Theme: Sex Differences

  • sterilization in exchange for subsidy

    sterilization in exchange for subsidy.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-04 17:17:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202275732241735681

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202262240461836296


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202262240461836296

  • Returning western distribution to victorian levels

    Returning western distribution to victorian levels.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-04 17:16:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202275530873159681

    Reply addressees: @fashggot @immoral_liberty @lllLucart

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202266701573873664


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202266701573873664

  • So whenever generalizing about genders (which is easy) ask what trade-off nature

    So whenever generalizing about genders (which is easy) ask what trade-off nature has been made between the genders.Women generalize at low-risk, time, men specialize at high risk,speed. Men are disposable,and about 1/3 desirable.Women are not disposable and about 1/3 undesirable.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-04 13:58:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202225710540173312

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202225709562941441


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Brains are expensive organs (11x muscle). There are only so many degrees of freedom in dividing the labor given our reproductive responsibilities. Women have almost no emotional agency, but task agency an empathic sensitivity. Men have emotional agency, and threat agency.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1202225709562941441


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    Brains are expensive organs (11x muscle). There are only so many degrees of freedom in dividing the labor given our reproductive responsibilities. Women have almost no emotional agency, but task agency an empathic sensitivity. Men have emotional agency, and threat agency.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1202225709562941441

  • Brains are expensive organs (11x muscle). There are only so many degrees of free

    Brains are expensive organs (11x muscle). There are only so many degrees of freedom in dividing the labor given our reproductive responsibilities. Women have almost no emotional agency, but task agency an empathic sensitivity. Men have emotional agency, and threat agency.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-04 13:58:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202225709562941441

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202225707683856385


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    False conclusion which (as usual) conflates task performance with reaction, threat, social, and political performance. Women can cook, weave & work endlessly, especially if chatting. Compare with gorillas, chimps and human males when children threatened. Costs:M-Fast vs F-Slow. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1201922235394646016

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1202225707683856385


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    False conclusion which (as usual) conflates task performance with reaction, threat, social, and political performance. Women can cook, weave & work endlessly, especially if chatting. Compare with gorillas, chimps and human males when children threatened. Costs:M-Fast vs F-Slow. https://t.co/ClnlOeB1jk

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1202225707683856385

  • False conclusion which (as usual) conflates task performance with reaction, thre

    False conclusion which (as usual) conflates task performance with reaction, threat, social, and political performance. Women can cook, weave & work endlessly, especially if chatting. Compare with gorillas, chimps and human males when children threatened. Costs:M-Fast vs F-Slow. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1201922235394646016

  • And yes, east asians took it too far. and yes africans took it the other directi

    And yes, east asians took it too far. and yes africans took it the other direction (had to because of disease gradient) and yes, cold winters and animal husbandry take personality traits the right direction. So domestication= pro-sociality (patience), not pacification (weakness).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-04 13:04:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202212135679545346

    Reply addressees: @PowerNihilism

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202211357019516928


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @PowerNihilism Thanks. Although I want to take the opportunity to correct the general thought. Scientifically, agency (not acting like fking impulsive animals) is produced by neoteny (delaying development giving time for self control (conscientiousness) and therefore low(long) time preference.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1202211357019516928


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @PowerNihilism Thanks. Although I want to take the opportunity to correct the general thought. Scientifically, agency (not acting like fking impulsive animals) is produced by neoteny (delaying development giving time for self control (conscientiousness) and therefore low(long) time preference.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1202211357019516928

  • Whenever there is a crisis watch how women freeze – and how men don’t. Watch how

    Whenever there is a crisis watch how women freeze – and how men don’t.
    Watch how fast men organize to complete a task, and how slowly women do.
    The difference between the sexes is expressed as a division of labor IN TIME.
    Think big act big (men), think small act small (women).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-04 01:19:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202034550966235136

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201922235394646016


    IN REPLY TO:

    @DegenRolf

    Men reacted faster and more impulsive in simple and complex response tasks, while women were more accurate and conservative in complex tasks. https://t.co/8ezXTHhUpO Confirming in microcosm that women are generally better at controlling their impulses. https://t.co/FlCZGnKMIW https://t.co/uDIhCU5UmF

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201922235394646016

  • Or stated differently, 1) Men evolved for speed and problem solving: “Lean, Mean

    Or stated differently, 1) Men evolved for speed and problem solving: “Lean, Mean, Problem-Solving, Machines”, and women evolved to process more information: “Managing children”. 2) Men Evolved to conquer with tools. Women evolved to undermine with words.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-04 01:16:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202033975205801985

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201922235394646016


    IN REPLY TO:

    @DegenRolf

    Men reacted faster and more impulsive in simple and complex response tasks, while women were more accurate and conservative in complex tasks. https://t.co/8ezXTHhUpO Confirming in microcosm that women are generally better at controlling their impulses. https://t.co/FlCZGnKMIW https://t.co/uDIhCU5UmF

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201922235394646016

  • Why Women Are Historically The Root of Political Evil

    TRUTH IS OFTEN OFFENSIVE. WHICH IS WHY WE MUST SEARCH FOR IT – BECAUSE WE HIDE IT. BUT HERE IS THE ANSWER. by CURTD

    1. Women (females) evolved gossip, rallying, shaming, trading of care-taking, sex and affection, as a means of manipulation (power), by which to gain control over (much) more powerful males.
    2. Women (females) are not loyal to the tribe (males), as they could be easily stolen by one group or another, and have to survive within that group. Female choice arose late (after pairing-off). For much of our evolutionary history, women were property. To no small degree, our domestication of animals by taking over their dominance hierarchy and controlling their reproduction, followed the domestication of women by the same means. (If that isn’t upsetting to your high mindedness little will be.)
    3. Women Undermine. Everyone. Everywhere. All the Time.
    4. Women can (and often did, and still do) bear one man’s offspring at the cost of another man, thereby depriving him of the ability to trade his productivity for sex, affection, care-taking, and offspring. As many as one third of children ‘appear’ to have been the product of ‘sleeping around’. Our understanding of this number will improve over time. Around 70% of women reproduced in history, but only about 30% of men. Our understanding of this number will improve over time. However, men (out of evolutionary necessity) will demonstrate violence over women first and foremost above all other factors. (yes really). The vast majority of male impulsive violence is somehow connected to females. So female ‘wandering’ is the most dangerous to the tribe of any activity including theft and murder.
    5. Women evolved a very short term set of impulses (low risk tolerance) in order to limit their own cellular damage, and to protect the fragility of children that take so many years to mature into self-sufficiency. Women possess less ‘agency’ because of it. Despite our status as super-predators, or apex predators, Humans are frail and especially frail until maturity. Ergo, women ‘feel’ impulsively and cannot suppress their impulses as easily as men can. Nor are social structures to contain women’s impulses as severe as those of males. The reason being that an impulsive woman can be ignored or beaten,while an impulsive male can be sent off to fight or hunt, but may become too dangerous in the tribe or polity.
    6. So, because of high impulsivity, short term bias, the ability to sway men with sex, affection, care-taking, and the ability to sway men with gossip, rallying, and shaming, women were (and still are, to be honest) considered to be ‘troublemakers’.
    7. We tend to think of taming violence among men as the chief achievement of civlization, but that is not what the evidence tells us. It was equally the use of property and marriage to tame women’s gossip, reproduction, and impulsivity that built civilization. Even today, the root cause of central political conflicts is whether (a) women have a ‘right’ to bear children that they cannot create a family or career to support without forcing others to pay for their ‘freedom’, because the only remaining problem facing mankind at present is population. all problems today are reducible to population problems. (b) whether we advance universalism and dysgenia (the female and underclass reproductive strategy), or particularism and eugenia (the male and upper class reproductive strategy).
    8. Western women have always been ‘freer’ that other women, and we are not exactly sure why. It appears that whites are less clannish (at least circumpolar whites, if not anatolian/iranian). Whites have less testosterone than all but east asians. There is some evidence that white female traits were especially desirable and spread quickly through selection and were integrated through selection into white males. There is some evidence that the scarcity of people in the northern climes, the value of ‘others’ in northern climes for survival; the ‘homogeneity’ of the three or four major waves of europeans plus the limited clannishness simply created a less hostile environment for mate selection. (This is the current hypothesis). It will take another generation of work on genetics before we know the answer for certain. But needless to say, whites (at least northerners) are less ‘clannish’ than all other races and sub-races. Conversely, africans, desert, and steppe peoples appear more clannish and more aggressive than far east and far west peoples. This appears to be due to little more than the scale of the underclasses in warm climates. Without selection pressures the median behavior evolves into a general rule.
    9. So history is hard on women because women in fact are (a) physically weaker, (b) emotionally more impulsive and possessed of less agency (weaker), (c) the cause of hidden constant conflict, if not constrained, (d) un-loyal to the tribe.
    10. Education and participation in the work force has done quite a bit to solve women’s impulsivity but women have, since the introduction of socialism, and the feminist movement as a proxy replacement for socialism, worked consistently to vote (a) to destroy the requirement to form a family (corporation for the production of children), prior to bearing offspring, (b) impoverishing men and causing vast increases in suicide through no fault divorce, alimony, and child support, and heavy increases in taxes that consume 100% of the revenues produced by the addition of women to the work force. (c) harm to the ‘tribe’ by making possible the immigration policies since the 1960’s that achieved through underclass immigration what could not be achieved either through advocacy of socialism, or advocacy of feminism.
    11. The West survived the European civil war we call the World Wars. Yet the West will not likely survive the enfranchisement of women without equal investment in the constraint upon women’s behavior that was developed to constrain men’s behavior over the past 10,000 years.
    12. Pandora deserved her reputation. The question is. Men admit their history. Can women admit theirs? History, biology, and evolution are against it.

    Female Sexuality and Bodily Functions in Different Religious Traditions by Terry Flower. [T]hough women have had a position where they are completely provided for and protected by men, most ancient texts and philosophies have a far more negative view on women than men. Here are some instances: Buddhism According to Buddhist tradition, the Buddha’s stepmother wished to become a nun. She expressed this wish to the Buddha several times and each time she was refused. Finally, on the advice of one of his disciples, he acquiesced. But even as he did so, the Buddha claimed that establishing a community of nuns would reduce the time in which his teaching (the dharma) would be effective from 1,000 to 500 years. Islam According to the Quran, ‘Men are the maintainers (or in charge) of women. So the good women are obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah has guarded. And (as to) those whose part you fear desertion, admonish them and leave them alone in their beds and chastise them. So if they obey you, seek not a way against them.’ (Quran 5:34). Islam – Prophet Muhammad claimed what he saw in hell regarding most of the people in hell were women Judaism One of the morning blessings made by an Orthodox Jewish male: ‘Blessed are you Lord our God, King of the Universe, who has not made me a woman.’ Hinduism Many Hindu religious texts describe women as deceitful and sexually provocative by nature. The following quote from the Devi Bhagaveta (1.5.83) is typical. ‘A woman is the embodiment of rashness and a mine of vices. she is an obstacle to the path of devotion, a hindrance to emancipation. she is practically a sorceress and represents vile desire.’ Hinduism – There is nothing else that is more sinful than women. Women are the root of all faults. Scientology – Society begins its sharpest decline at the instant when women begin to take part, on an equal footing with men Ancient Greece – Zeus becomes infuriated and decides to punish humankind with an “evil thing for their delight”. This “evil thing” is Pandora, the first woman Christianity – “And a man will choose… any wickedness, but the wickedness of a woman… Sin began with a woman and thanks to her we all must die” Why have women been considered evil? Female sexuality has always taught as being dangerous and to be kept under control by men as it’s freedom makes men helpless and destroys civilization. Research by Terry Flower. See the World Council of Churches’ studyFemale Sexuality and Bodily Functions in Different Religious Traditionsfor more information.

  • Why Women Are Historically The Root of Political Evil

    TRUTH IS OFTEN OFFENSIVE. WHICH IS WHY WE MUST SEARCH FOR IT – BECAUSE WE HIDE IT. BUT HERE IS THE ANSWER. by CURTD

    1. Women (females) evolved gossip, rallying, shaming, trading of care-taking, sex and affection, as a means of manipulation (power), by which to gain control over (much) more powerful males.
    2. Women (females) are not loyal to the tribe (males), as they could be easily stolen by one group or another, and have to survive within that group. Female choice arose late (after pairing-off). For much of our evolutionary history, women were property. To no small degree, our domestication of animals by taking over their dominance hierarchy and controlling their reproduction, followed the domestication of women by the same means. (If that isn’t upsetting to your high mindedness little will be.)
    3. Women Undermine. Everyone. Everywhere. All the Time.
    4. Women can (and often did, and still do) bear one man’s offspring at the cost of another man, thereby depriving him of the ability to trade his productivity for sex, affection, care-taking, and offspring. As many as one third of children ‘appear’ to have been the product of ‘sleeping around’. Our understanding of this number will improve over time. Around 70% of women reproduced in history, but only about 30% of men. Our understanding of this number will improve over time. However, men (out of evolutionary necessity) will demonstrate violence over women first and foremost above all other factors. (yes really). The vast majority of male impulsive violence is somehow connected to females. So female ‘wandering’ is the most dangerous to the tribe of any activity including theft and murder.
    5. Women evolved a very short term set of impulses (low risk tolerance) in order to limit their own cellular damage, and to protect the fragility of children that take so many years to mature into self-sufficiency. Women possess less ‘agency’ because of it. Despite our status as super-predators, or apex predators, Humans are frail and especially frail until maturity. Ergo, women ‘feel’ impulsively and cannot suppress their impulses as easily as men can. Nor are social structures to contain women’s impulses as severe as those of males. The reason being that an impulsive woman can be ignored or beaten,while an impulsive male can be sent off to fight or hunt, but may become too dangerous in the tribe or polity.
    6. So, because of high impulsivity, short term bias, the ability to sway men with sex, affection, care-taking, and the ability to sway men with gossip, rallying, and shaming, women were (and still are, to be honest) considered to be ‘troublemakers’.
    7. We tend to think of taming violence among men as the chief achievement of civlization, but that is not what the evidence tells us. It was equally the use of property and marriage to tame women’s gossip, reproduction, and impulsivity that built civilization. Even today, the root cause of central political conflicts is whether (a) women have a ‘right’ to bear children that they cannot create a family or career to support without forcing others to pay for their ‘freedom’, because the only remaining problem facing mankind at present is population. all problems today are reducible to population problems. (b) whether we advance universalism and dysgenia (the female and underclass reproductive strategy), or particularism and eugenia (the male and upper class reproductive strategy).
    8. Western women have always been ‘freer’ that other women, and we are not exactly sure why. It appears that whites are less clannish (at least circumpolar whites, if not anatolian/iranian). Whites have less testosterone than all but east asians. There is some evidence that white female traits were especially desirable and spread quickly through selection and were integrated through selection into white males. There is some evidence that the scarcity of people in the northern climes, the value of ‘others’ in northern climes for survival; the ‘homogeneity’ of the three or four major waves of europeans plus the limited clannishness simply created a less hostile environment for mate selection. (This is the current hypothesis). It will take another generation of work on genetics before we know the answer for certain. But needless to say, whites (at least northerners) are less ‘clannish’ than all other races and sub-races. Conversely, africans, desert, and steppe peoples appear more clannish and more aggressive than far east and far west peoples. This appears to be due to little more than the scale of the underclasses in warm climates. Without selection pressures the median behavior evolves into a general rule.
    9. So history is hard on women because women in fact are (a) physically weaker, (b) emotionally more impulsive and possessed of less agency (weaker), (c) the cause of hidden constant conflict, if not constrained, (d) un-loyal to the tribe.
    10. Education and participation in the work force has done quite a bit to solve women’s impulsivity but women have, since the introduction of socialism, and the feminist movement as a proxy replacement for socialism, worked consistently to vote (a) to destroy the requirement to form a family (corporation for the production of children), prior to bearing offspring, (b) impoverishing men and causing vast increases in suicide through no fault divorce, alimony, and child support, and heavy increases in taxes that consume 100% of the revenues produced by the addition of women to the work force. (c) harm to the ‘tribe’ by making possible the immigration policies since the 1960’s that achieved through underclass immigration what could not be achieved either through advocacy of socialism, or advocacy of feminism.
    11. The West survived the European civil war we call the World Wars. Yet the West will not likely survive the enfranchisement of women without equal investment in the constraint upon women’s behavior that was developed to constrain men’s behavior over the past 10,000 years.
    12. Pandora deserved her reputation. The question is. Men admit their history. Can women admit theirs? History, biology, and evolution are against it.

    Female Sexuality and Bodily Functions in Different Religious Traditions by Terry Flower. [T]hough women have had a position where they are completely provided for and protected by men, most ancient texts and philosophies have a far more negative view on women than men. Here are some instances: Buddhism According to Buddhist tradition, the Buddha’s stepmother wished to become a nun. She expressed this wish to the Buddha several times and each time she was refused. Finally, on the advice of one of his disciples, he acquiesced. But even as he did so, the Buddha claimed that establishing a community of nuns would reduce the time in which his teaching (the dharma) would be effective from 1,000 to 500 years. Islam According to the Quran, ‘Men are the maintainers (or in charge) of women. So the good women are obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah has guarded. And (as to) those whose part you fear desertion, admonish them and leave them alone in their beds and chastise them. So if they obey you, seek not a way against them.’ (Quran 5:34). Islam – Prophet Muhammad claimed what he saw in hell regarding most of the people in hell were women Judaism One of the morning blessings made by an Orthodox Jewish male: ‘Blessed are you Lord our God, King of the Universe, who has not made me a woman.’ Hinduism Many Hindu religious texts describe women as deceitful and sexually provocative by nature. The following quote from the Devi Bhagaveta (1.5.83) is typical. ‘A woman is the embodiment of rashness and a mine of vices. she is an obstacle to the path of devotion, a hindrance to emancipation. she is practically a sorceress and represents vile desire.’ Hinduism – There is nothing else that is more sinful than women. Women are the root of all faults. Scientology – Society begins its sharpest decline at the instant when women begin to take part, on an equal footing with men Ancient Greece – Zeus becomes infuriated and decides to punish humankind with an “evil thing for their delight”. This “evil thing” is Pandora, the first woman Christianity – “And a man will choose… any wickedness, but the wickedness of a woman… Sin began with a woman and thanks to her we all must die” Why have women been considered evil? Female sexuality has always taught as being dangerous and to be kept under control by men as it’s freedom makes men helpless and destroys civilization. Research by Terry Flower. See the World Council of Churches’ studyFemale Sexuality and Bodily Functions in Different Religious Traditionsfor more information.