Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • @PeterZeihan; Hard Question: Given: “United Nations World Population Prospects”

    @PeterZeihan;
    Hard Question:
    Given: “United Nations World Population Prospects” thru 2100. And: Current collapse of dating, mating, marriage, and reproduction. And: The flat line for the USA of 12 per 1k @ .09% growth doesn’t match what I’m seeing in real-time. And: assuming downward shift out of clerical white collar due to tech.
    (a) What are your thoughts? Better guess?
    (b) Are all births equal to so speak? Is the distribution of reproduction symmetric or asymmetric with future demand? (Pass on this one if you can’t couch it comfortably.).

    -Thanks

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 01:59:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633648713301123072

  • Not so much. More in personality. That she was a shy young naive girly-girl, ins

    Not so much. More in personality. That she was a shy young naive girly-girl, instead of a competitive mature woman with ambitions, who could understand life in the monarchy as doing ones’ duty for god and country so to speak, and making the best of it. She was a broodmare. That…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 01:40:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633643825410220033

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633640343404163073

  • Systematizing and Things vs Empathizing and Words (sex differences in communicat

    Systematizing and Things vs Empathizing and Words
    (sex differences in communication)

    Having spent the past decade or so doing my research online, victimizing the poor folks who are willing mice in the maze of social science, you notice rather odd subtleties of sex, moral and political bias.

    For example, the feminine, left, verbal empathic tend to be concerned with word choice, spelling, and grammar.

    While the masculine right systematizing sometimes produce sentences that consist of anchors from which the meaning must be interpreted by filling in the blank.

    Conversely the feminine, left, verbal empathic tend to be as equally incompetent in causal realtions and truth vs preference.

    So in some sense illogical thought by good grammar, and logical thought by bad grammar.

    And it’s just… I dunno… endlessly amusing.

    We’re just bots really.

    Maybe future generations will learn my work like they learn physics or programming today, and this ‘problem’ will be solved over time.

    I don’t hold out hope.
    But it’s a possibility. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 22:54:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633602193650581504

  • Systematizing and Things vs Empathizing and Words (sex differences in communicat

    Systematizing and Things vs Empathizing and Words
    (sex differences in communication)

    Having spent the past decade or so doing my research online, victimizing the poor folks who are willing mice in the maze of social science, you notice rather odd subtleties of sex, moral and political bias.

    For example, the feminine, left, verbal empathic tend to be concerned with word choice, spelling, and grammar.

    While the masculine right systematizing sometimes produce sentences that consist of anchors from which the meaning must be interpreted by filling in the blank.

    Conversely the feminine, left, verbal empathic tend to be as equally incompetent in causal realtions and truth vs preference.

    So in some sense illogical thought by good grammar, and logical thought by bad grammar.

    And it’s just… I dunno… endlessly amusing.

    We’re just bots really.

    Maybe future generations will learn my work like they learn physics or programming today, and this ‘problem’ will be solved over time.

    I don’t hold out hope.
    But it’s a possibility. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 22:54:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633602193545736194

  • EQ VS IQ? WELL, SORT OF, AND SORT OF NOT Not quite sure how we convert the pseud

    EQ VS IQ? WELL, SORT OF, AND SORT OF NOT
    Not quite sure how we convert the pseudoscience of EQ/IQ into sex differences in the valuation of perception.

    But, there isn’t so much a difference in sensitivity as a difference in PRIORITY. The sexes are very, very unequal in the distribution of ability and interest.

    The sexes prioritize perception by male predator, over time and scale, political, and female prey, in time independent of scale, interpersonal – for obvious evolutionary reasons.

    With man-splaining (cause and long-term consequence: reals) and woman-splaining (experience and short-term consequence: feels) an inescapable reality of daily life for all of us.

    And the collapse of the family, the dating market, and sustainable reproduction have demonstrated just how different we are.

    And how much, without natural incentives to divide the labor of reproduction and society (children) and production and polity (adults), we are different, and how evolution selects against violating that division of labor.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 16:18:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633502513029685260

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633419567027437568

  • EQ VS IQ? WELL, SORT OF, AND SORT OF NOT Not quite sure how we convert the pseud

    EQ VS IQ? WELL, SORT OF, AND SORT OF NOT
    Not quite sure how we convert the pseudoscience of EQ/IQ into sex differences in the valuation of perception.

    But, there isn’t so much a difference in sensitivity as a difference in PRIORITY. The sexes are very, very unequal in the distribution of ability and interest.

    The sexes prioritize perception by male predator, over time and scale, political, and female prey, in time independent of scale, interpersonal – for obvious evolutionary reasons.

    With man-splaining (cause and long-term consequence: reals) and woman-splaining (experience and short-term consequence: feels) an inescapable reality of daily life for all of us.

    And the collapse of the family, the dating market, and sustainable reproduction have demonstrated just how different we are.

    And how much, without natural incentives to divide the labor of reproduction and society (children) and production and polity (adults), we are different, and how evolution selects against violating that division of labor.

    Reply addressees: @doczoliday @lindaserg

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 16:18:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633502512861913094

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633419567027437568

  • No. IQ is IQ. A general measure of neural responsiveness. Let me help you: While

    No. IQ is IQ. A general measure of neural responsiveness. Let me help you: While we are both an admixture in the main, female brains empathize in time and male brains systematize over time. So we intuit things the other doesn’t. The result is Prey vs Predatory, Verbal Experiential vs Spatial-Mechanical, interpersonal vs political, oppression vs conspiracy, womansplaining vs mainsplaining.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 05:15:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633335728846372868

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633325314498592768

  • No. IQ is IQ. A general measure of neural responsiveness. Let me help you: While

    No. IQ is IQ. A general measure of neural responsiveness. Let me help you: While we are both an admixture in the main, female brains empathize in time and male brains systematize over time. So we intuit things the other doesn’t. The result is Prey vs Predatory, Verbal Experiential vs Spatial-Mechanical, interpersonal vs political, oppression vs conspiracy, womansplaining vs mainsplaining.

    Reply addressees: @lindaserg

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 05:15:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633335728766681090

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633325314498592768

  • Funny how few women understand just how annoyingly logical most men are. Even if

    Funny how few women understand just how annoyingly logical most men are. Even if they can’t articulate it, they think logically. And this can be a problem. Because logic requires more knowledge than feelings do. So you the scope of that logic vary by context based on a man’s knowledge and experience. Within context men are extremely rational. Men specialize women generalize.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 17:58:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633165360466653196

  • Funny how few women understand just how annoyingly logical most men are. Even if

    Funny how few women understand just how annoyingly logical most men are. Even if they can’t articulate it, they think logically. And this can be a problem. Because logic requires more knowledge than feelings do. So you the scope of that logic vary by context based on a man’s knowledge and experience. Within context men are extremely rational. Men specialize women generalize.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 17:58:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633165360374464512