Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • 3) The left is by demonstrated preference cognitively feminine: consumptive, rep

    3) The left is by demonstrated preference cognitively feminine: consumptive, reproductive, maternal, the right masculine: conservative, capital producing, paternal. And women resist tightening the belt more than men do. So you will continue to tighten your belt and resist it all.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 13:55:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184105414046162946

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @EveningStandard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184104907894378497

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 2) Under vast asymmetry, like when inheriting a fortune or winning a lottery, we can afford to transgress previous norms and traditions that preserved our common interests. Conversely, having SPENT DOWN all that accumulated capital, we now return to the historical mean: nations.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184104907894378497

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 2) Under vast asymmetry, like when inheriting a fortune or winning a lottery, we can afford to transgress previous norms and traditions that preserved our common interests. Conversely, having SPENT DOWN all that accumulated capital, we now return to the historical mean: nations.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184104907894378497

  • 1) NO. NO. NO. We came out of a period of vast economic institutional, cultural,

    1) NO. NO. NO. We came out of a period of vast economic institutional, cultural, and genetic asymmetry and conspicuous consumption of compromises between genes, gender, class, and interests. We are no longer in conditions making possible conspicuous consumption of signal goods.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 13:50:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184104200759844864

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @EveningStandard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184066817414828032

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184066817414828032

  • THE ECONOMICS OF FEMALE MATE SELECTION Women voluntarily pair with men, (a) to d

    THE ECONOMICS OF FEMALE MATE SELECTION

    Women voluntarily pair with men, (a) to defend against involuntary pairing with other men; (b)to gain access to resource and defense, (c) status (market value) largely among women, (d) to capture genes, attention and resources and keep them away from other women, (e) mates will sacrifice more than all other combined except mothers for children (ie: friendship), (f) cooperation is disproportionately more productive than all other individual actions.

    This produces the emotional reaction of friendship: ready access to attention and care. Our emotions evolved to inform us that these are the optimum actions.

    Marriage is only an optimum under property. As we can see reversing in modernity. Successful people with assets stay together. Poor without them far less so. I can explain that also but it’s not very ‘nice’.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-14 10:12:00 UTC

  • by Shannon Constantine Personally I’d like to see the other 30% devote their tal

    by Shannon Constantine

    Personally I’d like to see the other 30% devote their talents to improving womankind. The problem with feminism is that it succeeded in improving women’s lot in life, without actually improving women.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-13 11:06:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183338160404738048

  • by Shannon Constantine Personally I’d like to see the other 30% devote their tal

    by Shannon Constantine

    Personally I’d like to see the other 30% devote their talents to improving womankind. The problem with feminism is that it succeeded in improving women’s lot in life, without actually improving women.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-13 07:06:00 UTC

  • True. You have to be physically unattractive to be a liberal. Tulsi could switch

    True. You have to be physically unattractive to be a liberal. Tulsi could switch parties and be VP candidate, then Pres easily.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 15:44:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183045677070405632

    Reply addressees: @CAGoldenBear @TulsiGabbard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182333334027849733

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182333334027849733

  • Martin Štěpán Insight gained while watching this (albeit not directly mentioned

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrZ33sR3N0Qby Martin Štěpán

    Insight gained while watching this (albeit not directly mentioned here).

    Women used to be more religious and more conservative as a result. This is because they’re more inclined towards empathizing on the empathy-systems spectrum (with extremes being schizophrenia and autism). As a result, they attribute intention to where none is present and consider emergent properties of systems a result of the will of God.

    What happens when you take that away and there are these emergent properties of nature left to explain, such as wage-gap, men at all the top positions, all the different outcomes arising from different groups possessing different traits and so on?Updated Oct 12, 2019, 10:43 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 10:43:00 UTC

  • GROUP DIFFERENCES IN BODY AND COGNITION 1. degree of neoteny (limited maturity)

    GROUP DIFFERENCES IN BODY AND COGNITION

    1. degree of neoteny (limited maturity) Paedomorphic vs Peramorphic traits,

    2. rate and duration of maturity (time in maturity) slow = plasticity

    3. degree of dimorphism and bias dimorphic bias

    Asian: fast maturity, shallow maturity, low dimorphism, -?

    West: slow maturity, deep maturity, high dimorphism, F-bias

    African: fast maturity, deep maturity, low dimorphism. M-Bias

    The San People (africa) have neotenous traits relative to Caucasoids: large brain, light skin pigment, less hairy, round-headed, bulging forehead, small cranial sinuses, flat roof of the nose, small face, small mastoid processes, wide eye separation, median eye fold, short stature and horizontal penis

    We need narrow the causes down but the data is pretty consistent and it’s interesting.

    paedomorphosis and peramorphosis.

    These terms refer to deceleration and acceleration of development, respectively.

    Neoteny refers to retention of juvenile features into adulthood, Neoteny falls under paedomorphosis, as physical development of features is slowed. Peramorphic is the opposite such as Large noses and long legs

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-11 21:32:00 UTC

  • ADVICE TO ASPIES(MASCULINE MINDS) WANTING TO EXPAND SOCIAL CIRCLES: TREAT PEOPLE

    ADVICE TO ASPIES(MASCULINE MINDS) WANTING TO EXPAND SOCIAL CIRCLES: TREAT PEOPLE LIKE SUNSHINE

    (or “Advice to Aspies on how to go through life without continually failing the Turing test.” – Shannon Constantine )

    There aren’t enough of ‘us’ to build a society. We are outliers. Society is built for ‘them’.

    They feel more than we do. They sense more than we do. They trade confirmation because they are not as sure of what they think as we are.

    And like anything in life, a trade must be done on the customer’s terms. So sell what they’re buying, not what you want to sell.

    So, I just shut my brain off, smile, and feel human presence like sunshine, not feel I need to contribute other than to confirm or compliment. I practiced ‘feeling’ others not ‘thinking’ them. Its sort of like being still so you can listen to a soft sound.

    We tend to listen to problems. Try not to respond to the problem but to the experience in relation to the problem, mirror his or her feelings and confirm them.

    I practice four disciplines.

    1. I only disagree if a person will come to harm – not because the situation can be solved better.

    2. I only give advice or ‘explain’ if I ask if they want it, or if they ask for it. “I have a thought on that if you want to hear it sometime”.

    3. I only explain incentives, not what someone with lower agreeableness (us) would to correct the people involved. People don’t have our masculine absence of demand for agreeableness.

    4. I confirm their emotions as rational for them in the circumstance.

    This produces trust. We operate on truth and falsehood rather than approval or disapproval, and rather than inclusion or exclusion. This is our ‘gift’. And it is a tool we can help them use. But they operate by inclusion and exclusion, and approval and disapproval, not by truth and falsehood.

    Once you have developed trust – sensitivity to their ned for approval and inclusion – which takes quite a bit of time, they might ask you for explanations. But don’t volunteer them. Over time, they will ask questions in such a way that they will cue you that they’re asking.

    Work to find fulfillment from the experience of people, not the conversation. Then the conversation will come – on their terms.

    I became happy when I said: how can I make everyone I meet feel comfortable, or complimented, or helped in some way no matter how small.

    We don’t realize that when we talk to them we are taking not giving. Give and you will receive so to speak.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-11 10:30:00 UTC

  • THE THREE METHODS OF COERCION 1 – Force (masculine) – By Law or Military 2 – Pay

    THE THREE METHODS OF COERCION

    1 – Force (masculine) – By Law or Military

    2 – Payment (libertarian) – By Trade – or Payment

    3 – Undermining (feminine) – By Gossip or Religion

    That’s what you’ve got to work with. That’s it.

    1. The Russians and Chinese use force: Command

    2. The West uses Libertarian: sovereignty and reciprocity

    3. The Semites use undermining: Priesthoods

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-10 09:06:00 UTC