Theme: Sex Differences

  • FEMININE > ABRAHAMIC > MARXIST SEQENCE > WOKE > LEFT > DEMOCRATIC PARTY > DONORS

    FEMININE > ABRAHAMIC > MARXIST SEQENCE > WOKE > LEFT > DEMOCRATIC PARTY > DONORS > ACTIVISTS.

    ROLLING ACCUSATIONS
    The Left alliances uses the technique of rolling accusations of unspecific, untestifiable, and often non-existent instuitions, thoughts words and deeds, that they can’t even articulate or apply to the individual, as a means of disapproval masquerading (lying, false accusation) under cover of free speech, without liability for defamation under the pretense, or even apology for past indiscretions.

    ENDING ROLLLING ACCUSATIONS AND MORE
    We can easily restore and expand defamation in spoken (slander), or published (libel), and remove the limit of demonstrated harm, instead returning to it simply needs to be untestifiable or false. And then we can expand it, as we have in commercial speech (fraud, libel), to public speech in the commons, to the commons, of matters common, and criminalize false accusation AND false promise in political speech.

    ALL LEFTISM IS ORGANIZED CRIME
    Since ALL lefitst claims are attempts to violate the natural, common, concurrent law, our natural righst obligations and inalienations under that law, and the capture of that law in our constitution and code, we would, rather quikcly outlaw no only the explicity political left, but the seditious left, and the means by which the left achieves funding of its war against our people and civilization by organized crime in entertainment, media, academy, finance, and state.

    ITS POSSIBLE
    Easy to do.
    You just need to ‘show up’ to make it happen.
    And the the market for the suppression of crimniality we call the courts, do their job.
    In ten years ‘its fixed’.
    That’s the amount of time legislation and regulation are required to spread through the pouplation and convert into norm and habit.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:31:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636072567017553924

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636017896370614273

  • FEMININE > ABRAHAMIC > MARXIST SEQENCE > WOKE > LEFT > DEMOCRATIC PARTY > DONORS

    FEMININE > ABRAHAMIC > MARXIST SEQENCE > WOKE > LEFT > DEMOCRATIC PARTY > DONORS > ACTIVISTS.

    ROLLING ACCUSATIONS
    The Left alliances uses the technique of rolling accusations of unspecific, untestifiable, and often non-existent instuitions, thoughts words and deeds, that they can’t even articulate or apply to the individual, as a means of disapproval masquerading (lying, false accusation) under cover of free speech, without liability for defamation under the pretense, or even apology for past indiscretions.

    ENDING ROLLLING ACCUSATIONS AND MORE
    We can easily restore and expand defamation in spoken (slander), or published (libel), and remove the limit of demonstrated harm, instead returning to it simply needs to be untestifiable or false. And then we can expand it, as we have in commercial speech (fraud, libel), to public speech in the commons, to the commons, of matters common, and criminalize false accusation AND false promise in political speech.

    ALL LEFTISM IS ORGANIZED CRIME
    Since ALL lefitst claims are attempts to violate the natural, common, concurrent law, our natural righst obligations and inalienations under that law, and the capture of that law in our constitution and code, we would, rather quikcly outlaw no only the explicity political left, but the seditious left, and the means by which the left achieves funding of its war against our people and civilization by organized crime in entertainment, media, academy, finance, and state.

    ITS POSSIBLE
    Easy to do.
    You just need to ‘show up’ to make it happen.
    And the the market for the suppression of crimniality we call the courts, do their job.
    In ten years ‘its fixed’.
    That’s the amount of time legislation and regulation are required to spread through the pouplation and convert into norm and habit.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:31:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636072566849695744

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636017896370614273

  • We are all a distribution of male systematizing-to-female empathizing. And as we

    We are all a distribution of male systematizing-to-female empathizing. And as we see in the voting, it’s about a third, third, and a third, with only white women defecting against their tribe and society in pretty substantial numbers. WIthout women voters we never would have had a leftist president (or had to explain that women vote for why they “like” a candidate rather than his policies without taking away the vote again.).

    Reply addressees: @SovereigntyKing @TheAutistocrat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:10:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636067416374476800

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636063753862103048

  • We are all a distribution of male systematizing-to-female empathizing. And as we

    We are all a distribution of male systematizing-to-female empathizing. And as we see in the voting, it’s about a third, third, and a third, with only white women defecting against their tribe and society in pretty substantial numbers. WIthout women voters we never would have had a leftist president (or had to explain that women vote for why they “like” a candidate rather than his policies without taking away the vote again.).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:10:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636067416458293248

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636063753862103048

  • You haven’t “dated” any I take it. 😉 (sarcasm) More likely a narrowing of cogni

    You haven’t “dated” any I take it. 😉 (sarcasm)

    More likely a narrowing of cognitive dimorphism, or an expansion of the feminine into the masculine. We’ll know within the next twenty years. But honestly, my sample size isn’t large but there is something ‘not quite right’ in the women that’s decidedly masculine. Unfortunately, the IQ and verbal acuity thing is a draw that it’s hard to resist. 😉

    Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 17:35:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636058451771113478

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636057245178789888

  • You haven’t “dated” any I take it. 😉 (sarcasm) More likely a narrowing of cogni

    You haven’t “dated” any I take it. 😉 (sarcasm)

    More likely a narrowing of cognitive dimorphism, or an expansion of the feminine into the masculine. We’ll know within the next twenty years. But honestly, my sample size isn’t large but there is something ‘not quite right’ in the women that’s decidedly masculine. Unfortunately, the IQ and verbal acuity thing is a draw that it’s hard to resist. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 17:35:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636058451854991361

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636057245178789888

  • Sam Harris is evidence that the theory of reversal of cognitive sexual dimorphis

    Sam Harris is evidence that the theory of reversal of cognitive sexual dimorphism is correct, and that the instincts, intuition, antisocial behavior, means of argument, verbal acuity, magical thinking, and inability to self regulate, admit failure, and adapt, are expressions of feminine cognition by aggression against the person rather than the ideas in reaction to fear.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 17:29:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636057011145039874

  • Sam Harris is evidence that the theory of reversal of cognitive sexual dimorphis

    Sam Harris is evidence that the theory of reversal of cognitive sexual dimorphism is correct, and that the instincts, intuition, antisocial behavior, means of argument, verbal acuity, magical thinking, and inability to self regulate, admit failure, and adapt, are expressions of feminine cognition by aggression against the person rather than the ideas in reaction to fear.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 17:29:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636057011245785094

  • No, just that men ‘manipulate’ by nonsense pretense of rational argument. They d

    No, just that men ‘manipulate’ by nonsense pretense of rational argument. They don’t manipulate as women do by emotion social construction.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 16:18:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636039258669449218

    Reply addressees: @Amphianda @ConceptualJames

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636034134614364161

  • The left has only one techinque. The same technique women have used to undermine

    The left has only one techinque. The same technique women have used to undermine men since the dawn of time:

    “Seduction by Baiting into Hazard”
    The Female > Abrahamic > Marxist sequence

    How many women in divorce court today provoke men intentionally into physical force, then claim they are victims?

    What is the left doing to the conservatives and the government? Why are the government and the right accused of authoritarianism when they police the commons against the left. And why do we oddly have any sense of guilt about it. Yet the right can protest and it strikes fear into the hearts of government and the left?

    The question is rather odd really: why do we put up with the feminine-left false oppression narrative, when in both cases we are correcting female anti-social behavior by social economic and political harm, but suppress male anti-social behavior by physical harm?

    Wny do we pander to women and the left?
    Is it culture or instinct? It appears to be animal instinct. Becuase it’s irrational on its face.

    WHy is ‘masculine policing of the commons’ even vaguely considered authoritarian when the entire purpose of the feminine and the left is baiting into hazard: ‘the crime of construction’ just like in the inverse they egage in deceit by ‘social construction’.

    Seduction > Baiting Into Hazard > Social Construction of A Falsehood > Under cover of what? Pretense of innocence? Incompetence?

    Why do we permit feminine crime and not masculine?

    Biology we need to ‘counter’.
    That’s why I worked on the law, to equally suppress feminine criminality as we have suppressed masculine.

    Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 15:33:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636027899714187266

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636022835008208896