Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • The Wallet Game Is in Both Party’s Interest if You “buy” Within Your Means.

    Mar 6, 2020, 9:37 AM

    —“It’s the women who AREN’T looking to be supported who are often the most difficult. For … if they don’t need you for your financial support, that must mean they want you for emotional support. Which is a lot more complicated.”— by Michael Churchill

    Be valuable: sexual, social, economic, political, military market value. This is as easy as (a) stay fit, (b) avoid risks to brain (drugs, alcohol), and fix broken brains (therapy, drugs, psychedelic treatments.) Live within the means of the value you create. Quality women will upgrade for consumption of stimulation at lower emotional, psychological, and compromise cost – men are not fulfilling masculine role for the given variability of woman’s demand for masculine traits. Quality men will upgrade for consumption of femininity at lower emotional, psychological, and compromise cost, given the invariability of the value of femininity to men. As we age our ability to learn, adapt, and compromise decreases – we demand greater consilience. Successful high school sweethearts from similar backgrounds with similar values working together to raise a family have least risk of divergence of consilience. Two Parent Working Families with Children in School create insufficient shared experience for relationship persistence. Our forecast of future value of one another is poor. Marriages currently operate via trade-ins for this reason. And while the cost of depreciation on a car is high; The cost of depreciation on marriage is far, far higher. This is why we must restore:

    – Bring capital to people not people to capital – Civil Society so we are invested in the commons and one another. – Possibility of single parent income – Reduction or eliminate of 4 year high-debt education for all but extreme (outlier) cases. – Physical, emotional, and mental fitness by mindfulness training, physical fitness, and P-logic so that we have no deciets over the nature of man and what is possible for man.

  • The Wallet Game Is in Both Party’s Interest if You “buy” Within Your Means.

    Mar 6, 2020, 9:37 AM

    —“It’s the women who AREN’T looking to be supported who are often the most difficult. For … if they don’t need you for your financial support, that must mean they want you for emotional support. Which is a lot more complicated.”— by Michael Churchill

    Be valuable: sexual, social, economic, political, military market value. This is as easy as (a) stay fit, (b) avoid risks to brain (drugs, alcohol), and fix broken brains (therapy, drugs, psychedelic treatments.) Live within the means of the value you create. Quality women will upgrade for consumption of stimulation at lower emotional, psychological, and compromise cost – men are not fulfilling masculine role for the given variability of woman’s demand for masculine traits. Quality men will upgrade for consumption of femininity at lower emotional, psychological, and compromise cost, given the invariability of the value of femininity to men. As we age our ability to learn, adapt, and compromise decreases – we demand greater consilience. Successful high school sweethearts from similar backgrounds with similar values working together to raise a family have least risk of divergence of consilience. Two Parent Working Families with Children in School create insufficient shared experience for relationship persistence. Our forecast of future value of one another is poor. Marriages currently operate via trade-ins for this reason. And while the cost of depreciation on a car is high; The cost of depreciation on marriage is far, far higher. This is why we must restore:

    – Bring capital to people not people to capital – Civil Society so we are invested in the commons and one another. – Possibility of single parent income – Reduction or eliminate of 4 year high-debt education for all but extreme (outlier) cases. – Physical, emotional, and mental fitness by mindfulness training, physical fitness, and P-logic so that we have no deciets over the nature of man and what is possible for man.

  • History Solves the Incel Problem with Civil War

    History Solves the Incel Problem with Civil War https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/history-solves-the-incel-problem-with-civil-war/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 16:04:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266400153948299266

  • History Solves the Incel Problem with Civil War

    Mar 6, 2020, 4:40 PM

    —“Curt, How do we solve the incel problem? Do we must accept as a natural fact that 80% of women go to 20% of men?”–

    That’s not true. It’s that 30% of men are less desirable b/c they’ve been deprived of necessary male training, education, and fraternity in order to accomodate (the frailties of) women’s intolerance for dominance play. Yes, 1/3 of men are undesirable, but b/c dysgenia – fix both.

    —“You mean we have 30% of good quality men who can’t find partner( marriage,children) because of feminist waves( freedom of women and its consequences).”—

    I am saying that (a) people in general are having a lot less sex for reasons we understand, (b) women no longer need men for economic support or reproduction, ( c) incentives (education, taxes, immigration pressure) are hostile to marriage, (d) this is producing expected results. And yes, (e) the expected results mean that we have returned to the HISTORICAL NORM where 1/3 under monogamy, 2/3 under poverty, and as few as 1 in 17 men during prehistory have access to sex. These men are de facto, by the evidence, not of sufficient quality that women will defer other consumption in order to consume those men. Claiming they are of sufficient quality is simply demonstrably false. Fix men (product) or fix the incentives (market). Latter is easier. So – if you want to fix the problem fix men (product) fix incentives (markets). I suspect that incels are insufficiently manly to solve the problem as have their ancestors – and therefore are demonstrating the truth of the market condition. In other words, the gene pool is selecting incels out of it, unless incels demonstrate that they are manly enough not to be selected out of it.

  • History Solves the Incel Problem with Civil War

    Mar 6, 2020, 4:40 PM

    —“Curt, How do we solve the incel problem? Do we must accept as a natural fact that 80% of women go to 20% of men?”–

    That’s not true. It’s that 30% of men are less desirable b/c they’ve been deprived of necessary male training, education, and fraternity in order to accomodate (the frailties of) women’s intolerance for dominance play. Yes, 1/3 of men are undesirable, but b/c dysgenia – fix both.

    —“You mean we have 30% of good quality men who can’t find partner( marriage,children) because of feminist waves( freedom of women and its consequences).”—

    I am saying that (a) people in general are having a lot less sex for reasons we understand, (b) women no longer need men for economic support or reproduction, ( c) incentives (education, taxes, immigration pressure) are hostile to marriage, (d) this is producing expected results. And yes, (e) the expected results mean that we have returned to the HISTORICAL NORM where 1/3 under monogamy, 2/3 under poverty, and as few as 1 in 17 men during prehistory have access to sex. These men are de facto, by the evidence, not of sufficient quality that women will defer other consumption in order to consume those men. Claiming they are of sufficient quality is simply demonstrably false. Fix men (product) or fix the incentives (market). Latter is easier. So – if you want to fix the problem fix men (product) fix incentives (markets). I suspect that incels are insufficiently manly to solve the problem as have their ancestors – and therefore are demonstrating the truth of the market condition. In other words, the gene pool is selecting incels out of it, unless incels demonstrate that they are manly enough not to be selected out of it.

  • Deliberate Destruction by Design to Reduce the Military Morale of Fighting Age M

    Deliberate Destruction by Design to Reduce the Military Morale of Fighting Age Men. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/deliberate-destruction-by-design-to-reduce-the-military-morale-of-fighting-age-men/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 12:42:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266349128570884100

  • Deliberate Destruction by Design to Reduce the Military Morale of Fighting Age Men.

    Mar 8, 2020, 12:46 PM By M. Makienko Post pogrom then post war immigration of certain intellectuals – Marxist, socialist, cultural marxist, postmodernist and feminist philosophies pushed through marketing, media, Hollywood academia, persecution & rallying in the American psychological association, destroyed the patriarchy, a system where female cognition was suppressed in favor of logic, reason, and merit for the sake of giving fighting age men something to be loyal to fight for. To further demoralize fighting age men, feminist law-fare created a divorce-rape system and porn industry designed at weakening the family unit and military morale of fighting age men. All this subversion seems to be targeting the military morale of fighting age men to keep them weak, and today especially you cannot buy makeup in a non immigrant location without horrifically ugly boys wearing makeup in a way designed to maximize repulsion of male cognates. Eric Danelaw there is deliberate destruction by design to reduce the military morale of fighting age men. Observe Putin with his military expansionist agenda bans a lot of these things in Russia, and works to flatter those men will lose their lives for his silly wars instead of women who are worse fighters.

  • Deliberate Destruction by Design to Reduce the Military Morale of Fighting Age Men.

    Mar 8, 2020, 12:46 PM By M. Makienko Post pogrom then post war immigration of certain intellectuals – Marxist, socialist, cultural marxist, postmodernist and feminist philosophies pushed through marketing, media, Hollywood academia, persecution & rallying in the American psychological association, destroyed the patriarchy, a system where female cognition was suppressed in favor of logic, reason, and merit for the sake of giving fighting age men something to be loyal to fight for. To further demoralize fighting age men, feminist law-fare created a divorce-rape system and porn industry designed at weakening the family unit and military morale of fighting age men. All this subversion seems to be targeting the military morale of fighting age men to keep them weak, and today especially you cannot buy makeup in a non immigrant location without horrifically ugly boys wearing makeup in a way designed to maximize repulsion of male cognates. Eric Danelaw there is deliberate destruction by design to reduce the military morale of fighting age men. Observe Putin with his military expansionist agenda bans a lot of these things in Russia, and works to flatter those men will lose their lives for his silly wars instead of women who are worse fighters.

  • How Did They Exterminate You?

    Mar 8, 2020, 7:57 PM

    1. Entering women into the workforce, limiting reproduction.
    2. Consuming all their income with taxes, limiting reproduction.
    3. Placing the tax burden on the middle class,Limiting reproduction.
    4. Exacerbating home prices through long term loans, limiting reproduction.
    5. Exacerbating income demands with college educations that teach nothing other than indoctrination, limiting reproduction.
    6. Fostering easy high interests credit and subsequent debt, limiting reproduction.
    7. Changing from family first policy to individual first policy.
    8. While redistributing income, government services, and tax policy to the underclasses with low quality genes with low investment parenting,
    9. Causing economic, social, cultural, and institutional decline.
    10. Then immigrating vast numbers of the underclass that europe spent millenia eliminating through harsh winters, plagues, wars, prohibition on cousin marriage, manorialism restricting access to land, and aggressive hanging of malcontents.

  • How Did They Exterminate You?

    Mar 8, 2020, 7:57 PM

    1. Entering women into the workforce, limiting reproduction.
    2. Consuming all their income with taxes, limiting reproduction.
    3. Placing the tax burden on the middle class,Limiting reproduction.
    4. Exacerbating home prices through long term loans, limiting reproduction.
    5. Exacerbating income demands with college educations that teach nothing other than indoctrination, limiting reproduction.
    6. Fostering easy high interests credit and subsequent debt, limiting reproduction.
    7. Changing from family first policy to individual first policy.
    8. While redistributing income, government services, and tax policy to the underclasses with low quality genes with low investment parenting,
    9. Causing economic, social, cultural, and institutional decline.
    10. Then immigrating vast numbers of the underclass that europe spent millenia eliminating through harsh winters, plagues, wars, prohibition on cousin marriage, manorialism restricting access to land, and aggressive hanging of malcontents.