RT @charlesmurray: Proposition 1. “Sex differences in personality are consistent worldwide and tend to widen in more gender-egalitarian cul…
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 17:01:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221840581330194435
There are many checks on men’s antisocial behavior in fulfillment of demand for cognitive load – although sports, and video games are wasteful they aren’t harmful, and business and the arts are constructive. There are no such checks on women’s behavior.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 13:49:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221792376450179072
Reply addressees: @clairlemon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221792061344698373
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@clairlemon Vegetarianism, like animal activism, political activism, or gossiping and undermining, is among the strange obsessions that women devote their cognitive demand for emotional load to in the absence of more constructive outputs (children). The problem is there is no check on women.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1221792061344698373
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@clairlemon Vegetarianism, like animal activism, political activism, or gossiping and undermining, is among the strange obsessions that women devote their cognitive demand for emotional load to in the absence of more constructive outputs (children). The problem is there is no check on women.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1221792061344698373
Vegetarianism, like animal activism, political activism, or gossiping and undermining, is among the strange obsessions that women devote their cognitive demand for emotional load to in the absence of more constructive outputs (children). The problem is there is no check on women.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 13:48:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221792061344698373
Reply addressees: @clairlemon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221791526969401344
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@clairlemon Secondly, pejoratively, the female nervous system evolved to carry a cognitive load that included empathy with offspring. Just as when men aren’t supplied with competition they behave dysfunctionally, when women aren’t supplied with emotional load they find “strange obsessions”.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1221791526969401344
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@clairlemon Secondly, pejoratively, the female nervous system evolved to carry a cognitive load that included empathy with offspring. Just as when men aren’t supplied with competition they behave dysfunctionally, when women aren’t supplied with emotional load they find “strange obsessions”.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1221791526969401344
Secondly, pejoratively, the female nervous system evolved to carry a cognitive load that included empathy with offspring. Just as when men aren’t supplied with competition they behave dysfunctionally, when women aren’t supplied with emotional load they find “strange obsessions”.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 13:46:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221791526969401344
Reply addressees: @clairlemon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221791016304480261
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@clairlemon Let’s avoid conflating sentience, awareness, and the consciousness spectrum – and prevent overreach. These things are our food. Not abusing them and not eating them are two different things. And the reason not to abuse them is that we don’t want such people in our midst. https://t.co/sO1yvXPoyg
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1221791016304480261
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@clairlemon Let’s avoid conflating sentience, awareness, and the consciousness spectrum – and prevent overreach. These things are our food. Not abusing them and not eating them are two different things. And the reason not to abuse them is that we don’t want such people in our midst. https://t.co/sO1yvXPoyg
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1221791016304480261
INTERSEX “DISCIPLINE”
(hard questions) (judgemet of the natural law)
—“Serious question, is it ever justifiable to hit a woman if she grsm’s you too much? What is the recommended amount of force under P?”—Jack Hwite
This is a great example of how sovereignty has been used throughout our history. And why this question has such a long history in our law: because it’s a common problem.
Justifiable isn’t a meaningful term. Instead, under natural law, and under traditional european law, you can challenge anyone male of female to a duel, demand apology, demand satisfaction, and if refused exercise sovereignty in self defense.
Or put differently, in natural law, each of us is sovereign, whether male or female. But the sexes differ in our exercise of force.
“A male physical super-predator exchanges the forgoing of his violence with women so long as women social super-predators exchange forgoing their their undermining (GSRRM) in return. If this contract is broken then physical violence and undermining are both licensed.
Or the individuals may choose to forgo the duel and simply have at each other in words and hands.
A judicially sanctioned duel before peers is preferred, since differences in ability can be minimized by traditional pit and bag or other means.
A conflict can be brought before the court instead and settled there. Because “Scolding” is just as much a violation of sovereignty and the peach as is physical violence.
However, this is limited to discipline for insult, and when the other party lies down and submits the conflict must stop – otherwise the parties extend beyond the judicial duel into attempted murder.
This competition is the only way to prevent male and female warfare by their individual means.
We have constrained men’s violence but let loose women’s violence – and we are paying the price of undermining our civilization as a consequence.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 11:14:00 UTC
😉 It’s for these moments I wish there was more than just a heart react on twitter. Truth: radical feminist after interrogating me over lunch for ninety minutes goes silent, stares at me, thinks for a minute, and says “You would make a great king” completely honestly. (no thanks)
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-26 12:44:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221413644304637954
Reply addressees: @JohnNune1 @libertarianism
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221274977162297349
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221274977162297349
This paper is accessible, from 2016, and summarizes the findings from across the decades. It’s rather obvious that “The fraternal-birth-order effect” is currently the most convincing cause, and its heritability, a most convincing vulnerability.
http://psi.sagepub.com/content/17/2/45.full.pdf
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 01:51:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220886816510873600
Reply addressees: @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220881087024586752
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@JayMan471 BTW 2: So far in the two or three times you’ve disagreed with me it’s because you are rushing to judgement. I realize that the world is full of idiots you must defend your time and space against. But I’m not one of them. -hugs
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1220881087024586752
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@JayMan471 BTW 2: So far in the two or three times you’ve disagreed with me it’s because you are rushing to judgement. I realize that the world is full of idiots you must defend your time and space against. But I’m not one of them. -hugs
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1220881087024586752
(I studied fine art. I think four of us were straight in the whole college of art. lol. I don’t have a problem with preference. I have a problem with the externalities on society that people of preferences seem to demand. )
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-24 22:00:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/83940730_561248917805336_8704295496484651008_o_561248907805337.jpg ORIGINS OF HOMOSEXUALITY
(for some reason jayman is countersignaling and I haven’t figured out why yet)
Again: This is because as far as I know, homosexuality is an in utero developmental failure that was insufficient to produce either male brain or miscarriage.The two most common theories attribute this to immune system responses to internal (genetic) or external (viral) stimulus.
https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1220583969810534401
—“No that’s not what it is, nor does that make any sense whatsoever. That said male and female same sex attraction likely do have different etiology”—JayMan @JayMan471
It makes perfect sense. AFAIK immuno response, possibly to T. That doesn’t mean it’s true. If you have a better body of science to work from then I’d love to see it. But this is a subject I’ve followed for three decades, and the two theories are still out there working.
—“[See] Greg Cochran’s “Gay Germ” Hypothesis – An Exercise in the Power of Germs”—JayMan
@JayMan471
Agreed. That doesn’t nullify the (a) runs in families (b) second son, (c) testosterone and immune system theories. As for the viral is merely that I can’t falsify the hypothesis, so I’m not willing to take it off the shelf.
And BTW: Nothing in that set of articles or any other, undermines the hypothesis that (like cervical cancer by viral transmission) that there isn’t some other immune trigger either heritable or environmental that produces the defect in development.
BTW 2: So far in the two or three times you’ve disagreed with me it’s because you are rushing to judgement. I realize that the world is full of idiots you must defend your time and space against. But I’m not one of them. -hugs
This paper is accessible, from 2016, and summarizes the findings from across the decades. It’s rather obvious that “The fraternal-birth-order effect” is currently the most convincing cause, and its heritability, a most convincing vulnerability.ORIGINS OF HOMOSEXUALITY
(for some reason jayman is countersignaling and I haven’t figured out why yet)
Again: This is because as far as I know, homosexuality is an in utero developmental failure that was insufficient to produce either male brain or miscarriage.The two most common theories attribute this to immune system responses to internal (genetic) or external (viral) stimulus.
https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1220583969810534401
—“No that’s not what it is, nor does that make any sense whatsoever. That said male and female same sex attraction likely do have different etiology”—JayMan @JayMan471
It makes perfect sense. AFAIK immuno response, possibly to T. That doesn’t mean it’s true. If you have a better body of science to work from then I’d love to see it. But this is a subject I’ve followed for three decades, and the two theories are still out there working.
—“[See] Greg Cochran’s “Gay Germ” Hypothesis – An Exercise in the Power of Germs”—JayMan
@JayMan471
Agreed. That doesn’t nullify the (a) runs in families (b) second son, (c) testosterone and immune system theories. As for the viral is merely that I can’t falsify the hypothesis, so I’m not willing to take it off the shelf.
And BTW: Nothing in that set of articles or any other, undermines the hypothesis that (like cervical cancer by viral transmission) that there isn’t some other immune trigger either heritable or environmental that produces the defect in development.
BTW 2: So far in the two or three times you’ve disagreed with me it’s because you are rushing to judgement. I realize that the world is full of idiots you must defend your time and space against. But I’m not one of them. -hugs
This paper is accessible, from 2016, and summarizes the findings from across the decades. It’s rather obvious that “The fraternal-birth-order effect” is currently the most convincing cause, and its heritability, a most convincing vulnerability.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-24 20:57:00 UTC
(Knowing you it’s possible you’re interpreting “internal (genetic)” as other than “a genetic predisposition for the mother to produce an immune reaction to testosterone particularly after the first son.” Twitter brevity introduces interpretive variability. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-24 17:48:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220765320677380097
Reply addressees: @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220757679565680640
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
No that’s not what it is, nor does that make any sense whatsoever. That said male and female same sex attraction likely do have different etiology https://t.co/LkdyTPaZR0
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220757679565680640