Theme: Sex Differences

  • HOW TO FIX OUR DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIAL COLLAPSE? Of the four candidates for our d

    HOW TO FIX OUR DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIAL COLLAPSE?
    Of the four candidates for our demographic, economic, political, and geostrategic collapse: a) the pill, b) abortion, d) women in education and workforce, e) immigration of underclasses, the data is very clear, that it’s women in education and the work force.

    While you’d easily blame pill and abortion, and replacement immigration, the cause is i) college education and ii) workforce participation and iii) debt created by college education and iv) export of traditionally male jobs, v) women replacing men in ‘easy’ clerical jobs and ‘feminizing’ the workplaces – and reinforcing female ‘culture’ of these ‘non-reproducing’ norms.

    And if we look at the data, it’s that many more women are having no children, not necessarily fewer children. And so the trigger for women producing replacement reproduction is the first child. After having the first child, each subsequent child is marginally less impactful.

    The solution would, in theory, be simple: women have children before college in exchange for our paying for
    their college.

    To make this possible requires altering our education system for life preparation more than babysitting and indoctrination.

    And as a side benefit, marrying mating and reproducing young 17-23, especially while living with parents, makes use of your maximum adaptation to another person for the purpose of creating a sustainable family and high investment parenting.

    But what’s college for? To find a mate. How can we alter that demand? Easily. Move ‘college’ to grade 10. (For those of us with private school educations we know how that game works.)

    And no this isn’t a question of whether men have control of their bodies when called to war or women have control of their bodies when called to mother hood. It’s simply the fact that we need reproduction like we need work economies, and taxes to survive.

    Lots more to clarify here but it saturday morning and I’m looking at my coffee and bagel.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 15:15:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634573678070382592

  • HOW TO FIX OUR DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIAL COLLAPSE? Of the four candidates for our d

    HOW TO FIX OUR DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIAL COLLAPSE?
    Of the four candidates for our demographic, economic, political, and geostrategic collapse: a) the pill, b) abortion, d) women in education and workforce, e) immigration of underclasses, the data is very clear, that it’s women in education and the work force.

    While you’d easily blame pill and abortion, and replacement immigration, the cause is i) college education and ii) workforce participation and iii) debt created by college education and iv) export of traditionally male jobs, v) women replacing men in ‘easy’ clerical jobs and ‘feminizing’ the workplaces – and reinforcing female ‘culture’ of these ‘non-reproducing’ norms.

    And if we look at the data, it’s that many more women are having no children, not necessarily fewer children. And so the trigger for women producing replacement reproduction is the first child. After having the first child, each subsequent child is marginally less impactful.

    The solution would, in theory, be simple: women have children before college in exchange for our paying for
    their college.

    To make this possible requires altering our education system for life preparation more than babysitting and indoctrination.

    And as a side benefit, marrying mating and reproducing young 17-23, especially while living with parents, makes use of your maximum adaptation to another person for the purpose of creating a sustainable family and high investment parenting.

    But what’s college for? To find a mate. How can we alter that demand? Easily. Move ‘college’ to grade 10. (For those of us with private school educations we know how that game works.)

    And no this isn’t a question of whether men have control of their bodies when called to war or women have control of their bodies when called to mother hood. It’s simply the fact that we need reproduction like we need work economies, and taxes to survive.

    Lots more to clarify here but it saturday morning and I’m looking at my coffee and bagel.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 15:15:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634573677877501954

  • It’s relatively easy to cause women to demonstrate female behaviors. Especially

    It’s relatively easy to cause women to demonstrate female behaviors. Especially NAXALT/AXALT or non-scaling empathy. And it’s trivial to use aggression to cause women’s disapproval and trigger into the list you’re commenting on above. Men do the same things very differently.…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 04:04:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634404858433339394

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634402415033065473

  • THE TIPPING POINT IN MALE COGNITION (repost) (exasperation) I love my fellow mas

    THE TIPPING POINT IN MALE COGNITION
    (repost) (exasperation)

    I love my fellow masculine males, I love the common man, despite not being one, and I love that Gab exists to give them voice – when that voice is so thoroughly suppressed elsewhere.

    On the other hand I’ve become absolutely convinced, despite every possible attempt to find a solution, that the …

    Mascluline > Disagreeable > Anti-Social > Sociopathic

    .. spectrum is no more open to education and organization into a political force than is the extreme left that this right-wing mirrors in behavior.

    It’s actually worse because the left extremes will at least follow direction despite all the risks and costs, and the right won’t show up without certainty that they have to bear neither cost nor risk – the right are natural cowards.

    So there is no hope for the hard right. The middle or center-right will have to lead. Because disagreeable, antisocial, and sociopathic magical thinking (conspiracy) mad-boys are a dead weight on themselves, and a cancer for the broader conservative and traditional population.

    So realistically, I write for the tiny percent for whom there is hope to provide insight, education, and strategy. And I pretty much ignore the rest unless there is some reason for conducting an argument that might educate the truth-seeking audience despite the cacophony of idiocy spammed by the dysfunctionals.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:44:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634324485745639425

  • THE TIPPING POINT IN MALE COGNITION (repost) (exasperation) I love my fellow mas

    THE TIPPING POINT IN MALE COGNITION
    (repost) (exasperation)

    I love my fellow masculine males, I love the common man, despite not being one, and I love that Gab exists to give them voice – when that voice is so thoroughly suppressed elsewhere.

    On the other hand I’ve become absolutely convinced, despite every possible attempt to find a solution, that the …

    Mascluline > Disagreeable > Anti-Social > Sociopathic

    .. spectrum is no more open to education and organization into a political force than is the extreme left that this right-wing mirrors in behavior.

    It’s actually worse because the left extremes will at least follow direction despite all the risks and costs, and the right won’t show up without certainty that they have to bear neither cost nor risk – the right are natural cowards.

    So there is no hope for the hard right. The middle or center-right will have to lead. Because disagreeable, antisocial, and sociopathic magical thinking (conspiracy) mad-boys are a dead weight on themselves, and a cancer for the broader conservative and traditional population.

    So realistically, I write for the tiny percent for whom there is hope to provide insight, education, and strategy. And I pretty much ignore the rest unless there is some reason for conducting an argument that might educate the truth-seeking audience despite the cacophony of idiocy spammed by the dysfunctionals.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:44:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634324485879873540

  • DOING THE MATH ON JOB REPLACEMENTS I’ve done the math. No, it doesn’t make sense

    DOING THE MATH ON JOB REPLACEMENTS

    I’ve done the math.
    No, it doesn’t make sense to make a robot plumber.
    It DOES make sense to buy a robot wife tho. 😉
    But from the woman’s side of things: what good is a robot husband? I mean, what’s the point of nagging, and complaining and telling stories about nonsense to a robot that doesn’t get annoyed with you for doing so and then create drama that makes you satisfied for having caused the agitation as a means of getting attention?

    Wait.
    Come to think if that.
    Sure. We can make an AI to do that. 😉

    -Cheers

    Reply addressees: @FlashGorgone @CharlesL1902


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 21:28:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634305213757546497

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634298890370285568

  • DOING THE MATH ON JOB REPLACEMENTS I’ve done the math. No, it doesn’t make sense

    DOING THE MATH ON JOB REPLACEMENTS

    I’ve done the math.
    No, it doesn’t make sense to make a robot plumber.
    It DOES make sense to buy a robot wife tho. 😉
    But from the woman’s side of things: what good is a robot husband? I mean, what’s the point of nagging, and complaining and telling stories about nonsense to a robot that doesn’t get annoyed with you for doing so and then create drama that makes you satisfied for having caused the agitation as a means of getting attention?

    Wait.
    Come to think if that.
    Sure. We can make an AI to do that. 😉

    -Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 21:28:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634305213845630978

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634298890370285568

  • A POSITIVE MESSAGE FOR WOMEN? –“Almost no one on the right has a positive messa

    A POSITIVE MESSAGE FOR WOMEN?

    –“Almost no one on the right has a positive message for women.”– @FrailSkeleton

    Hmmm. Well, is that true?
    We’re running an experiment.
    One of the most dangerous in history.
    – We have learned that women in their evolutionary roles are priceless. We have learned that women in the economy is a false return on rate of reproduction.
    – We have learned that the inclusion of women into economy and polity, at the cost of reproduction, ends in genetic decline. And our IQ is heading to second-world threshold within the next few years.
    – We have learned that women do not net contribute to the labor pool as much as displace men out of the labor pool (labor participation rates) in those fields that are least damaging to our bodies.
    – We have learned that the totality of the contribution of women to the economy is absorbed by taxation. And because of it we require two income households.
    – We have learned that even by participating in the economy the only net taxpayers are white men over 35, yet 70% of government services are consumed by women. But men are not taken care of by the state as are women and suicide in vast numbers in late middle age.
    – We have learned women in a polity are, as expected, biased to empathizing at interpersonal scale, and naturally incompetent to, and resistant to, systematizing at political scale.
    – We have learned that it destroyed the intersexual cooperation between the sexes, the family as the fist institution of reproductive, social, economic, and political organization.
    – We have learned that nearly everything we were warned about women in politics was true.
    – We have learned that suicide is increasing in both sexes at different ages, that everyone is de-socialized, that society means children, that the production of families is the only thing that makes us relatively equal with equal incentives.
    – We have learned that the consequences are horrific.

    So when you say the right has nothing positive to say about women. What I think you mean is, we have nothing positive to say about women acting as if they are men, and failing at it. And we have plenty of positive things to say about women when they act as women, and succeed at it. So we’d prefer they didn’t fail at being men AND fail at being women too. And instead succeeded at being women. So we can succeed at being men. And together we can succeed as families. And as families produce the next generation as good or better than the last.

    (That’s the quotable bit there at the end.)

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @FrailSkeleton


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:31:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634290827915669505

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634107030699999232

  • A POSITIVE MESSAGE FOR WOMEN? –“Almost no one on the right has a positive messa

    A POSITIVE MESSAGE FOR WOMEN?

    –“Almost no one on the right has a positive message for women.”– @FrailSkeleton

    Hmmm. Well, is that true?
    We’re running an experiment.
    One of the most dangerous in history.
    – We have learned that women in their evolutionary roles are priceless. We have learned that women in the economy is a false return on rate of reproduction.
    – We have learned that the inclusion of women into economy and polity, at the cost of reproduction, ends in genetic decline. And our IQ is heading to second-world threshold within the next few years.
    – We have learned that women do not net contribute to the labor pool as much as displace men out of the labor pool (labor participation rates) in those fields that are least damaging to our bodies.
    – We have learned that the totality of the contribution of women to the economy is absorbed by taxation. And because of it we require two income households.
    – We have learned that even by participating in the economy the only net taxpayers are white men over 35, yet 70% of government services are consumed by women. But men are not taken care of by the state as are women and suicide in vast numbers in late middle age.
    – We have learned women in a polity are, as expected, biased to empathizing at interpersonal scale, and naturally incompetent to, and resistant to, systematizing at political scale.
    – We have learned that it destroyed the intersexual cooperation between the sexes, the family as the fist institution of reproductive, social, economic, and political organization.
    – We have learned that nearly everything we were warned about women in politics was true.
    – We have learned that suicide is increasing in both sexes at different ages, that everyone is de-socialized, that society means children, that the production of families is the only thing that makes us relatively equal with equal incentives.
    – We have learned that the consequences are horrific.

    So when you say the right has nothing positive to say about women. What I think you mean is, we have nothing positive to say about women acting as if they are men, and failing at it. And we have plenty of positive things to say about women when they act as women, and succeed at it. So we’d prefer they didn’t fail at being men AND fail at being women too. And instead succeeded at being women. So we can succeed at being men. And together we can succeed as families. And as families produce the next generation as good or better than the last.

    (That’s the quotable bit there at the end.)

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:31:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634290828213469184

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634107030699999232

  • Unfortulately you’re wrong. And we. have a vast corpus of twin studies to prove

    Unfortulately you’re wrong. And we. have a vast corpus of twin studies to prove it.

    Why do people (women in particular) have so much trouble believing it? Well, there are a lot of reasons.

    But mostly there is a sort of obvious evolutionary law necessary for all animal survival at play: your competence or incompetence needs to matter so little that the child will mature, survive and reproduce regardless of your competency.

    So, you can screw up your kids, you can make life harder or easier. But over the course of one’s life – GENES ALWAYS EXPRESS. Why? A child is sharing your prefrontal cortex so to speak. When mature and away from you the child isn’t. Genes always express. Always.

    Just is what it is.
    🙁

    Reply addressees: @Barbarian_Brain @AeoliumTweets @datepsych


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:10:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634285729231654922

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634284351981604970