–“The enemy’s usurpation of feminine behavior undermined the value of women’s virtues.” –@LukeWeinhagen
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-04 22:40:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1478496678663659523
–“The enemy’s usurpation of feminine behavior undermined the value of women’s virtues.” –@LukeWeinhagen
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-04 22:40:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1478496678663659523
The enemy behaves with all the evils of women with none of the virtues.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-04 20:53:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1478469732537978884
You would be mistaken. The relative inequality of sex, race, class, intelligence, and personality composition is obscured and denied, when it is that variation that produces the scope of outcomes. The darwinians were right, it’s a law of nature, and we can’t stand it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-31 18:17:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1476980830551658499
Reply addressees: @NeveltenJohn @EPoe187
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1476609200272941059
Male Jealousy, Loyalty, Heroism vs Female Envy, Devotion, Sacrifice
Any human value can be expressed as an inverse equilibrium between the male and the female. Why? in the abstract at least, the universe can only trade-off.
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-31 00:03:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1476705644803760130
It’s pseudoscientific fictionalism. Master (Prey) vs Emissary (Predator) and Feminine (Slow, Empathic-Now) vs Masculine (Fast, Systematizing-Then). He’s a cognitive scientist in as much as Marx was an economist. Not so much.
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-30 18:42:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1476624784196870155
Reply addressees: @norman_spencer @EPoe187
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1476580149776855047
Correct. Why? The postwar ‘war’ against Darwinian evolution, the red queen, natural selection, regression to the mean, and accumulated genetic load, resulting variation in intelligence, conscientiousness, agreeableness, empathizing vs systematizing, in races, classes, and sexes.
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-30 18:35:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1476623024405233666
Reply addressees: @EPoe187
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1476578712191746049
Brain organization, demonstrated behavior, particularly sex differences in extremes of anti-social behavior and competency.
You’d need to follow me for a while.
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-30 01:31:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1476365402829692941
Reply addressees: @danwroy @Steve_Sailer @EPoe187
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1476364645560508416
(All): General Rule of Sex Differences in Cognition:
Male: Over-Time, Capitalizing, Systematizing, Repeatability
-vs-
Female: In-Time, Consuming, Empathizing(Experiencing), Novelty.
A division of perception, cognition, valuation, advocacy, and labor.
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-28 20:53:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1475932893264420868
Reply addressees: @Steve_Sailer @EPoe187
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1475931570783416323
RT @Steve_Sailer: @EPoe187 In general, males tend to be more nostalgic and backward looking in their tastes, so they make up most of the li…
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-28 20:48:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1475931792272236552
@MrWillis@SomeBitchIKnow I don’t want to get deep into this discussion but the fact that females are sexually flexible and opportunistic, manipulative, dominate by manipulation and undermining, and the enemy is cognitively female, explains a lot.
Source date (UTC): 2021-12-24 03:20:24 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107499750969207418