This strange difference between the female/empathic frame and the masculine/martial frame pervades the Left-Right discourse. And it wasn’t there before the marxist-neo-marxist-pomo-pc/woke movements. I can’t figure out if the jewish vs european conflict is that simple. (likely)
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-01 06:58:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1356134711475785731
Reply addressees: @GadSaad @BillHess78
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1356003017682780162
-“Capitulation is a feminine virtue. And society has become feminized, feminine virtues and sensibilities are dominant. So to be moral you must signal and espouse feminine virtues.”– W.R. https://t.co/Hfcw6WZwF6
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-31 01:02:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355682712695267334
@Tayai Ah. Well. I am but that’s because I talk about stupid nonsense like women, sex, relationships, cars, guns, and other nonsense instead of what we discuss here. lol
Never toss pearls before swine at parties. It reminds them that they’re swine.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-31 00:29:25 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105647503153789806
The Technique of “GSRRM” includes: … (L)ying by Plausible Deniability By: … (E)vading the Truth By: … (E)quating Truth to (F)ace, (A)pproval, or (C)onsent By: … (D)isapproving … … (D)enying … … … (S)ilence And By Escalating To: … (S)haming, … … (M)oralizing, … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … (O)utraging, And By Escalating To: … (R)allying … … (G)ossiping … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … (P)ropagandizing And By Escalating To: … (S)houting Down … … (S)ilencing … … … (C)ancelling … … … … (D)eplatforming (interference in communication and colaboration) And By Escalating to: … (R)eputation destruction (interference in reputation) … … (D)oxxing (interference in safety and anonymity) … … … (J)ob Doxxing (interference in employement) … … … … (B)usiness Doxxing (interference in the conduct of a business) And By Escalating to: … (C)ourt Abuse (using cost of litigation to silence, obtain false confession, or to harm) … … (J)udicial Abuse (using select cases to exploit vunlerabilities in the law) … … … (C)onstitutional Abuse (using advocacy of incrementally harmful legislation to exploit vulnerabilities in the construction of the constitution, under cover of moral pretense) And By Escalating to: … (M)ore…
In western history under our ancient laws, men were prohibited from reputation destruction by direct violence between men under the law of the Duel.
In western history Female Conflict (social violence by GSRRM) was largely illegal or punishable under laws against “scolds” –women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace.
During the democratic and Marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony).
Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.
GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience.
The Technique of “GSRRM” includes: … (L)ying by Plausible Deniability By: … (E)vading the Truth By: … (E)quating Truth to (F)ace, (A)pproval, or (C)onsent By: … (D)isapproving … … (D)enying … … … (S)ilence And By Escalating To: … (S)haming, … … (M)oralizing, … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … (O)utraging, And By Escalating To: … (R)allying … … (G)ossiping … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … (P)ropagandizing And By Escalating To: … (S)houting Down … … (S)ilencing … … … (C)ancelling … … … … (D)eplatforming (interference in communication and colaboration) And By Escalating to: … (R)eputation destruction (interference in reputation) … … (D)oxxing (interference in safety and anonymity) … … … (J)ob Doxxing (interference in employement) … … … … (B)usiness Doxxing (interference in the conduct of a business) And By Escalating to: … (C)ourt Abuse (using cost of litigation to silence, obtain false confession, or to harm) … … (J)udicial Abuse (using select cases to exploit vunlerabilities in the law) … … … (C)onstitutional Abuse (using advocacy of incrementally harmful legislation to exploit vulnerabilities in the construction of the constitution, under cover of moral pretense) And By Escalating to: … (M)ore…
In western history under our ancient laws, men were prohibited from reputation destruction by direct violence between men under the law of the Duel.
In western history Female Conflict (social violence by GSRRM) was largely illegal or punishable under laws against “scolds” –women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace.
During the democratic and Marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony).
Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.
GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience.
WHY DO WESTERN WOMEN UNDERMINE WESTERN CIVILIZATION? 1. Anglos converted to 100% middle class, seeking cheap success in democracy without paying the cost of maintaining our intellectual, social, economic, political advantage by military service, unity, political control. 2. Aryanism (European civilization’s core drive) is heroic so breeds altruism and virtue signaling. 3. Christianity teaches submission, pacifism, tolerance, and amplifies altruism, altruistic punishment, and virtue signal spirals if virtue can be proxied through political pretense instead of personal action at personal cost. Fake Christians. Fake Christian Ethics. 4. And Women are Worst. They seek attention. They seek attention as aggressively as men seek sex. And verbal signaling is cheaper for them than men’s signaling status by demonstrated achievement. And they seek safety. They seek safety by signaling non-aggression. They seek safety by virtue-signaling non-aggression. They used mass communication combined with women in the voting pool, to virtue signal without personal cost. They created a market of escalating demands for attention, and escalating demand for attention by virtue signaling of non-aggression, thereby producing virtue signal spirals that convert from non-aggression and tolerance to aggression and intolerance. (Just as Popper predicted.) 5. This demand for attention, the pretense of non-aggression, virtue signaling (value signaling), and escalating demand for attention by virtue-signaling into virtue signal spirals, that turns into intolerance, aggression and undermining is simply female social super-predation industrialized by mass communication, where the costs of their political ‘accommodation’ of the enemies of civilization are born by men and men alone.
WHY DO WESTERN WOMEN UNDERMINE WESTERN CIVILIZATION? 1. Anglos converted to 100% middle class, seeking cheap success in democracy without paying the cost of maintaining our intellectual, social, economic, political advantage by military service, unity, political control. 2. Aryanism (European civilization’s core drive) is heroic so breeds altruism and virtue signaling. 3. Christianity teaches submission, pacifism, tolerance, and amplifies altruism, altruistic punishment, and virtue signal spirals if virtue can be proxied through political pretense instead of personal action at personal cost. Fake Christians. Fake Christian Ethics. 4. And Women are Worst. They seek attention. They seek attention as aggressively as men seek sex. And verbal signaling is cheaper for them than men’s signaling status by demonstrated achievement. And they seek safety. They seek safety by signaling non-aggression. They seek safety by virtue-signaling non-aggression. They used mass communication combined with women in the voting pool, to virtue signal without personal cost. They created a market of escalating demands for attention, and escalating demand for attention by virtue signaling of non-aggression, thereby producing virtue signal spirals that convert from non-aggression and tolerance to aggression and intolerance. (Just as Popper predicted.) 5. This demand for attention, the pretense of non-aggression, virtue signaling (value signaling), and escalating demand for attention by virtue-signaling into virtue signal spirals, that turns into intolerance, aggression and undermining is simply female social super-predation industrialized by mass communication, where the costs of their political ‘accommodation’ of the enemies of civilization are born by men and men alone.
EXAMPLE OF WHEN MEN ARGUE AS WOMEN – AND EXPLAINING WHY IT MATTERS
-“Even your opinions wrong.”- a hostile
I pretty much never err. It’s my job not to. I do make one mistake on a regular basis – I overestimate the common man, and in particular, I underestimate the degree to which a third of the male sex was born with female personality and cognitive traits. (“Men without chests”)
-“Even your follow up opinion is wrong”-
And you respond with a cognitively female expression of disapproval in the absence of testifiable argument rather than a male expression of truth or falsehood by use of a testifiable argument. … Like I said. I don’t err.
-“And you continue to miss the point”-
Again: female cognitive bias from female personality traits by avoiding questions of truth or falsehood. My point is, and will remain, that the sexes demonstrate marginal indifference in task processing other than preference but vast differences in intuition and accountability in social and political performance. (It’s the science). So you have to ask yourself why you’re lying and denying,evading and ad hom, disapproval instead of argument. The reason is, as I stated because you’re demonstrating cognitively female traits – not education, information, cognitive, and testimonial discipline. And you continue to miss the point: Truth permits reciprocal exchange. Truth evasion avoids reciprocity and produces a race to the bottom. There is a reason for western civilization’s historical hyper innovation and adaptation: “Truth Before Face Regardless of Cost.” So in simple terms, you’re a social tax evader. Failing to pay the normative and behavioral tax of truth before face regardless of cost, that is necessary for the jury, for rule of law, for democracy,and for the high trust society that produces disproportionate economic velocity.
EXAMPLE OF WHEN MEN ARGUE AS WOMEN – AND EXPLAINING WHY IT MATTERS
-“Even your opinions wrong.”- a hostile
I pretty much never err. It’s my job not to. I do make one mistake on a regular basis – I overestimate the common man, and in particular, I underestimate the degree to which a third of the male sex was born with female personality and cognitive traits. (“Men without chests”)
-“Even your follow up opinion is wrong”-
And you respond with a cognitively female expression of disapproval in the absence of testifiable argument rather than a male expression of truth or falsehood by use of a testifiable argument. … Like I said. I don’t err.
-“And you continue to miss the point”-
Again: female cognitive bias from female personality traits by avoiding questions of truth or falsehood. My point is, and will remain, that the sexes demonstrate marginal indifference in task processing other than preference but vast differences in intuition and accountability in social and political performance. (It’s the science). So you have to ask yourself why you’re lying and denying,evading and ad hom, disapproval instead of argument. The reason is, as I stated because you’re demonstrating cognitively female traits – not education, information, cognitive, and testimonial discipline. And you continue to miss the point: Truth permits reciprocal exchange. Truth evasion avoids reciprocity and produces a race to the bottom. There is a reason for western civilization’s historical hyper innovation and adaptation: “Truth Before Face Regardless of Cost.” So in simple terms, you’re a social tax evader. Failing to pay the normative and behavioral tax of truth before face regardless of cost, that is necessary for the jury, for rule of law, for democracy,and for the high trust society that produces disproportionate economic velocity.
EXAMPLE OF WHEN MEN ARGUE AS WOMEN – AND EXPLAINING WHY IT MATTERS
-“Even your opinions wrong.”- a hostile
I pretty much never err. It’s my job not to. I do make one mistake on a regular basis – I overestimate the common man, and in particular, I underestimate the degree to which a third of the male sex was born with female personality and cognitive traits. (“Men without chests”)
-“Even your follow up opinion is wrong”-
And you respond with a cognitively female expression of disapproval in the absence of testifiable argument rather than a male expression of truth or falsehood by use of a testifiable argument. … Like I said. I don’t err.
-“And you continue to miss the point”-
Again: female cognitive bias from female personality traits by avoiding questions of truth or falsehood. My point is, and will remain, that the sexes demonstrate marginal indifference in task processing other than preference but vast differences in intuition and accountability in social and political performance.
(It’s the science). So you have to ask yourself why you’re lying and denying,evading and ad hom, disapproval instead of argument. The reason is, as I stated because you’re demonstrating cognitively female traits – not education, information, cognitive, and testimonial discipline.
And you continue to miss the point: Truth permits reciprocal exchange. Truth evasion avoids reciprocity and produces a race to the bottom. There is a reason for western civilization’s historical hyper innovation and adaptation: “Truth Before Face Regardless of Cost.”
So in simple terms, you’re a social tax evader. Failing to pay the normative and behavioral tax of truth before face regardless of cost, that is necessary for the jury, for rule of law, for democracy,and for the high trust society that produces disproportionate economic velocity.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 15:48:22 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105645454301901640