Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • WHY DO CHILDREN GO WITH THE MOTHER GIVEN THE DATA? —-“immature children are th

    WHY DO CHILDREN GO WITH THE MOTHER GIVEN THE DATA?

    —-“immature children are the responsibility of the mother in the event of a divorce.” What is the empirical basis for this? Is there a scientific literature showing that when post-breastfeeding prepubescent children are made ward of their fathers, rather than their mothers, they have developmental failures?”—Asab Karpuz

    ^No. It’s just the evidence from every law code throughout history, that whenever there is a divorce the mother is returned to her father with her children and those assets the father contributed to the marriage.”

    Traditionally men take charge of boys during a ritual of some sort (coming of age) where they leave the mother gradually or rapidly and join the world of men. Girls are not treated the same because there is endless demand for them, whether helping mother and siblings, or for sex and fertility, or for assistance in the operation of a household whether single or multi-generational.

    The evidence is somewhat the opposite in that single women are deleterious to the development of their children, mostly because they will not accept a male who has influence over her children, where as the opposite is true in that men quickly reform stable households.

    So (a) is the mother emotionally stable and not exposing her children to psychological chaos (b) is she sufficiently conscientious to run a household and govern children (c) is she financially stable in and possessed of enough income to run a household, and (d) is she stable enough to restore a two-parent family.

    Conversely is the man (a) not anti-social, abusive, addictive, or criminal (c) desirable enough and conscientious enough to attract a woman who can maintain a household, (c) capable of producing sufficient income to afford doing so. In other words, it simply more beneficial to hold a two parent household and men are more likely to rapidly construct one.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 14:42:00 UTC

  • WHAT ‘TRADITIONAL’ MEANS, WHAT TO SAY INSTEAD, AND HOW TO RESTORE RECIPROCITY BE

    WHAT ‘TRADITIONAL’ MEANS, WHAT TO SAY INSTEAD, AND HOW TO RESTORE RECIPROCITY BETWEEN GENDERS.

    Advice to Libertarian(ideology), Constitutional (rule of law), Right(normative tradition), and Religious(theological tradition): Avoid “Traditional” as it’s indefensible. (FWIW; it means ’empirically successful in pre technological history because of the division of labor necessary under intergenerational agrarianism.’)

    Better argument is “Biological gender roles constitute the optimum Nash equilibrium under which all of us do the best we can even if none of us or few of us do as well as we’d wish, without imposing irreciprocal hardship upon one another.”

    This is why we evolved paring off and serial monogamy, and only developed long term monogamy as (a) we lived longer (b) we developed property and productivity and (c) were able to perform intergenerational care in exchange for intergenerational inheritance.

    Because of the narrower distribution of desirable men, and the wider distribution of desirable women and the increase in the division of labor such that women are freed from manual household labor like men are (largely)freed from manual environmental labor, we can no longer expect postwar rates of marriage, and will return to pre-industrial rates of marriage – preserving it more commonly among the better classes who have greater interests in property and its returns, and the working and laboring classes who possess sufficient in-class sexual social market value, and sufficient conscientiousness and reciprocity, and returning to serial or parallel relations around maternal households living on the edge of self sufficiency.

    However, we can eliminate ir-reciprocity for MEN in the current era, by (a) ending marriage to the state (redistribution); (b) ending community property, alimony, child support, (c) restore liability for interference in a marriage; (e) restore voluntary disassociation so that men can reform paternal institutions of reciprocal support in lieu of marriage; and (d) forcible savings for retirement that is unattachable by anyone and everyone as insurance by and for the polity from your moral hazard of self insufficiency.

    In other words, we can restore reciprocal interest in the returns on investment in a partnership, by restoring the disincentive to parasitically live off others permitted by their intuition of reciprocity against moral hazard.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 13:10:00 UTC

  • WHAT ‘TRADITIONAL’ MEANS, WHAT TO SAY INSTEAD, AND HOW TO RESTORE RECIPROCITY BE

    WHAT ‘TRADITIONAL’ MEANS, WHAT TO SAY INSTEAD, AND HOW TO RESTORE RECIPROCITY BETWEEN GENDERS.

    Advice to Libertarian(ideology), Constitutional (rule of law), Right(normative tradition), and Religious(theological tradition): Avoid “Traditional” as it’s indefensible. (FWIW; it means ’empirically successful in pre technological history because of the division of labor necessary under intergenerational agrarianism.’)

    Better argument is “Biological gender roles constitute the optimum Nash equilibrium under which all of us do the best we can even if none of us or few of us do as well as we’d wish, without imposing irreciprocal hardship upon one another.”

    This is why we evolved paring off and serial monogamy, and only developed long term monogamy as (a) we lived longer (b) we developed property and productivity and (c) were able to perform intergenerational care in exchange for intergenerational inheritance.

    Because of the narrower distribution of desirable men, and the wider distribution of desirable women and the increase in the division of labor such that women are freed from manual household labor like men are (largely)freed from manual environmental labor, we can no longer expect postwar rates of marriage, and will return to pre-industrial rates of marriage – preserving it more commonly among the better classes who have greater interests in property and its returns, and the working and laboring classes who possess sufficient in-class sexual social market value, and sufficient conscientiousness and reciprocity, and returning to serial or parallel relations around maternal households living on the edge of self sufficiency.

    However, we can eliminate ir-reciprocity for MEN in the current era, by (a) ending marriage to the state (redistribution); (b) ending community property, alimony, child support, (c) restore liability for interference in a marriage; (e) restore voluntary disassociation so that men can reform paternal institutions of reciprocal support in lieu of marriage; and (d) forcible savings for retirement that is unattachable by anyone and everyone as insurance by and for the polity from your moral hazard of self insufficiency.

    In other words, we can restore reciprocal interest in the returns on investment in a partnership, by restoring the disincentive to parasitically live off others permitted by their intuition of reciprocity against moral hazard.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 12:26:00 UTC

  • (Women at the next table discussing reading women authors in particular Alcott a

    (Women at the next table discussing reading women authors in particular Alcott and Austen, with interjections complaining abut housework, how other people don’t serve their interests as much as they think they serve others’ interests; how other women think foolishly or have selfish intent -without realizing the natural contradiction in the conversation; and the evil of men in between. All stereotypes are true.”)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 11:41:00 UTC

  • Breakfast yesterday morning. Six women. A candidate’s appearance definitely infl

    Breakfast yesterday morning. Six women. A candidate’s appearance definitely influences their opinion. It’s … this has gotta stop. Really. Seriously.

    Now we can reverse it, or give them their own ‘house’ of commons so to speak. And restore the multiple houses of the classes.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 00:59:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186447026260774913

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186296323412299776

    IN REPLY TO:

    @StefanMolyneux

    Ladies.

    Justin Trudeau will NOT date you if you vote for him.

    But he WILL tax the hell out of the man who will marry you.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186296323412299776

  • Laurelle asked: —“Why does Cane find it necessary, in a 2009 publication, to i

    Laurelle asked: —“Why does Cane find it necessary, in a 2009 publication, to include an essay (within the chapter on J.D. Salinger) titled, “How to create female characters that readers… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=489735368290025&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 19:52:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186369666379210752

  • WRITING CHARACTERS: SORRY BUT YES, FEMALES AND MALES SPEAK (VERY) DIFFERENTLY. A

    WRITING CHARACTERS: SORRY BUT YES, FEMALES AND MALES SPEAK (VERY) DIFFERENTLY.

    And we speak differently whether or not members of the opposite sex are the the room or hearing distance. Both are more reserved in the presence of the opposite sex.

    So when writing characters, don’t force the audience out of suspension of disbelief.

    Laurelle asked: —“Why does Cane find it necessary, in a 2009 publication, to include an essay (within the chapter on J.D. Salinger) titled, “How to create female characters that readers remember?” I mean, really.’—

    Because men are as notoriously bad at creating female characters, as women are at creating men. Dialog that is counter to type (falling out of character) is one of the most common failings of authors, with misgendered speech the most common means of creating cardboard characters. Sensitivity tends to vary between male and female cognition with empathizing minds (dominantly female) tolerating it (not breaking suspension of disbelief), and systematizing minds (dominantly male) not tolerating it (breaking suspension of disbelief). In fact, it’s rather humorous that you even mention this because you’re demonstrating it. The most common demonstrably female cognitive bias is NAXALT (“not all x are like that”) meaning failure to grasp a distribution.

    Now all of us vary in our distribution of systematizing(autistic extreme) male bias and empathizing (psychotic extreme) female bias and we find masculinely biased females and femininely biased males. But that doesn’t change the fact that while some of us are insensitive (empathic) to patterns of behavior and some of us are extremely sensitive to behavioral patterns (systematizing), that the audience’s (marketplace’s) tolerance (willingness to keep investing time in the author’s work) is unaffected by one’s ability to construct a believable character that meets the target market’s demand for suspension of disbelief.

    Same is for age, same is for occupation, same is for socio-economic class. Same is for time period.

    BTW: Stereotypes are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences, for obvious reasons: they’re continually tested empirically every day. Analytic males have the most accurate judgement of groups (patterns of action), and slightly sensitive females have the most accurate judgement of individuals (patterns of empathy(feeling)). This measure averages out at somewhere between .2 and .5. So it isn’t an extreme advantage or disadvantage. But it does matter. ie: If you write a romance novel it doesn’t matter as much as if you write a spy thriller.

    Hope this is useful for other writers.

    Cheers.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 15:52:00 UTC

  • We don’t need to protect western civilisation from anyone as much as solipsistic

    We don’t need to protect western civilisation from anyone as much as solipsistic psychotic women here at home. Repeal the nineteenth and all is settled.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-20 14:22:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185924296478248960

    Reply addressees: @LadyAodh

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185923825235562506

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LadyAodh Did you know that about a third of women have some form of mental illness? That the spectrum of female to male brain structure is psychotic to autistic? That hyper solipsistic empathising is borderline psychotic? And that moralising doesn’t scale or account for costs?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1185923825235562506

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @LadyAodh Did you know that about a third of women have some form of mental illness? That the spectrum of female to male brain structure is psychotic to autistic? That hyper solipsistic empathising is borderline psychotic? And that moralising doesn’t scale or account for costs?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1185923825235562506

  • Did you know that about a third of women have some form of mental illness? That

    Did you know that about a third of women have some form of mental illness? That the spectrum of female to male brain structure is psychotic to autistic? That hyper solipsistic empathising is borderline psychotic? And that moralising doesn’t scale or account for costs?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-20 14:20:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185923825235562506

    Reply addressees: @LadyAodh

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185922461373812739

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185922461373812739

  • Masculine and Feminine Anti-Social Behavior

    Masculine and Feminine Anti-Social Behavior https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/19/masculine-and-feminine-anti-social-behavior/

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 23:25:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185698396499300353