Theme: Sex Differences

  • RT @Rational_Quotes: “Women just are. Men must become.” – Rational Male

    RT @Rational_Quotes: “Women just are. Men must become.” – Rational Male


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-09 00:11:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457863450458304520

  • RESTORING THE FAMILY A woman has intrinsic value to a man, so he must only deter

    RESTORING THE FAMILY

    A woman has intrinsic value to a man, so he must only determine her costs. A man has extrinsic value to a woman, so she must only determine her returns. We are going to have to restore the family as the object of policy(not the individual) if we are going to SURVIVE.

    If, as I recommend, we state the reproduction of the intergenerational family is the purpose of policy, we reverse the marriage vs unmarried penalty, we eliminate common property, alimony, child support, restore insurance by the population from interference in the marriage, by restoring liability for interfering with or breaking a marriage, and we reduce the financial stress, reduce taxation housing and interest at the bottom, end and sexual asymmetry in the present marketplace for low and medium wage employment, restore the academy as a ‘church’, and limit voting to those with self-supporting famiilies with children, then we will help families form once again. If we determine retirement payments by children and their incomes, and we restore inheritances then this begins to again encourage family formation.

    If, as I recommend, we repatriate strategic industries, end income tax for manual labor (including drivers, craftsmen, construction, and one-man businesses) and eliminate interest on durable goods and homes, and distribute liquidity directly to families, we ‘fix’ most problems.

    If as I recommend, we provide ‘British ability to draw down against future liquidity distributions (increases in money supply), we eliminate a lot of familial stresses. If we nationalize pensions, and insurance, and adopt Singapore retirement and medical we solve even more.

    If as I recommend, we restore centralized design and production of homes, for rail distribution and local assembly, we can negotiate resource prices, standardize and reduce prices, reduce the cost of homes, end mc-houses, increase quality, (see 1920’s home catalogs).

    If, as I recommend, we regionalize manufacture of apartments, particularly designs for three generations, down to what are effectively ‘dorms’ for single men, we can state fund, and mass-produce housing superior to the soviet model, while imposing severe behavioral restrictions.

    — “The solutions aren’t out of reach when there are guys like you working on the problem. The real barrier is the social ecosystem of power, bureaucracy, vested interests in the status quo, etc that prevent changes.” —

    Like I said. If 2M show up that’s all it takes to force a peaceful negotiation so that the state preserves its self interest at the expense of the financial sector, academy, and media. They will do it only if it means self-perpetuation. And that’s what we’re offering them.

    You have to think of it from the Bureaucracy’s perspective. They need ‘permission, direction, and operating rules’ in order to change from financial, political, and globalist system masters to serving the people once again – and mostly by protecting them from bad people again.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 17:57:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107242735104954059

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: @BoonnHem @curtdoolittle It’s the same type of faction from bo

    RT @ThruTheHayes: @BoonnHem @curtdoolittle It’s the same type of faction from both sides. In politics resides the feminine faction of each…


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 17:38:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457764437721505792

  • A woman has intrinsic value to a man, so he must only determine her costs. A man

    A woman has intrinsic value to a man, so he must only determine her costs. A man has extrinsic value to a woman, so she must only determine her returns.

    We are going to have to restore the family as the object of policy(not the individual) if we are going to SURVIVE.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 17:24:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457760988946632704

  • BUT WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? FEMALE: Adapt to Women and Children (herd, internal) MA

    BUT WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?
    FEMALE: Adapt to Women and Children (herd, internal)
    MALE: Adapt to the Physical Universe (pack, external)
    MALE-FEMALE TRADE: calculate the possible difference between Female Reproductive Demands and Male Physical Universe Supplies. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1457456177613262849

  • RT @Logos_Elect: Free your mind from the abrahamic feminine frame of authority.

    RT @Logos_Elect: Free your mind from the abrahamic feminine frame of authority. Embrace the Aryan Masculine Spirit. Remember who you are. h…


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-07 21:23:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457458695881756679

  • ALL PERSONALITY DIFFERENCES ARE VARIATIONS ON ADAPTATION GIVEN INTELLIGENCE AND

    ALL PERSONALITY DIFFERENCES ARE VARIATIONS ON ADAPTATION GIVEN INTELLIGENCE AND SEX DIFFERENCES

    Intelligence is just a measure of rates of neural adaptation to stimulation (fluidic) and the consequences of exposure to training data (crystalline).

    I: Intelligence = (rate of adaptability)
    T: Over Time In Time
    S: Male-Systematizing Female-Empathizing
    GFP: Dominance:Ego Submission:Altruistism
    C: Conscientiousness Adaptableness
    E: Internal External
    A: Disagreeable Agreeable
    N: Calm Fear
    P: Individual Group
    O: Hierarchy Equality
    E: Supply Demand

    BUT WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?

    FEMALE: Adapt to Women and Children (herd, internal)
    MALE: Adapt to the Physical Universe (pack, external)
    MALE-FEMALE TRADE: calculate the possible difference between Female Reproductive Demands and Male Physical Universe Supplies.

    BUT THEN WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

    It means there is only one simple rule to the universe: Evolutionary computation of exchanges between opposing forces, producing increases in the transformation of energy into mass.

    That’s it.

    That’s the universe in a nutshell.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-07 21:21:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107237873101044176

  • O: Intelligence(adaptability) T: Over Time <-> In Time S: M-Systematizing <-> F-

    O: Intelligence(adaptability)
    T: Over Time <-> In Time
    S: M-Systematizing <-> F-Empathizing
    GFP: Dom:Ego <> Sub:Altruistic
    C: Conscientiousness <> Adaptableness
    E: Internal <> External
    A: Disagreeable <-> Agreeable
    N: Calm <-> Fear
    P: Individual <-> Group
    Hierarchy <-> Equality


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-07 21:13:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457456177613262849

  • I want to use this map to illustrate the asia vs west problem. (a) the northern

    I want to use this map to illustrate the asia vs west problem. (a) the northern

    I want to use this map to illustrate the asia vs west problem.

    (a) the northern European IQ average was closer to 115 before the industrial revolution.
    (b) china has a 5 pt advantage but will return to relative equilibrium with europeans in just a few decades too.

    – “Why does it matter?” –

    (a) The most influential factor in the determination of prosperity is the average IQ of a polity.
    (b) European average IQ has lost 15 points since ~1830.
    (c) Chinese average IQ is losing and will lose its ~5 point advantage over the next few decades.

    Why? Low Middle-Class births.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 16:44:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107231120302366313

  • And in doing so you demonstrated that I’m correct. That the Female->Abrahamic me

    And in doing so you demonstrated that I’m correct. That the Female->Abrahamic method of argument is endemic in jewish-christian-muslim, and marxism, neo-marxism, postmodern, libertarian, neoconservative, feminist, pc-woke discourses.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 16:39:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456662396731281412

    Reply addressees: @Bohm_Baller @BobMurphyEcon @billyj41

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456661857591300103


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Bohm_Baller @BobMurphyEcon @billyj41 You didn’t ask me to make an argument. You stated I was wrong and a sophist. You engaged in intellectual dishonesty by using rallying shaming and reputation destruction to generate demand for self-defense using the pretense of knowledge you didn’t have. ie: a crime of fraud.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456661857591300103