Theme: Sex Differences

  • Regarding Dating Single Moms: Still seeing the social media fervor over single m

    Regarding Dating Single Moms:
    Still seeing the social media fervor over single mothers rebelling against men not wanting to date or marry them. I understand both sides. But I can’t understand why women can’t understand it.
    I’ve learned a lot because I have a bunch of ‘stepkids’ from the single mom’s I’ve dated (or married):
    1) You will have to adapt to her life not her to yours.
    2) You will always come in second after the kids.
    3) You cannot discipline the children other than in their behavior toward you.
    4) She will expect you to carry the financial weight of the kids despite this – and still use her money for her own purposes.
    5) She will burden you with whatever trauma she has from her previous relationships. And often it will make you want to leave.

    Why does this work – at least, for me:
    1) Busy mom’s impose limited demands on me and my time are in my favor (as a workaholic).
    2) I can get along with everyone easily so fitting into a household is easy – in fact I prefer a woman’s sovereignty in the home as long as I have my ‘peaceful’ place to reset, work, and think.
    3) I can defer to her without impact on my ego as long as it is not a risk to me, cost to me, or disrespectful to me. (Never tolerate disrespect.)
    4) I can support the kids or mom when one or the other gets out of hand – which always happens and makes me trusted by both.
    5) I follow the same strategy in all relationships with women: figure out what makes them feel safe, and provide it. Conversely, figure out if they desire attention, and if so … Run.
    6) I maintain walk away power – which must never be stated, but always preserved.
    That’s why it works for me. I can’t see most men, who need the emotional connection, support, and respect (male version of validation), tolerating these conditions. When they are the optimum conditions for me.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 00:56:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859400475084488704

  • Regarding Dating Single Moms: Still seeing the social media fervor over single m

    Regarding Dating Single Moms:
    Still seeing the social media fervor over single mothers rebelling against men wanting to date or marry them. I understand both sides. But I can’t understand why women can’t understand it.
    I’ve learned a lot because I have a bunch of ‘stepkids’ from the single mom’s I’ve dated (or married):
    1) You will have to adapt to her life not her to yours.
    2) You will always come in second after the kids.
    3) You cannot discipline the children other than in their behavior toward you.
    4) She will expect you to carry the financial weight of the kids despite this – and still use her money for her own purposes.
    5) She will burden you with whatever trauma she has from her previous relationships. And often it will make you want to leave.

    Why does this work – at least, for me:
    1) Busy mom’s impose limited demands on me and my time are in my favor (as a workaholic).
    2) I can get along with everyone easily so fitting into a household is easy – in fact I prefer a woman’s sovereignty in the home as long as I have my ‘peaceful’ place to reset, work, and think.
    3) I can defer to her without impact on my ego as long as it is not a risk to me, cost to me, or disrespectful to me. (Never tolerate disrespect.)
    4) I can support the kids or mom when one or the other gets out of hand – which always happens and makes me trusted by both.
    5) I follow the same strategy in all relationships with women: figure out what makes them feel safe, and provide it. Conversely, figure out if they desire attention, and if so … Run.
    6) I maintain walk away power – which must never be stated, but always preserved.
    That’s why it works for me. I can’t see most men, who need the emotional connection, support, and respect (male version of validation), tolerating these conditions. When they are the optimum conditions for me.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 00:56:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859399089173237760

  • Turns out that teachers are a cancer destroying society from within by applying

    Turns out that teachers are a cancer destroying society from within by applying feminine intuition that causes infantilism rather than masculine paternalism that causes flexibility adaptation responsibility and maturity.

    Nurses yes. What does that have to do with anything other…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-18 04:26:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858366037298987276

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858361646520930461

  • Understood. My complaint, upon seeing these, as someone for whom women have been

    Understood.
    My complaint, upon seeing these, as someone for whom women have been a boon, is “look what damage has been wrought”.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-17 22:42:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858279547613192254

    Reply addressees: @lovemist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858236376896115123

  • RT @Lord__Sousa: Sedition is women’s gunpowder, lies are their rifles, and prete

    RT @Lord__Sousa: Sedition is women’s gunpowder, lies are their rifles, and pretense of victimhood and innocent their shields.

    – @curtdooli…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-17 22:36:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858278164705038471

  • AI Analyzes Female Behavior (Every Man Needs to Know)

    AI Analyzes Female Behavior (Every Man Needs to Know) https://youtu.be/o9N2d1ggtGU?si=llPINJom-gxINbAn


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-17 19:27:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858230427980554456

  • RT @whatifalthist: Breakdown of society holistically. Loss of community, values,

    RT @whatifalthist: Breakdown of society holistically. Loss of community, values, marriage, childrearing and work. Women need that stuff mor…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-16 19:55:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857875219979076043

  • we are blaming men for failing to regulate women in modernity, given the lower c

    we are blaming men for failing to regulate women in modernity, given the lower capacity of women to self regulate.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-16 18:05:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857847408102932864

    Reply addressees: @ppxl888

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857824729266032778

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @traungena @gspeth @RichardDawkins That’s a demonstration of

    RT @curtdoolittle: @traungena @gspeth @RichardDawkins That’s a demonstration of female NAXALT / AXALT cognitive bias. Wherein males compreh…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-16 08:00:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857695139231313957

  • That’s a demonstration of female NAXALT / AXALT cognitive bias. Wherein males co

    That’s a demonstration of female NAXALT / AXALT cognitive bias. Wherein males comprehend all statements refer to distributions and females, females comprehend inverse distributions. So where a man would say ‘yes that’s true’ (a distribution) a woman would say (but not all are like that). Or worse, personalize it (as you did) when the statement is impersonal description of a distribution. It is one of the most obvious sex differences in cognition.

    What I find interesting is the cognitively feminine means of proving me correct with each retort and the persistent total inability to adapt one’s frame.

    My principle concern is the tendency of women – especially those without at least two or three children – to support policy that they view as supportive but which instead infantilizes, by the failure to demand individual responsibility for the private and common, leading to the weakness of the group on one hand and exhaustive free riding, rent seeking, and corruption on the other.

    BACKGROUND ON NAXALT / AXALT

    Biological and Evolutionary Perspectives:
    Group Cohesion: Historically, group cohesion has been crucial for survival. Recognizing and promoting the exceptions or unique traits within a group (NAXALT) could be an evolutionary trait aimed at maintaining group harmony and cooperation, which might be more pronounced in roles traditionally associated with nurturing or community building.
    Protective Instincts: Your assumption about “instinctual sensitivity to being left behind” could align with evolutionary psychology where sensitivity to social exclusion or being underestimated might push individuals to correct or mitigate generalizations that could exclude or devalue members of their group.

    Cognitive Biases:
    Confirmation Bias: People might seek out or give more weight to information that confirms their worldview or group identity, leading to the NAXALT fallacy when defending against negative stereotypes or the AXALT when reinforcing positive ones about their group.
    Cognitive Dissonance: When faced with information that contradicts one’s beliefs about their group, the NAXALT response might be a way to resolve the discomfort by highlighting exceptions rather than accepting the generalization.

    Psychological and Identity Needs:
    Identity Protection: Identifying with a group can lead to a protective stance where individuals are quick to refute generalizations (NAXALT) that threaten the positive aspects of that identity.
    Need for Belonging: The desire to belong can drive cognitive biases where individuals might either exaggerate similarities (AXALT) within their group for unity or highlight individuality (NAXALT) to prevent exclusion.

    Reply addressees: @traungena @gspeth @RichardDawkins


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-16 08:00:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857695101327388682

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1857647864454996419