Pink Shirts and white sorts
High Investment Grooming (powerhouse)
Eccentric High Investment (WASP)
F-U Open Collar/ Jacket
Black Turtleneck
Coat and Tie
White Collar
Hipsters
Polo Shirt Uniform.
Sportsman
Blue Collar (Workman)
No Collar
Sports Wear
Wife Beater
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-10 15:52:00 UTC
WOMEN IN OUR ARGUMENTS
Oh. BTW: Women rarely engage in any of these arguments at the fundamental level – more to ‘fine tune’ our arguments – especially when we overdo it. (which we do)…. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=503296116933950&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-10 00:35:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193326346702934017
WOMEN IN OUR ARGUMENTS
Oh. BTW: Women rarely engage in any of these arguments at the fundamental level – more to ‘fine tune’ our arguments – especially when we overdo it. (which we do).
It’s MEN who use the female strategy of undermining(GSRRM) that are the usual target of our criticism – not women. So yeah, when we say “You’re using the female means of showing disapproval instead of argument to the truth or falsehood, reciprocity or irreciprocity of the argument – when and claiming you’re falsifying the argument.” So yes, it’s not just calling the opposition dishonest, but insulting his masculinity.
What you’ll find here is that the primary difference between men and women is female cog bias of NAXALT (exceptions) because of the personal cog bias, and the male cog bias of Generalizations (distributions), because of the political cog bias. )
Hugs.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 19:35:00 UTC
—“I guess my question is: Why is the feminine always framed as negative or wrong? I understand GSRRM would be wrong for a male. But isn’t there an appropriate application? Is it only among women? Should it have any reach beyond that? Please excuse if I’m out of line here. I ask in all sincerity.”— New Person
–Brandon Hayes–
Intellectual honesty will never be met with hostility here. 🙂
You’re simply mistaking things.
In the case of stigma (scarlet letter) you’re talking about norms.
Shaming to maintain order.
GRSM is shaming to undermine order (create chaos).
Shaming isn’t wrong.
Subversion is.
–The Propertarian Institute–
^He’s good. 😉
1 -So violence can be used to:
… (a) violate law, or (b) enforce law.
2 – Shaming can be used to:
… (a) subvert norms or enforce norms.
3 – The difference is:
… (a) cost and severity of punishment must fit the crime.
… (b) shaming is cheap to perform and to correct
… (c) violence is expensive to perform and to correct.
4 – GSRRM (undermining) can be used to
… (a) suppress truth
… (b) undermine those who speak truth
… (c) undermine societies that operate by trust and truth.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 17:30:00 UTC
And no it’s not a social construction.
(a) brain structures vary (sometimes greatly) by gender
(b) brain functions vary (sometimes greatly) by gender
(c) in utero development failure produces ‘failures’.
(d) early development, social development, trauma produce ‘failures’.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 14:37:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193175889326026752
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193175423762386946
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM … -> Subjective(experience, conflate) vs Executive (Plan Act Recuse Disambiguate).
Female and Male cognitive stereotypes (as always) are correct at the general and at the extreme. However, w/ heavily overlapping, so we find a few males with female cog bias, and opposite.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1193175423762386946
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM … -> Subjective(experience, conflate) vs Executive (Plan Act Recuse Disambiguate).
Female and Male cognitive stereotypes (as always) are correct at the general and at the extreme. However, w/ heavily overlapping, so we find a few males with female cog bias, and opposite.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1193175423762386946
… -> Subjective(experience, conflate) vs Executive (Plan Act Recuse Disambiguate).
Female and Male cognitive stereotypes (as always) are correct at the general and at the extreme. However, w/ heavily overlapping, so we find a few males with female cog bias, and opposite.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 14:36:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193175423762386946
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193173983962775554
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM Dorsal: Sensory, S-M, Motor(physical), M-E, Executive, E-S, Social, S-F, Focus, P-F, Plan, > Recurse.
Lateral: Prey(Perception) vs Predator (Action).
Diff Auto-Association ->Diff in Prediction(imagination) -> Diff in Activity(value detection) ->Diff in Attention …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1193173983962775554
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM Dorsal: Sensory, S-M, Motor(physical), M-E, Executive, E-S, Social, S-F, Focus, P-F, Plan, > Recurse.
Lateral: Prey(Perception) vs Predator (Action).
Diff Auto-Association ->Diff in Prediction(imagination) -> Diff in Activity(value detection) ->Diff in Attention …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1193173983962775554
Dorsal: Sensory, S-M, Motor(physical), M-E, Executive, E-S, Social, S-F, Focus, P-F, Plan, > Recurse.
Lateral: Prey(Perception) vs Predator (Action).
Diff Auto-Association ->Diff in Prediction(imagination) -> Diff in Activity(value detection) ->Diff in Attention …
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 14:30:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193173983962775554
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193166428754653184
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193166428754653184
Always and everywhere M|F/2,+7 >=F|M applies, otherwise costs are imposed on the individual and common. So between teens unable to bear consequences or with teens unable judge or bear consequences, they are not reciprocal, they cannot be, they may be voluntary, and that is all.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 08:14:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193079352478580736
Reply addressees: @jeefan_ @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193047332616622080
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193047332616622080
AND… even then, our genetic (species) differences are such that for MANY of us, you invoke our disgust response. So even if tolerable, you are not desirable, and as undesirable we would prefer to be free of contract with you.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 14:10:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192806598248456192
Reply addressees: @FreePeterBiarM @Nalo_Nei
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192806022513090560
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@FreePeterBiarM @Nalo_Nei Otherwise (empirically and logically) you cannot have these things.
AND… because you will not pay those costs in thought, display, words, and deeds we cannot coexist with you in the same neighborhoods, jobs, markets, polities, nations, ro civilizations until you do.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192806022513090560
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@FreePeterBiarM @Nalo_Nei Otherwise (empirically and logically) you cannot have these things.
AND… because you will not pay those costs in thought, display, words, and deeds we cannot coexist with you in the same neighborhoods, jobs, markets, polities, nations, ro civilizations until you do.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192806022513090560
“WHAT DOES GSRRM STAND FOR?”
The Female (herd) competitive strategy of circumventing argument by use of undermining, poisoning the well, reputation destruction by use of (D)enial, (D)isapproval,(O)utrage, (G) ossiping, (R]allying,(S)haming, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, (P)sychologizing,(U)ndermining, to cause (R)eputation destruction, Ostracization, or Death and solving for (F)ace, consensus, or consent .
This feminine strategy is in contrast with Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” using rejection or approval vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood.
FULL LIST
(D)enial
… (D)isapproval
… … (O)utrage
… … … (S)haming,
… … … … (M)oralizing,
… … … … … (P)sychologizing,
… … … … … … (R)idiculing
… … … … … … … [R]allying
… … … … … … … … (G)ossiping
… … … … … … … … … (P)ropagandizing
For the purpose of:
… … … … … … … … … … (U)ndermining,
… … … … … … … … … … … (R)eputation destruction.
And and preserving:
… (F)ace, approval, or consent – instead of Truth (Decidability)
… … (S)elf Image
… … … (S)tatus
… … … … (F)ree Riding
… … … … … (R)ent Seeking
… … … … … … (C)oruption
… … … … … … … (P)arasitism
… … … … … … … … (P)redation
With their act of:
… … … … … … … … … … (F)raud.
Men generally make an argument and let the argument do it work. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of disapproving of, denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it.
DIAGNOSIS
So discovering the lie is rather easy. It’s crime they commit, the fraud that the liars engage in, which provides them with the incentive to lie. This isn’t very difficult since the benefits of abrahamic deceit are all psychological comforts.
ADDICTION
Unfortunately, like all false comforts, whether psychotic(mental), ritual (religion), or chemical (drugs alcohol), the addiction is almost always incurable, and results in a life long struggle to recover.
—Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 13:05:00 UTC