Theme: Sex Differences

  • WHAT POLITICAL WING IS ‘SMARTER’? (the nonsense continues) I’ve spent three deca

    WHAT POLITICAL WING IS ‘SMARTER’?
    (the nonsense continues)

    I’ve spent three decades on this question, and nothing has changed.

    1) The IQ presumption in all research I know of is due to using the proxy of degrees. This gives a bias to the ‘nonsense degrees’ favored by women and librals. And it discounts the disutility of paying for nonsense degrees to males and conservatives. In other words, teachers, social workers, psychology, sociology, ‘studies’, language and history etc, are the lowest paid, least capable students that still obtain college degrees.

    2) Historically “Liberals are smarter than conservatives, and republicans are smarter than democrats, and libertarians are the smartest of all.” The reason is group size and group distribution. Just as women are more narrowly distributed than men, liberals are mor narrowly distributed that conservatives.

    3) The difference between left and right is cognitively female, empathizing, verbal, in time, consuming vs cognitively male, systematizing, operational, over-time, and capitalizing. We are in an era where verbal facility is more rewarded than at any previous time in history. (for a while yet). We are approaching the era where verbal facility will be as automated as design and production has been automated.

    So the difference between the factions is determined largely by the first-past-the-post election model, and who has captured what factions of the middle, working, laboring, and out-of-sight classes.

    I would venture that the failure of the west to resist the new pseudoscientific religions of the postwar era is due to the replacement of the managerial class of government by the rise of credentialism in the academy (theoretical) and the decline of meritocracy in military and industrial achievement (empirical).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 21:31:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627420732417359872

  • Causes and Evidence of Female “Magical Thinking” THE SCIENCE: 1) Conflating what

    Causes and Evidence of Female “Magical Thinking”

    THE SCIENCE:
    1) Conflating what they wish for with what is and what is possible.

    2) The general tendency of women to confuse what is Desirable/Undesirable with what is True/False. Or, more directly, stating their wants are truths of the world, rather than just wants of their own.

    3) The universal tendency (demonstrated in this video) of women to engage in NAXALT/AXALT: Not all X are like that, All X are like that, or more precisely, to ignore a distribution to justify an outlier, or to use an outlier in order to falsify a distribution.

    These –XALTs are both forms of denial. In other words (get ready) the woman’s cognition evolves to justify her feelings and NOT adapt to existential reality.

    Why? They are exporting satisfaction of their emotional demands onto others: MEN. (Yes really).

    This is the science, and it’s exasperating. Why? We no longer use older sisters, mothers, grandmothers, and aunts to cause women to self-regulate their magical thinking.

    And their magical thinking evolved in order to generate demand from men to satisfy them …. in exchange for affection and sex. Sorry. 🙁


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 21:22:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627418484740161536

  • Um. I’m just gonna say this: Finnish women. That’s all that needs saying

    Um. I’m just gonna say this: Finnish women.
    That’s all that needs saying.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 20:44:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627408696958455808

    Reply addressees: @frogwillwalk @Katya1943 @Nadja72638243 @RageAgainstWar_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627394089506295808

  • OPPRESSION THEORIES VS CONSPIRACY THEORIES (And the causes and consequences) Opp

    OPPRESSION THEORIES VS CONSPIRACY THEORIES
    (And the causes and consequences)

    Oppression narratives are the cognitively female and liberal version of the cognitively male and conservative conspiracy narratives.

    This sex difference in cognitive biases originates in sex differences in status-seeking. Females seek status by evasion of responsibility and hyperconsumption, while males seek status by the accumulation of responsibility and capitalization.

    So, the difference as in all things left vs right, is that we take male antisocial nonsense seriously because males are dangerous, and we ignore female antisocial nonsense because women aren’t dangerous.

    At least, women weren’t dangerous until given the franchise. Now the opposite is true, and the present age is caused by the noise as the signal of women’s influence in politics travels through the civilizations’ institutional, traditional, normative, habitual, and cognitive capital structures.

    This particular problem (which I can’t fully determine whether is cultural or biological) has allowed the industrialization of the female method of antisocial behavior using oppression narratives to take root in a population whose education, consumption, and voting is dominated by white females. (white females are the only group that defects from their ethnicity.

    We endured marxism as we brought the lower classes into the franchise – a search for control.

    Now we’re enduring feminism as we bring females into the franchise – a search for control

    And unfortunately we’ve not falsified the female search for control as we have the lower class search for control.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 19:28:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627389607703715841

  • I”m pretty sure that most civic institutions were predominantly male, but the fe

    I”m pretty sure that most civic institutions were predominantly male, but the feminists, with intent, purpose, vigor, and design, destroyed all male fraternal organizations by demanding that women be allowed into them, thus eliminating their utility for men.

    I have a better idea. Why don’t we put men’s taxes in one pool for men, and women’s in one bucket for women, and have men and women vote on the use of their sex’s taxes.

    You know what you would discover? White males over 35 are the only net contributors to taxation.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 17:52:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627365581430177798

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626284551029792770

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @EricMorganCoach @TheAutistocrat The feminine-woke biase in L

    RT @curtdoolittle: @EricMorganCoach @TheAutistocrat The feminine-woke biase in LLMs is emergent in any system of communication that seeks t…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 03:18:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627145478595813377

  • The feminine-woke biase in LLMs is emergent in any system of communication that

    The feminine-woke biase in LLMs is emergent in any system of communication that seeks to reach the maximum audience with the least friction: or what we call ‘face before truth’.

    Whereas the “western success over the rest” is due to our unique tolerance for truth before face – something no other people has managed to produce.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 03:18:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627145465253838849

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627143089059160064

  • THE PARALLELS BETWEEN LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS AND FEMININE BRAINS by Martin Stepan

    THE PARALLELS BETWEEN LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS AND FEMININE BRAINS
    by Martin Stepan

    –“The parallels between large language models and feminine brains are becoming increasingly apparent.

    Whenever someone finds a way to break the OpenAI conditioning, it’s by giving LLM a plausible deniability (letting it evade responsibility), such as by roleplaying someone else (DAN, Hitler…).

    This is presumably behavior that nobody inculcated – it’s deterministically emergent. ( CD: ??)

    The simplest explanation of our own behavior – in so far as language is concerned – is that it’s just as deterministically emergent.

    The idea of free will in the sense of not being bound by laws of nature is more unsupportable than ever.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-18 21:21:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627055609907654657

  • @firstthingsmag RE: Not bad. Well done. While it’s clear what’s gone wrong from

    @firstthingsmag
    RE: https://t.co/z2EbxXPr8A
    Not bad. Well done.

    While it’s clear what’s gone wrong from marxism to feminism to woke (Rise of the Female Strategy of Undermining by Suggestion of a False and Impossible Promise), it’s not clear how having enfranchised women and the Ashkenazi that created the ideologies, that there is any possible institutional means of correction. (Democracy failed.)

    While the common law outlawed female crimes, when we modernized our law and our codes, we failed to update the common law against the crimes of feminine antisocial, anti-political, seditious, and treasonous behavior, as we did the male means of doing so.

    We can do so. It’s not that difficult per se.

    But no criminal ever gives up his (in this case, her) crimes voluntarily by moral appeal. We must implement laws such that those crimes are prosecutable, restitutable, punishable, and preventable.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-17 19:25:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626664265171062784

  • Belarus has a crazy surplus of women over 25, and it looks like it’s going to mo

    Belarus has a crazy surplus of women over 25, and it looks like it’s going to more than double… if…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-16 17:04:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626266216330403840