Well you know, ‘bating into hazard’ is an operational generalization of Seduction. And so you wonder why it’s the means of female via positiva coercion, and the means by which the Enemy came to use Baiting into Hazard.
Well you know, ‘baiting into hazard’ is an operational generalization of Seduction. And so you wonder why it’s the means of female via positiva coercion, and the means by which the Enemy came to use Baiting into Hazard.
( FULL DEFINITION: propertarianism.com/2019/12/14/full-definition-baiting-into-hazard/ http://propertarianism.com/2019/12/14/full-definition-baiting-into-hazard/ )
Did you actually not notice that most thinkers do that as a means of branding?
BTW: Let me help you understand the difference between feminine brain structure, and masculine brain structure, and how we grasp the world, and discourse about it: https://t.co/s14IasJzYk
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
@Steve_Sailer What the opposite(female cognition), and all leftists tend to do, consciously or not, is DISAPPROVE of statements by circumvention operational possibility, distribution of ability, consequences over time, and kantian imperative, by use of DENIAL, SOPHISM, PSEUDOSCIENCE and GSRRM.
@Steve_Sailer What the opposite(female cognition), and all leftists tend to do, consciously or not, is DISAPPROVE of statements by circumvention operational possibility, distribution of ability, consequences over time, and kantian imperative, by use of DENIAL, SOPHISM, PSEUDOSCIENCE and GSRRM.