The problem with cognitively female groups is that they have no loyalty, subconsciously expect ‘the men’ to take care of the commons, avoid productive work at all costs, seek parasitism on a ‘husband’ through the state, academy, or finance, and undermine constantly from within.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-30 00:46:39 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106151516524818239
The problem with cognitively female groups is that they have no loyalty, subconsciously expect ‘the men’ to take care of the commons, avoid productive work at all costs, seek parasitism on a ‘husband’ through the state, academy, or finance, and undermine constantly from within.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-30 00:46:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387931261075918852
What if a body of people is genetically predisposed to higher aggression and higher aggression expressed as the female means of warfare: undermining?
What if they find the thrill of cheating that we find in producing innovation?
These can be biological in origin (yes really).
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-30 00:36:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387928726093111298
Reply addressees: @NickTurko78
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387927487259332610
2) But it’s not clear that the people those elites work on behalf of are anything other than semi-trained domesticated animals following instincts both genetic and cultural. Women don’t know they’re politically destructive and couldn’t face it if they did. Same is true for Civs.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-29 19:31:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387852069625794562
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387852068434677767
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
1) You know, there are elites in Russia, China, Judaism, and Islam that do know what they’re doing in the conduct of civilizational warfare. It’s Europeans and Indians that don’t know what they’re doing – and are suckers for the ‘enemies’. (Not that I see Russia as an enemy).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1387852068434677767
I get a lot of flack for constructing human behavior from first principles, simply because the first principle of human variation is sexual dimorphism in body, brain, mind, behavior, and speech. We all grow, learn, acquire, cooperate in classes. Divergence beings with sex. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1386434799242416130
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-26 14:47:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386693441191497729
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1386434799242416130
‘Conspiracy theorizing’ varies slightly by sex, but is generally the result of inexperience with organizations, procedures, and incentives at scale – just as women intuit the family and society scales, men intuit the hunting party does the same. Both combine the naive and fear. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1386691622214189057
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-26 14:43:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386692422369951749
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1386691622214189057
(insult that men with high spatial IQ’s can’t figureout how to load the dishwasher)
Women will brag of their higher verbal IQ’s yet fail to produce the most basic abstract analogy, or an argument free of female cognitive bias for conflating truth and desirability, truth and “face”, individual and distribution, and an endless list of variations on those themes.
(Insult that appeals to GSRRM that I”m somehow offended)
Nope. Just spinning the humor for the male audience. Meanwhile, in response, you act like a woman whose flirtations were laughed at. 😉 Providing evidence confirming my statement.
The irony is … well. Tedious really.
(Another Insult that’s an adhominem not a denial.)
“Woman” who demonstrates the female emotional bias to undermine rather than refute. 😉
(Another Ad Hom)
I dunno. I just do the science. I let the Twitterati amuse the peasantry with marxist bread and postmodern circus leaving them empty of mind and body, but distracted by the action at the show.
This is an area of my expertise – the female method of conflict and deceit and the failure of law to suppress female ‘violence’ as much as male. So you know, I can do this all day long.
I work in the Formal logic of decidability in science, economics, law and testimony. Writing proofs of construction from first causes in and across behavioral sciences. And no you wouldn’t understand. 🙂 It requires deep knowledge of multiple fields, not the least of which is cog sci.
I don’t do humanities. I just do the data. 😉 there is consistency between physics, neurology, demonstrated behavior, evolution, their measurement in economics and in law. The first principles are consistent across all formal, physical, behavioral, evolutionary sciences.
Cheers.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-26 00:46:28 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106128866562302604
WHY DO WESTERN WOMEN UNDERMINE WESTERN CIVILIZATION?
1. Anglos converted to 100% middle class, seeking cheap success in democracy without paying the cost of maintaining our intellectual, social, economic, political advantage by military service, unity, political control.
2. Aryanism (European civilization’s core drive) is heroic so breeds altruism and virtue signaling. It is the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons.
3. Christianity teaches submission, pacifism, tolerance, and amplifies altruism, altruistic punishment, and virtue signal spirals if virtue can be proxied through political pretense instead of personal action at personal cost. Fake Christians. Fake Christian Ethics.
4. And Women are the worst. They seek attention. They seek attention as aggressively as men seek sex. And verbal signaling is cheaper for them than men’s signaling status by demonstrated achievement.
5. And they seek safety. They seek safety by signaling non-aggression. They seek safety by virtue-signaling non-aggression. They used mass communication combined with women in the voting pool, to virtue signal without personal cost.
6. They created a market of escalating demands for attention, and escalating demand for attention by virtue signaling of non-aggression,thereby producing virtue signal spirals that convert from non-aggression and tolerance to aggression and intolerance.(Just as Popper predicted.)
7. This demand for attention, the pretense of non-aggression, virtue signaling (value signaling), and escalating demand for attention by virtue-signaling into virtue signal spirals, that turns into intolerance, aggression and undermining …
8. … is simply female social super-predation industrialized by mass communication, where the costs of their political ‘accommodation’ of the enemies of civilization are born by men and men alone.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-26 00:36:18 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106128826590914173
RACE DIFFERENCES ARE IMPOSSIBLE TO EQUILIBRATE
Brains grow individually just like fingerprints, from whatever they’re connected to. There are around 50 brain regions, and around 15-18 are more influential than most, of those, and have more in and out connections than others, and the utmost are related to language.
There are either four or five generations of man living today, each with about a 10% difference in average intelligence over the other. This means equality is impossible without natural selection by political means at the bottom of the earlier generations and their admixtures.
Our difference in cognitive ability is the result of many things going right, and not going wrong (genetic load), and our personality due to these variations in regional influence, with the most influential factor our sex, that causes the greatest differences.
Because we are adapting by rates of learning now, and resulting economic cooperation, leaving many behind – unfit for basic work. It may be possible for chemical means of increasing intelligence in utero or by genetic means over time. But it appears to require hundreds of genes.
Man may be trained against racism, but we cannot train god, nature, and evolution against the fact that the races consist of four to five generations of man, due to isolation, speciation, and some later hybridization.
To strike a little fear into the heart of many: the most obvious and urgent ‘great filter’ is not nuclear war, or climate, or geological, or astronomic crisis, but our inability to restore nature selection by continuing the ancient practice of limiting reproduction of the unfit.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-26 00:33:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106128816743987255
Sense of humor varies by sex, class, culture. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-25 22:25:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386446412892852226
Reply addressees: @MMMalign @BLUNDERBUSSTED
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386445372919271426