmarried childless).

    You cannot fix the natural differences between males and females but you can stop the damage we have done to the production of the institution of marriage as a corporation for reproduction production insurance and care.

    TOURNAMENT SPECIES.
    –“Tournament species in zoology are those species in which members of one sex (usually males) compete in order to mate. In tournament species, the reproductive success of the small group of competition winners is predominantly higher than that of the large group of losers.”—

    PAIR BONDING SPECIES
    —“In biology, a pair bond is the strong affinity that develops in some species between a pair consisting of a male and female, or in some cases as a same-sex pairing, potentially leading to producing offspring and/or a lifelong bond.”—

    DISTRIBUTION
    —“Humans are a hybrid between the two, and different individuals fall into different places on the spectrum of pair-bonding vs. tournament. And, tournament women will pretend to be pair bonding to increase their reproductive success, and pair-bonding trending men will adapt themselves to be more tournament-oriented (TheRedPill/Pickup Game is basically all of these).—Anon

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:46:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426185858126992

  • MALES GSRRM – BUT FOR DIFFERENT REASONS. by Bill Joslin Males GSRRM but for diff

    MALES GSRRM – BUT FOR DIFFERENT REASONS.
    by Bill Joslin

    Males GSRRM but for different reasons. All day long I work with guys that are verbally jabbing each other. It twofold – risk management (keep your shit together, do it right – this is the content) coupled with ‘if you fuck up, you’ll be the butt if jokes for the rest of the day or until someone else fucks up – humour is the context. Humour is the context because it encourages honesty).

    The two together equates to “if you f-up it’s okay tell us we’ll fix it, but also, it’s not okay to f-up)

    It’s risk management opposed to truth suppression, disapproval instead of argument, dominance and power plays.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:31:55 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424714616200800

  • MANAGING FUTURE DYSGENIA Last century <85 was dead weight. Right now <95 is dead

    MANAGING FUTURE DYSGENIA

    Last century <85 was dead weight. Right now <95 is dead weight. In the future < 105 will be dead weight. [1]

    One child policy is enough.

    [1] these are absolute measures, at current standing, not normative, where 105 is the desired minimum median of the distribution, established by the ability to learn from instructions rather than imitation.

    This means we will move from 15-30-50% if we are not careful, and then we will end up like south america or the middle east….

    —“Aren’t there ways to make them not dead weight? Mediating structures?”—Moritz Bierling

    Multiple economies with multiple currencies, where those who cannot serve consumption market ends can work to serve commons (aesthetic) ends. In other words, the market for voluntary organization of production and a non-market of involuntary organization of production (how unions operate today).

    In other words, absorb a lot of labor making the commons the worlds greatest garden of eden, including restoration of the use of hand-build construction techniques that have millennia long durability rather than current nonsense.

    There is a particular problem in economics under which one currency drives up all prices and wages. This isn’t necessary.
    There is a similar problem in the theoretical basis of most digital currencies….

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:23:09 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424680124160661

  • “Genuine question…If men don’t like to be criticized, etc by their women (GRSS

    —“Genuine question…If men don’t like to be criticized, etc by their women (GRSSM), how do women let them know they’re slipping and need to step up? Or is this left to the men’s circle and considered a man’s job to keep himself in check (so to speak)?”— ‎Michelle German

    It’s fine if its not argument. GSRRM = disapproval. argument = true/false, reciprocal/not. you can disapprove of behavior, but not truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:21:38 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424674220334270

  • RT @NoahRevoy: @EthnoHan @curtdoolittle Not overcome but rather harness, tamed.

    RT @NoahRevoy: @EthnoHan @curtdoolittle Not overcome but rather harness, tamed. Put within masculine boundaries so as to be used in creativ…

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-06 18:04:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1147566881911558146

  • the feminine consumption has defeated masculine accumulation, yes

    the feminine consumption has defeated masculine accumulation, yes.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-06 17:50:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1147563508978081792

    Reply addressees: @EthnoHan @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1147563226676322304

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1147563226676322304

  • Women want to ‘force’ you to feel their emotions. Evolution gave them that want.

    Women want to ‘force’ you to feel their emotions. Evolution gave them that want. What do you suppose the evolutionary purpose of that want is?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-06-29 12:47:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1144950613530357762