—“The crazy notion that overlapping distributions can still have divergent central tendencies and dispersion. It’s almost as if statistical reasoning doesn’t stop at the door just because we want it to.”—Duke Newcomb
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:17:00 UTC
MEN EVOLVED FOR ANALYTICS (POLITICS) AND WOMEN FOR EMPATHY (CHILDREN)
(sarcastic humor warning)
Yes, the ability of the Academy to sell non-stem courses in and emotional sedation to women wiling to pay 100k for a non-science degree in pseudosciences, sophisms and fictionalisms like psychology, sociology, marketing, human relations, ‘business’, ‘nonsense-studies’, – “advance mothering and gossiping” – without demonstrating cognitive ability in mathematics, physics, chemistry, biochemistry, and economics does in fact fund the entire edifice, and at the same time nearly eradicate rates of reproduction.
This is the problem throughout history. Women in every civlization conform to whatever other women conform to no matter how … questionable – whether islamic suppression, or endemic tolerance for physical abuse, or the marxist, postmodern,, feminist, and denialist folly of equality that takes advantage of the female cognitive fear of she or her children being left behind in the resource distribution – or worse, left behind as the band and tribe migrate to new territories.
Women are how the they brought christianity in to undermine the empire, and women are how the marxist, postmodernists, and feminists, brought their repetition of the destruction of civilization into ours.
Women evolved for empathy to extend their nervous system to infants and children who are unable to communicate. Men are easily fooled by women day in day out. We lack their empathy. But we men evolved for politics (empiricism). We are not fooled in politics – we are just fooled by women. And interestingly enough, the enemy uses the feminine technique of women to undermine our civilization using our women.
Otherwise we would never have had the present problems, because we would never have had other than a conservative president and senate.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:00:00 UTC
You do:
– approval or rejection (feminine)
– desirable or undesirable (feminine)
– proportional or disproportional. (feminine lef)
– moral or immoral (christian right)
– right or wrong. (masculine right)
– true or false (everyone)
And we do;
– reciprocal (productive) vs irreciprocal ( parasitic)
– testifiable vs untestifiable
– truthful and untruthful
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:58:00 UTC
WOMEN EVOLVED to make use of the market for sovereignty, particularly sovereignty from males seeking to limit their choice of reproduction and limits to their consumption.
Conversely, men in collections of brothers, evolved to kill off rival collections of brothers, in order to obtain their property and their females. And men evolved cooperation using tools to constrain alphas in order to redistribute access to females for sex, and care. (reproduction is not in male minds until property evolves)
—“Women initiate more divorces because we’re more easily persuaded by the modern-day mantra of “Whatever makes you happy”. It is entirely due to our capacity to prioritise feelings over truth.’—Lisa Outhwaite
Lisa is insightful. But i’ll clarify a bit that that women have always and everywhere been hypergamic, and men willing to kill more so over women than any other reason by orders of magnitude, which is the origin of our ‘pairing off’ prior to our institution of marriage. When we evolved a division of labor, specialized tools, equipment, and constructions, animal property, and territorial property, we evolved marriage, but the property division was a women and her children and a man and his assets – which is a necessary division of the means of survival.
So in contemporary economic productivity, there is no cost to women’s exercise of disassociation, and there are, as she says above, many incentives from the feminist movement, the postmodernist movement, and the anti-white male, anti-western civilization movement, and women always conform to whatever higher status women conform to, no matter what those women conform to.
I’ll state “Whatever Makes You Happy” scientifically: the organization of the female brain, it’s developmental differences in connectivity and size, and it’s bias in hormones to cause that differences (brains are grown), creates a far more numerous, for more intense, far more urgent, stimulation of independent networks creating far more demand for her attention, and attention that causes her to bear costs (effort) to maintain in stable state (control). This is a purely physical process she has ver little control over and evolution prohibited her from having control over. Men by contrast ‘use less of our brains’ which is better said as men’s brains evolved for the opposite function, and they are organized to “compartmentalize information” so that it is limited to the physical world and physical body, so that we will bear physical costs on behalf of one another, of women, and of children they raise.
Between work on the constitution, work on completing religion, work on migrating to the mainstream, work on the institute, work on Michael’s collection of my essays, and not working on the main book I need to publish, I am trying to make time to finish the Foundations course, and the explanation of the brain and behavior in operational terms, so that we are no longer attribute to petty psychologizing that which is a physical difference instructions of our brains, that evolution discovered was necessary for us to rise to the top of the planetary food chain. Once that is done, we will see the relationship between the structure of the brain, operational language, testimonial speech, psychological acquisitionism, ethical and moral propertarianism, and social compatibilism, that is only optimized by extending the structure of the brain into our institutions: markets in everything.
The brain evolved to function as a market for attention, with differences in the cost of attention, by region, module, and sub-organ, determining differences in costs of providing attention to that region, module, and sub-organ.
Even this description describes compatibilism.
I only do compatibilism, for the purpose of maximum quality of life while in pursuit of maximum eugenic evolution, with maximum speed, for the maximum achievement of mankind, in the shortest possible time, given the hostility of the planet and the universe to the development of intelligent life forms, that require long periods of stability and short periods of stress to incrementally evolve.
In other words, I always and everywhere take a question to its last criteria of decidability using what we call in computer science ‘exhaustive search’.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:57:00 UTC
Lisa Outhwaite CORRECTLY APPORTIONS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAILURE OF THE WEST
—“Curt Doolittle, You personally do not. There is nothing MGTOW about you.
<q>”…women are how the marxist, postmodernists, and feminists, brought their repetition of the destruction of civilization into ours.”</q>
This point, and the general spirit of the original post fell short in terms of fairly apportioning responsibility and, therefore, will have fallen short in terms of re-building legitimate male strength, which must be founded on a more serious appraisal of past mistakes and a full acknowledgement of the burden of blame.
The:
<q>”women have destroyed Western civilisation'</q>
… argument has become almost a rallying call to less discerning, disenfranchised males and it’s in dire need of correction, or balance certainly, by more superintendent males.”— Lisa Outhwaite
Correct.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:23:00 UTC
WOMEN EVOLVED to make use of the market for sovereignty, particularly sovereignty from males seeking to limit their choice of reproduction and limits to their consumption.
Conversely, men in collections of brothers, evolved to kill off rival collections of brothers, in order to obtain their property and their females. And men evolved cooperation using tools to constrain alphas in order to redistribute access to females for sex, and care. (reproduction is not in male minds until property evolves)
—“Women initiate more divorces because we’re more easily persuaded by the modern-day mantra of “Whatever makes you happy”. It is entirely due to our capacity to prioritise feelings over truth.’—Lisa Outhwaite
Lisa is insightful. But i’ll clarify a bit that that women have always and everywhere been hypergamic, and men willing to kill more so over women than any other reason by orders of magnitude, which is the origin of our ‘pairing off’ prior to our institution of marriage. When we evolved a division of labor, specialized tools, equipment, and constructions, animal property, and territorial property, we evolved marriage, but the property division was a women and her children and a man and his assets – which is a necessary division of the means of survival.
So in contemporary economic productivity, there is no cost to women’s exercise of disassociation, and there are, as she says above, many incentives from the feminist movement, the postmodernist movement, and the anti-white male, anti-western civilization movement, and women always conform to whatever higher status women conform to, no matter what those women conform to.
I’ll state “Whatever Makes You Happy” scientifically: the organization of the female brain, it’s developmental differences in connectivity and size, and it’s bias in hormones to cause that differences (brains are grown), creates a far more numerous, for more intense, far more urgent, stimulation of independent networks creating far more demand for her attention, and attention that causes her to bear costs (effort) to maintain in stable state (control). This is a purely physical process she has ver little control over and evolution prohibited her from having control over. Men by contrast ‘use less of our brains’ which is better said as men’s brains evolved for the opposite function, and they are organized to “compartmentalize information” so that it is limited to the physical world and physical body, so that we will bear physical costs on behalf of one another, of women, and of children they raise.
Between work on the constitution, work on completing religion, work on migrating to the mainstream, work on the institute, work on Michael’s collection of my essays, and not working on the main book I need to publish, I am trying to make time to finish the Foundations course, and the explanation of the brain and behavior in operational terms, so that we are no longer attribute to petty psychologizing that which is a physical difference instructions of our brains, that evolution discovered was necessary for us to rise to the top of the planetary food chain. Once that is done, we will see the relationship between the structure of the brain, operational language, testimonial speech, psychological acquisitionism, ethical and moral propertarianism, and social compatibilism, that is only optimized by extending the structure of the brain into our institutions: markets in everything.
The brain evolved to function as a market for attention, with differences in the cost of attention, by region, module, and sub-organ, determining differences in costs of providing attention to that region, module, and sub-organ.
Even this description describes compatibilism.
I only do compatibilism, for the purpose of maximum quality of life while in pursuit of maximum eugenic evolution, with maximum speed, for the maximum achievement of mankind, in the shortest possible time, given the hostility of the planet and the universe to the development of intelligent life forms, that require long periods of stability and short periods of stress to incrementally evolve.
In other words, I always and everywhere take a question to its last criteria of decidability using what we call in computer science ‘exhaustive search’.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 09:55:00 UTC
When we went to college they got pre-wed degrees. Today they get work-study c-carousel degrees, and infertility-debt.
(humor)
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 22:41:00 UTC
You do:
– approval or rejection (feminine)
– desirable or undesirable (feminine)
– proportional or disproportional. (feminine lef)
– moral or immoral (christian right)
– right or wrong. (masculine right)
– true or false (everyone)
And we do;
– reciprocal (productive) vs irreciprocal ( parasitic)
– testifiable vs untestifiable
– truthful and untruthful
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 20:52:00 UTC
MEN EVOLVED FOR ANALYTICS (POLITICS) AND WOMEN FOR EMPATHY (CHILDREN)
(sarcastic humor warning)
Yes, the ability of the Academy to sell non-stem courses in and emotional sedation to women wiling to pay 100k for a non-science degree in pseudosciences, sophisms and fictionalisms like psychology, sociology, marketing, human relations, ‘business’, ‘nonsense-studies’, – “advance mothering and gossiping” – without demonstrating cognitive ability in mathematics, physics, chemistry, biochemistry, and economics does in fact fund the entire edifice, and at the same time nearly eradicate rates of reproduction.
This is the problem throughout history. Women in every civlization conform to whatever other women conform to no matter how … questionable – whether islamic suppression, or endemic tolerance for physical abuse, or the marxist, postmodern,, feminist, and denialist folly of equality that takes advantage of the female cognitive fear of she or her children being left behind in the resource distribution – or worse, left behind as the band and tribe migrate to new territories.
Women are how the they brought christianity in to undermine the empire, and women are how the marxist, postmodernists, and feminists, brought their repetition of the destruction of civilization into ours.
Women evolved for empathy to extend their nervous system to infants and children who are unable to communicate. Men are easily fooled by women day in day out. We lack their empathy. But we men evolved for politics (empiricism). We are not fooled in politics – we are just fooled by women. And interestingly enough, the enemy uses the feminine technique of women to undermine our civilization using our women.
Otherwise we would never have had the present problems, because we would never have had other than a conservative president and senate.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 19:43:00 UTC
So you know I am right, tha I speak the truth. But you engage in disapproval and rejection because you lack an argument, and use the cognitively female technique of denial, ridicule, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, rallying, and gossiping to obscure your fraud and deceit. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 18:09:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188880365009756160
Reply addressees: @GregCampNC @fryskefilosoof
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188877476656832512
IN REPLY TO:
@GregCampNC
@fryskefilosoof @curtdoolittle Your bigotry is boring. Run along now.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188877476656832512