Theme: Sex Differences

  • No they did not and you will find no such evidence in the literature. Sorry. You

    No they did not and you will find no such evidence in the literature. Sorry. You can try. And I’ll sit on google scholar and present thousands of studies. Sorry. What we found from twin studies is that genetics are even MORE determinant than we’d expected.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-28 05:49:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640591847733985284

    Reply addressees: @Albrando213

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640590898684633088

  • Well, the behavior is constant, but as intelligence, consceintiousness, and trai

    Well, the behavior is constant, but as intelligence, consceintiousness, and training increase, we gain influence (agency) over our instincts.
    Those are the basal female instincts.
    But I could, with ease, bait you into demonstrating female cognition, and bias, because women are…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 20:04:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640444581450842112

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640443422703243264

  • I should have included 2a) that explains that predicting is close to doing, so s

    I should have included 2a) that explains that predicting is close to doing, so shopping for women is like watching women for men.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 19:29:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640435783076069376

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640371752113958912


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Q:”CURT: CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE FEMALE MIND?”
    (in a word: ‘prey’. (fear))

    1) OPPORTUNITY: Identification of novelties is easier (requires less skill) for the brain than excellences (requires more skill) -ie: children’s tastes vs adult tastes. (ie: shopping)

    2) CONSUMPTION: The brain identifies novelties that are possible resources for consumption – as such drives our attention to novelties.

    3) HYPERCONSUMPTION: The female brain seeks hyper-consumption for status just as the male seeks hyper-capitalization for status. Acquisition(material loss aversion) and Status(opportunity loss aversion) drive all human priorities.

    4) ATTENTION: The female brain seeks attention because the female brain seeks successful manipulation by the capture of attention, using seduction (from subtle approval to sexual), to acquire hyper-consumption and status.

    5) RESPONSIBILITY EVASION: The female brain fears being wrong, rarely if ever admits error, casts itself as a victim, and avoids responsibility for its instincts, intuitions, and choices at all times. (neurosis)

    6) MAXIMUM UTILITY IN HYPERCONSUMPTION: Novelties, that do not require skill but just basal instincts, offer opportunities for consumption, for hyperconsumption, for status, for attention, for manipulation by seduction, where the female can’t be wrong, produce the greatest incentive available to women (other than defense of her young).

    7) SAFETY: Most women seek safety by maximizing hyperconsumption, hypergamy, social relations, and minimum responsibility, as such they can ‘feel, love, care’ without risk. Why? These traits minimize the risk to her and her offspring. However, in the absence of offspring this becomes what we see as female selfishness and anti-sociality, and in numbers, anti-civilizational warfare (feminism-woke).

    8) NEGATIVE SELECTION: (this might hurt): Men select women by neoteny (fertility, youth, symmetry, gracility, femininity), where women select AGAINST neoteny. In other words, men drive evolution toward human domestication, and women drive evolution toward human primitivization. This is why it’s important to teach women what a ‘good man’ is because otherwise they will ‘race to the bottom’ – at least the vast majority will do so. So again, men created civilization and partly by domesticating women as much as one another.

    That’s about the most accurate description of female behavior you will ever need to understand all female behavior regardless of context.

    Seriously.
    Women are really that simple.
    And yes, men are really wallet objects, and women are really sex objects, and it turns out evolution did that out of necessity. So we develop rituals and myths to romanticize and socialize and institutionalize what is otherwise just physics at work.

    But nature has an inescapable law: “We are not equal and He Who Breeds Wins.”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1640371752113958912

  • Q: CURT: WHY DO MALE LIBERTARIANS AND CONSERVAITIVES TALK PAST EACH OTHER SO FRE

    Q: CURT: WHY DO MALE LIBERTARIANS AND CONSERVAITIVES TALK PAST EACH OTHER SO FREQUENTLY?
    Pretty simple really.

    1) Masculine systematizing predicts systems (physical), and feminine empathizing predicts emotions (emotional).
    2) Masculine disagreeableness means male systemizing prediction is less affected by search for agreement, and amplifies systematizing.
    3) In the absence of prediction of emotions and indentive for agreement, the male mind has no alternative but projection (presumption), that both parties are working from the same frame of reference.
    4) So we presume others share the same mind, despite that we are more different in mind than feminine, empathizing, agreeables.
    5) And as such we talk past each other.
    6) The same effect is mirrored by the feminine behavior, where they can’t imagine you feel differently than they do and can’t imagine that you think systemically.

    So that means:
    a) the feminine left can almost always understand each other.
    b) The Masculine rights can sometimes understand the feminine left.
    c) But the feminine left can never understand masculine rights.

    WHich is exactly what we see in all aspects of life.

    This is why I teach construction from first principles of the sciences: because everything turns out to be pretty simple if you think through rather than just ‘feel’ or ‘intuit’ differences in human behavior.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 18:00:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640413511435141121

  • Q: CURT: WHY DO MALE LIBERTARIANS AND CONSERVAITIVES TALK PAST EACH OTHER SO FRE

    Q: CURT: WHY DO MALE LIBERTARIANS AND CONSERVAITIVES TALK PAST EACH OTHER SO FREQUENTLY?
    Pretty simple really.

    1) Masculine systematizing predicts systems (physical), and feminine empathizing predicts emotions (emotional).
    2) Masculine disagreeableness means male systemizing prediction is less affected by search for agreement, and amplifies systematizing.
    3) In the absence of prediction of emotions and indentive for agreement, the male mind has no alternative but projection (presumption), that both parties are working from the same frame of reference.
    4) So we presume others share the same mind, despite that we are more different in mind than feminine, empathizing, agreeables.
    5) And as such we talk past each other.
    6) The same effect is mirrored by the feminine behavior, where they can’t imagine you feel differently than they do and can’t imagine that you think systemically.

    So that means:
    a) the feminine left can almost always understand each other.
    b) The Masculine rights can sometimes understand the feminine left.
    c) But the feminine left can never understand masculine rights.

    WHich is exactly what we see in all aspects of life.

    This is why I teach construction from first principles of the sciences: because everything turns out to be pretty simple if you think through rather than just ‘feel’ or ‘intuit’ differences in human behavior.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 18:00:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640413511640596489

  • RT @WalterIII: The childless female is missing the cognitive load required to ma

    RT @WalterIII: The childless female is missing the cognitive load required to make her mind right. She needs a place to put her empathy so…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 17:14:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640401839513387025

  • Q:”CURT: CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE FEMALE MIND?” (in a word: ‘prey’. (fear)) 1) OPPORT

    Q:”CURT: CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE FEMALE MIND?”
    (in a word: ‘prey’. (fear))

    1) OPPORTUNITY: Identification of novelties is easier (requires less skill) for the brain than excellences (requires more skill) -ie: children’s tastes vs adult tastes. (ie: shopping)

    2) CONSUMPTION: The brain identifies novelties that are possible resources for consumption – as such drives our attention to novelties.

    3) HYPERCONSUMPTION: The female brain seeks hyper-consumption for status just as the male seeks hyper-capitalization for status. Acquisition(material loss aversion) and Status(opportunity loss aversion) drive all human priorities.

    4) ATTENTION: The female brain seeks attention because the female brain seeks successful manipulation by the capture of attention, using seduction (from subtle approval to sexual), to acquire hyper-consumption and status.

    5) RESPONSIBILITY EVASION: The female brain fears being wrong, rarely if ever admits error, casts itself as a victim, and avoids responsibility for its instincts, intuitions, and choices at all times. (neurosis)

    6) MAXIMUM UTILITY IN HYPERCONSUMPTION: Novelties, that do not require skill but just basal instincts, offer opportunities for consumption, for hyperconsumption, for status, for attention, for manipulation by seduction, where the female can’t be wrong, produce the greatest incentive available to women (other than defense of her young).

    7) SAFETY: Most women seek safety by maximizing hyperconsumption, hypergamy, social relations, and minimum responsibility, as such they can ‘feel, love, care’ without risk. Why? These traits minimize the risk to her and her offspring. However, in the absence of offspring this becomes what we see as female selfishness and anti-sociality, and in numbers, anti-civilizational warfare (feminism-woke).

    8) NEGATIVE SELECTION: (this might hurt): Men select women by neoteny (fertility, youth, symmetry, gracility, femininity), where women select AGAINST neoteny. In other words, men drive evolution toward human domestication, and women drive evolution toward human primitivization. This is why it’s important to teach women what a ‘good man’ is because otherwise they will ‘race to the bottom’ – at least the vast majority will do so. So again, men created civilization and partly by domesticating women as much as one another.

    That’s about the most accurate description of female behavior you will ever need to understand all female behavior regardless of context.

    Seriously.
    Women are really that simple.
    And yes, men are really wallet objects, and women are really sex objects, and it turns out evolution did that out of necessity. So we develop rituals and myths to romanticize and socialize and institutionalize what is otherwise just physics at work.

    But nature has an inescapable law: “We are not equal and He Who Breeds Wins.”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 15:14:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640371751761715203

  • Q:”CURT: CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE FEMALE MIND?” (in a word: ‘prey’. (fear)) 1) OPPORT

    Q:”CURT: CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE FEMALE MIND?”
    (in a word: ‘prey’. (fear))

    1) OPPORTUNITY: Identification of novelties is easier (requires less skill) for the brain than excellences (requires more skill) -ie: children’s tastes vs adult tastes. (ie: shopping)

    2) CONSUMPTION: The brain identifies novelties that are possible resources for consumption – as such drives our attention to novelties.

    3) HYPERCONSUMPTION: The female brain seeks hyper-consumption for status just as the male seeks hyper-capitalization for status. Acquisition(material loss aversion) and Status(opportunity loss aversion) drive all human priorities.

    4) ATTENTION: The female brain seeks attention because the female brain seeks successful manipulation by the capture of attention, using seduction (from subtle approval to sexual), to acquire hyper-consumption and status.

    5) RESPONSIBILITY EVASION: The female brain fears being wrong, rarely if ever admits error, casts itself as a victim, and avoids responsibility for its instincts, intuitions, and choices at all times. (neurosis)

    6) MAXIMUM UTILITY IN HYPERCONSUMPTION: Novelties, that do not require skill but just basal instincts, offer opportunities for consumption, for hyperconsumption, for status, for attention, for manipulation by seduction, where the female can’t be wrong, produce the greatest incentive available to women (other than defense of her young).

    7) SAFETY: Most women seek safety by maximizing hyperconsumption, hypergamy, social relations, and minimum responsibility, as such they can ‘feel, love, care’ without risk. Why? These traits minimize the risk to her and her offspring. However, in the absence of offspring this becomes what we see as female selfishness and anti-sociality, and in numbers, anti-civilizational warfare (feminism-woke).

    8) NEGATIVE SELECTION: (this might hurt): Men select women by neoteny (fertility, youth, symmetry, gracility, femininity), where women select AGAINST neoteny. In other words, men drive evolution toward human domestication, and women drive evolution toward human primitivization. This is why it’s important to teach women what a ‘good man’ is because otherwise they will ‘race to the bottom’ – at least the vast majority will do so. So again, men created civilization and partly by domesticating women as much as one another.

    That’s about the most accurate description of female behavior you will ever need to understand all female behavior regardless of context.

    Seriously.
    Women are really that simple.
    And yes, men are really wallet objects, and women are really sex objects, and it turns out evolution did that out of necessity. So we develop rituals and myths to romanticize and socialize and institutionalize what is otherwise just physics at work.

    But nature has an inescapable law: “We are not equal and He Who Breeds Wins.”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 15:14:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640371752113958912

  • No I sweat like a pig in 105 degree heat. But if it makes you feel better I”m ha

    No I sweat like a pig in 105 degree heat. But if it makes you feel better I”m happy for you to demonstrate yet another example of male magical thinking when desperate because of one’s failure in life.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 02:07:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640173646382526466

    Reply addressees: @xSpartan346x

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640172818242338817

  • THE RACE AND IQ DEBATE IS OVER. FINALLY. We are done with the debate ok? Race di

    THE RACE AND IQ DEBATE IS OVER. FINALLY.
    We are done with the debate ok? Race differences in intelligence are predictable from brain function. It’s over. Thank you. Finally. No more anti-darwinian marxist nonsense please.

    Now can we get on with ‘this is largely a consequence… https://twitter.com/BronskiJoseph/status/1640065967702040576