Jan 10, 2020, 12:02 PM The problem is, that as neoteny increases so apparently does possibility mental illness, and ‘the pill’ increases possibility of mental illness – so the masculine brain (autism spectrum) is the only defense against the two sides (agency, mental illness) of neoteny (slowing and limiting rate and depth of maturity). Ties into Bill’s Post: FAILURE POINTS: MALE, PACK, (K) vs FEMALE, HERD, (R) by Bill Joslin Friend or Foe Detection Failures for Each Bias: 1. FEMALE: far left presume everyone is a friend (Failed Foe Detection) 2. MALE: failed right presume everyone’s an enemy (Failed Friend Detection Theres a biological component when factoring in female in-group preference which spikes with oxy. Females under higher oxy have higher ingroup preference and higher threat alertness. males don’t have this same dynamic. My speculation is that females trigger threat warnings earlier (on sight, at a distances). Males, who need to investigate the threat, can’t have the same spike. They investigate and upon receiving threaten signals from the stranger, then they spike in ingroup preference. And that seems to play out less as hatred for the outgroup, and more as “taking care on my brothers” different expression of ingroup preference. The former being outgroup aversion (offensive), the later being ingroup care(defensive). Edit
Theme: Sex Differences
-
WE ARE COMPATIBLE NOT EQUAL
WE ARE COMPATIBLE NOT EQUAL https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/we-are-compatible-not-equal/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 23:04:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265056071493791744
-
We Are Compatible Not Equal
Jan 13, 2020, 5:21 PM In the division of sensory, perceptual, cognitive, preferential, labor, men and women are compatible, not equal. We are not equal in any meaningful way, because ‘meaningful’ means ‘exceptional’. Stop thinking of people as ideals (that’s a monotheistic evil cancer of the mind) and think of us as extended families with different senses, perceptions, and skills, where we negotiate and often cooperate. As such a coincidence of wants provides the equals sign – cooperation – in the mathematics of calculating human existence.
-
We Are Compatible Not Equal
Jan 13, 2020, 5:21 PM In the division of sensory, perceptual, cognitive, preferential, labor, men and women are compatible, not equal. We are not equal in any meaningful way, because ‘meaningful’ means ‘exceptional’. Stop thinking of people as ideals (that’s a monotheistic evil cancer of the mind) and think of us as extended families with different senses, perceptions, and skills, where we negotiate and often cooperate. As such a coincidence of wants provides the equals sign – cooperation – in the mathematics of calculating human existence.
-
Yes Men Love Women with Masculine Cog Bias.. But
Yes Men Love Women with Masculine Cog Bias.. But https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/yes-men-love-women-with-masculine-cog-bias-but/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 23:03:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265055862466453505
-
Yes Men Love Women with Masculine Cog Bias.. But
Jan 13, 2020, 6:11 PM Humans require agency. A masculine cognitive bias favors agency. I am not sure the world would populate very successfully with exclusively male-minded females. My present understanding is that women evolved to carry a very heavy emotional cognitive load necessary for rearing multiple children. Agency appears to develop in women as children increase in number – especially with three or more. I would prefer we understand how to manage both men’s and women’s talents than claim that a single ideal is optimum. Autism is a superpower. Yes. But so is extending the female nervous system to perceive infants, toddlers, children, and young adults. It’s up to men to take over at that point. And that appears to be where we are failing.
-
Yes Men Love Women with Masculine Cog Bias.. But
Jan 13, 2020, 6:11 PM Humans require agency. A masculine cognitive bias favors agency. I am not sure the world would populate very successfully with exclusively male-minded females. My present understanding is that women evolved to carry a very heavy emotional cognitive load necessary for rearing multiple children. Agency appears to develop in women as children increase in number – especially with three or more. I would prefer we understand how to manage both men’s and women’s talents than claim that a single ideal is optimum. Autism is a superpower. Yes. But so is extending the female nervous system to perceive infants, toddlers, children, and young adults. It’s up to men to take over at that point. And that appears to be where we are failing.
-
No, Nothing Is Evenly Distributed – Ever
Jan 16, 2020, 3:55 PM
- No, talent is not evenly distributed – just the opposite.
- No, intelligence is not evenly distributed – just the opposite.
- No, personality traits are not evenly distributed – just the opposite.
- Because you are, everyone you know is, and everyone past resent and future, is 80% the product of genes, and 20% the product arbitrary results of the accumulation of idiosyncratic experiences.
- And, No, opportunity is not evenly distributed – just the opposite.
- Because sexual, social, economic, political and military market value is not evenly distributed – just the opposite.
- Because demand for competitive advantage is necessary for survival, production, and evolution.
- Because the red queen of nature never rests.
- And nothing ever under any circumstance can be done about it.
(some happy families vs european civ traits)
-
No, Nothing Is Evenly Distributed – Ever
Jan 16, 2020, 3:55 PM
- No, talent is not evenly distributed – just the opposite.
- No, intelligence is not evenly distributed – just the opposite.
- No, personality traits are not evenly distributed – just the opposite.
- Because you are, everyone you know is, and everyone past resent and future, is 80% the product of genes, and 20% the product arbitrary results of the accumulation of idiosyncratic experiences.
- And, No, opportunity is not evenly distributed – just the opposite.
- Because sexual, social, economic, political and military market value is not evenly distributed – just the opposite.
- Because demand for competitive advantage is necessary for survival, production, and evolution.
- Because the red queen of nature never rests.
- And nothing ever under any circumstance can be done about it.
(some happy families vs european civ traits)
-
Relationships Are Just Another Organization that Adapt to Circumstances
Jan 17, 2020, 2:23 PM
—“Curt: I’m reading the book Sex at Dawn of your library. So which is our natural form of mating: monogamy or polygamy? What type of mating we ( europeans) should aspire?”—
AFAIK, pairing off via serial monogamy with discreet cheating that doesn’t insult the other party is the sort of median – but we adapt to monogamy-polygamy or serial marriage, or serial marriage with ‘cheating’ pretty easily. Religion imposed monogamy because men kill over women.