photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84440722_197811434950351_6975906609675370496_o_197811428283685.jpg TRUTH BEFORE FACE AND WESTERN WOMENTRUTH BEFORE FACE AND WESTERN WOMEN

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 19:18:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84440722_197811434950351_6975906609675370496_o_197811428283685.jpg TRUTH BEFORE FACE AND WESTERN WOMENTRUTH BEFORE FACE AND WESTERN WOMEN

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 19:18:00 UTC
(There are very few intellectually honest and articulate progressives. This is a great opportunity to illustrate the differences caused by the effect of our genes on our cognition – presumption of agency and free will.) https://t.co/9rSTjMsxgy

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 13:27:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223961055187161090
Reply addressees: @flancian
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223951554862034946
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223951554862034946
We must use TRADE to bridge our differences.
(Are you starting to see yet?)
I’m using male concrete (scientific) terms.
You’re using female seductive (deceptive) terms.
Once you see it you can’t un-see it. The question is adaptation possible? No. Hence institutions of trade.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 13:21:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223959529425117186
Reply addressees: @flancian
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223950825883668482
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223950825883668482
Progressives (consumptives) err on the side of consumption in the face of uncertainty. Conservatives(capitalizers) err on the side of saving in the face of uncertainty.
The female consumptive herd (her children) the male capitalizing pack (their tribe).
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 13:19:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223959130504859650
Reply addressees: @flancian
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223950825883668482
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223950825883668482
Do you think females think about sh-t testing men, undermining dominance hierarchies, raiding status through undermining others by gossiping, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, outraging, ridicule, and rallying? No. It’s genetic disposition.
(((They))) are cognitively female.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 02:37:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223797446721052672
And since evidence has falsified marxism, socialism, and science has falsified feminism, postmodernism, and denial of our substantial differences in gender, class, and race, other than invasive immigration the west would have survived the 20th century of social pseudoscience.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 02:04:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223789225084104705
Reply addressees: @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223788573297647616
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto We have the most ignorant generation in almost two centuries for a reason: by design of the left to manufacture useful idiots under the postwar false promise that their evolutionary condition was a product of oppression rather than market value to others.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223788573297647616
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto We have the most ignorant generation in almost two centuries for a reason: by design of the left to manufacture useful idiots under the postwar false promise that their evolutionary condition was a product of oppression rather than market value to others.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223788573297647616
And the Left is desperately chasing the false promise that they can be free of genetic, sexual, social, economic and political market value in a world where the european civilizational windfall has been spent on dragging the world out of communism, socialism, and now islamism.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 02:00:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223788257101721601
Reply addressees: @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223787777646612481
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was instituted as a means of choosing priorities for the allocation of scarce revenues to the production of commons in common interest. It was not an invitation to destroy the American experiment in a third way.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223787777646612481
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was instituted as a means of choosing priorities for the allocation of scarce revenues to the production of commons in common interest. It was not an invitation to destroy the American experiment in a third way.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223787777646612481
Mating criticism from both sides is caused by the same problems.
It overstates the sex maybe, underestimates the entertainment, friendship, and economic qualities – and how temporary entertainment, and social goods are compared to economic and friendship.
Then, because of the overweight average, the lack of exercise, the safe-i-fication of sports, the suppression of male dominance play, and agitation of female victimhood, the percent of moderately desirable men and women has decreased.
Yes, high performance women are of no value to men and they have to settle.
Yes, low value men are not valuable to women (or men).
And women ride the c–ck carousel as the article suggests only to discover it lowers their chances of successful relationships, and their value to quality men.
Frankly? too many men and too many women are undesirable for very obvious reasons.
This leaves high performance men holding all the cards.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 13:42:00 UTC
—“Usually when I encounter a male engaging in GSRRM, I ask them if they were raised by a single mother, and they stop commenting.”—Benny Belige
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 11:39:00 UTC
RT @Steve_Sailer: Feminists have been making children cry on Christmas morning since 1969. https://twitter.com/SteveStuWill/status/1222079320417390593
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 02:40:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223073567081975808