Theme: Sex Differences

  • The Beautiful Feminine Vision of Christians – and How to Restore It to The Masculine

    Apr 9, 2020, 10:58 AM

    —“Hi Curt… I haven’t done the deep dive into Propertarianism yet, but have watched a number of video’s through John Mark’s Youtube. I am more of a Theocracy based, Freedom to do good, Republic oriented person. But from what I have seen thus far… The proposed expression of Propertarianism can run in harmony with these ideals. Thanks for thinking outside the traditional boxes, and inside a practical and diverse people filled world!”— George Reninger

    Thanks. And thanks for being one of the few people that understands the difference between the freedom to do good (faith), and the constraint on doing bad (law). -hugs.

    —“Thank you for the Affirmation Curt… I have a vision in me, to see the establishment of an Alliance, Like NATO, but among Individuals, Communities & Nations globally (Including Armies) that Covenantally affirm their alignment with the ONE God, His TWO Values of loving God & Neighbor, as well as His TEN governing Commandments regarding ownership affirmations, boundaries & related reciprocities. This could form a “Life, Liberty & Property Grounded” Commonwealth of Nations!”—George Reninger

    This is a beautiful vision. It’s a beautiful vision until you travel the world and meet people with influence, wealth, political, and military power, who have very different visions that are completely hostile to yours. The faithful like women, by design, live in an echo chamber – even when they travel the world. I never, ever, ever, make the mistake that ‘community of faith’ scales beyond those who know one another personally. Just as female cognition fails beyond those who know one another personally, just as male cognition succeeds largely beyond those who know one another personally. This goal of harmony is the same reason women fail in politics. It is why the church always failed as a political system, and why neither jews nor islam can produce a political system but why the jews remain dependent upon host populations just as females upon males. And why the muslims cannot organize anything beyond a family, or family business, a government other than tribal despots, or a military capable of other than small group acts of terrorism. The family, neighborhood, local church community, and village does not scale. Gods, evolution of us, divided the female and male cognition for reasons. Because for every man like you that seeks consensus, peace and harmony – there are men like me who seek power, to bend man, beast, animal, plant, world and universe to our will. And the moment people like you are marginally successful with your vision, the men like me in competing cultures, states, empires, and civilizations will conquer you for your folly. This ever has been and every will be. Because God left us with these rules: the laws of nature, the natural law of man, the christian law of love, and the evolutionary law of transcendence. There is no steady state. No condition of eternal peace. The faithful like the woman, seeks steady state free of competition. And steady state means you are just a human herd – food for the Red Queen of evolution, because you have forgotten, and denied, that God gave us the evolutionary law of transcendence, and set us in competition with one another, so that those of use who defied that law would be eradicated by those that obey that law. In fact, I would make the rather obvious argument that the abrahamic faiths exist for the sole purpose of denying God’s laws of transcendence – which is why jews accomplished noting until integrated into Aristotelian Empiricism of Europeans, and the muslims consumed and destroyed every civilization of the ancient world – and are now threatening to destroy ours. Because christians like the female, share this violation of God’s Law of Evolutionary Transcendence. This denial of one of the four sets of god’s laws is why christianity is failing among the educated classes and is devolving into a folk religion and has lost its chances – possibly forever – as a political religion. Christianity will either adapt to the necessity of Trifunctionalism: the competitive compatibility between the military, the judicial, and the faith, or it will continue to be the cause of its decline, because it is too selfish to obey one of god’s laws: the organized use of violence by the militia, to defend the faith, it’s people, and the law that together are the only people on this earth who have transcended man out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and the chaos of a natural world that has given us but twelve thousand years of respite, but otherwise has sought to exterminate us with regularity. Love does not conquer all. Love serves only integrate the conquered into loving one another in conformity of god’s laws revealed by god’s hand – not scripture written by men. The unconquered are the enemy of our people, of our god, of god’s law of transcendence, and as a consequence of mankind, and our destiny to sit at the hand of the father of us all.

  • The Limits of Love’s Conquest

    Apr 9, 2020, 11:57 AM

    —“Love is capable of conquering all in the close-knit feminine realm. All in terms of self and self-development, in terms of family, and in terms of immediate community (assuming reciprocity of that love is granted). On the larger scales love must be replaced with respect, and respect itself is much harsher in judgement than love. Both enemies and friends must be respected, perceived in alignment with their proper place, and treated accordingly.”—Alice Crawford McKinty

  • The Limits of Love’s Conquest

    Apr 9, 2020, 11:57 AM

    —“Love is capable of conquering all in the close-knit feminine realm. All in terms of self and self-development, in terms of family, and in terms of immediate community (assuming reciprocity of that love is granted). On the larger scales love must be replaced with respect, and respect itself is much harsher in judgement than love. Both enemies and friends must be respected, perceived in alignment with their proper place, and treated accordingly.”—Alice Crawford McKinty

  • Why Are Women More Prone to “magical Beliefs”?

    [E]xamining the roles of Intuition and Gender in Magical Beliefs Four studies explored gender differences in magical beliefs, specifically examining whether reliance on intuition accounts for women’s higher… https://t.co/XCcotuod8p?amp=1

    —“Women were more prone to magical beliefs than men, making more suboptimal choices in a lottery task after imagining that a dream told them to do so.”—

    A simple mechanical reason: Women’s intuition as in all female cognition utilizes more experiential auto-associations closed to introspection, vs male precise future predictions open to introspection. We specialize. The brain is not that complicated. It’s the stories we tell ourselves that make it seem so.

    92563255_253037002761127_861156567939022848_n.jpg
  • Why Are Women More Prone to “magical Beliefs”?

    [E]xamining the roles of Intuition and Gender in Magical Beliefs Four studies explored gender differences in magical beliefs, specifically examining whether reliance on intuition accounts for women’s higher… https://t.co/XCcotuod8p?amp=1

    —“Women were more prone to magical beliefs than men, making more suboptimal choices in a lottery task after imagining that a dream told them to do so.”—

    A simple mechanical reason: Women’s intuition as in all female cognition utilizes more experiential auto-associations closed to introspection, vs male precise future predictions open to introspection. We specialize. The brain is not that complicated. It’s the stories we tell ourselves that make it seem so.

    92563255_253037002761127_861156567939022848_n.jpg
  • But it’s certainly possible. And if we change law and education so that people a

    But it’s certainly possible. And if we change law and education so that people are as aware of criminality, including female anti-social and interpersonal and social criminality, then we should be able (over time) to suppress it as we have suppressed other anti-social behavior.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 13:34:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253678634205839366

    Reply addressees: @unfinis06265716 @YouTube

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253678232626495489


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @unfinis06265716 @YouTube If it’s genetic then as I’ve suggested our laws must evolve to protect against cognitively female anti-social and social-criminal behavior (Undermining, Seduction,False promise, Baiting into Hazard, Magical Thinking). But it is difficult to imagine females or Ashkenazim changing.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1253678232626495489

  • If it’s genetic then as I’ve suggested our laws must evolve to protect against c

    If it’s genetic then as I’ve suggested our laws must evolve to protect against cognitively female anti-social and social-criminal behavior (Undermining, Seduction,False promise, Baiting into Hazard, Magical Thinking). But it is difficult to imagine females or Ashkenazim changing.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 13:32:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253678232626495489

    Reply addressees: @unfinis06265716 @YouTube

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253677342578409472


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @unfinis06265716 @YouTube The question is, whether the degree to which the Ashkenazim are cognitively feminine in each influence: Genetics, Religion, Tradition, and Culture. (German jews had almost fully integrated pre-war, such that “presbyterians and jews were indistinguishable.”) Evidence says genetic.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1253677342578409472

  • The question is, whether the degree to which the Ashkenazim are cognitively femi

    The question is, whether the degree to which the Ashkenazim are cognitively feminine in each influence: Genetics, Religion, Tradition, and Culture. (German jews had almost fully integrated pre-war, such that “presbyterians and jews were indistinguishable.”) Evidence says genetic.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 13:29:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253677342578409472

    Reply addressees: @unfinis06265716 @YouTube

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253676784119414785


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @unfinis06265716 @YouTube There are good people and bad people in every group. It’s just IQ, Cognitive Masculinity: eschewing attention, priority for system(group) rather than empathy(individual), solving for Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth before Preference or Face, and Purity, Loyalty, and Hierarchy.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1253676784119414785

  • There are good people and bad people in every group. It’s just IQ, Cognitive Mas

    There are good people and bad people in every group. It’s just IQ, Cognitive Masculinity: eschewing attention, priority for system(group) rather than empathy(individual), solving for Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth before Preference or Face, and Purity, Loyalty, and Hierarchy.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 13:26:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253676784119414785

    Reply addressees: @unfinis06265716 @YouTube

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253671572696526848

  • Lesson

    1. Eve’s apple, 2. Pandora’s box, 3. The 19th Amendment.

    Is it the fault of the female, or is it the fault of the male, for not having created laws to equally suppress the female interpersonal and social, superpredator, that they did to suppress the male physical and military, superpredator. One family one vote was a compromise. In the absence of one family one vote we require houses for men and women just as we required house for aristocracy, nobility, industry, and family. The animal just follows its instincts. It is up for those few men of ability to domesticate the animals. And we are always the few.